logo
The Stablecoin Sandwich: A Better Way to Move Money Across Borders

The Stablecoin Sandwich: A Better Way to Move Money Across Borders

FF News18-06-2025
Cross-border payments remain one of the most expensive and opaque aspects of international business. Fintech Finance reports that global corporations move $23.5 trillion across borders and pay an estimated $120bn in transaction fees annually. With slow settlement times, high FX fees, and complex compliance requirements, many companies are seeking faster and more transparent alternatives. What traditional cross-border payments get wrong
Despite living in an era of instant communication and cloud-based everything, cross-border payments are still burdened by outdated infrastructure. Much of the friction stems from reliance on legacy systems like SWIFT and correspondent banking networks, which introduce delays, fees, and opacity into every transaction. These systems were never designed for the speed and scale of today's global digital economy.
The list of issues that businesses face when making payments in 2025 is a long one: delays, hidden fees, poor FX rates, limited transparency, access issues, failed payments… These inefficiencies aren't just a nuisance. They create real business risk and operational drag. Consider the following scenarios: A tech firm in London needs to pay its developer team in Argentina weekly. FX volatility and delays mean developers are paid late, and the firm must overfund to account for slippage.
An online education platform in Singapore pays tutors across Africa. Bank coverage is patchy, and students complain when class schedules are affected by delayed payouts.
A French import/export company struggles to make timely supplier payments in Turkey due to capital controls and high intermediary costs.
In each of these cases, the core problem is the lack of a direct, efficient, and programmable value-transfer mechanism.
Enter, a modern-day solution, the 'stablecoin sandwich.' What is a stablecoin sandwich?
A stablecoin sandwich is a cross-border payment strategy that wraps a blockchain-based stablecoin transfer between two fiat currency conversions. The process begins by converting the sender's fiat currency (e.g., GBP) into a stablecoin (e.g., USDC). That stablecoin is transmitted over a fast, low-cost blockchain network, like Solana, before being converted back into the recipient's local fiat currency (e.g., INR).
Think of it as putting a stablecoin in the middle of two fiat 'slices', a transaction sandwich, crafted to avoid the sogginess of traditional banking rails. No one likes a soggy sandwich.
This structure isn't just more appetising, it's more efficient. It delivers: Faster settlement: Cross-border payments that typically take 2–5 days via SWIFT can now be completed in minutes or hours, depending on network choice.
Lower fees: While traditional correspondent banking can incur fees of 3–6% per transaction , stablecoin transfers often cost a fraction of that, especially on efficient Layer 2 networks.
Greater transparency: Transactions are recorded immutably on-chain, allowing for real-time tracking and automated reconciliation.
More importantly, it enables businesses to bypass congested correspondent banking networks, which still underpin most traditional international payments. According to the BIS , nearly 40% of cross-border transactions rely on just a handful of major correspondent banks, creating concentration risk and liquidity bottlenecks, especially in emerging markets. In contrast, blockchain-based rails use decentralised infrastructure that routes payments through faster, borderless channels.
However, the fiat off-ramp still depends on access to local currency. That's where Bitpace plays a key role: we partner with licensed financial entities and local payout nodes to ensure liquidity is available, where it's needed for clients. This decentralised but regulated approach shifts the burden away from slow, centralised institutions and toward programmatic, API-driven liquidity networks optimised for scale, speed, and compliance.
The stablecoin sandwich is especially powerful in regions where traditional banking infrastructure is patchy, restricted, or expensive. In Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, the average cost of sending $200 is 8.5% . Stablecoin pathways offer a modern workaround, enabling access to liquidity without the inefficiencies of legacy financial networks. How it works: The technical filler
The stablecoin sandwich is built on three core steps: on-ramp, transfer, and off-ramp. Each step is designed to reduce cost, increase speed, and maximise transparency. Here's how the process works in practice: Fiat on-ramp: The sender begins by converting their local fiat currency (e.g., GBP) into a stablecoin (e.g., USDC) using a trusted payment service provider (PSP), crypto exchange, or an integrated payment gateway such as Bitpace.
