logo
Trump's Tariff Push Is a Race against Time, and Potential Voter Backlash

Trump's Tariff Push Is a Race against Time, and Potential Voter Backlash

Asharq Al-Awsat04-04-2025
President Donald Trump's expansive new tariffs reverse a decades-long global trend of lower trade barriers and are likely, economists say, to raise prices for Americans by thousands of dollars each year while sharply slowing the US economy.
The White House is gambling that other countries will also suffer enough pain that they will open up their economies to more American exports, leading to negotiations that would reduce the tariffs imposed Wednesday.
Or, the White House hopes, companies will reverse their moves toward global supply chains and bring more production to the United States to avoid higher import taxes.
How will Americans react? But a key question for the Trump administration will be how Americans react to the tariffs. If prices rise noticeably and jobs are lost, voters could turn against the duties and make it harder to keep them in place for the time needed to encourage companies to return to the US.
The Yale Budget Lab estimates the Trump administration's tariffs would cost the average household $3,800 in higher prices this year. That includes the 10% universal tariff plus much higher tariffs on about 60 countries announced Wednesday, as well as previous import taxes on steel, aluminum and cars. Inflation could top 4% this year, from 2.8% currently, while the economy may barely grow, according to estimates by Nationwide Financial.
Investors turned thumbs-down on the new duties Thursday, with the S&P 500 index dropping 4.8% at the close of trading, its worst day since the pandemic. The Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged more than 1,600 points.
Still, Trump was upbeat Thursday when asked about the stock market drop.
"I think it's going very well," he said. "We have an operation, like when a patient gets operated on and it's a big thing. I said this would exactly be the way it is."
The average US tariff could rise to nearly 25% when the tariffs are fully implemented April 9, economists estimate, higher than in more than a century, and higher than the 1930 Smoot-Hawley tariffs that are widely blamed for worsening the Great Depression.
"The president just announced the de facto separation of the US economy from the global economy," said Mary Lovely, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. "The stage is set for higher prices and slower growth over the long term."
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick argued the policies will help open markets overseas for US exports.
"I expect most countries to start to really examine their trade policy towards the United States of America, and stop picking on us," he said on CNBC Thursday. "This is the reordering of fair trade."
Bob Lehmann, 73, who stopped by a Best Buy in Portland, Oregon, Wednesday opposed the tariffs. "They're going to raise prices and cause people to pay more for daily living," he said.
Mathew Hall, a 64-year-old paint contractor, called the tariffs a "great idea" and said potential price increases in the short term were worth it.
"I believe in the long term, it's going to be good," he said, adding that he felt the US had been taken advantage of.
But a former trade official from Trump's first term, speaking on condition of anonymity to talk candidly about the impact, suggested that Americans, including those who voted for Trump, may have difficulty accepting the stiff duties.
Americans "have never faced tariffs like this," the former official said Thursday. "The downstream impact on clothing and shoe stores, it's going to be pretty significant. So we'll have to see how the Trump voters view this ... and how long their support for these policies goes."
On Thursday, automaker Stellantis, which owns the Jeep, Citroen and Ram brands, said it would temporarily halt production at plants in Canada and Mexico in response to Trump's 25% tax on imported cars. The reduced output means the company is temporarily laying off 900 workers at plants in Michigan and Indiana.
Some exporters overseas may cut their prices to offset some of the tariffs, and US retailers could eat some of the cost as well. But most economists expect much of the tariffs to bring higher prices.
The tariffs will hit many Asian countries hard, with duties on Vietnamese imports rising to 46% and on Indonesia to 32%. Tariffs on some Chinese imports will be as high as 79%. Those three countries are the top sources of US shoe imports, with Nike making about half its shoes last year and one-third of its clothes in Vietnam.
The Yale Budget Lab estimates all Trump's tariffs this year will push clothing prices 17% higher.
On Thursday, the Home Furnishings Association, which represents more than 13,000 US furniture stores, predicted the tariffs will increase prices between 10% and 46%. Vietnam and China are the top furniture exporters to the US.
It said manufacturers in Asia are offsetting some of the costs by discounting their products and lowering ocean freight rates, but that won't be enough to avoid price hikes. Even domestically made furniture often relies on imported components.
"While many in the industry support the long-term goal of reshoring manufacturing, the reality is that it will take at least a decade to scale domestic production," Home Furnishings Association CEO Shannon Williams said in a statement. "Permitting, training a skilled workforce and managing the higher costs of US manufacturing are significant hurdles."
At Gethsemane Garden Center in Chicago, there are Canadian-grown tulip, daffodil and hyacinth bulbs, though only about 5% of center plants are imported. Thousands of lemon cypress trees from Canada are sold year-round and Canadian mums are sold in the fall.
Regas Chefas, whose family has owned Gethsemane for decades, says all the tariffs won't be passed onto customers.
"We're going to absorb some of the increase. The growers will absorb some of the increases and then the customers will pay a little bit higher price," he said.
The Consumer Brands Association, which represents Coca-Cola, General Mills, Nestle, Tyson and Del Monte as well as Procter & Gamble and Colgate-Palmolive, said its companies already make the majority of their goods in the US.
But there are critical ingredients and inputs — like wood pulp for toilet paper — that are imported because of scarce domestic availability. Cinnamon is harvested from trees that can't survive in the US. Domestic production of coffee and cocoa is also limited.
"We encourage President Trump and his trade advisers to fine-tune their approach and exempt key ingredients and inputs in order to protect manufacturing jobs and prevent unnecessary inflation at the grocery store," said Tom Madrecki, the association's vice president of supply chain resiliency.
Outside a Tractor Supply south of Denver, two family members on opposite sides of the political spectrum debated the tariffs.
Chris Theisen, a 62-year-old Republican, said: "I feel a good change coming on, I feel it's going to be hard, but you don't go to the gym and walk away and say, 'God, I feel great."
Nayen Shakya, a Democrat and Theisen's great nephew, said higher prices are already a hardship. At the restaurant where he works, menu prices have been raised to account for higher ingredient costs.
"It's really easy sometimes to say some things in a vague way that everyone can agree with that is definitely more complex under the surface," said Shakya. "The burden of the increased prices is already going to the consumer."
Listening to his nephew, Theisen added: "I understand this side of it, too."
"I ain't got no crystal ball. I hope it works out good."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump blames renewable energy for rising electricity prices. Experts point elsewhere
Trump blames renewable energy for rising electricity prices. Experts point elsewhere

