logo
What Happened to India Becoming the Next China?

What Happened to India Becoming the Next China?

New York Times06-08-2025
President Trump all but declared economic war against India on Wednesday, threatening to add a 25 percent punitive tariff for India's purchases of Russian oil on top of a 25 percent tariff he announced last week. In his second term, Mr. Trump had been expected to marshal India as a friendly counterweight to the challenge posed by China.
But added together, the 50 percent tariff paints India as a political enemy, putting it in the company of Brazil, whose leftist president sparred with Mr. Trump when the country was threatened with a similarly punishing tariff rate. The crisis between India and the United States suddenly looks much bigger than the terms of trade.
The onslaught against India started on July 30, when Mr. Trump declared that India's economy was 'dead.' Until that point, his administration had been angling to reduce India's trade barriers, but said nothing about its two years of buying Russian oil at a wartime discount.
Before the shock of Mr. Trump's announcement in April of sweeping global tariffs, the world's two largest democracies seemed to be enjoying the friendship that its leaders had forged.
At a meeting with Mr. Trump at the White House in February, India's prime minister, Narendra Modi, described India's intention to become one of the world's most advanced economies, with the United States as a partner.
'In the language of America, it's 'Make India Great Again' — MIGA,' he said. 'When America and India work together, this MAGA plus MIGA becomes a 'mega partnership for prosperity.'' Mr. Trump smiled.
Left unmentioned but lingering just out of sight was China, the only country with a population to rival India's and an economy to stand in its way. China is also far and away America's most important economic competitor. Together, the United States and India were seen as ready to use each other to try to restrain China's might.
Mr. Modi's confidence in enlisting the United States in its economic rise was well grounded. U.S. administrations have been courting India as a geopolitical ally for more than a quarter century, since India announced its nuclear arsenal as a deterrent, it said, to China.
And American dollars have poured into India as China's economy has matured and become more assertive. The Covid-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine were the catalysts for a surge in investment. Multinational companies grew excited about doing business in India, to reduce the risk of exposure to China, as it girds for a trade war with the United States and possibly a real war with Taiwan. Manufacturing and professional services led the way.
Wall Street followed, banking on the future growth of India, with its relatively young population and enviable political stability.
But over the past week, Mr. Trump's escalating attacks on India have suddenly undermined this joint venture and sent reverberations throughout the business worlds of both countries. On Wednesday, an executive order by Mr. Trump said that India would face an extra 25 percent tariff starting on Aug. 27 if it continued to buy oil from Russia. That levy on Indian goods imported into the United States would come on top of a 25 percent tariff that Mr. Trump announced last week, which is set to take effect on Thursday and on its own ranks as one of the highest rates in Asia.
India's foreign ministry responded to Mr. Trump's executive order on Wednesday, reiterating that the country's motives for importing oil from Russia were tied to the energy needs of its 1.4 billion people. It was 'extremely unfortunate that the U.S. should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest,' the ministry's statement said. Indian officials signaled over the weekend that they did not intend to stop buying Russian oil.
With his tariff threats, Mr. Trump has thrown months of trade talks between both countries into question. Just a couple weeks ago, negotiators and business leaders sounded upbeat. Even with some difficult details to be settled, the expectation was that India and the United States mean too much to each other to let a global trade war tear them apart.
Mr. Modi was one of the first world leaders to visit Mr. Trump in Washington after he returned to the White House in January. The two men had long shared what was by all appearances a close relationship. As political leaders, both are regarded as strongmen.
The United States was earlier on wary of Mr. Modi, who had been denied a visa to the United States on the grounds that he played a role in the deadly anti-Muslim riots in 2002. But he was embraced when he became prime minister in 2014.
Part of the calculation was based on security and the possible future of military alliances across Asia. Yet, India's attractive qualities as a partner in defense always hinged on the promise of its economy.
Companies like Apple have poured billions into India, which in 2023 eclipsed China in population, with eyes on India's domestic market and its capacity to export manufactured goods to the United States and elsewhere. Those investments were supposed to be better than profitable; they were supposed to reduce or eliminate everyone's dependence on China to be the factory of the world.
The 25 percent tariff alone, already much higher than Asian competitors' like Vietnam, Japan and South Korea, would reduce the viability of such a trade. A 50 percent tariff would kill it.
On Tuesday, Mr. Trump took aim at two other industries that were explicitly being developed in India as an alternative to China.
Pharmaceuticals, where India has world-beating advantages and sells more than $10 billion a year to the United States, is to face a special tariff that could eventually reach 250 percent, Mr. Trump said, to be announced 'within a week or so.' Eli Lilly, as one of many American corporations that have invested in India, for example, recently invested $3 billion in an Indian factory. India makes nearly 40 percent of the generic drugs bought in the United States.
Mr. Trump's plan is to bring back manufacturing to the United States, which is also the reason he has given for imposing another special tariff on semiconductors. Unfortunately for Indian and American companies, and some in East Asia too, everyone has been spending to make India competitive in this sector. Micron, based in Idaho, has taken advantage of Indian government subsidies to put $2.5 billion into building chip-making facilities in Mr. Modi's home state of Gujarat.
High finance has also followed bricks-and-mortar businesses. The Indian stock market has been on a bull run, finding enthusiastic new buyers among middle-class Indians. That made foreign investors eager for private deals. Stephen Schwarzman, the chief executive of Blackstone, a New York investment firm, said this year that it was putting $11 billion into Indian data centers to fuel the global artificial intelligence boom.
A Mumbai-based investment professional, who was not authorized to speak publicly, said there was much more at stake in these investments than their dollar value.
Bets like Blackstone's are about the future of business between India, China and the United States, he said, and bring expertise from one economy to another. India was benefiting from that. But now it looks like a vulnerability.
The rupture of the relationship has generated huge uncertainty. Who wants to be responsible for making the next big bet?
Some parts of the U.S.-Indian equation look relatively secure. The trade in goods between the two countries has never been as important to their economic relationship as their trade in services, and other people-to-people exchanges. Indians are just as present in American boardrooms as American-trained Indians are in Mumbai's corner offices.
One aspect of this exchange, the proliferation of globally integrated, high-end offices in India — first in information technology and then across the professions — has remained a bright spot. Worth $65 billion last year, it is more valuable than the total trade deficit in goods. China does not hold a candle to India's ability as a hub for office work other countries send its way.
As frightening as the new tariffs are for many Indian factories, most American investors who have built stakes in India are not yet fleeing.
They do, however, remember what happened in 2020, when India and China traded blows at their border and 24 soldiers were killed. Almost overnight, Chinese companies were forced to ditch their Indian investments at a loss.
A war of words and tariffs is different, of course. But Indian and American cooperation around China is no longer something that anyone can count on.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chinese investors eyeing Indonesia to avoid US tariffs, tap local market
Chinese investors eyeing Indonesia to avoid US tariffs, tap local market

