We're backing Scotland with billions in investment, says Reeves ahead of visit
She will visit RAF Lossiemouth in Moray and the St Fergus gas plant in Aberdeenshire on Friday, exactly a week after she toured the Rolls-Royce factory near Glasgow Airport.
The Chancellor will meet 200 Boeing staff at the military site where three new E-7 Wedgetail aircraft are being made.
The UK Government said its plans to increase defence spending to 2.6% will raise Britain's GDP by around 0.3%, while adding 26,100 jobs to the Scottish economy.
It also pointed to its £200 million investment for Aberdeenshire's Acorn carbon capture project, which could create 15,000 new jobs while safeguarding 18,000 more. A final investment decision for the project is yet to be made.
Ms Reeves said: 'We're seizing the huge potential and opportunities that Scotland has on offer.
'Whether it's in defence to keep the UK safe, or clean energy to power all corners of the country, this Government is backing Scotland with billions of pounds of investment to grow the economy and create jobs.'
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the Government is investing in defence to 'ensure Britain's security and deter our adversaries and drive economic growth'.
He added: 'This investment is a massive jobs opportunity for Scotland – this 'defence dividend' is good news for Scotland, where it will help create skilled jobs, drive economic growth, and help tackle the critical skills gaps facing the country in sectors such as nuclear, construction, maritime and project management.'
Maria Laine, Boeing's UK president, said: 'Boeing has a long-standing presence in Scotland including at RAF Lossiemouth, the home to the UK's P-8 Poseidon fleet and where the E-7 Wedgetail will be based when it enters service.
'As a key partner of the UK Armed Forces, Boeing welcomes the defence spending increase and has seen first-hand how defence infrastructure investments, such as the £100 million Atlantic Building and new E-7 facilities at RAF Lossiemouth, can deliver for local jobs, suppliers and UK national security.'
Michelle Ferguson, director of CBI Scotland, added: 'Scotland's energy and defence sectors are vital to our economy, driving investment and supporting thousands of skilled jobs.
'The Chancellor's announcement of £200 million for the Acorn energy project is very encouraging, but businesses are eager for final approval to unlock its full potential and secure North Sea jobs.
'Increased defence spending will further boost Scotland's skilled workforce and create growth opportunities across key supply-chain.
'Close collaboration between the Scottish and UK governments will be essential to fully realise these benefits, driving forward national security and Scotland's transition to a resilient, low-carbon economy.'
Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce urged the Chancellor to drop the energy profits levy (EPL), the so-called 'windfall tax' on oil and gas companies, which has a headline rate of 78%.
Chief executive Russell Borthwick said: 'If we stick to course on the accelerated decline of the North Sea, then we'll only have a few short years and not prosperous decades of future oil and gas from our own waters.
'Instead, we'll import more, pay more and suffer further consequences of jobs and businesses lost, just at the time we need them to support the energy transition.
'We know the Chancellor needs to find growth from somewhere within the UK economy. With oil and gas, there's no need to start from scratch or build out a nascent industry.
'Simply by removing the confiscatory EPL, letting investment flow into projects and stimulating activity in a sector which has been hammered by policy for too long, we can unlock significant growth in the UK economy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
18 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Swinney brands Gaza crisis ‘genocide' after Fringe show disrupted
Police were called to the Stand Comedy Club in Edinburgh after the First Minister was interrupted seven times by six different groups of protesters during a conversation with comedian Susan Morrison. The protesters urged the First Minister to describe the crisis as a genocide and stop state funding for arms companies. Speaking to journalists after the event, the First Minister said: 'It's quite clear that there is a genocide in Palestine – it can't be disputed. 'I have seen reports of terrible atrocities which have the character of being genocide. 'I've expressed that and obviously it's not reached all those individuals, but that's my feeling.' The Scottish Government has also been criticised for – while not funding directly the manufacturing of munitions – providing money for apprenticeships at firms which build weapons. But the First Minister said the Government's commercial arm Scottish Enterprise has the 'strictest assessments imaginable about the purpose and the use of public expenditure in companies who may be related to defence industries'. Pushed on providing money for staff who could potentially build munitions, the First Minister added: 'We're trying to enable companies to diversify their activities, that's the purpose. 'That's why the due diligence checks are applied and they are applied unreservedly.' Throughout the show, groups of attendees stood up, holding signs which spelled the word 'genocide', and heckled the First Minister. As the event continued, the interruptions became more forceful, before two groups stood at the same time, angrily shouting at the First Minister and chanting slogans such as 'call it genocide'. Members of his security team stood in front of the stage, stopping protesters from approaching the First Minister, before three uniformed police officers arrived at the venue to usher the protesters out. I still remember the bus ride to my first Edinburgh Festival show as a teenager, with my late mother – not knowing it would spark a lifelong love of culture. As the Festival season starts, I want every community in Scotland to have that same access to a booming cultural scene. — John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) August 2, 2025 During the tense exchange, which lasted several minutes, a number of the crowd – who were not protesting – appeared to be in tears. A final disruption came from one woman in the crowd, who asked the First Minister why he had not responded to her letter about heavy metal band Disturbed playing at the Hydro in Glasgow. The band's lead singer David Draiman has been criticised after being pictured signing an Israeli bomb. The woman asked the First Minister why he did not speak out on Disturbed playing at the city's biggest venue, when he said it would be inappropriate for Irish band Kneecap to play the TRNSMT festival after comments members of the band had made about Tory MPs. The First Minister said his comments on Kneecap had come due to questions from the media and he 'didn't particularly' want to speak about the band earlier this year, adding that he did not want to choose what art people do and do not consume. The woman became increasingly angry with the First Minister's response and was eventually dragged from the venue by a police officer, whom she branded a 'thug'.
