84% of Gen Z use GenAI to interpret news: What it reveals about today's learners
That seems like an obsolete memory and the world is fading fast. A new cohort, born in an era of search engines, social feeds, and on-demand answers, is shattering those boundaries and building its own pathways to comprehension. Generation Z as the definition and news headlines often say is a generation that is altering the status quo of the society. They have something different to serve, sometimes in terms of workplace culture, and in other forms of learning.
The latest Google–Kantar study delivers a telling statistic: 84% of Gen Z have used generative AI to make sense of the news they consume. This is not mere curiosity about the newest tech toy. It is an intentional, almost instinctive, act of reframing information, taking raw reports and filtering them through an intelligent system to extract meaning, simplify complexity, or bridge linguistic gaps.
News as raw material, not a finished product
Gen Z, defined as those born between 1997 and 2012, is the most connected generation in history.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Jolie-Pitt Family Shows Support For Shiloh's Change
Drivepedia
Undo
Grown up with smartphones and internet accessibility, this generation thinks in a way that their predecessors could never try. Even in news, they disagree to believe what is presented, rather dig out the roots, and then pour into the depths.
The study shows 38% turn to AI to fill knowledge gaps, 43% seek it for quick clarity, and 36% use it to translate content. These choices reflect a fundamental shift in mindset. The news is no longer a static product delivered by a newsroom; it is a fluid dataset that can be broken down, repackaged, and customised to fit the reader's own cognitive and cultural lens.
A generation wary of blind trust
While critics often claim younger generations trust online sources too much. But the numbers speak quite differently. Nearly half of Gen Z actively distrusts unverified reports, and 43% verify messages before forwarding them as suggested by the report. While the stakes are higher, stories involving health, safety, or money, scrutiny intensifies: 39% fact-check such claims, while 36% seek additional proof if none is presented.
Interestingly, the habit is more pronounced outside metro cities, where 42% fact-check sensitive content compared to 37% in metros, suggests the Google-Kantar study. This hints at a widening spread of digital scepticism, one that extends far beyond the media-savvy urban elite.
Creators, platforms, and the question of trust
For news access, Gen Z is clear in its preferences: 91% favour social media, with video platforms close behind at 88%. Within that space, 48% follow creators, whether niche experts or civic commentators, while 43% choose established news organisations as the data survey reports.
Yet when the issue is trust, legacy outlets still hold the edge, scoring 47% compared to 38–39% for creator-led content. The duality emphasises the Gen Z paradox: A hunger for personalised, engaging narratives, tempered by a recognition that credibility cannot be sacrificed.
The language of connection
While English remains the preferred reading language for 42% of respondents, the switch is dramatic when the format changes. In audio and video, local languages dominate, attracting 57% for their ease of understanding, emotional resonance, and shareability.
This dual-language behaviour positions Gen Z as both global consumers and local custodians, equally comfortable in a streaming lecture from the US and a regional-language news recap on their phone.
What this says about today's learners
Taken together, these findings reveal a generation reshaping the architecture of learning. They are not passive recipients of information but active interpreters, curators, and verifiers. In classrooms, this approach can accelerate critical thinking and adaptability; in society, it can foster a more discerning public.
But it also raises questions. When interpretation is outsourced to AI, does human judgment strengthen, or atrophy? Will the speed of machine-generated clarity crowd out the slow, sometimes messy process of forming independent perspectives?
While, their dependence on AI is at surge, the uncertainty dwells whether it is crippling the present generation and handing over the powers to the artificial intelligence, or it is strengthening them to see beyond what is shown. All of it depends, on the way the technology is leveraged and integrated into the lives that will decide the fate of the current generation.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
CEOs want their companies to adopt AI. But do they get it themselves?