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Chinese investors eyeing Indonesia to avoid US tariffs, tap local market

JAKARTA (Reuters) -Gao Xiaoyu, the founder of an industrial land consulting firm in Jakarta, has been inundated with calls from Chinese companies eager to expand or set up operations in Indonesia as they try to shield themselves from the United States' hefty import tariffs. The 19% U.S. tariff rate for goods from Indonesia is the same as for Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand, and just below Vietnam's 20%. China's rates currently exceed 30%. Shop Top Mortgage Rates A quicker path to financial freedom Your Path to Homeownership Personalized rates in minutes But Indonesia, Southeast Asia's biggest economy and the world's fourth most populous country, has an edge over its neighbours - the potential of its vast consumer market. "We are quite busy these days. We have meetings from morning till night," said Gao, who set up her company PT Yard Zeal Indonesia in 2021 with four employees and now has more than 40. "The industrial parks are also very busy." Indonesia's economy expanded at a better-than-expected 5.12% in the second quarter, the fastest pace in two years, government data showed last week. "If you can establish a strong business presence in Indonesia, you've essentially captured half of the Southeast Asian market," said Zhang Chao, a Chinese manufacturer who sells motorcycle headlights in Indonesia, the world's third biggest market for motorbikes. Vietnam and Thailand were among the major beneficiaries of the first wave of Chinese companies' overseas diversification, but amid the latest trade turmoil with the United States, other near neighbours are benefiting. "There has always been a synergy ... with Chinese corporates having the confidence to set up shop with ease in Indonesia," said Mira Arifin, the Indonesia country head at Bank of America. "Indonesia has a huge talent pool with a dynamic young demographic that encourages foreign investors to rapidly build scale in the country." Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto has championed China ties, visiting Beijing in November where he held talks with President Xi Jinping and welcoming the Chinese Premier Li Qiang to Jakarta in May. Investment from China and Hong Kong into Indonesia was up 6.5% year-on-year to $8.2 billion in the first six months of 2025. Total FDI grew 2.58% over the same period to 432.6 trillion rupiah ($26.56 billion), and the government has said it expects more investments in the second half of the year. MASSIVE CONSUMER MARKET To be sure, challenges persist across Indonesia, including regulatory hurdles, bureaucratic red tape, ownership restrictions, deficient infrastructure and the lack of a complete industrial supply chain that made China the "workshop of the world" for decades. Some foreign investors have also raised concerns about the populist Prabowo's fiscal prudence, as he pushes ahead with his campaign promises, including a flagship programme to deliver free meals to schoolchildren and pregnant women. After falling in March to its lowest level against the U.S. dollar since June 1998, the rupiah has steadied. It is currently trading about 1% below its level at the end of last year. At the sprawling, more than 2,700 hectare (6,672 acres) Subang Smartpolitan industrial park in West Java, executives said it had been inundated with enquiries from Chinese investors. "Our phone, email and WeChat were immediately busy with new customers, agents wanting to introduce clients," once the U.S.-Indonesia trade deal was announced last month, said Abednego Purnomo, vice-president for sales, marketing and tenant relations of Suryacipta Swadaya, Subang Smartpolitan's operator. "Coincidentally, all of them were from China." Companies ranging from toy makers and textile firms to electric vehicle makers are scouring for facilities, particularly in West Java, the most populous province in Indonesia, which is home to the Patimban deep sea port. Chinese demand has pushed up prices of industrial real estate and warehouses by 15% to 25% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2025, the fastest rise in 20 years, according to Gao, from the land consulting firm. Rivan Munansa, the head of industrial and logistics services at the Indonesian arm of global property consultant Colliers International said that there was an urgency among Chinese firms to move and the company was getting inquiries for industrial land "almost every day" in the run-up to the tariff agreement. "Most of them (Chinese companies) are looking for immediate opportunities. So, they want land and a temporary building that can be used immediately, it's like a crash programme,' Rivan said. Zhang said he signed up for a new four-floor office building in Jakarta in May at an annual rent of 100,000 yuan ($13,936), up 43% from last year, underscoring the pent-up demand. "The 19% level is lower than my expectation. I thought it would be 30%," Zhang said, referring to Indonesia's tariff deal and adding that net profit margins in China could be as little as 3%. "In Indonesia, it's relatively easy to achieve net profit margins of 20% to 30%." And then there's the growing pool of consumers with household spending making up more than half of Indonesia's GDP. The gauge accelerated slightly to 4.97% year-on-year in the second quarter, helped by several public holidays. "Indonesia has always stood out for a different reason. Beyond supply chain diversification, Indonesia offers what few others in the regions can: a massive domestic market," said Marco Foster, ASEAN director at Dezan Shira & Associates, an investment consultancy. ($1 = 7.1756 Chinese yuan renminbi) ($1 = 16,285.0000 rupiah) (Reporting By Beijing Newsroom; Stefanno Sulaiman in Jakarta and Casey Hall in Shanghai; Additional reporting by Francesco Guarascio and Khanh Vu in Hanoi; Writing by Anne Marie Roantree; Editing by Kate Mayberry) Sign in to access your portfolio