Blockchain transfer: Once the stablecoin is issued, it is transferred via a blockchain network. The choice of network, Layer 1 or Layer 2, depends on speed, cost, and regional infrastructure. Each has trade-offs in terms of latency and transaction fees. For example, the Ethereum network can be used for high security and liquidity.
Fiat off-ramp: Once the stablecoin arrives, it is converted into the recipient's local currency (e.g., INR) through a licensed partner or PSP connected to local banking rails. Bitpace coordinates this process end-to-end through a network of verified payout nodes in key markets.
Because stablecoins are largely 1:1 backed when issued by regulated entities and held in transparent reserves, and are not subject to the volatility of other crypto assets. They serve as a safe, fast medium of value transfer, especially for B2B use cases.
In B2B use cases, such as payroll, treasury transfers, supplier payments, and digital export settlements, this balance of speed, stability, and programmability makes stablecoins a compelling instrument for moving value at a global scale. Crypto sandwich use cases
Many suppliers in Africa, Asia, and LATAM face delays in receiving payments through traditional banks, often waiting 3 days or more for funds to be settled, which are further diminished by FX spread losses. A stablecoin sandwich enables same-day delivery of funds with better FX rates, improved visibility, and full auditability.
Example: A UK-based e-commerce firm pays a textile manufacturer in the UAE. GBP is converted to USDC, sent via the Solana network, and instantly settled in AED through a local partner.
Remote talent marketplaces struggle with payout delays and high intermediary fees. With the stablecoin sandwich model, talent in over 100 countries can receive funds in minutes, in their preferred local currency or even as stablecoins.
Example: A London-based design agency pays contractors in the UAE. Payments are routed through Bitpace, converting GBP to USDC, sent over the Ethereum network, and withdrawn in AED.
Stablecoins offer programmable liquidity. Businesses can hold them during global settlement cycles to manage timing mismatches and use Bitpace to hedge or convert when rates are most favourable.
Example: A UK-based SaaS firm with clients in the UAE receives revenue in AED. They convert to USDC to hold until rates are favourable, then settle GBP expenses in the UK, all without touching legacy FX platforms.
Exporters of digital goods (think SaaS, gaming, digital art) often don't need the friction of banking systems. A stablecoin sandwich allows these businesses to sell to global buyers and receive clean, fast payments they can either hold or cash out.
Example: An indie game studio in England receives royalties from the UAE. Bitpace enables them to accept AED via USDC rails, convert to GBP, and settle in their UK business account. Why the sandwich works
The stablecoin sandwich is not just a workaround, it's an upgrade. It removes the weakest parts of traditional cross-border payments (slow banks, expensive FX, opaque routing) and replaces them with the strengths of crypto (speed, transparency, and programmability). At Bitpace, we've seen this model deliver real-world efficiency gains for our clients, without the regulatory or volatility concerns often associated with crypto.
Under frameworks like the EU's MiCA regulation, UK's FCA DP23/4, or Brazil's PL 4401/2021 and CVM/BCB division of roles, stablecoins will be issued by regulated e-money institutions, backed by 1:1 fiat reserves, and subject to rigorous audit requirements. This clarity is already attracting institutional players who want the benefits of crypto rails, without the volatility of speculative assets. As the market matures and stablecoin regulation (like MiCA) brings further clarity, I believe this sandwich will become the default meal for modern global payments.
Final thoughts
With global B2B payment volumes expected to surpass $150 trillion by 2025 , the pressure is on to modernise infrastructure. The stablecoin sandwich offers a path forward: one that combines the trust of fiat, the efficiency of crypto, and the compliance of licensed platforms like Bitpace.
Let's make moving money as simple and fast as sending an email (or making a sandwich). We're building the rails for compliant, real-time global value transfer. If you're a business, PSP, or financial institution looking to stay ahead of the curve, join us.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pension Saving Strong in 2025, Yet Gender Inequality Remains Entrenched
Pension Saving Strong in 2025, Yet Gender Inequality Remains Entrenched

