India's Modi, Brazil's Lula speak amid Trump tariff blitz
Lula confirmed a state visit to India in early 2026 during the call on Thursday, which occurred a day after the Brazilian leader told the news agency Reuters that he would initiate a conversation among the BRICS group of countries on tackling US President Donald Trump's levies, which are the highest on Brazil and India.
The group of major emerging economies also includes China, Russia and South Africa.
'The leaders discussed the international economic scenario and the imposition of unilateral tariffs. Brazil and India are, to date, the two countries most affected,' Lula's office said in a statement.
Trump announced an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods on Wednesday, raising the total duty to 50 percent. The additional tariff, effective August 28, is meant to penalise India for continuing to buy Russian oil, Trump has said.
Trump has also slapped a 50 percent tariff on goods from Brazil, with lower levels for sectors such as aircraft, energy and orange juice, tying the move to what he called a 'witch hunt' against former President Jair Bolsonaro, a right-wing ally on trial for an alleged coup plot to overturn his 2022 election loss.
On their call, Lula and Modi reiterated their goal of boosting bilateral trade to more than $20bn annually by 2030, according to the Brazilian president's office, up from roughly $12bn last year.
Brasilia said they also agreed to expand the reach of the preferential trade agreement between India and the South American trade bloc Mercosur, and discussed the virtual payment platforms of their countries.
Modi's office, in its statement, did not explicitly mention Trump or US tariffs, but said 'the two leaders exchanged views on various regional and global issues of mutual interest.'
India is already signalling it may seek to rebalance its global partnerships after Trump's salvo of tariffs on Indian goods.
Modi is preparing for his first visit to China in more than seven years, suggesting a potential diplomatic realignment amid growing tensions with Washington. The Indian leader visited Lula in Brasilia last month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘Attack on people's memory': Kashmir's book ban sparks new censorship fears
Srinagar, India-administered Kashmir – Hafsa Kanjwal's book on Kashmir has just been banned, but it's the irony of the moment that strikes her the most. This week, authorities in India-administered Kashmir proscribed 25 books authored by acclaimed scholars, writers and journalists. The banned books include Kanjwal's Colonizing Kashmir: State‑Building under Indian Occupation. But even as the ban was followed by police raids on several bookstores in the region's biggest city, Srinagar, during which they seized books on the blacklist, Indian officials are holding a book festival in the city on the banks of Dal Lake. 'Nothing is surprising about this ban, which comes at a moment when the level of censorship and surveillance in Kashmir since 2019 has reached absurd heights,' Kanjwal told Al Jazeera, referring to India's crackdown on the region since it revoked Kashmir's semiautonomous status six years ago. 'It is, of course, even more absurd that this ban comes at a time when the Indian army is simultaneously promoting book reading and literature through a state-sponsored Chinar Book Festival.' Yet even with Kashmir's long history of facing censorship, the book bans represent to many critics a particularly sweeping attempt by New Delhi to assert control over academia in the disputed region. 'Misguiding youth' The 25 books banned by the government offer a detailed overview of the events surrounding the Partition of India and the reasons why Kashmir became such an intransigent territorial dispute to begin with. They include writings like Azadi by Booker Prize winner Arundhati Roy, Human Rights Violations in Kashmir by Piotr Balcerowicz and Agnieszka Kuszewska, Kashmiris' Fight for Freedom by Mohd Yusaf Saraf, Kashmir Politics and Plebiscite by Abdul Gockhami Jabbar and Do You Remember Kunan Poshpora? by Essar Batool. These are books that directly speak to rights abuses and massacres in Kashmir and promises broken by the Indian state. Then there are books like Kanjwal's, journalist Anuradha Bhasin's A Dismantled State: The Untold Story of Kashmir After Article 370 and legal scholar AG Noorani's The Kashmir Dispute 1947-2012, which dissect the region's political journey over the decades. The government has blamed these books for allegedly 'misguiding youth' in Kashmir and instigating their 'participation in violence and terrorism'. The government's order states: 'This literature would deeply impact the psyche of youth by promoting a culture of grievance, victimhood, and terrorist heroism.' The dispute in Kashmir dates back to 1947 when the departing British cleaved the Indian subcontinent into the two dominions of India and Pakistan. Muslim-majority