
Inside Saudi's blood-soaked $8.8TRILLION Neom megacity project plagued by death & chaos as it grinds to humiliating halt
A worker spoke exclusively to The Sun about the horrors of the project, with over 21,000 labourers now said to have died
DESERT DISASTER ZONE Inside Saudi's blood-soaked $8.8TRILLION Neom megacity project plagued by death & chaos as it grinds to humiliating halt
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
WHEN Saudi Arabia revealed its ambitious $500billion megacity project, set to be a glittering jewel in the heart of the country's desert, the world marvelled.
But the Middle Eastern nation's NEOM project - which would see a high-tech utopia built from scratch near the country's border with Jordan - has long been cursed as one worker reveals all.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
10
NEOM is envisaged as a futuristic city in the desert
Credit: @neom / instagram
10
The project has been plagued by delays and setbacks
Credit: NEOM
10
NEOM was announced as part of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman's Project 2030 in 2017
Credit: @neom / instagram
10
The anticipated cost of delivering the gargantuan scheme is reported to have spiralled
Credit: Rise
10
NEOM was announced as part of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman's Project 2030 in 2017 - a major push to wean the oil-rich nation's economy off its reliance on fossil fuels.
NEOM will be a futuristic city across 26,000 sqft on the Red Sea and will include smaller projects The Line, Oxagon, Trojena, Sindalah and the Gulf of Aqaba Projects.
Stunning concept art gave a taste of what was to come, from floating structures to luxury holiday and ski resorts, but eight years on and not much progress has been made.
The daring project has been plagued by setbacks and controversy ever since the first construction workers descended into the sprawling dunes.
The anticipated cost of delivering the gargantuan scheme is reported to have spiralled from $500bn (£386bn) estimate to a head-spinning $8.8 trillion (£6.8 trillion), according to The New Civil Engineer.
But even more shocking are the human rights abuses and brutal conditions for workers looming over NEOM - issues that have plagued the country well before the project.
As many as 21,000 are reported to have died during construction on various sections of NEOM, although Saudi authorities have disputed this figure.
One former employee has shared their story of working at the gigaproject with The Sun, shedding light on the atrocities taking place behind NEOM's doors.
Rights organisations have long blasted the Saudi regime's record on workers' welfare, with a recent Human Rights Watch report detailing the "gruesome yet avoidable" deaths faced by many migrant workers.
The advocacy group mentions that some workers die falling from buildings, by electrocution, and even decapitation.
Human Rights Watch researcher Joey Shea told the Sun: "Unfortunately migrant workers in Saudi Arabia continue to face widespread abuses, some of which may amount to situations of forced labour, including at high profile gigaprojects.
"On NEOM, Human Rights Watch has found that ambitious targets set by Saudi authorities have tight and unrealistic deadlines which can lead employers to demand that workers continue to work under dangerous conditions.
"Migrant workers in Saudi Arabia experience illegal and exorbitant Recruitment Fees, limits to job mobility, obstacles exiting the country, as well as serious health and safety risks."
Michael, whose name has been changed to protect his identity, told The Sun that the project is unlikely to be anywhere near complete before 2055.
Talking about delays, Michael said: "From the very beginning, NEOM had a very long timeline.
"There were certain objectives they wanted to achieve by 2030, but most of the leadership were aware of a longer timeframe."
Michael said NEOM's management has "overspent quite a bit" since its announcement.
He says: "They were focusing on way too many things at the same time.
"They just wanted everything at the highest level possible. The biggest entertainment complex in the world. The biggest media studio in the region.
"No matter how much money you throw at the thing, it takes more than just money to make it work."
The much hyped project, aided by an aggressive social media marketing campaign, has sought to big up NEOM as a vision of futuristic city living.
Sci-fi ideas from levitating trains to an artificial moon are reported to have been among the features of the project.
But NEOM continues to fall chronically behind schedule, with many of its most ambitious projects still looking like a distant dream.
Speaking exclusively to The Sun, the former employee described the work culture at NEOM.
10
NEOM continues to fall chronically behind schedule
Credit: NEOM
10
Sci-fi ideas from levitating trains to an artificial moon are reported to have been among the features of the project
Credit: Rise
10
Many experts have questioned the viability of the proposals
Credit: @neom / instagram
He said: "When I started doing the project, I talked to some people and said that it's absolutely crazy.
"Then my Saudi friend told me that in this region, things tend to not be the way they seem. In reality, you never know what's going on in the highest echelons of power."
NEOM brands itself as the "future of urban living", aimed at providing sustainable living with 100% renewable energy.
One of the flagship proposals in the project is The Line - a single-building high-tech "city" that would house nine million people in just 34 square kilometres.
Located deep in the desert, NEOM's construction has also seen horrifying reports of forced displacement of tribal villagers from to make way for construction.
