German government sued over deportation of Afghan refugees from Pakistan
The group Pro Asyl said Pakistan had arrested hundreds of them this week and deported 34, placing them at risk of "arbitrary imprisonment, mistreatment or even execution" in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan.
Pro Asyl and a second group said they had filed charges against Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul and Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, accusing them of "abandonment and failure to render assistance" to Afghan refugees caught up in an escalating crackdown by Pakistani authorities.
The cases relate to a government scheme set up under former German chancellor Olaf Scholz in the wake of the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan four years ago.
Berlin then offered to take in thousands of Afghans who had worked with German institutions or who were particularly threatened by the Taliban, for example journalists and human rights activists.
However, as part of an immigration crackdown promised by conservative Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who took office in May, the programme has been put on hold.
This has left around 2,000 Afghans stranded in Pakistan waiting for visas to travel to Germany.
The Kabul Airbridge initiative, which aims to help those stuck in Pakistan, said that another 270 Afghans who had been accepted under the German scheme faced being deported on Friday.
In a statement marking the fourth anniversary of the Taliban's return to power, Wadephul on Friday expressed his "deep concern" over the fate of those at risk of deportation.
Germany was "in touch with the Pakistani government at the highest level to ensure these people are protected", he said.
However, the government continues to keep the admissions programme on ice, despite a court ruling last month which found that it had a "legally binding commitment" to give visas to those who had been accepted under the programme.
Immigration has been a hot-button topic in Europe's biggest economy, pushed strongly by the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.
A string of violent attacks committed by foreign nationals, including Afghans, in the run-up to February's election led Merz to promise to end the admissions scheme and to increase deportations of convicted criminals to Afghanistan.
Pakistan, home to many Afghan refugees, first launched a deportation drive in 2023 and renewed it in April when it rescinded hundreds of thousands of residence permits for Afghans, threatening to arrest any who did not leave.
In total, more than one million Afghans have left Pakistan since 2023, including more than 200,000 since April.
(bts)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
18 hours ago
- Euractiv
German government sued over deportation of Afghan refugees from Pakistan
BERLIN (AFP) – Rights activists in Germany filed criminal cases Friday against two government ministers after Afghans accepted under a German scheme for at-risk refugees were deported from Pakistan while waiting for their visas. The group Pro Asyl said Pakistan had arrested hundreds of them this week and deported 34, placing them at risk of "arbitrary imprisonment, mistreatment or even execution" in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan. Pro Asyl and a second group said they had filed charges against Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul and Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, accusing them of "abandonment and failure to render assistance" to Afghan refugees caught up in an escalating crackdown by Pakistani authorities. The cases relate to a government scheme set up under former German chancellor Olaf Scholz in the wake of the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan four years ago. Berlin then offered to take in thousands of Afghans who had worked with German institutions or who were particularly threatened by the Taliban, for example journalists and human rights activists. However, as part of an immigration crackdown promised by conservative Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who took office in May, the programme has been put on hold. This has left around 2,000 Afghans stranded in Pakistan waiting for visas to travel to Germany. The Kabul Airbridge initiative, which aims to help those stuck in Pakistan, said that another 270 Afghans who had been accepted under the German scheme faced being deported on Friday. In a statement marking the fourth anniversary of the Taliban's return to power, Wadephul on Friday expressed his "deep concern" over the fate of those at risk of deportation. Germany was "in touch with the Pakistani government at the highest level to ensure these people are protected", he said. However, the government continues to keep the admissions programme on ice, despite a court ruling last month which found that it had a "legally binding commitment" to give visas to those who had been accepted under the programme. Immigration has been a hot-button topic in Europe's biggest economy, pushed strongly by the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. A string of violent attacks committed by foreign nationals, including Afghans, in the run-up to February's election led Merz to promise to end the admissions scheme and to increase deportations of convicted criminals to Afghanistan. Pakistan, home to many Afghan refugees, first launched a deportation drive in 2023 and renewed it in April when it rescinded hundreds of thousands of residence permits for Afghans, threatening to arrest any who did not leave. In total, more than one million Afghans have left Pakistan since 2023, including more than 200,000 since April. (bts)
Euractiv
2 days ago
- Euractiv
Germany fires boss of underperforming national rail company
BERLIN – German Transport Minister Patrick Schnieder dismissed Deutsche Bahn CEO Richard Lutz on Thursday, saying the underperforming state-owned rail operator needed a 'reset' in terms of management and structure. A private company, Deutsche Bahn (DB) is wholly owned by the federal government and dominates passenger rail traffic in Germany, but has suffered years of declining performance and service quality, drawing public ridicule for chronic delays. 'We are now working on the causes of the current situation in which the railway finds itself,' Schnieder, a Christian Democrat who became transport minister in May, said at an impromptu press briefing announcing Lutz's removal. Tackling DB's failures, he said, would require a 'reset' in structures and staffing. Lutz, a long-standing member of DB's management, had led the company since 2017 but had failed to engineer a turnaround. The share of long-distance trains arriving on time fell from 78.5% in his first year to a record low of 62.5% last year. Germany's rail infrastructure, also managed by DB, has deteriorated after years of underinvestment. Last month, the company reported a €760 million loss in the first half of the year – €1 billion less than in the same period last year. Lutz called this 'step-by-step" progress, but the new transport minister appears to have lost confidence in his leadership. 'The situation at Deutsche Bahn is dramatic, especially when you look at customer satisfaction, punctuality, and profitability,' said Schnieder. He said that the ministry would now work to finalise its "Agenda for satisfied rail customers" as part of its plan to reform DB before appointing a new CEO. The strategy is due to be presented on 22 September. The new government has also set up a €500 billion special fund for infrastructure modernisation, some of which will go towards modernising the rail network. Schnieder said he hoped to present the strategy and Lutz's successor 'within a relatively short period". (de)