In March, Andy Katz-Mayfield, co-founder of the razor brand Harry's, started inviting junior employees to monthly meetings usually reserved for his most senior leaders. The purpose was for lower-level workers to show off how they were using generative artificial intelligence to improve the supply chain, finance and marketing. But Katz-Mayfield had another purpose, too: getting the top executives comfortable with using AI themselves. 'Building familiarity with these tools opens people's eyes,' said Katz-Mayfield, who is also a CEO of Harry's parent company, Mammoth Brands. 'Through demos and stuff, people are like: 'Oh, that's cool. I didn't think about that, but I now realize why this is important for my team.'' Executives refer to the promise of AI with grandiose comparisons: the dawn of the internet, the Industrial Revolution, Carl Friedrich Gauss' discovery of number theory. But while boards and top executives may mandate using AI to make their businesses more efficient and competitive, many of those leaders haven't fully integrated it into their own workdays. As with most technological advances, younger people have taken to AI more quickly than their elders. And the work that people do earlier in their careers — inserting data into spreadsheets, creating decks, coming up with designs — also lends itself to playing around with the technology. Top executives, on the other hand, are often several steps removed from the mechanics. Once they're in the C-suite, days are filled with meetings. Less doing, more approving. So to nudge high-level managers, CEOs who have fully embraced AI are trying new tactics. Some have told senior leaders to use Gemini, Google's AI assistant, before defaulting to Google search. Some are carving out time at corporate retreats to play around with generative AI tools like Creatify. At Mayer Brown, a law firm in Chicago, chair Jon Van Gorp has shared with the partners how he uses a generative AI tool built for legal professionals to help draft contracts and distill the most salient points from his own writing. At a fashion startup called Daydream, Friday lunches are devoted to employees' sharing how they're using generative AI tools; the chief technology officer has shared her Gemini prompts from the week. Mammoth's chief technology officer, Sandeep Chouksey, 41, is well aware of AI and has been playing around with ChatGPT since it came out nearly three years ago. But he found that watching the engineers on his team helped him understand the technology better. He figured his peers needed to get their eyes on it, too, and suggested inviting employees who were working closely with AI to the leadership meetings. The work of senior executives 'doesn't lend itself to actually experimenting with the technology,' Chouksey said. 'I knew that the other leaders needed to see what I was seeing — all the bottom-up work that was happening.' Chuck Whitten is witnessing how company executives are gradually wrapping their heads around the AI phenomenon. He is the global head of digital practices at Bain & Co., a management consulting firm where his job is to advise CEOs about technology. They understand the importance of integrating AI into their companies, he said, but don't yet have a feel for the technology itself. He was in their shoes not too long ago. In 2021, he left Bain after 22 years to become co-chief operating officer at Dell Technologies. He was in that job when ChatGPT rolled out. He describes it as a 'lightning bolt' moment. Part of the reason he returned to Bain was realizing that senior leaders needed assistance entering the 'golden age of artificial intelligence,' he said. 'I think the majority that I see are just experimenting with the basics, sort of trying Copilot or ChatGPT for the occasional email, draft or quick fact check,' Whitten said. 'This is not a tool you can delegate down the hall to the chief information officer. They need to be hands-on in both where the technology is going and how they can apply it today.' According to a survey of 456 CEOs by Gartner, a research and advisory firm, released in May, 77% of the executives thought AI is transformative for business, but fewer than half thought their technology officers were up to the task of navigating the current digital landscape. Every CEO is trying to 'figure out whether they're set up for the future or not and how the world looks on the other side of this technology transformation,' said Tom Pickett, CEO of Headspace, a wellness app. 'They're facing this constant change, which just leads to stress and everyday anxiety.' Pickett, 56, has dealt with his own anxiety by using AI chatbots as much as possible. He joined the company last August and said chatbots had helped him get up to speed in his role. He uses ChatGPT or Gemini to do research and receive advice about business moves, such as potential partnerships with other companies. He said it helped him 'learn 10 times as much or test 10 times as many ideas in a very lightweight way.' In the past, he said, 'I would have had to ask the resident expert or somebody who worked with that company to really give me a debrief,' Pickett said. 'And instead, in five minutes, I'm like, 'Oh, OK, I get this.'' (He said he had also consulted people in his company, but now 'the conversations are more productive.') Sarah Franklin, CEO of Lattice, a human resources software platform, said it can be difficult to get executives to use new tools, and in internal meetings she regularly asks, 'Did you test that message with ChatGPT?' Franklin, who previously was chief marketing officer at Salesforce, has been using generative AI tools since they came on the market. But the technology is moving quickly, and everyone is trying to figure it out on the go. 'Nobody has 10 years of agentic AI experience right now. They at best have six months. So nobody is fully prepared,' Franklin, 49, said. 'What we have right now in the world is a lot of optimism combined with a lot of FOMO.' Fear of missing out can be the mother of innovation, it seems. In January, Greg Schwartz, CEO of StockX, was scrolling the social platform X when he saw several users posting projects that they had made with various AI coding apps. He downloaded the apps. He hadn't written a line of code in years. But using the apps got his mind racing. During a corporate retreat in March, he decided to push 10 senior leaders to play around with these tools, too. He gave everyone in the room, including the heads of supply chain, marketing and customer service, 30 minutes to build a website with the tool Replit and make a marketing video with the app Creatify. 'I'm just a tinkerer by trait,' Schwartz, 44, said. 'I thought that was going to be more engaging and more impactful than me standing in front of the room.' There was a 'little bit of shock' when he presented the exercise, he said. But he tried to remind people it was a fun activity. They weren't being graded. Their discomfort is normal, said Ethan Mollick, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and author of the newsletter One Useful Thing and the book 'Co-Intelligence: Living and Working With AI.' 'AI is weird and off-putting,' Mollick said. 'There's a lot of psychological resistance to using the systems even for people who know they should be doing it.' Many organizations, he added, have a 'real failure of imagination and vision' when it comes to the power of these systems. 'The main issue is that leaders have to take a leading role,' Mollick said. 'They all say AI is the future, use AI to do stuff. And then they don't make any decisions or choices.' About half of companies do not have road maps for integrating AI, according to a Bain survey. Whitten at Bain said that about only 20% of companies were scaling their AI bets and that most didn't have benchmarks for how workers should use AI. At Mammoth Brands, Katz-Mayfield said that he and his team had discussed providing incentives to employees who use AI but that they hadn't needed to. The energy around experimenting is working for the company. In the last meeting it had five demos on the docket but didn't get to all of them because senior leaders were 'asking so many questions and wanting to see different things.' 'If the leadership team is excited and engaged in that stuff,' Katz-Mayfield said, 'that's probably more than half the battle.'