Kashmir's Hindu king sought to be independent of both, but after Pakistan-backed fighters entered a part of the region, he agreed to join India on the condition that Kashmir enjoy a special status within the new union with some autonomy guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. But the Kashmiri people were never asked what they wanted, and India repeatedly rebuffed demands for a United Nations-sponsored plebiscite. Discontent against Indian rule simmered on and off and exploded into an armed uprising against India in 1989 in response to allegations of election fixing. Kanjwal's Colonizing Kashmir sheds light on the complicated ways in which the Indian government under its first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, consolidated its control over Kashmir. Some of Nehru's decisions that have come under criticism include the unceremonious dismissal of the region's leader Sheikh Abdullah, who advocated for self-rule for Kashmir, and the decision to replace him with his lieutenant, Bakshi Ghulam Muhammad, whose 10 years in office were marked by the strengthening of New Delhi's rule of Indian-administered Kashmir. Kanjwal's book won this year's Bernard Cohn Book Prize, which 'recognizes outstanding and innovative scholarship for a first single-authored English-language monograph on South Asia'. Kanjwal said the ban gives a sense of how 'insecure' the government is. 'Intensification of political clampdown' India has a long history of censorship and information control in Kashmir. In 2010, after major protests broke out following the killing of 17-year-old student Tufail Mattoo by security forces, the provincial government banned SMS services and restored them only three years later. At the height of another civil uprising in 2016, the government stopped Kashmir Reader, an independent publication in Srinagar, from going to press, citing its purported 'tendency to incite violence'. Aside from prohibitions on newspapers and modes of communication, Indian authorities have routinely detained journalists under stringent preventive detention laws in Kashmir. That pattern has picked up since 2019. 'First they came for journalists, and realising they were successful in silencing them, they have turned their attention to academia,' said veteran editor Anuradha Bhasin, whose book on India's revocation of Kashmir's special status in 2019 is among those banned. Bhasin described the accusations that her book promotes violence as strange. 'Nowhere does my book glorify terrorism, but it does criticise the state. There's a distinction between the two that authorities in Kashmir want to blur. That's a very dangerous trend.' Bhasin told Al Jazeera that such bans will have far-reaching implications for future works being produced on Kashmir. 'Publishers will think twice before printing anything critical on Kashmir,' she said. 'When my book went to print, the legal team vetted it thrice.' 'A feeling of despair' The book bans have drawn criticism from various quarters in Kashmir with students and researchers calling it an attempt to impose collective amnesia. Sabir Rashid, a 27-year-old independent scholar from Kashmir, said he was very disappointed. 'If we take these books out of Kashmir's literary canon, we are left with nothing,' he said. Rashid is working on a book on Kashmir's modern history concerning the period surrounding the Partition of India. 'If these works are no longer available to me, my research is naturally going to be lopsided.' On Thursday, videos showed uniformed policemen entering bookstores in Srinagar and asking their proprietors if they possessed any of the books in the banned list. At least one book vendor in Srinagar told Al Jazeera he had a single copy of Bhasin's Dismantled State, which he sold just before the raids. 'Except that one, I did not have any of these books,' he shrugged. More acclaimed works on the blacklist Historian Sumantra Bose is aghast at the suggestion by Indian authorities that his book Kashmir at the Crossroads has fuelled violence in the region. He has worked on the Kashmir dispute since 1993 and said he has focused on devising pathways for finding a lasting peace for the region. Bose is also amused at a family legacy represented by the ban. In 1935, the colonial authorities in British India banned The Indian Struggle, 1920-1934, a compendium of political analysis authored by Subhas Chandra Bose, his great-uncle and a leader of India's freedom struggle. 'Ninety years later, I have been accorded the singular honour of following in the legendary freedom fighter's footsteps,' he said. As police step up raids on bookshops in Srinagar and seize valuable, more critical works, the literary community in Kashmir has a feeling of despondency. 'This is an attack on the people's memory,' Rashid said. 'These books served as sentinels. They were supposed to remind us of our history. But now, the erasure of memory in Kashmir is nearly complete.'
