Milei eyes legislative win to push second wave of reforms
June 17 (UPI) -- Argentine President Javier Milei plans to introduce a new package of state and economic reforms to Congress after the country's legislative elections in October.
Milei hopes the vote will strengthen his party, La Libertad Avanza, which holds limited representation in Congress. He aims to win control of the Senate with allies, unseat the Peronist-Kirchnerist bloc and push his reform agenda through quickly.
Recent polls show Milei's party leading voter preferences by a wide margin, polling between 37% and 43%. The left-leaning coalition Unión por la Patria trails with support between 30% and 33%, while other parties lag far behind.
If Milei wins big in October, he plans to launch a broader reform program targeting Argentina's government, judiciary and public security system.
On fiscal policy, Milei says he wants to cut consolidated public spending to no more than 25% of GDP by 2027. "The national government, provinces and municipalities will all have to do their part," he said.
The administration plans to eliminate 90% of national taxes, keeping only six, in a bid to dismantle Argentina's complex tax system and shrink the state bureaucracy.
Milei has pledged to give Argentines "greater economic freedom," including lifting price controls and opening up foreign trade.
On security, the government wants to lower the age of criminal responsibility, raise penalties under the penal code and pass a national security law. The measure would expand powers for the state, intelligence services and law enforcement to combat crime.
The proposed justice reform seeks to address the country's public safety crisis by curbing what the government sees as excessive political influence over the judiciary.
Milei has said he will nominate candidates this year to fill all vacancies in the federal justice system. That includes top judgeships, federal courts, prosecutors and public defenders -- positions that account for about 40% of Argentina's federal bench.
On the economic front, the government plans to end controls on foreign currency transactions, expand deregulation, downsize overlapping agencies and speed up privatizations. Officials have not ruled out including Aerolíneas Argentinas.
On immigration, Milei wants to tighten citizenship rules, restrict free access to public healthcare -- particularly along the Bolivian border -- and limit enrollment of foreign students in national universities. He also aims to authorize expedited deportation procedures.
In labor policy, the government aims to curb union power. The plan would require 75% of normal operations to continue during strikes in essential services such as healthcare, education, security and telecommunications. For sectors deemed critically important -- including food production, banking, exports and construction -- a minimum service level of 50% would be required.
Milei's first reform package included deep fiscal austerity, cutting public investment, halting money printing by the Central Bank, closing state agencies and laying off about 43,000 public employees.
The government also launched privatization efforts for eight state-owned companies.
The measures triggered a drop in consumption and wages, affecting employment and private sector output.
Still, the administration points to falling inflation -- down to 1.5% in May -- along with rising imports and exports, climbing stock values for Argentine companies and a new agreement with the International Monetary Fund as key achievements.
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
34 minutes ago
- UPI
On This Day, June 18: Saudi prince executed for assassination of King Faisal
1 of 5 | On June 18, 1975, Saudi Arabian Prince Museid was publicly beheaded in Riyadh for the assassination of King Faisal, pictured. File Photo by Marion S. Trikosko/Library of Congress On this date in history: In 1812, the United States declared war on Britain, beginning the War of 1812. In 1815, England's Duke of Wellington and Prussian Field Marshal Gebhard von Blucher defeated Napoleon at Waterloo in Belgium. File Photo by Bill Greenblatt/UPI In 1975, Saudi Arabian Prince Museid was publicly beheaded in Riyadh for the assassination of his uncle, King Faisal. In 1979, U.S. President Jimmy Carter and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev signed a strategic arms control treaty (SALT II) in Vienna. In 1983, Sally Ride became the first American woman in space after the shuttle Challenger was launched from Cape Canaveral, Fla. In 1990, gunman James Edward Pough, 42, whose car had been repossessed, killed nine people and wounded four before killing himself at a General Motors Acceptance Corp. loan office in Jacksonville, Fla. Investigators said he had killed two people and injured two others a day earlier. In 1997, Turkish Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan resigned under pressure after his governing coalition lost its majority in Parliament. File Photo by Tarik Tinazay/EPA In 2004, U.S. hostage Paul Johnson Jr., 49, was