Those who resisted suffered a brutal crackdown, which has drawn furious condemnation from human rights groups.
A report into the matter by Saudi human rights group ALQST reads: "The NEOM project, which has been mired in secrecy from the start and marked by serious rights violations, shows the extent to which the Saudi authorities are prepared to proceed with planned projects at the expense of local inhabitants."
Julia Legner, executive director at ALQST for human rights, told The Sun: "While the project faces reported delays and downsizing, the human rights concerns remain as pressing as ever.
"These include widespread labour rights abuses and uninvestigated worker deaths, and the continued imprisonment of dozens of local inhabitants who peacefully opposed their forced displacement.
"At this critical juncture, companies involved—or considering involvement—must carefully assess the situation and take appropriate action to avoid complicity in these ongoing abuses."
Many experts have questioned the viability of the proposals, and Michael is sceptical they will ever be realised.
"Maybe the idea of The Line and robot cops is a very expensive marketing ploy. But it's worked," he said.
"So what if it's going to be scaled back? They've achieved their objective. It's put Saudi Arabia on the map.
"Even if NEOM just becomes a small tourist resort with some hotel and villas, that would already be seen as a massive success."
Saudi Arabia has invested vast sums in prestige building projects across the country over the past decade.
This isn't just limited to NEOM, with plans to build the world's tallest building in Jeddah and numerous stadiums for the 2034 FIFA World Cup also well underway.
Top 5 blunders plaguing NEOM project
BY Juliana Cruz Lima, Foreign News Reporter
Saudi Arabia's NEOM project, despite its ambitious vision, has been criticized for several major blunders that have raised concerns about its feasibility, ethics, and overall execution.
Here are the top five major blunders associated with the project:
Forced Displacement of Indigenous Communities: One of the most significant controversies surrounding NEOM is the forced displacement of the Huwaitat tribe.
This indigenous community, which has lived in the area for centuries, was forcibly removed from their ancestral lands to make way for the development of the mega-city.
The Saudi government's crackdown on those who resisted, including the killing of a tribal leader, Abdul Rahim al-Howeiti, has drawn widespread condemnation from human rights organisations.
This blunder not only sparked international outrage but also tainted NEOM's image as a forward-thinking, humane project.
Environmental Impact and Sustainability Concerns: NEOM has been marketed as an environmentally sustainable city, but the environmental impact of such a massive development is a major concern.
The project's scale—covering over 26,500 square kilometers—poses significant risks to local ecosystems, particularly in the Red Sea, which is home to rich marine biodiversity.
Critics argue that the construction of artificial islands and extensive urbanisation could lead to irreversible ecological damage.
The enormous water and energy demands required to maintain a green city in the desert also raise questions about the project's sustainability.
Economic Viability and Cost Overruns: NEOM is one of the most expensive development projects in history.
But there are serious doubts about its economic viability. Critics question whether the project can attract the necessary foreign investment and whether it will generate sufficient returns to justify the enormous expenditure.
The economic risks are further compounded by potential cost overruns and delays, which are common in megaprojects of this scale.
This financial gamble has led some to worry that NEOM could become a costly white elephant if it fails to meet its ambitious goals.
Technological Overreach and Ethical Concerns: NEOM is envisioned as a high-tech city, heavily reliant on artificial intelligence, robotics, and extensive surveillance systems.
While this technological ambition is central to NEOM's identity, it also raises significant ethical concerns. The level of surveillance planned for the city could lead to unprecedented control over residents' lives, sparking fears about privacy and civil liberties.
The lack of transparency about how AI will be used, coupled with concerns about job displacement, has also led to criticism that NEOM's technological vision may be more dystopian than utopian.
Cultural and Social Disconnect: NEOM's vision of a futuristic, liberalized society clashes sharply with Saudi Arabia's deeply conservative cultural norms.
The project plans to introduce mixed-gender sports, entertainment events, and other liberal lifestyle elements that are rare in the kingdom.
This cultural shift has raised concerns about a potential clash between NEOM's globalised vision and the traditional values of Saudi society.
The disconnect between the project's ambitions and the broader cultural context has led to skepticism about whether NEOM can truly integrate into Saudi Arabia's social fabric without causing significant friction.
But widespread problems with workers' rights have been reported across these projects, with Human Rights Watch blasting a "blatant failure to protect migrant workers" in the country.
"These abuses are enabled by Saudi Arabia's kafala, or labour sponsorship, system that ties the legal status of migrant workers to their respective sponsors," the group says.
An Amnesty International spokesperson told The Sun: 'With projects like NEOM Saudi Arabia is trying to present a glitzy, futuristic vision of the country, but this should not come at the expense of human rights.