Hong Leong Finance First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: S$0.072 (vs S$0.12 in 1H 2024)
Hong Leong Finance First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: S$0.072 (vs S$0.12 in 1H 2024)

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hong Leong Finance First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: S$0.072 (vs S$0.12 in 1H 2024)

Explore Hong Leong Finance's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Hong Leong Finance (SGX:S41) First Half 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: S$99.7m (down 16% from 1H 2024). Net income: S$32.2m (down 39% from 1H 2024). Profit margin: 32% (down from 44% in 1H 2024). The decrease in margin was primarily driven by lower revenue. EPS: S$0.072 (down from S$0.12 in 1H 2024). We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Hong Leong Finance shares are down 6.2% from a week ago. Risk Analysis It is worth noting though that we have found 1 warning sign for Hong Leong Finance that you need to take into consideration. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Melania Trump demands Hunter Biden retract 'extremely salacious' Epstein comments
Melania Trump demands Hunter Biden retract 'extremely salacious' Epstein comments

San Francisco Chronicle​

time18 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Melania Trump demands Hunter Biden retract 'extremely salacious' Epstein comments

WASHINGTON (AP) — First lady Melania Trump demanded that Hunter Biden retract comments linking her to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and threatened to sue if he does not. Trump takes issue with two comments Biden, son of former President Joe Biden, made in an interview this month with British journalist Andrew Callaghan. He alleged that Epstein introduced the first lady to now-President Donald Trump. The statements are false, defamatory and 'extremely salacious,' Melania Trump's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, wrote in a letter to Biden. Biden's remarks were widely disseminated on social media and reported by media outlets around the world, causing the first lady 'to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm,' he wrote. Biden made the Epstein comments during a sprawling interview in which he lashed out at 'elites' and others in the Democratic Party he says undermined his father before he dropped out of last year's presidential campaign. 'Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The connections are, like, so wide and deep,' Biden said in one of the comments Trump disputes. Biden attributed the claim to author Michael Wolff, whom Trump disparaged in June as a 'Third Rate Reporter.' He has accused Wolff of making up stories to sell books. The first lady's threats echo a favored strategy of her husband, who has aggressively used litigation to go after critics. Public figures like the Trumps face a high bar to succeed in a defamation lawsuit. The president and first lady have long said they were introduced by Paolo Zampolli, a modeling agent, at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store