killed by his Saudi captors despite pleas from senior Muslim clerics. In 2014, Spanish King Juan Carlos abdicated the throne amid scandal, massive unemployment and regional separatism. His son was crowned King Felipe VI one day later. In 2018, President Donald Trump directed the Department of Defense to create a sixth branch of the military -- a Space Force. In 2023, the U.S. Coast Guard announced that the Titan, a small submersible with five people on board, went missing off the coast of Newfoundland during an expedition to visit the site of the sunken Titanic. After days of searching, it was determined the submersible imploded, killing pilot and OceanGate founder Stockton Rush, crew member Paul-Henri Nargeolet, and tourists Hamish Harding, Shahzada Dawood and Suleman Dawood. In 2024, AI-related earnings enabled chipmaker Nvidia to surpass Microsoft as the world's most valuable publicly traded company. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI

an hour ago
Senate Republicans double down and target clean energy in draft tax bill
Tax credits for clean energy and home energy efficiency would still be phased out, albeit less quickly, under Senate Republicans' latest proposed changes to a massive tax bill. Electric vehicle incentives and other provisions intended to move the United States away from fossil fuels would be gutted rapidly. Senate Republicans cast their version of the bill as less damaging to the clean energy industry than the version House Republicans passed last month, but Democrats and advocates criticized it, saying it would still have significant consequences for wind, solar and other projects. Ultimately, wherever Congress ends up could have a big impact on consumers, companies and others that were depending on tax credits for green energy investments. It could also impact long-term how quickly America transitions to renewable energies. 'They want everybody to believe that after the flawed House bill, that they have come up with a much more moderate climate approach," said Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the top Democrat on the finance committee, during a conference call with reporters Tuesday. 'The reality is, if the early projections on the clean energy cuts are accurate, the Senate Republican bill does almost 90%" as much damage as the House proposal, added Wyden, who authored clean energy tax credits included in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act passed during former President Joe Biden's term. 'Let's not get too serious about this new Senate bill being a kinder, gentler approach.' The Edison Electric Institute, a trade association representing investor-owned electric companies, issued a statement applauding the Senate proposal for including 'more reasonable timelines for phasing out energy tax credits.' 'These modifications are a step in the right direction,' said the statement from Pat Vincent-Collawn, the institute's interim chief executive officer, adding that the changes balance 'business certainty with fiscal responsibility.' Whether all of the changes will be enacted into law isn't clear yet. The Senate can still modify its proposals before they go to a vote. Any conflicts in the draft legislation will have to be sorted out with the House as the GOP looks to fast-track the bill for a vote by President Donald Trump's imminent Fourth of July target. Notably, many Republicans in Congress have advocated to protect the clean-energy credits, which have overwhelmingly benefited Republican congressional districts. A report by the Atlas Public Policy research firm found that 77% of planned spending on credit-eligible projects are in GOP-held House districts. The clean energy tax credits stem from Biden's climate law, which aimed to boost to the nation's transition away from planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions and toward renewable energy such as wind and solar power. The House version of the bill took an ax to many of the credits and effectively made it impossible for wind and solar providers to meet the requirements and timelines necessary to qualify for the incentives. After the House vote, 13 House Republicans lobbied the Senate to preserve some of the clean energy incentives that GOP lawmakers had voted to erase. Language included Monday in the reconciliation bill from the Senate Finance Committee would still phase out — though more slowly than House lawmakers envisioned — some Biden-era green energy tax breaks. The Senate proposal further 'achieves significant savings by slashing Green New Deal spending and targeting waste, fraud and abuse in spending programs while preserving and protecting them for the most vulnerable,' said Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho and chairman of the committee. On the chopping block are tax credits for residential rooftop solar installations, ending within 180 days of passage, and a subsidy for hydrogen production. Federal credits for wind and solar would have a longer phaseout than in the House version, but it would still be difficult for developers to meet the rules for beginning construction in order to receive the credit. At the same time, it would boost support for geothermal, nuclear and hydropower projects that begin construction by 2033. 