R.I.P. Revel—the Uber rival is ceasing its rideshares in NYC and beyond this week
The decision ends a short but memorable chapter in New York City transit. Launched in 2021 with just 50 cars, Revel quickly became known for its sky-blue Model Ys and 30-percent-off promo codes that made the long wait times easier to swallow. For a certain slice of New Yorkers, the service was a go-to for clean interiors, courteous drivers and an occasional cheaper airport run. For others, it was the app they opened, saw a 40-minute wait, and closed again.
CEO Frank Reig called the move bittersweet but necessary. 'The best way we can keep the EV transition moving forward is by ending our rideshare service and focusing on building the fast-charging infrastructure our biggest cities need,' he said in a statement. Revel currently operates 100 chargers across New York City and one in San Francisco, with another 100 under construction and plans to hit 2,000 by 2030.
It's not Revel's first pivot. The company's original claim to fame was its rentable navy-blue mopeds, which zipped around the city until safety issues, insurance costs and several high-profile crashes ended that business in 2023. The rideshare service, while praised for paying drivers better than many competitors (at least early on), faced uphill battles against Uber and Lyft's scale, New York's tight licensing rules and the brutal economics of VC-funded transit startups.
In recent months, Revel ended its Hertz rental car deal, moved drivers from employee status to contractors and, according to industry chatter, may be looking to sell its 100-plus corporate TLC plates. Most of its 500 leased vehicles will head back to owners and drivers say they got little notice of the shutdown.
For riders, the loss means one fewer option in a city where 'choice' usually means picking which surge price hurts less. For Revel, it's a bet that the future (and the money) is in powering the cars, not driving them. Whether that future arrives before your next Uber surge hits $75 remains to be seen.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
a day ago
- STV News
Survey to determine if Edinburgh has too many private hire drivers
A survey to determine whether there are too many private hire cars in Edinburgh has been approved by Edinburgh councillors. It comes after a group of taxi drivers in the capital handed over a petition to city councillors last month, asking for a review to be carried out. The drivers had also asked for a pause to be placed on issuing new private hire licences while the survey was carried out. But at Friday's meeting of the Regulatory Committee, councillors did not back a Green group amendment that would have called for that. According to council regulatory services head Andrew Mitchell, tendering for a survey would take about 12 weeks, and data collection would take place in the first half of 2026. In a deputation to the committee, city taxi driver Keith Auld told councillors: 'We believe every passenger deserves a professional journey. But we are undergoing unsustainable pressure. 'This is not healthy competition, it is over-saturation. And it is already having real consequences. We need fair, sustainable and regulated competition.' Mr Auld and other city black cab drivers say that private hire drivers, many of whom carry out work for apps like Uber and Bolt, end up undercutting their trade. According to them, this comes down to the lower cost to buy and run a hire car, with the vehicles allowed for use as taxis being very expensive and requiring public hire insurance. In addition, fares for black cabs are set by the council, while Uber, Bolt and other private hire providers have no minimum charge. They also argued in their petition that due to the low incomes drivers get from those rideshare services, many of them work for dangerously long hours. Officers said that 2,982 private hire cars were presently operating in the capital, while 1,090 taxis were also running. Mr Auld said that three new private hire cars were being added in the city every day, and that the number would reach 4,000 'in no time'. After the survey is returned to councillors next year, they may consider putting a cap on the number of private hire cars allowed in the city. In the meeting, councillors were supportive of the idea of a survey, but the committee stopped short of supporting the temporary freeze on licence grants. Green councillor Susan Rae put forward an amendment that would have called for this, but Mr Mitchell said that if the committee voted for it, the law could be broken. He said: 'There is no legal power to issue a moratorium. There would be no basis in law to refuse to consider an application on the basis of overprovision [without evidence]. 'In my view, an immediate moratorium is not something that would be competent.' Liberal Democrat councillor and committee convener Neil Ross endorsed his group's motion, which called for a survey to be conducted. He said: 'It would be helpful if we had a workshop for committee members to discuss other issues and elements of concern around the current numbers of private hire vehicles. 'I would be grateful if that were factored in. I'm proposing that we proceed with the consultation and overprovision survey. 'I'm also proposing that officers are alert to concerns raised by all members of the trade who have issues around long working hours. 'I think this is a sensible way forward, it follows the guidance that we have been given by the Scottish Government, it is a legally robust way of approaching the question.' Labour councillor Margaret Graham put forward an amendment for the city's administration, which asked that any survey look at the number of private hire cars parked in city streets. Conservative councillor Joanna Mowat said: 'I'm probably alone in this committee in having very great nervousness about interfering in the market. 