Arab News

timean hour ago

  • Arab News

Trump blames renewable energy for rising electricity prices. Experts point elsewhere

WASHINGTON: With electricity prices rising at more than twice the rate of inflation, President Donald Trump has lashed out at renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, blaming them for skyrocketing energy costs. Trump called wind and solar power 'THE SCAM OF THE CENTURY!' in a social media post and vowed not to approve wind or 'farmer destroying Solar' projects. 'The days of stupidity are over in the USA!!!' he wrote on his Truth Social site. Energy analysts say renewable sources have little to do with recent price hikes, which are based on increased demand, aging infrastructure and increasingly extreme weather events such as wildfires that are exacerbated by climate change. The rapid growth of cloud computing and artificial intelligence has fueled demand for energy-hungry data centers that need power to run servers, storage systems, networking equipment and cooling systems. Increased use of electric vehicles also has boosted demand, even as the Trump administration and congressional Republicans move to restrict tax credits and other incentives for EV purchases approved under the Biden administration. Natural gas prices, meanwhile, are rising sharply amid increased exports to Europe and other international customers. More than 40 percent of US electricity is generated by natural gas. Trump promised during the 2024 campaign to lower Americans' electric bills by 50 percent. Democrats have been quick to blame him for the price hikes, citing actions to hamstring clean energy in the sprawling tax-and-spending cut bill approved last month, as well as regulations since then to further restrict wind and solar power. Advocates say renewables provide the extra energy needed 'Now more than ever, we need more energy, not less, to meet our increased energy demand and power our grid. Instead of increasing our energy supply Donald Trump is taking a sledgehammer to the clean energy sector, killing jobs and projects,' said New Mexico Sen. Martin Heinrich, the top Democrat on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. The GOP bill will cost thousands of jobs and impose higher energy costs nationwide, Heinrich and other critics said. A report from Energy Innovation, a non-partisan think tank, found the GOP tax law will increase the average family's energy bill by $130 annually by 2030. 'By quickly phasing out technology-neutral clean energy tax credits and adding complex material sourcing requirements,' the tax law will 'significantly hamper the development of domestic electricity generation capacity,' the report said. Renewable advocates were more blunt. 'The real scam is blaming solar for fossil fuel price spikes,' the Solar Energy Industries Association said in response to Trump's post. 'Farmers, families, and businesses choose solar to save money, preserve land, and escape high costs of the old, dirty fuels being forced on them by this administration,' the group added. As technology improves, wind and solar offer some of the cheapest and fastest ways to provide electric power. More than 90 percent of new energy capacity that came online in the US in 2024 was clean energy, said Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, another industry group. States with the highest share of clean energy production have seen prices decline in the past year, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration, while prices have gone up in states with the least renewable energy use. 'By slowing clean energy deployment, the Trump administration is directly fueling cost increases,' Grumet said 'Blocking cheap, clean energy while doubling down on outdated fossil fuels makes no economic or environmental sense,' added Ted Kelly, director of US clean energy for the Environmental Defense Fund, a nonprofit advocacy group. Partisanship anchors debate over rising energy prices Energy Secretary Chris Wright blamed rising prices on 'momentum' from Biden-era policies that backed renewable power over fossil fuel sources such as oil, coal and natural gas. 'That momentum is pushing prices up right now. And who's going to get blamed for it? We're going to get blamed because we're in office,' Wright told POLITICO during a visit to Iowa last week. About 60 percent of the state's electricity comes from wind. Not all the pushback comes from Democrats. Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, a Republican who backs wind power, has placed a hold on three Treasury nominees to ensure wind and solar have 'an appropriate glidepath for the orderly phase-out of the tax credits' approved in the 2022 climate law under former President Joe Biden. Grassley said he was encouraged by new Treasury guidance that limits tax credits for wind and solar projects but does not eliminate them. The guidance 'seems to offer a viable path forward for the wind and solar industries to continue to meet increased energy demand,' Grassley said in a statement. John Quigley, senior fellow at the Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, said the Republican tax law will increase US power bills by slowing construction of solar, wind, and battery projects and could eliminate as many as 45,000 jobs by 2030. Trump administration polices that emphasize fossil fuels are 'an extremely backward force in this conversation,' Quigley said. 'Besides ceding the clean energy future to other nations, we are paying for fossil foolishness with more than money — with our health and with our safety. And our children will pay an even higher price.'