'The bill will strip the ability of millions of American families to choose the energy savings, energy resilience, and energy freedom that solar and storage provide,' said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association. 'If this bill passes as is, we cannot ensure an affordable, reliable and secure energy system.' Opponents of the Senate's text also decry domestic manufacturing job and economic losses as a result. 'This is a 20-pound sledgehammer swung at clean energy. It would mean higher energy prices, lost manufacturing jobs, shuttered factories, and a worsening climate crisis,' said Jackie Wong, senior vice president for climate and energy at the Natural Resources Defense Council. The bill would also cancel incentives such as the Energy Efficient Home Improvement credit — which helps homeowners make improvements such as insulation or heating and cooling systems that reduce their energy usage and energy bills — 180 days after enactment. An incentive for builders constructing new energy-efficient homes and apartments would end 12 months after signing. The House's proposed end date for both is Dec. 31. 'Canceling these credits would increase monthly bills for American families and businesses,' Steven Nadel, executive director of the nonprofit American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy said in a statement. The Senate proposal moves up the timeline for ending the consumer electric vehicle tax credit from the end of this year to 180 days after passage. It also cuts the provision that would have extended until the end of 2026 a credit for automakers that had not made 200,000 qualifying EVs for U.S. sale. It would also immediately eliminate the $7,500 credit for leased EVs. This administration has staunchly gone after EVs amid Trump's targeting of what he calls a 'mandate,' incorrectly referring to a Biden-era target for half of new vehicle sales by 2030 be electric. ___


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump calls for Iran's ‘unconditional surrender' and threatens its supreme leader
Trump's increasingly martial tone -- a sharp reversal from his announced confidence two weeks ago that a nuclear deal with Iran was easily within reach -- came only hours after he cut short his attendance at the Group of 7 summit of industrialized nations in Alberta, Canada, saying he needed to return to Washington to deal with the situation in the Middle East. Advertisement His immediate decision is whether to deploy America's largest conventional weapon -- the 30,000-pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator -- to attack Fordo, Iran's deepest nuclear enrichment site. While Trump suggested that the United States had control of Iran's skies, the only visible combatant has been Israel, which has been using U.S.-made fighter jets. Israeli officials have said that they have been able to destroy much of Iran's air defenses. Advertisement In one of his messages Tuesday, Trump threatened Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, saying 'we know exactly where' he is. But he added that 'we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least for now.' He added, 'Our patience is growing thin.' Killing foreign leaders violates executive orders signed by a series of presidents dating to Gerald Ford. The operative one states: 'No person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassination.' In his own social media post, Vice President JD Vance also hinted that the United States could step up its engagement. Vance said that Iran has no need for nuclear fuel enriched above the level needed for commercial power. Trump, he wrote, 'has shown remarkable restraint,' but 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment.' 'That decision ultimately belongs to the president,' Vance wrote. The vice president acknowledged the sentiments of some in the Republican Party who have called for staying out of conflicts in the Middle East, writing 'of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy,' a period of time that encompasses Trump's first term and the Bush, Obama and Biden administrations. But, he added, 'I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue.' It remains to be seen whether Trump will decide that the United States should join Israel's efforts, with American offensive capability. But the decision to launch a full-on attack on Iran's facilities would easily be in the gray area between the president's powers as commander in chief and the Constitution's mandate that only Congress can declare war. Advertisement Officially, the United States has said nothing about joining offensive operations with Israel. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said only that U.S. forces were maintaining a 'defensive posture.' It was also unclear whether Trump, who has talked repeatedly about seeking a diplomatic solution, now believes the time for negotiation is over. One senior official indicated Tuesday that there may be a short round of 'coercive diplomacy,' in which Iran is given a brief period of time to agree to the terms that Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, presented two weeks ago. That called for a gradual end to all enrichment on Iranian soil, a condition the Iranians said publicly they would reject. But on his flight back to Washington from Canada early Tuesday morning, Trump told reporters on Air Force One that he was not in the mood to continue talks with Iran, which were scheduled for last Sunday before Israel began mounting its attacks. Trump said that he was seeking a result that was 'better than a cease-fire' between Israel and Iran. Asked what would qualify, he said 'an end, a real end, not a cease-fire, a real end.' It was also unclear what Trump meant when he demanded Iran's 'unconditional surrender.' The United States has not declared war on Iran, and it has said it is not pursuing regime change there, though in Trump's first term many of his aides talked openly of trying to speed the collapse of its government. Iran has sent indications it is still willing to negotiate, but only if Israel's attacks on Tehran, the capital, and nuclear and missile sites cease. Advertisement The Israelis have shown no interest in letting up. And many Iran analysts believe Iranian leadership, shocked by the killing of many top military leaders and scientists, would likely not reverse its insistence on retaining enrichment capability, even if the alternative is continued assaults on its spread-out nuclear facilities. Their time may be running out. By deploying the refueling KC-135 and KC-46 aircraft to air bases in Italy, Spain, Germany and Greece, U.S. officials said that the Air Force was building an 'air bridge' in Europe should installations in the Middle East come under Iranian attack. Deploying the aircraft closer to the Middle East also provides the Pentagon more options if it needs to defend bases in the region, officials said. 'Protecting U.S. forces is our top priority and these deployments are intended to enhance our defensive positions in the region,' Hegseth said on social platform X on Monday. But the moves also put in place an elaborate refueling network for B-2 bombers, should Trump order them to fly the nearly 7,000 miles from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri to attack the Fordo site. In addition to the refueling tankers, the Pentagon is deploying F-16, F-22 and F-35 fighters to the Middle East. Fordo is Iran's most heavily fortified enrichment center, built deep inside a mountain to protect it from an attack. Only the U.S. military has the 30,000-pound bomb capable of even reaching it. Its size -- 20 feet long and 30,000 pounds -- means that only the American B-2 stealth bomber can carry it. On Capitol Hill, the president's public flirtation with joining Israel's bombing campaign has reawakened a long-dormant debate about clawing back congressional power to declare war. Advertisement In the House, a Democrat and a Republican teamed up on Tuesday to introduce a resolution that would require congressional approval before U.S. troops could engage in offensive attacks against Iran. The measure by Reps. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and Thomas Massie, R-Ky., underscored a view held by many in Congress that Trump should not be able to decide on his own whether the United States wades deeper into the conflict. Thirteen additional Democrats signed on to the resolution, but no Republicans were so far supporting the effort. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., on Monday introduced a similar resolution. Both efforts face long odds, given Republican reluctance to challenge Trump's power. But with some lawmakers in both parties openly resisting further U.S. involvement, they are likely to prompt a vibrant debate. The measures enjoy a special status that will compel Congress to vote on them one way or the other in the coming days. Still, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has, so far, been successful in deflecting efforts to force Republican members to take any vote that would require them to challenge Trump's authority, and he could seek a procedural solution that would allow him to circumvent a vote on a war declaration. In the Senate, defense hawks cheered Trump's bellicose posture. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., reiterated his stance that he supported U.S. involvement in the conflict against Iran. 'I want us to go all in to help Israel destroy their nuclear programs,' he said Tuesday, adding that he had spoken to Trump on Monday evening about his views. Advertisement When asked what role Congress should have in authorizing offensive strikes in Iran, Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, deferred to Trump. 'I have total faith and confidence in the president of the United States,' he said in an interview Tuesday. This article originally appeared in