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Garena Free Fire Max Redeem Codes for August 17, 2025: Unlock free rewards now
Garena Free Fire Max, the popular battle royale game, keeps players hooked with frequent tournaments, events, and daily rewards. One of the easiest ways to grab in-game freebies is by using redeem codes, which are released regularly. These Free Fire Max redeem codes are 12-character alphanumeric combinations, each with a limited validity period. Since each code can only be used once, players are encouraged to redeem them as quickly as possible to avoid missing out. Free Fire Max Redeem Codes for August 17 2025 HBG48P7T6R5E FFBCLQ6S7W25 ZY5K2HR89FV3 FFBCT7P7N2P4 GYXKT8U9WF8J FFM5LE4H5Z8S JJCM4D8ZQP9V KLLPDJHDDBJD A4GRED445T6Y How to Redeem Free Fire Max Codes (17 August 2025) Visit the official redemption site: Log in using one of your game-linked accounts (Facebook, Google, VK, Apple ID, Huawei ID, or Twitter) Enter the 12-digit redeem code in the provided text field A confirmation dialogue box will appear Click on 'OK' to confirm and claim your rewards
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Google Pixel 10 Pro 5G: Which flagship model is worth the hype?
The Google Pixel 10 series will make an official debut on August 21, whereas the Apple iPhone 17 series launch date is yet to be announced. However, rumours suggest a September 9 launch, just about 20 days after the 'Made by Google.' As both rivals are launching in a similar timeline, many smartphone buyers must be considering whether they should buy the latest Pixel 10 models or the iPhone 17 models. Therefore, we have curated a detailed comparison between the iPhone 17 Pro and Pixel 10 Pro to know which Pro model you should be buying this year. Apple iPhone 17 Pro or Pixel 10 Pro 5G? Pick before the official launch.(Majin BU/ Google) Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Google Pixel 10 Pro 5G: Design and display The Apple iPhone 17 Pro is expected to get major design changes as it is rumoured to bring back the aluminium frame. The smartphone could also feature an expanded camera bar housing a triple camera setup. Apart from these changes, the iPhone 17 Pro could retain the USB-C charging, camera control button, and the Action button. On the other hand, the Google Pixel 10 Pro model will likely resemble its predecessor in terms of design. However, rumours suggest that it may come with new bold colour options that may grab attention. For display, the iPhone 17 Pro is expected to feature a 6.3-inch Super Retina XDR display with a 120Hz refresh rate and up to 3000nits peak brightness. Whereas the Pixel 10 Pro may feature a 6.3-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and up to 3000nits brightness. Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Google Pixel 10 Pro 5G: Camera The iPhone 17 Pro is expected to feature a triple camera setup that may include a 48MP main camera, a 48MP ultrawide camera, and a 48MP telephoto lens with 5x optical zoom. On the other hand, the Google Pixel 10 Pro will likely feature a 50MP main camera, a 48MP ultrawide camera, and a 48MP telephoto lens that may also offer 5x optical zoom. For selfies, the iPhone 17 Pro may feature a 24MP selfie camera, and the Pixel 10 Pro could feature a 42MP selfie camera. Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Google Pixel 10 Pro 5G: Performance and battery The iPhone 17 Pro is expected to be powered by the A19 Pro chip paired with 12GB of RAM and up to 1TB of internal storage. On the other hand, the Pixel 10 Pro will likely be powered by the TSMC-made Tensor G5 chip paired with up to 16GB RAM and up to 1TB internal storage. In terms of battery life, the iPhone 17 Pro will likely get an upgraded battery. However, the exact mAh is yet to be determined. In comparison, the Pixel 10 Pro will likely be backed by a 4870mAh battery that may support 29W charging. Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Google Pixel 10 Pro 5G: Price in India The Apple iPhone 17 Pro will likely be priced at around Rs. 1,25,000 in India for the 256GB variant as the base model. On the other hand, the Google Pixel 10 Pro is expected to be priced at Rs. 1,09,999 for the 256GB storage variant.