Trump plans to patrol streets of US capital with troops
Trump plans to patrol streets of US capital with troops

Arab News

timean hour ago

  • Arab News

Trump plans to patrol streets of US capital with troops

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said he plans to patrol Washington's streets on Thursday with troops he deployed to the US capital in a show of force against what he claims is a 'crime emergency.' Trump ordered hundreds of National Guard to deploy in Washington last week vowing to 'take our capital back,' despite protests by some residents and statistics showing violent offenses falling. 'I'm going to be going out tonight I think with the police and with the military of course... We're going to be doing a job,' the Republican told Todd Starnes, a host for right-wing media outlet Newsmax. He spoke one day after his vice president, JD Vance, was greeted by boos and shouts of 'Free DC' — referring to the District of Columbia — on his own meet-and-greet with troops deployed in the city. The DC National Guard has mobilized 800 troops for the mission, while Republican states Ohio, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee and West Virginia are sending a total of around 1,200 more. They have been spotted in major tourist areas such as the National Mall and its monuments, the Nationals Park baseball stadium and others. In addition to sending troops onto the streets, Trump has also sought to take full control of the local Washington police department, attempting at one point to sideline its leadership. Some residents have welcomed the crackdown, pointing to crime in their areas — but others have complained the show of force is unnecessary, or has not been seen in parts of the US capital where violence is concentrated. Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller visited troops at Washington's Union Station Wednesday. Loud boos could be heard from outside as Vance walked into a fast-food restaurant at the train station. People also shouted expletive-laden jeers and slogans including 'Free DC! Free DC!' Vance dismissed the hecklers as 'a bunch of crazy protesters.'Several incidents involving the surge of law enforcement have gone viral as capital residents voice their discontent, including the arrest of one man who was caught on camera throwing a sandwich at an agent after a night out. Banksy-style posters honoring the so-called 'sandwich guy' have popped up around the city. The National Guard troops have provided 'critical support such as crowd management, presence patrols and perimeter control in support of law enforcement,' according to statements on their official X account. The overwhelmingly Democratic US capital faces allegations from Republican politicians that it is overrun by crime, plagued by homelessness and financially mismanaged. But data from Washington police showed significant drops in violent crime between 2023 and 2024, though that was coming off the back of a post-pandemic surge. The deployment of troops in Washington comes after Trump dispatched the National Guard and Marines to quell unrest in Los Angeles, California, that was sparked by immigration enforcement raids.