Rhyl Journal
18 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Swinney brands Gaza crisis ‘genocide' after Fringe show disrupted
Police were called to the Stand Comedy Club in Edinburgh after the First Minister was interrupted seven times by six different groups of protesters during a conversation with comedian Susan Morrison. The protesters urged the First Minister to describe the crisis as a genocide and stop state funding for arms companies. Speaking to journalists after the event, the First Minister said: 'It's quite clear that there is a genocide in Palestine – it can't be disputed. 'I have seen reports of terrible atrocities which have the character of being genocide. 'I've expressed that and obviously it's not reached all those individuals, but that's my feeling.' The Scottish Government has also been criticised for – while not funding directly the manufacturing of munitions – providing money for apprenticeships at firms which build weapons. But the First Minister said the Government's commercial arm Scottish Enterprise has the 'strictest assessments imaginable about the purpose and the use of public expenditure in companies who may be related to defence industries'. Pushed on providing money for staff who could potentially build munitions, the First Minister added: 'We're trying to enable companies to diversify their activities, that's the purpose. 'That's why the due diligence checks are applied and they are applied unreservedly.' Throughout the show, groups of attendees stood up, holding signs which spelled the word 'genocide', and heckled the First Minister. As the event continued, the interruptions became more forceful, before two groups stood at the same time, angrily shouting at the First Minister and chanting slogans such as 'call it genocide'. Members of his security team stood in front of the stage, stopping protesters from approaching the First Minister, before three uniformed police officers arrived at the venue to usher the protesters out. I still remember the bus ride to my first Edinburgh Festival show as a teenager, with my late mother – not knowing it would spark a lifelong love of culture. As the Festival season starts, I want every community in Scotland to have that same access to a booming cultural scene. — John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) August 2, 2025 During the tense exchange, which lasted several minutes, a number of the crowd – who were not protesting – appeared to be in tears. A final disruption came from one woman in the crowd, who asked the First Minister why he had not responded to her letter about heavy metal band Disturbed playing at the Hydro in Glasgow. The band's lead singer David Draiman has been criticised after being pictured signing an Israeli bomb. The woman asked the First Minister why he did not speak out on Disturbed playing at the city's biggest venue, when he said it would be inappropriate for Irish band Kneecap to play the TRNSMT festival after comments members of the band had made about Tory MPs. The First Minister said his comments on Kneecap had come due to questions from the media and he 'didn't particularly' want to speak about the band earlier this year, adding that he did not want to choose what art people do and do not consume. The woman became increasingly angry with the First Minister's response and was eventually dragged from the venue by a police officer, whom she branded a 'thug'.