FF News

timean hour ago

  • FF News

Pension Saving Strong in 2025, Yet Gender Inequality Remains Entrenched

Pension savers have maintained strong contribution levels in the first half of 2025, sustaining the record momentum seen in 2024, according to new analysis from leading online pension provider, PensionBee . However, the figures, based on 286,000 invested PensionBee customers as of 30 June 2025, reveal a persistent gender gap in pension savings, highlighting ongoing inequality in retirement outcomes and raising fresh questions about how to close the divide. Average quarterly contributions stood at £1,624 in the first half of 2025, compared to £1,677 during the same period in 2024, representing a 3% decline. The small drop may reflect a market settling down, following the exceptional high contributions spurred by the increased annual allowance in 2024. Despite this, savers are largely holding firm in their pension commitments amid ongoing economic uncertainty. Gender gap remains stubbornly wide The data shows a continued disparity between male and female savers. In the first half of 2025, men contributed an average of £1,845 per quarter, while women contributed £1,347 – a 27% gap that has shown little movement. This aligns with recent Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) figures, which reveal a 48% gender pensions gap among those approaching retirement. Male contributions fell 4% year-on-year (from £1,920), whereas female contributions remained largely unchanged (from £1,349). This suggests that women are sustaining their pension contributions, even as financial pressures persist, whereas male contributions may be more responsive to financial circumstances or market conditions. Self-employed narrow the gap Encouragingly, the gap between employed and self-employed savers has narrowed. In the first half of 2025, the self-employed contributed an average of £1,635 per quarter, compared to £1,679 among employed savers – a modest difference of just £44. Contribution levels declined slightly from a 2024 high over the same period, falling 4% (from £1,708) for self-employed savers and 1% (from £1,702) for employed. Lisa Picardo, Chief Business Officer UK at PensionBee, commented: 'We can't allow today's contribution gaps to become tomorrow's poverty in retirement. It's encouraging to see average contributions maintaining 2024's exceptional levels. But the persistent gender gap in contributions is concerning. 'The fact that male savers consistently contribute over 25% more than female savers reflects systemic inequalities that compound over decades. When women are earning less and taking career breaks for caring responsibilities, lower pension contributions naturally follow. 'The DWP's own figures show a significant 48% private wealth gap between men and women approaching retirement. The government must urgently address these structural barriers through policy reforms, while employers and the pensions industry need to do more to support women's retirement outcomes.' Companies In This Post PensionBee

Huge Scottish forest sold for £145m to Gresham House investors in 'astronomical' sale
Huge Scottish forest sold for £145m to Gresham House investors in 'astronomical' sale

Scotsman

time2 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Huge Scottish forest sold for £145m to Gresham House investors in 'astronomical' sale

The sale illuminates the demand for Scotland's asset-rich landscapes. Sign up to our Scotsman Rural News - A weekly of the Hay's Way tour of Scotland emailed direct to you. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A forest estate in Scotland has been sold to asset managers for £145 million in one of the biggest deals of its kind. Griffin Forestry Estate, near Aberfeldy in Perthshire, which spans some 5,560 hectares, has been bought by a subsidiary of Gresham House Ltd, a London-based asset management company now owned by a private equity firm headquartered in New York. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Griffin Forestry Estate near Aberfeldy in Perthshire. PIC: Savills. | Savills Griffin Forestry Estate is made up of three separate woodlands and a windfarm. The land was marketed by Savills in 2023 for offers over £130m given its 'exceptional sustainability and income credentials'. The sale of Griffin illuminates the demand for Scotland's asset-rich landscapes and the 'astronomical sums' paid by 'anonymous corporate investors' for the land, Community Land Scotland said. Meanwhile, Andy Wightman, Scotland's land ownership expert, said he believed that Gresham House and its subsidiaries could now be 'on track' to become Scotland's second-largest landowner following the Griffin deal, with his latest research into the company due. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Wightman said: 'It is a unique property as it is so huge and has such valuable assets. This is a straightforward commercial transaction where £145m is deemed to be the price worth paying for that future stream of revenue from windpower and timber.' Griffin Forestry Estate was originally part of the Grandtully Estate and was earlier owned by Guy Hands, an investment manager and former chairman of record company EMI. The new owner is Gresham House FF VI LLP, a limited liability partnership between Gresham House Initial Partner Ltd and Gresham House Forest Fund VI LP, a Scottish Limited Partnership that includes City of Cardiff Pension Fund, Swansea Council Pension Fund and Gresham House Ltd among its limited partners. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dr Josh Doble, director of policy and advocacy at Community Land Scotland , said the sale was another 'concerning example of landownership concentrating in Scotland into the hands of anonymous corporate investors'. He said: 'This sale also sets the remarkable and quite unbelievable precedent that an average sized Highland estate can sell for astronomical sums, which seem completely removed from the reality of many Highland communities who are in dire need of investment in local housing, travel infrastructure and local services. READ MORE: Owner of Scottish castle heads to court amid Net Zero tree planting row 'This disparity raises the serious question of who is benefiting from Scotland's natural resources and how a remote corporate entity such as Gresham House can justify an apparent investment of £145 million in a Highland estate, and how much of that investment will be benefiting the local area.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dr Doble said he hoped the new owners would 'closely and meaningfully engage' with the local community about their plans for the estate and what benefits would be shared with the local community. In February last year, Olly Hughes, managing director of Gresham House, appeared before the net zero, energy and transport committee at Holyrood and told MSPs the company did 'not own any land directly under the name of Gresham House'. However, it is understood the firm and its subsidiaries are namd as General Partner in a number of Scottish Limited Partnerships (SLP) - legal entities which can own land.