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Brazil's Lula vetoes large parts of environmental ‘devastation bill'
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has signed into law a bill easing environmental licensing rules, but bowed to pressure from activist groups as he vetoed key provisions that would have made it easier for companies to secure environmental permits. Lula approved on Friday what detractors have dubbed the 'devastation bill', but struck down or altered 63 of its nearly 400 articles, his office's executive secretary, Miriam Belchior, told reporters. The president had faced mounting pressure from environmental groups to intervene in the bill, which was backed by Brazil's powerful agribusiness sector and focused on rolling back strict licensing rules that had kept the destruction of the Amazon rainforest in check. A previous version of the bill adopted by lawmakers last month would have meant that for some permits, all that would have been required is a simple declaration of the company's environmental commitment. Lula's revisions, however, reinstated the current strict licensing rules for strategic projects. Belchior said the new proposal sought to preserve the integrity of the licensing process, ensure legal certainty, and protect the rights of Indigenous and Quilombola communities. She added that Lula will introduce a 'Special Environmental Licence' designed to fast-track strategic projects while filling the legal gaps created by the vetoes. 'We maintained what we consider to be significant advances in streamlining the environmental licensing process,' she said. Nongovernmental organisation SOS Atlantic Forest, which garnered more than a million signatures calling for a veto of the law, hailed Lula's move as 'a victory' for environmental protection. Lula's environmental vetoes Of the provisions struck down by Lula, 26 were vetoed outright, while another 37 will either be replaced with alternative text or modified in a new bill that will be sent to Congress for ratification under a constitutional urgency procedure. Securing support for the amendments is far from guaranteed for the leftist leader. Brazil's conservative-dominated Congress has repeatedly defeated key government proposals, including overturning previous presidential vetoes. Lawmakers aligned with embattled ex-president Jair Bolsonaro are also blocking legislative activity amid an escalating political standoff, as they call for the former president's charges around an alleged failed coup attempt in 2022 to be dropped. Speaking at a Friday news conference in the capital, Brasilia, Environment Minister Marina Silva maintained a positive tone, telling reporters that Lula's vetoes would ensure that 'the economy does not compete with ecology, but rather they are part of the same equation'. 'We hope to be able to streamline licensing processes without compromising their quality, which is essential for environmental protection at a time of climate crisis, biodiversity loss and desertification,' said Silva. Silva said a previous version of the bill, approved by Congress last month, threatened the country's pledge to eliminate deforestation by 2030 and described it as a 'death blow' to Brazil's licensing framework. But, she said, Lula's revised version meant Brazil's 'targets to reach zero deforestation' and its goal to 'cut CO2 emissions by between 59 percent and 67 percent remain fully on track'. Lula's environmental credentials are under close scrutiny in advance of the annual UN climate summit in November in the Amazon city of Belem.
Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,262
Here is how things stand on Saturday, August 9: Fighting A Russian drone attack on Ukraine's southern Odesa region damaged an oil depot owned by Azerbaijan's state oil company SOCAR, two industry sources told the Reuters news agency on Friday. Four people were wounded in the attack, one of the sources said. Ukrainian journalist Viktoria Roshchyna, who died in Russian captivity last year, was buried in Kyiv, while her colleagues called for international pressure to secure the release of other Ukrainian reporters held prisoner by Moscow. Ceasefire United States President Donald Trump will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine on August 15 in Alaska. Trump made the announcement on social media after he said that the parties, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, were close to a ceasefire deal that could resolve the three-year conflict. Addressing reporters at the White House earlier on Friday, Trump suggested an agreement would involve some exchange of land. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both,' Trump said. Putin has presented the Trump administration with a ceasefire proposal that demands major territorial concessions by Kyiv and a push for global recognition of Moscow's claims on Ukrainian territory in exchange for a halt to fighting, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing European and Ukrainian officials. Putin spoke to the leaders of China, India and three ex-Soviet states in a flurry of calls to brief them on his contacts with the US about the war in Ukraine. In his evening address to the nation, President Zelenskyy said it was possible to achieve a ceasefire as long as adequate pressure was applied to Russia. He said he had held more than a dozen conversations with leaders of different countries, and his team was in constant contact with the US. Economy and finance Canada, the European Union and the United Kingdom will lower the price cap paid for seaborne Russian-origin crude oil to $47.60 from $60 per barrel over Moscow's war in Ukraine, Ottawa's Finance Department said in a statement. Ukraine is set to receive over 3.2 billion euros ($3.73bn) in funding after the European Council adopted a decision on the fourth regular disbursement of support under the EU's Ukraine Facility. The funding aims primarily to bolster Ukraine's macro-financial stability and support the functioning of its public administration, the council said.
