Bears Look To Capture Focus Of Legislators For Help On Stadium
The franchise's goal is to 'move dirt' before the end of 2025 in Arlington Heights, with a target of moving out of Soldier Field, the NFL's oldest stadium, by 2028 or '29. But Warren continues to link the start of construction to the Illinois legislature passing a so-called 'mega projects' bill that would essentially freeze property taxes for large-scale construction projects, which Warren says would allow the team to proceed.
Warren and Bears Chairman George McCaskey had hoped the legislature would consider the measure in its regular 2025 session but it failed to reach the floor before adjournment on May 31. The state's leaders reconvene in October but it remains unclear if stadium funding will be on the agenda.
'I haven't talked to a single member about the Bears,' House Speaker Chris Welch told the Chicago Tribune. '(Legislators) are so focused on talking to their neighbors and getting (candidacy) petitions signed, and what they're hearing at the doors is property taxes, grocery prices, gas prices — they're talking about things around the kitchen table. You know what they're not talking about? The Chicago Bears.'
The Bears have drawn up public-private funding plan that has the team and the NFL spending about $2.7 billion. They are seeking help on needed infrastructure improvements around the 326-acre site, which previously was home for the Arlington Park horse track.
Warren has been pitching the project as a stimulus for the local economy in recent interviews. He says the new stadium would create 56,000 jobs during construction and 9,000 permanent jobs.
But the team hasn't found a path to getting beyond negative feelings that linger from the state funding a $632 million renovation of Soldier Field in 2002-03. The team extended its stadium lease to 2033 as a condition of that funding. The Tribune reports there is $525 million in outstanding public debt remaining from the project.
While the McCaskey family purchased the suburban acreage before hiring Warren, the former Big Ten commissioner and Minnesota Vikings executive once said his preference was a roofed stadium on a lot near Soldier Field. He briefly received support from Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson but Illinois Governor JB Pritzker remains a consistent opponent of public funding for sports facilities.
Warren subsequently shifted the team's focus to the Arlington Heights site.
'These things take time,' McCaskey told reporters during an appearance at training camp. 'It's on us to convince the governor and the state legislators that this is a good idea for the people of Illinois and we need to do a better job at that.'
The Tribune reports the Bears should brace themselves for requests from a variety of blocs within the legislature. The story from political reporters Rick Pearson, Jeremy Gorner and Olivia Olander says Chicago-based reps are likely to seek additional funding from the team to maintain Soldier Field or to contribute to schools and public transportation while downstate reps introduce their own local initiatives.
Warren said the fate of a new stadium is tied to the 'mega projects' bill.
'It is very, very important that it passes because without that legislation, we are not able to proceed forward,' Warren said. 'We stand ready. The stadium is designed. If that bill passes in October there are items we have to work on and, obviously, there is a process you have to follow with the village of Arlington Heights from an approval process. But obviously they are committed.'
Can the Bears pull this off on such a short timeline? They had better find a lot of friends fast.
Consider the perspective of John Curran of Downers Gove, who leads the GOP minority in the state senate. Like Welch, he seems to hear about the Bears more from the media than his constituents or Springfield peers.
'This has not been top of the list at all,' Curran told the Tribune. 'We're engaged with our Democratic colleagues on a lot of issues. This has not been one (of them).'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Social media reacts to Bears QB Tyson Bagent's extension
The Chicago Bears are keeping their quarterback room intact for the next couple of seasons. The team announced quarterback Tyson Bagent signed a two-year, $10 million contract extension that could be worth up to $16 million with incentives. Bagent was set to become a restricted free agent at the end of the year but will now remain with the Bears through the 2027 season. Bagent joined the Bears in 2023 as an undrafted free agent out of Shepherd University and quickly impressed the front office. He managed to beat out P.J. Walker and Nathan Peterman to become the primary backup quarterback behind Justin Fields in 2023, where he started four games. Bagent went 2-2 as a starter and remained with the Bears as the backup to Caleb Williams in 2024. Despite increased competition from veteran Case Keenum, Bagent was able to hold onto the backup quarterback position and was rewarded for his hard work inside the building. Here is how social media reacted to the news: This article originally appeared on Bears Wire: Social media reacts to Bears QB Tyson Bagent's extension
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NFL analysts give positive prediction for Rams' 2025 season
The Los Angeles Rams enter the 2025 season with the hopes of improving on a solid 2024 campaign. The Rams brought back most of the roster that went to the NFC Divisional round a year ago and upgraded at positions like receiver and offensive line. Does that mean the Rams of this year will be better than their predecessor? That remains to be seen. Ali Bhanpuri and Adam Rank went through every game in the 2025 regular season to determine each team's win-loss record. Both of them picked L.A. to win double-digit games and make the postseason. Bhanpuri had the Rams going 11-6, winning the NFC West and earning the No. 2 seed in the NFC, while Rank thinks the Rams will go 10-6, finish second in the division and play as the No. 5 seed. The two analysts had similar schedule predictions, too. Both picked the Rams to lose to the Eagles, Ravens and Jaguars before the bye week, as well as the Seahawks in 16, but also predicted L.A. would go 8-2 over the final 10 games of the season. The "toughest game to call" for the duo was Week 15 against Lions, although both predicted a win for L.A. The Rams could absolutely get revenge for their 2024 playoff loss to the Eagles in Week 3 and/or surprise Baltimore three weeks later, but it was hard to pick against the home squads in both of those matchups. That same calculation is why I ultimately took the Rams in L.A. over the Lions. But, honestly, hearing "JA-RED GOFF" chants after a Detroit win at SoFi is a totally plausible outcome. After an inauspicious start, the Rams put questions about Matthew Stafford's back to rest (if he's not right, don't expect this prediction to be, either) and accomplish something they've yet to do in the Sean McVay era: sweep November. Since 2017, L.A. has posted the 24th-best win percentage (.429) during the month — twice going winless and never going undefeated. Their 5-0 mark in November— part of a win streak that extends through mid-December — propels the Rams to the NFC West title. This would certainly be a great outcome for the Rams in a pivotal year for the franchise. Stafford will be 38 by season's end the Rams need to capitalize on his ability before he rides off into the sunset. This article originally appeared on Rams Wire: NFL analysts give positive prediction for Rams' 2025 season