How Arsenal silently hijacked Spurs' Eberechi Eze transfer well before anyone knew
How Arsenal silently hijacked Spurs' Eberechi Eze transfer well before anyone knew

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

How Arsenal silently hijacked Spurs' Eberechi Eze transfer well before anyone knew

Just hours before Arsenal clinched a deal for Eberechi Eze, somewhat cruelly, Tottenham Hotspur finally put in the offer they felt would be acceptable to Crystal Palace. There had been a verbal agreement. Spurs just never got a proper answer. After days of difficult and painstaking negotiations between Daniel Levy and Steve Parish, Arsenal had appeared to steal in within a matter of mere hours. That has already seen this move cast as the mother of all transfer hijackings, especially with how it is another North London derby victory. Except, it wasn't really a hijacking at all. The Independent can now reveal that Arsenal had actually struck the principles of an agreement with Palace as early as the morning of Sunday 10 August. They managed to keep it extraordinarily quiet, as illustrated by how it was only after Wednesday evening's sensations that multiple sources were willing to talk about it. There was also the fact that, in those nine days, it didn't look like Arsenal would follow through on that agreement. The word put out was that they wanted to sell before any other purchase, and that they preferred a left winger. Interest in Eze was repeatedly played down. There had been a lot of mixed messages, which fit with the whole summer as regards Arsenal and the Palace star. Levy might certainly feel that now. The situation has led to some surprising sympathy for the Spurs chairman within the game. Their own negotiations for Eze had encountered repeated difficulties, as first reported by The Independent on Saturday night. The problems actually preceded that. Talks almost collapsed the Thursday before, and there were constant hold-ups over issues like add-ons and how much was being paid up front. Just when one issue was solved, another would arise. One description over the last few days was that 'the deal is both almost done and constantly at the point of collapse'. There is now a belief, especially within Spurs, that Palace were stalling. They were waiting for Arsenal to come back. It nevertheless looked so remote by Saturday that Eze himself had accepted Arsenal wasn't going to happen. He even spoke to Parish to try and get his move sorted, as Levy and the Palace chairman met on Monday morning. Eze was genuinely excited about joining Tottenham. It just wasn't the one he really wanted. His dream was a move to Arsenal. That suddenly looked like it would become a reality on Wednesday morning. Arsenal finally acted on that deal. That shift will be linked to Kai Havertz's injury but there is actually hope the German's absence won't be that long, maybe less than three months. The Havertz development just accelerated everything. Arsenal wanted to make sure they didn't miss out. Parish and Arsenal executive vice-chairman Tim Lewis have a closer relationship than Parish and Levy, even if they often bicker. They WhatsApp a lot about regulations and other in-game issues. That helped by Wednesday, especially given that Sunday 10 August agreement. Arsenal also have more players they can offer who Palace need. It is possible a deal is next done for Jakub Kiwior, given how Oliver Glasner's side need a centre-half on that side. Everything could happen very quickly. Arsenal, for their part, still had to pay more than the initial agreement. That was to ensure it actually got done over Spurs. Whereas the previous deal had been for £50m plus £10m in add-ons, this is for £60m and £7.5m in add-ons – pretty much exactly Eze's release clause, which expired for this window on Thursday. It is understood to have been superior to Spurs' offer. Parish played that part masterfully. He got the best possible deal for his club, which was the best-case scenario if you're forced to lose one of the greatest legends in your club history. Eze did just deliver the first major trophy in the club's trophy. Queens Park Rangers will also be celebrating, since they stand to receive 15 per cent of any deal. The Loftus Road hierarchy are now aiming to complete more business of their own, as they are set to receive more money than they've had in years. Eze has ultimately preferred Arsenal because they offer better opportunities for more trophies than the FA Cup – that he can prove a missing piece for – but also because of that dream. The connection was there. When Eze posted on instagram on 26 May celebrating Palace's FA Cup success, the fifth and last picture was a conspicuous image of Ian Wright. It is still to be confirmed whether Eze will play in the Europa Conference League play-off against Fredrikstad on Thursday. There would obviously be romance in this club hero putting in the performance that properly delivers Palace to Europe, while also getting the opportunity for an emotional goodbye. Except, amid all this talk of dreams, a realism must exist. This is a huge transfer, with a lot of money at stake. Levy knows the cost of that now. He will face even greater questions having lost out on two big transfers late on this summer, after Morgan Gibbs-White. Fan protests at Spurs are likely to heat up again. Arsenal have meanwhile signed a game-changer, in the way that some felt might be missing against Liverpool's and Manchester City's business. They've now pulled off the deal of the summer. It could be hugely significant in the season.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store