Euractiv
2 days ago
- Euractiv
The EU's moral collapse
Sven Kühn von Burgsdorff served as the European Union Representative to the occupied Palestinian territory, based in East Jerusalem, from January 2020 until his departure in July 2025. Prior to his role in Jerusalem, he served as a Senior Advisor on Mediation within the European External Action Service. The EU likes to think of itself as a normative power – a community of values, committed to upholding international law, promoting peace, protecting civilians, and building a rules-based global order. These are not just lofty ideals; they are enshrined in EU treaties and Council conclusions. But when it comes to the brutal destruction of Gaza and the continued occupation of Palestine, these principles seem to have become hollow rhetoric. Worse, they are being actively undermined by the craven inaction of the EU's institutions and the obstructionism of governments like Germany, Italy, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. While Germany undoubtedly has a historic responsibility to protect Jewish life and the security of the Jewish people, this does in no way justify placing Israeli government actions above international law. If the German government were serious about securing Israel's future and preventing another 7 October from happening, it would have to work tirelessly to end the occupation of Palestine and the ongoing military campaign in Gaza that, in my view, blatantly violates international humanitarian law. The European Commission has also been shamefully absent. Only as a result of recent pressure by many member states did it eventually propose the most tepid of measures by suspending access for Israeli SMEs under a dual-use innovation window of Horizon Europe. Even this minor proposal by the Commission is being blocked by spoiler governments. While tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians have reportedly been killed, maimed and starved, and nearly the entire population of Gaza displaced, the EU dithers. The ICJ has issued provisional measures towards Israel for what it sees as the risk of genocide in Gaza – warnings the Netanyahu government has flatly ignored – and declared that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory is unlawful. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued an arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. The UN, human rights organisations, and many former Israeli top military and intelligence officials have sounded the alarm about Israel's actions in Gaza and its policies in the West Bank. The EU has ample tools at its disposal to pressure Israel to end its brutal war in Gaza, dismantle the occupation, and move towards a viable two-state solution, with an independent and democratic Palestinian state living side by side in peace with Israel. If the EU remains unable to muster political will for collective action, then the moral, political and legal burden falls on individual Member States. Countries like Spain, Ireland, and Slovenia have already taken encouraging steps in recognising the state of Palestine and demanding accountability. But much more is needed now. European countries that claim to support human rights and uphold international law must start acting within their own prerogatives to bring their influence to bear. For starters, this would mean u nilaterally suspending or revoking arms export licenses to Israel under their own national export control laws, including for dual-use equipment and technology. Individual countries can also stop funding national co-financed projects involving Israeli entities, or withdraw from joint research agreements with Israeli institutions. They can impose their own national sanctions regimes on human rights grounds, including visa bans and asset freezes. While some Nordic countries have such laws, others could use counterterrorism laws to freeze assets. S ettlement-linked companies can be excluded from public procurement and state investment funds. On top of this, state-owned enterprises or sovereign wealth funds can divest from settlement-linked companies, and national authorities can ban port calls or airspace use for Israeli military vessels and aircraft. Finally, member states with universal jurisdiction provisions can prosecute suspected Israeli and Palestinian war criminals if they enter their territory, or in some cases even in absentia. All member states are of course obliged to support the ICC in arrest warrants and investigations. Individual countries should establish coalitions of the willing that take matters into their own hands as long as the EU remains frozen. Europe's image as a principled, reliable, and rules-based actor is being destroyed – not by autocratic Russia and China, or other adversaries with dictatorial regimes, but by its own refusal to enforce international law when the perpetrator is an ally. At the heart of this disgraceful paralysis are governments that have chosen to side with impunity. The EU spoiler governments are not acting in the interest of peace between Israel and Palestine. They are undermining European unity and damaging the EU's global credibility and partnerships. They are also complicit in prolonging the suffering of millions of Palestinians, endangering Israel's security. The EU's inaction is not just a strategic blunder – it is an appalling moral failure as it enables Israel's impunity and entrenches a conflict that will continue to fuel instability, radicalisation, and despair for generations in the Middle East. Palestinians deserve freedom, dignity, and self-determination. Israelis deserve peace and security within internationally recognised borders. Both peoples deserve leaders – and international partners – who spare no effort in working towards peace and justice, not a never-ending cycle of violence and perpetual domination.