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
RTA officials could transfer $74 million from Metra and Pace to CTA to delay city service cuts
Regional transportation officials may transfer $74 million from Metra and Pace to the CTA in an attempt to delay catastrophic cuts to Chicago's transit system. On Thursday, Regional Transportation Authority board members will vote on the measure, which the oversight body said would help delay catastrophic cuts to the CTA early next year while all three transit agencies hope lawmakers will come to their rescue with more state funding. The CTA, Metra and Pace are facing a budget gap in the hundreds of millions of dollars next year as federal pandemic aid runs out. All three agencies are preparing to cut service as much as 40% next year, and, most likely, to increase fares. But the CTA is scheduled to hit its fiscal cliff first, some months before Metra and Pace. Allocating more money to the CTA, the RTA has said, would push CTA's fiscal cliff back two or three months until the middle of 2026, leaving more time for state lawmakers to pass long-term funding for public transit throughout the entire region. Lawmakers, who failed to pass transit funding during their spring legislative session, plan to return to Springfield in October to try again. But advocates have warned that a veto session rescue, if it comes, may come too late. The transit agencies will need to start sending out layoff notices months before the cuts are set to take place, they argue, and planned cuts, after a certain point, could become tough to reverse. Additionally, experts say it may take time for revenue streams created by any new legislation to generate enough tax dollars to avert service cuts. 'This year's approach reflects a one-time allocation method proposed only for 2026,' the RTA wrote in a memo on the proposed ordinance. 'This deviation is mainly to allow time for the Illinois General Assembly to act on long-term sustainable funding for transit in the Chicago region that averts the impending fiscal cliff.' Most of the public funding for the CTA, Metra and Pace is allocated by a formula mandated by state law. But a smaller amount of discretionary funding is available each year. The $74 million that could be flexed to the CTA represents an estimated 1.7% of the entire regional budget, according to RTA spokesperson Tina Fassett Smith. If board members approve the measure, the CTA would receive all of the RTA's discretionary funding in 2026, and Metra and Pace would receive none. But Metra and Pace would still receive small increases in funding compared with what they were previously projected to receive next year. That's largely because the RTA expects to have more sales tax revenue on hand than expected because of an expansion of that tax to include more online transactions. An expected $10 to $20 million in extra sales tax each month, the RTA has said, will help delay the transit fiscal cliff and could mitigate its magnitude. In a statement, Metra spokesperson Michael Gillis indicated the agency was on board with the proposal to move discretionary funds to the CTA. 'Metra understands the need for the region's transit agencies to work together and share resources to address this unprecedented financial situation,' Gillis said. 'We are hopeful that Springfield will soon reach a solution in which all of us receive stable and adequate funding to continue and expand service for all of northeast Illinois.' Pace Executive Director Melinda Metzger said in a statement that the agency 'is focused on working with our sister agencies to address the fiscal cliff collectively, recognizing CTA's timeline in early 2026 and preparing accordingly.' Still, she said, 'we are mindful that shifting resources away from suburban service will have real impacts on our riders, and we encourage funding solutions that support the entire region.' Discussions around transit funding and reform in the Chicago area have been marked by a city-suburban divide. Suburban critics have taken aim at what they view as efforts to consolidate Chicago's power over the region's transit systems at their expense. Backers of a more city-centered perspective, meanwhile, maintain that the entire region is reliant on the health of Chicago's economy, which itself is dependent on reliable transit service within the city. Catherine Hosinski, a spokesperson for the CTA, said the agency had stretched its pandemic dollars further than most peer agencies in other major cities. 'The CTA is the last major transit agency in the country to hit the fiscal cliff without state or local intervention,' she said. Other mass transit agencies in cities including Washington, D.C., and Philadelphia — where massive transit cuts are expected to start Sunday regardless — have received stopgap funding from state or local governments. Hosinski added that the CTA was 'eager to achieve legislation that provides reliable transit funding that not only maintains current service levels, but also helps to deliver the levels of public transit service the region deserves.' Justin Marlowe, the director of the Center for Municipal Finance at the University of Chicago, described the proposed transfer of funds to the CTA as 'maybe a necessary evil.' The RTA, he said, was making a tough decision from a menu of bad options. 'They're using up, in effect, all of their wiggle room,' he said. In a typical economic environment, Marlowe said, the RTA could reasonably expect that gamble to pay off. But economic uncertainty combined with pressure on state government to make up for federal cuts, particularly to Medicaid, mean the agency should take neither the appearance of additional state transit funding nor elevated sales tax revenues for granted, he said. Meanwhile, Pace, which operates federally mandated paratransit service for the entire region, is facing a multimillion-dollar shortfall of its own. Paratransit costs have ballooned since last year's introduction of a popular ride-share program, which allows approved paratransit riders to call Ubers in lieu of using traditional paratransit. Each ride-share trip costs less money to provide than a traditional paratransit ride, Pace has said. But the program has proven so popular that costs have spiraled out of control. So on Thursday, the RTA board will vote on bailing out the paratransit program in part with $34 million in this year's discretionary funds. Pace is also expected to help plug the gap by making cuts to the ride-share program starting later this year. 'Our goal is to maintain as much service as possible with available funding,' said Metzger, Pace's executive director. Solve the daily Crossword