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Soft drink sugar tax is a ‘wrecking ball', Reeves warned
Rachel Reeves is taking a 'wrecking ball' to the drinks industry with her plans to increase sugar taxes, three British brands have warned. The bosses of Fentimans, Belvoir Farm and Folkingtons said the raid will push many smaller domestic producers 'over the edge'. In a joint piece for The Telegraph Ian Bray, Pev Manners and Paul Bendit said shoppers will also lose out, being forced to choose between inferior products or higher prices. Their warning is the latest sign of tensions between businesses and the Treasury over the historically high tax burden imposed by Ms Reeves, the Chancellor. The sugary drinks tax was the brainchild of George Osborne, the former Tory chancellor, and first came into force in 2018 as an anti-obesity measure. But it has also proved to be a significant revenue raiser for the Exchequer, bringing in around £2 billion in the first six years of its operation. Under the measure beverages which contain more than 5g of sugar per 10 millilitres of liquid are subject to an additional government levy. As a result many fizzy drinks manufacturers changed their recipes at great cost to reduce the amount of sugar contained in their products. Others who chose not to, because they did not want to alienate customers by changing the taste of their product, raised prices to cover the cost. Ms Reeves unveiled plans in April to 'strengthen' the tax, including by lowering the threshold at which it kicks in from 5g of sugar per 100ml to 4g. Premium drinks brands Fentimans, Belvoir Farm and Folkingtons, who are all based in the UK, warned the change would be disastrous for family firms. They said many companies face ruinously high costs, whilst the projected daily calorie reduction for the average Briton is the equivalent of half a grape. 'On the ground for small and medium-sized enterprises such as ours, making premium soft drinks in glass bottles and aluminium cans, the impact would be akin to being hit with a wrecking ball,' they warned. 'The tiny calorie saving is justification for potentially wrecking products, losing customers, and pushing small businesses over the edge. 'Reformulating a drink – properly – takes time and money, and right now every penny counts. There's only so far you can stretch a business before it breaks.' The three companies also questioned why action was being taken against drinks producers and not manufacturers of other sugary products. Ms Reeves has set out plans to extend the tax, known as the Soft Drinks Industry Levy, to milk-based products such as milkshakes and canned lattes. But the makers of other high-sugar goods responsible for obesity, such as cakes and biscuits, are not subject to any equivalent levy. 'Which begs the question why are businesses like ours being pushed to the brink while other categories look like they're getting a free pass?' the firms said. 'Why should those consumers living a healthy, balanced lifestyle be forced to choose between paying more for a sweet treat or having the recipe of their favourite product amended again? That's simply not fair.' According to government figures the sugar content in drinks fell by almost half between 2015, when the levy was first announced, and 2024. But despite its introduction England's already high obesity rates have continued to rise, reaching 28 per cent in men and 30 per cent in women in 2022. Ministers say many products have now 'clustered' just below the 5g limit and that bolder action is needed to drive sugar levels down. A Government spokesman said: 'The Levy introduced by the previous government has halved the amount of sugar in drinks and helped to tackle child obesity. 'UK business confidence is the highest in 10 years according to a Lloyds Bank survey published only this week. 'Since the election, we have struck three major trade deals with the EU, US and India, the Bank of England has cut interest rates four times, business rates are being reformed and corporation tax is capped at 25 per cent.' Increased sugar taxes will push British drinks companies to the brink By Pev Manners, Ian Bray and Paul Bendit It's frustrating – infuriating, actually – to be facing yet another change to the Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL), especially one, that, according to the Government's own figures, would amount to a calorie saving that's equivalent of half a grape per person per day, at best. On paper, the Treasury's proposed lowering of the SDIL threshold from 5g to 4g per 100ml looks like it would require only a small adjustment. On the ground, however, for small and medium-sized enterprises such as ours, making premium soft drinks in glass bottles and aluminium cans, the impact would be more akin to being hit with a wrecking ball. British soft drinks manufacturers have a proud history. Many of us have been around for decades – some for more than a century – building businesses rooted in our communities, employing local people, and making drinks that people enjoy across the UK and in international markets. This industry is not just made up of big household names – it is full of small and medium-sized firms like ours, often family-run, quietly getting on with things and doing them to the highest standards that are, of course, expected of us. When the Levy came in back in 2018, many of us adjusted. Some reformulated our drinks, at huge cost. Others didn't – not because they didn't care, but because some companies are loath to change the make-up of products which have a loyal customer base. And besides, that's what a properly functioning market should offer: choice. Now, we're being told that we may have to go through the whole rigmarole again. Reformulate – again. Invest – again. Compromise – again. And for what? The tiny calorie saving is justification for potentially wrecking products, losing customers, and pushing small businesses over the edge, because it's us who are most at risk here, with research showing that micro, small, and medium-sized businesses – who make up the backbone of the UK soft drinks industry – face nearly double the impact relative to turnover compared to large companies. For those who may be thinking, 'well you've reformulated once, you can do it again' – unfortunately things are not that black and white. If it were easy, we'd have done it. But it's not. Reformulating a drink – properly – takes time and money. And, right now, every penny counts. Ingredient costs are up, National Insurance is up, Packaging Recovery Notes charges have tripled, Extended Producer Responsibility fees are landing us with fresh bills running into hundreds of thousands of pounds, even for SMEs, and industry is being told to stump up millions more for a Deposit Return Scheme. There's only so far you can stretch a business before it breaks. We cannot comprehend why soft drinks are back in the firing line. Since 2015, soft drinks manufacturers have invested to reduce sugar consumption from soft drinks by 43 per cent, according to Kantar Worldpanel. That's a major reduction. At the same time, the contribution to sugar in the UK diet from several food categories has grown, including confectionery, biscuits and cakes and pastries. None of these categories has been brought into the Levy. Which begs the question: why are businesses like ours being pushed to the brink while other categories look like they're getting a free pass? Also: why should those consumers living a healthy, balanced lifestyle be forced to choose between paying more for a sweet treat or having the recipe of their favourite product amended – again – to meet the potentially lowered SDIL threshold? That's simply not fair. The Government says it wants to support growth, back British businesses like ours, and drive reformulation. Well, here's a thought: start by recognising the ones that have already done the job. Stop looking at moving the goalposts. And leave the Levy as it is.