'There is an element with any cap that is introduced with numbers, the danger of creating protected markets. 'I'm uncomfortable with that, from a political point of view, my natural mean is to be uncomfortable with protecting markets. 'I do think the terms of the petition that has been brought here today, about the public safety element, is something that means we should probably consider this. 'I don't for one minute think this is going to produce the information that everyone else seems to think this is going to produce. 'But we're not going to know that unless we carry out an overprovision survey.' The Labour group added the Green amendment to their addendum, and the Liberal Democrat group added a portion of the administration addendum to their amendment. Both positions were tied, and as convener, Cllr Ross made a tiebreaking vote that saw the Liberal Democrat position win out. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Time Out
2 days ago
- Time Out
R.I.P. Revel—the Uber rival is ceasing its rideshares in NYC and beyond this week
Pour one out for the big blue Teslas: Revel, the all-electric rideshare that promised to make getting around New York cleaner (and sometimes cheaper), has officially pulled the plug on its car-hailing service as of Monday, August 11. The company says it's ditching passengers for plug-in stations, shifting its focus to building electric vehicle charging hubs in cities like New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles. The decision ends a short but memorable chapter in New York City transit. Launched in 2021 with just 50 cars, Revel quickly became known for its sky-blue Model Ys and 30-percent-off promo codes that made the long wait times easier to swallow. For a certain slice of New Yorkers, the service was a go-to for clean interiors, courteous drivers and an occasional cheaper airport run. For others, it was the app they opened, saw a 40-minute wait, and closed again. CEO Frank Reig called the move bittersweet but necessary. 'The best way we can keep the EV transition moving forward is by ending our rideshare service and focusing on building the fast-charging infrastructure our biggest cities need,' he said in a statement. Revel currently operates 100 chargers across New York City and one in San Francisco, with another 100 under construction and plans to hit 2,000 by 2030. It's not Revel's first pivot. The company's original claim to fame was its rentable navy-blue mopeds, which zipped around the city until safety issues, insurance costs and several high-profile crashes ended that business in 2023. The rideshare service, while praised for paying drivers better than many competitors (at least early on), faced uphill battles against Uber and Lyft's scale, New York's tight licensing rules and the brutal economics of VC-funded transit startups. In recent months, Revel ended its Hertz rental car deal, moved drivers from employee status to contractors and, according to industry chatter, may be looking to sell its 100-plus corporate TLC plates. Most of its 500 leased vehicles will head back to owners and drivers say they got little notice of the shutdown. For riders, the loss means one fewer option in a city where 'choice' usually means picking which surge price hurts less. For Revel, it's a bet that the future (and the money) is in powering the cars, not driving them. Whether that future arrives before your next Uber surge hits $75 remains to be seen.
Time Out
3 days ago
- Time Out
This is the tallest subway station in New York City—and it's finally getting major accessibility upgrades
If you've ever trudged up to the Smith–9th Streets station in Gowanus, Brooklyn, you know it's not for the faint of heart—or the bad of knees. Perched nearly 90 feet above street level, the city's tallest subway stop (and one of the tallest in the world) offers sweeping skyline views and a daunting staircase workout. Now, after 92 years of vertiginous climbs, the MTA says relief is on the way: Elevators are coming. The upgrade, announced on August 8 by State Sen. Andrew Gounardes, Assemblymember Jo Anne Simon and the MTA, is part of the agency's $68.4 billion 2025–2029 Capital Plan. More than 60 subway stations are slated for accessibility improvements, including Brooklyn's Court Street, Hoyt–Schermerhorn, 36th Street and 4th Avenue–9th Street. 'Every day, New Yorkers hike the stairs up this station like they're climbing Mount Everest, struggling to catch the train on time,' Gounardes said. 'With elevators coming to the Smith–9th Street station, that's finally going to change.' The station, which serves the F and G lines, opened in 1933 and has never had elevators—just escalators with a 'long history' of breaking down, as Simon put it. That's meant decades of headaches for wheelchair users, parents with strollers, travelers lugging suitcases and anyone who finds the daily climb more punishment than cardio. The MTA hasn't given a completion date yet, but officials say the work will push the subway system past 50-percent accessibility. It's also a step toward meeting a court-ordered settlement requiring 95-percent of stations to be ADA-accessible by 2055. 'No station better demonstrates the need for accessibility than Smith–9th Street, the highest point in the entire subway system,' said Quemuel Arroyo, the MTA's chief accessibility officer. 'We're excited to start work there and throughout the borough soon.' For riders, that means the city's most sky-high commute will finally be an option for everyone, not just the stair-sturdy and escalator-lucky. Until then, you can still enjoy the panoramic view of the Manhattan skyline from the platform, just make sure to leave a few extra minutes for the climb.
