Popular Asian Restaurant Chain Pei Wei Closes Location
On Saturday, MySanAntonio.com reported that the Pei Wei located at The Strand at Huebner Oaks shopping mall has "quietly" been shut down. The location no longer appears on the official Pei Wei website and shows up as "permanently closed" when searched on Google.
It is unclear exactly when the Huebner Oaks Pei Wei closed for good, though the most recent Yelp review for the site is from April 10.
This Pei Wei restaurant is one of several San Antonio establishments that has shut down recently, according to My San Antonio. However, five Pei Wei outposts remain in business in the Alamo City.
Founded in Scottsdale, Arizona in 2000, Pei Wei Asian Kitchen expanded to Texas in 2001 and California the following year. To date, the franchise has opened more than 100 locations around the country, serving Pan Asian fare to customers.
Pei Wei is known for "authentic, Asian-inspired cuisine without compromising on quality or convenience," according to the company's official website.
"The concept was born from the dream of creating a fast-service Chinese restaurant that serves bold, flavorful dishes made with fresh, whole ingredients," the site says.
Pei Wei's menu includes classics such as orange chicken, spicy General Tso's chicken, egg rolls, dumplings, rice and noodle bowls and more.
"With a menu full of bold, authentic flavors and a commitment to quality that is second to none, Pei Wei is the perfect choice for anyone seeking a taste of Asia without sacrificing convenience or freshness," the company contends.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
10 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know
SAN FRANCISCO — President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'
Business Wire
10 minutes ago
- Business Wire
TinyFish launches with $47 million to define the era of Enterprise Web Agents
PALO ALTO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- TinyFish, the enterprise web agent infrastructure company, today launched with $47 million in funding led by ICONIQ to transform complex business operations with enterprise web agents. Purpose-built TinyFish enterprise web agents are already in production at unmatched scale at Fortune 500 companies and other large enterprise brands across industries including hospitality, transportation, and e-commerce. TinyFish's enterprise web agents are designed to operate with the scale, reliability, and compliance required by the world's largest organizations and global brands. Powered by the company's patented infrastructure that learns, adapts, and scales, TinyFish agents execute complete workflows mapped to measurable business outcomes, from pricing and inventory tracking to real-time market intelligence, across thousands of platforms simultaneously. "TinyFish's platform manages web interaction complexity at scale," said Abhi Shah, Director of Data Science, DoorDash. Beyond DoorDash, TinyFish powers high-stakes workflows in hospitality, e-commerce, and marketplaces, helping enterprises capture shifting web data, act faster, and turn constant change into measurable outcomes. Most Deployed Enterprise Web Agent TinyFish Enterprise Web Agents are already deployed in high-volume, mission-critical environments: Hospitality: For Google, TinyFish agents aggregate inventory from thousands of hotels in Japan so it is available to consumers for search and booking through Google's hotel search. This inventory was previously inaccessible to Google's search aggregator due to the underlying infrastructure of many hotel booking systems. With TinyFish agents, this information is fully accessible without requiring hotels to overhaul and update their IT systems. Transportation: A leading rideshare company uses TinyFish to collect millions of pricing variables every month, enabling dynamic market adjustments in near real time. E-commerce: Global brands track competitor pricing, monitor inventory shifts, and capture promotional data across thousands of retail sites simultaneously. In total, TinyFish operates hundreds of thousands of enterprise web agents, performing millions of operations each month for Fortune 500 companies and high-growth enterprises. 'Today's web stretches across thousands of platforms and billions of pages, but companies can't fully tap its potential because the work needed to create business value at scale is complex, manual, and limited by human capacity,' said Sudheesh Nair, co-founder and CEO, TinyFish. 'Helping those companies get more value from the web isn't about automating low-value tasks. It's about amplifying the high-value, outcome-driven processes that require human-like interaction at scale. TinyFish's enterprise web agents make that possible, delivering the scale, precision, and security global organizations need to operate seamlessly across the modern web.' Defining the Category Unlike consumer browser agents, which excel at personal, one-to-one tasks like arranging a travel itinerary or creating a personalized recommendation based on past browsing history, enterprise web agents automate complex business workflows that must be performed thousands or millions of times, without failure. This can reduce hours of work spent on complex, repetitive digital tasks and also allow companies to uncover new opportunities that were previously limited by human scale. TinyFish's enterprise web agents are purpose-built to adapt to changes in the web environment and maintain precision at massive scale, delivering secure and compliant enterprise outcomes. Powered by TinyFish's platform technology, these agents provide: Outcome-Driven Design: Built to deliver measurable business results such as revenue lift, cost savings, or market share gain. Complete Workflow Coverage: Operate across every stage of a process, not just isolated tasks. Enterprise-Grade Reliability and Compliance: Built for security, governance, and uptime at global scale. Planet-Scale Reach: Coordinate actions across thousands of platforms simultaneously. Advances in Generative AI and newly released reasoning models have made the web more complex and less accessible to traditional tools. Valuable market intelligence sits siloed across constantly changing platforms while strategic teams spend hours on repetitive digital tasks instead of unlocking new growth. Using those same advanced reasoning models, TinyFish enterprise web agents can understand and act on the complexity of today's web so companies can scale their operations securely and turn that complexity into a business advantage. TinyFish has raised $47 million in Series A funding led by ICONIQ, with participation from USVP, Mango Capital, MongoDB Ventures, ASG, and Sandberg Bernthal Venture Partners. The company will use the funds to continue innovating its technology platform which is already in use at scale by large enterprise customers. 'TinyFish's innovative enterprise web agents can replicate human behaviors on the web at scale, with the resilience and reliability that enterprises require,' said Amit Agarwal, general partner at ICONIQ and TinyFish board member. 'This is setting the foundation for a major shift in the way enterprises and applications interact with the web, gather intelligence, and automate workflows. Nobody else has solved this, and TinyFish is already delivering results in production with customers today.' About TinyFish TinyFish develops and operates Enterprise Web Agents for global businesses. TinyFish agents handle the complexity of modern web interaction at scale, delivering complete, outcome-focused workflows across industries. Founded by Sudheesh Nair (former President of Nutanix), Shuhao Zhang (former Engineering Leader at Meta), and Keith Zhai (former The Wall Street Journal senior correspondent), TinyFish serves enterprises worldwide from its headquarters in Silicon Valley. To learn more, visit
Business Insider
41 minutes ago
- Business Insider
I'm a salary negotiator. Here are 6 things I'd never do — and one tip I always follow to get more money.