Global South can claim climate mantle at COP30
Global South can claim climate mantle at COP30

Arab News

time3 hours ago

  • Arab News

Global South can claim climate mantle at COP30

Of all the seismic geopolitical shifts in recent years, perhaps the most striking is the West's rapid decline as a force in global climate governance. Under President Donald Trump's second administration, the US has become both more aggressive and more isolationist. Meanwhile, the EU has grown timid, fragmented, and inward-looking. Will the Global South, especially Brazil, South Africa, India, and China, step up to fill the climate leadership vacuum? In 1972, at the UN's first major environmental conference in Stockholm, Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi famously declared: 'Poverty is the worst form of pollution.' To this day, the Global South grapples with the challenge of pursuing sustainable development while promoting environmental responsibility. Many developing countries have long feared that climate policies might reinforce historical inequalities or constrain their growth. But now, the Global South has an opening to ensure that the international agenda reflects its priorities. Many policymakers recognize the need for a change. While global cooperation has produced numerous important climate commitments, such as those made at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and those contained in the 2015 Paris climate agreement, they remain largely unfulfilled. Moreover, financial support from the rich world has been well below what is needed, hindering climate action in developing countries, eroding trust in Western leaders, and lowering global ambitions. The Global South has no shortage of climate visionaries — from Wangari Maathai to Vandana Shiva and Chico Mendes — who have connected environmental protection with community empowerment. But the West has controlled the climate narrative for decades, because it dominates the science that informs the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the multilateral development banks that provide climate financing, and the global media outlets that shape public opinion. That is particularly true for the US. Despite its stumbles, such as when President George W. Bush withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol in 2001, the rhetorical ambition of other US presidents, including Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden, ensured the West remained a leading voice in shaping the climate agenda, even when not matched by action. Trump's resurgence has brought that era to an end. The EU, weakened by the rise of the far right and preoccupied with bolstering its defenses, lacks the political will and has fallen short of providing the economic means to lead on international climate cooperation and finance. This collapse has shattered the idea of a coherent 'West,' if such a creature ever existed. But it could empower the Global South, which bears the brunt of climate shocks, to lead a more equitable and inclusive clean-energy transition. Despite short-term hurdles, in the long run, reducing fossil-fuel dependence — more feasible now that renewables are more scalable and reliable — can help stabilize economies and improve public health. Many Global South governments have already played key roles in shaping the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris climate agreement. China has also become the undisputed global leader in green tech, outpacing the West in the shift to renewables. Facing US trade barriers, China's surplus of solar panels, batteries, and wind turbines could be redirected to developing countries, strengthening their energy sovereignty. In today's fragmented world, multilateralism remains essential. Maiara Folly, Jayati Ghosh and Jorg Haas There are signs that Brazil, India, South Africa, and China are building on this foundation to forge a cohesive climate agenda ahead of the UN Climate Change Conference in Belem, Brazil, which is focused on collective action. In April, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres brought together 17 heads of state from the global south and the EU for a summit aimed at elevating countries' climate ambitions in the lead-up to COP30. Brazil has also leveraged its BRICS+ presidency to build momentum for COP30, creating a roadmap for expanding cooperation on energy security and establishing the BRICS Laboratory for Trade, Climate Change, and Sustainable Development. In early July, the BRICS+ Summit of presidents and heads of state approved a leaders' framework declaration on climate finance. Whether these initiatives will deliver tangible results remains uncertain, given BRICS+ countries' divergent interests. Meanwhile, South Africa is using its G20 presidency to amplify African voices and push for debt relief, green industrialization, and low-cost finance — in other words, it is attempting to address the structural barriers that prevent vulnerable countries from investing in climate mitigation and adaptation. With the right financial and technological support, the green transition can drive broad-based prosperity in the developing world. The costs of clean tech have plummeted, largely owing to China's industrial capacity, making some of the material conditions for climate leadership in the global south more favorable. Moreover, China could finance decarbonization projects in other countries through renminbi loans, export credits, and debt-for-clean-energy swaps. In today's fragmented world, multilateralism remains essential, and South-South cooperation on agreed climate targets offers a powerful platform to revitalize it. The Global South is also well-positioned to lead plurilateral initiatives that advance climate solutions. These coalitions of the willing are crucial for countering the Trump administration's bullying tactics — namely, the use of trade negotiations to shift other governments' investment priorities and weaken their green policies. Of course, Western countries must be held accountable at COP30 for their historic emissions and unmet climate-finance promises. But the summit represents a vital opportunity for the global south to demonstrate that climate and development goals are not mutually exclusive. To seize it, these countries' leaders must subordinate their differences to their overriding interest in presenting a clear-eyed vision of an energy transition that uplifts their people and protects the planet. • Maiara Folly is Co-Founder and Executive Director of the Brazil-based think tank Plataforma CIPO. • Jayati Ghosh, Professor of Economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, is a member of the Club of Rome's Transformational Economics Commission and Co-Chair of the Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation. • Jorg Haas is Head of the Globalization and Transformation Division at the Heinrich Boll Foundation. ©Project Syndicate

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store