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Jeremy Barnyak, a financial analyst who founded the salary-negotiation consultancy Peak Negotiations, which works with senior-level executives across the globe. There are very few moments in our lives where we have an opportunity to have a big impact on how much we're earning with what feels like a fairly reasonable amount of effort. But an hour of prep and five minutes of discomfort can potentially increase your salary by $10,000 or get you a $20,000 signing bonus. Take it from me — as a salary negotiator, I work with individuals to negotiate job offers directly and I've helped senior-level executives from across the globe gain 10% to 35% offer improvements. Before founding my consultancy Peak Negotiations in 2022, I'd run into a lot of people who were interviewing for jobs. I'd always ask how they were going to negotiate if they got an offer. Many didn't have a plan or were hesitant to make one. I found that a lot of smart, capable people were uncomfortable with negotiating, regardless of their background. However, there's so much value past the discomfort if you want to magnify your job offers and increase your earning potential. When it comes to negotiations, here are a few things I'd never do — and the tip I always follow. A lot of what I do with my clients is planning. We spend more time planning than we do negotiating. Plans help give us confidence and avoid missteps, which really help negotiation outcomes. If you have a plan for what is likely to happen and one for if things go off the rails, you can respond effectively. I'd never only use my previous or current compensation to determine my market value Your past and present compensation shouldn't be the only data points you use for figuring out your market value. Look at salary data posted on places like Glassdoor or Even better, ask people who have similar roles for firsthand information on what compensation ranges and components might look like. More abstract data sets can be helpful, but it's a lot more powerful to say, "My friend Sarah works at Google as a product manager and makes $250,000 a year." Then you can figure out: Is Sarah more qualified than I am? Does she have more experience? This can give you more of a sense of what's realistic to expect and ask for. I would never let fear of a rescinded offer stop me from negotiating People frequently tell me they don't negotiate because they're scared their job offer will be rescinded. I hear this concern a lot, but I don't see it happen often. Yet, it's a tremendously powerful deterrent for people to negotiate. I think it happens in two instances: one is the person negotiating has conducted themselves in a way that's made the company decide not to offer them the position anymore. Or, the company is a just a terrible place to work and you're dodging a bullet. If you negotiate in good faith, professionally, and it's a company that is a good place to work, the odds of you having an offer rescinded are very close to zero. I'd never make an ultimatum I was not willing to follow through on For example, if you offer me $100,000 and I was willing to work for that, I would never say, "I'm not willing to do this for anything less than $150,000." It's not great if the hiring team then says they can't do $150,000 and you say, "Just kidding, I would accept $100,000!" You don't want to put yourself in a position where you're losing your credibility by backtracking or, potentially even worse, being forced to follow through on something that's not actually in your best interest. I would never do a negotiation by myself The hiring side likely consists of a team of experts that is not emotionally attached to the outcome and has done this many times. As a result, they're more likely to have a better instead of doing the negotiation process by yourself, ask for help. There are, of course, resources like me, but even just speaking to others can be useful. It's worth asking those around you if they've negotiated their salary before. If they have, ask what they did. It can be especially helpful to hear the experience of someone you know who's applied to the company or position you're looking at. Just remember that the people advising you will come with their own experience, pitfalls, and advice. Take their insights with a grain of salt as everyone's situation is so different. I wouldn't feel like a failure if I didn't get what I asked for The first job offer I negotiated was in 2009. I was going into banking and everything around me was crumbling during the financial crisis. Still, I asked for more money after getting a job offer. I didn't even have other offers. The hiring team told me "no" but it was still a big win — this gave me an understanding that the worst-case scenario was this … which wasn't a big deal. Taking "no" off of its pedestal is super powerful. If you don't get what you asked for, that's OK. It's not the end of the world. That's a powerful insight, especially early in your career when "no" is a likely outcome — later, you won't be afraid to ask. And a "yes" will feel amazing. Lastly, the one tip I always follow to get more money is so simple: Ask for it Simply, closed mouths don't get fed. The fastest pathway to not getting more money is to not ask for it. This means not accepting an initial job offer on the spot — unless it's unbelievably good. Take time to think about your offers, but you don't want to miss out on a good deal. If you've negotiated and got what you want, then usually my advice is to sign as quickly as possible.