'Governments supporting investment in the project have a clear obligation to ensure they are not contributing to human rights violations and all investors, and companies involved in NEOM have a responsibility to carry out necessary due diligence checks to identify, prevent and address human rights abuses.
"No vision of the future can justify trampling on human rights today.'
But Michael believes the country is ultimately "heading in the right direction", noting the lifting of a ban on women driving and reduction in policing of religion.
"NEOM is an incredibly interesting business story. It's a big story in how big projects sometimes fail," Michael said.
The Saudi embassy in London and NEOM were contacted for comment.
10
Widespread problems with workers' rights have been reported across these projects
Credit: NEOM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Chancellor Rachel Reeves reveals £39bn plan to build affordable homes across the UK in spending review
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A HUGE boost for building more home was announced in today's spending review by Rachel Reeves. The Chancellor today unveiled a £39billion 10-year plan to build more social and affordable housing across the UK, alongside a new rent policy for social housing starting in 2026. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Rachel Reeves has announced £39billion in funding Credit: Alamy The multi-billion pound investment will be distributed among local authorities, private developers, and housing associations to help deliver 1.5million new homes and address the housing crisis. This funding is a major increase compared to the previous affordable housing programme, which allocated £11.5billion over five years (2021–2026), or £2.3billion annually. By the end of this Parliament, the government plans to almost double yearly spending on affordable housing to £4 billion by 2029/30. The £113billion increase in capital spending announced today will be funded through extra borrowing, made possible by changes to fiscal rules earlier this year. Read more on Money OUT OF CREDIT We sat wrapped in blankets and drained our savings after winter fuel axe Reeves told MPs: "I am proud to announce the biggest cash injection into social and affordable housing in 50 years. "A new Affordable Homes Programme – in which I am investing £39bn over the next decade. "Direct government funding that will support housebuilding… …especially for social rent." A government source added: "We're turning the tide against the unacceptable housing crisis in this country with the biggest boost to social and affordable housing investment in a generation, delivering on our commitment to get Britain building." What's happening to social rents? The government is also introducing a ten-year plan for social housing rents starting in 2026. This policy will allow housing providers to raise rents by inflation plus 1% (CPI+1%) each year, helping them secure funding to invest in building new homes and maintaining existing ones. At the same time, a consultation will soon be launched to explore how to make rent levels fairer across social housing. This plan aims to balance investment in housing with protecting social housing tenants from excessive rent increases. The previous Conservative governments made similar promises of long-term rent hike formulas in the early 2010s but often failed to follow through. For example, David Cameron's coalition set a 10-year rent settlement in 2012 based on the retail price index plus 0.5%. However, then-Chancellor George Osborne later imposed four years of below-inflation increases to reduce housing benefit costs. More recently, Johnson's government announced a five-year settlement of CPI plus 1% in 2020 but had to cap rent increases at 7% due to a surge in inflation. Most social housing tenants receive full housing benefits from the government, meaning taxpayers often fund any social rent increases. However, around 30% of social tenants pay full rent and will be hit by future increases in full because they're not eligible for support. There are around four million households currently living in rented social housing. That means 1.2million households will face future bill hikes with the new 10-year formula. However, the exact amount your rent will increase will depend on where you live and how big your property is. Help available for social renters IF you rent from the council or a housing association, you can get help if you're having problems affording your rent. If you miss a rent payment, you'll fall into 'arrears' and owe your council or housing associations. Fail to pay back what you owe and you could be evicted. If you can't afford your next rent payment, you should talk to your landlord as soon as possible. Call them and explain why you're struggling. Your landlord may be able to grant a temporary payment holiday or signpost you to other forms of help. It's worth asking if you can get a discretionary housing payment. This provides extra money from your local council to help pay your rent - you don't need to pay it back. It's always worth checking if you're getting any benefit payments you're entitled to. You can use several free calculators, such as Citizen's Advice, MoneySavingExpert, StepChange, and Turn2Us, to help you get an estimate. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Bargain hunters flock to Dunelm for huge 50% off garden furniture sale – it'll revamp your outdoors in time for summer
Scroll to see how much you can save LOOK AT THAT LOOK AT THAT Bargain hunters flock to Dunelm for huge 50% off garden furniture sale – it'll revamp your outdoors in time for summer Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SHOPPERS are rushing to Dunelm to kit out their garden at bargain prices. The retailer has slashed up to 50% off the price of outdoor furniture. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 The Dunelm sale includes this fire pit Credit: Facebook 3 This colourful egg chair is in the sale Credit: Facebook 3 Shopper post their finds online Credit: Facebook Egg chairs, parasols, patio sets, and fire pits are among the items that have been discounted. The Santorini egg chair is down from £249 to £124.50, while a black round fire pit is £48.30, down from £69. Softer outdoor furnishing such as cushions and rugs have also gone into the sale. Shoppers shared their haul online in the Facebook shopping group Extreme Couponing and Bargains UK. One wrote: "Dunelm have got a 6 piece outdoor dining set reduced. [sic] "Table, 4 chairs and a parasol reduced from £139 to £97.30." A pizza oven down from £89 to £62.30 was also posted. You should act quick if you have your eye on something particular, as one it's sold out there is unlikely to be further stock coming in. You can find your nearest Dunelm on the website or standard delivery is £3.95, or free when you spend over £49. Dunelm regularly launches sales so it's worth holding out if you are looking for some home decor upgrades. Dunelm shoppers are scrambling to their local store and their 'massive sale' kicks off with posh glasses for 89p and £8 gadgets to keep the Spring chill out For example, earlier this year a Medium Round Chunky Chenille Storage Pouffe scanned for just £8.75 - down from £120. And a stylish table lamp went from £69 to just £6.90. Compare prices to get the best shopping deals It's always worth comparing prices before buying an item to see if you can get it cheaper elsewhere. Comparison sites such as PriceRunner can help you find the best value. Google Shopping is another tool that lets users search for and compare prices for products across the web. Simply type in keywords, or a product number, to bring up search results. Idealo is another option to compare prices between retailers.


Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
We sat wrapped in blankets and drained our savings last year – the Winter Fuel Payment u-turn took too long
The U-turn means support is back for those earning £35,000 or less – but for readers like Jim, it's too late OUT OF CREDIT We sat wrapped in blankets and drained our savings last year – the Winter Fuel Payment u-turn took too long Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) LAST winter Jim Whitehouse, 66, and his wife sat shivering on their sofa wrapped in blankets rationing their energy. They drained some of their small £5,000 savings pot to help pay their gas and electricity, after Rachel Reeves announced Winter Fuel Payment would be axed for 10million pensioners unless they claimed Pension Credit. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Jim, a retired landscape gardener, was one of the thousands of pensioners who called our Winter Fuel SOS helpline last year Now, a year later the government has confirmed a massive u-turn - it WILL pay the benefit to anyone earning £35,000 or less without having to claim pension credit. For Jim, who lives in a small cottage in Shopshire, with his wife, 59, who is unable to work due to health reasons, it's welcome news - but it's taken too long. "For many £200 doesn't seem like much, but for us it's the difference between a slightly warmer winter and a downright miserable one," Jim said. He added: "That unnecessary stress put a massive strain on my health and left us either draining our savings to stay warm or sitting on the sofa wrapped in blankets to get through the cold." "It means we won't have to choose between heating and putting food on the table." "It's common sense, isn't it? People who've worked hard all their lives shouldn't be left to freeze. "I'm glad someone's finally seen sense, even if it took them long enough." Jim, a retired landscape gardener, was one of the thousands of pensioners who called our Winter Fuel SOS helpline last year, as we helped provide support for readers who were worried about their energy bills. The couple receive an £800 monthly state pension, which meant they were just over the threshold for support last year, missing out the payment. Jim said: "We drove 40 miles to apply for Universal Credit together, only to be told £800 a month is enough for us to live on… It was baffling." Keir Starmer confirms huge winter fuel payment U-turn Jim, who suffers from a chronic heart condition and has had three stents fitted, called the eligibility process "shambolic" and said the stress of it all took a toll on his health. The £200 extra this winter will allow him to buy logs to heat his small cottage for eight weeks during the cold winter months. Today, Rachel Reeves will reiterate an embarrassing U-turn on her harsh Winter Fuel cuts as part of her spending review. The reversal, costing £1.25 billion, was first revealed on Monday. Under the new rules, all pensioners earning £35,000 or less will now qualify for this year's Winter Fuel Payment. "I sat in the cold last winter after losing the winter fuel payment" LAST winter Richard Barton, 70, says he 'literally sat in the cold' after he lost the £300 Winter Fuel Payment. The retired electrical engineer from Fareham, Hampshire, has just £200 a month after paying his bills as his state pension doesn't stretch far enough. He still wasn't eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment after it was axed for 10million last year. To cope with the cold last winter, Richard relied on a fan heater, a thermal blanket, and a hat, confessing that he "literally sat in the cold." "I only have enough to survive on and I have to rely on savings for bills - this is no way to live your life at my age," he said. And while he will now get the payment, the lifelong Labour supporter said: "Labour's cuts have quite literally left me out in the cold." They might have reversed the changes for some of us now, but they've lost my vote for good." Another couple hit by the payment cull were Norah, 85, and Michael, 81, who after decades of hard work and paying into the system they were forced to endure a freezing winter. The couple contacted The Sun's Winter Fuel Payment SOS helpline last year. Michael, a retired foundry engineer who worked until he was 75, and Norah, a former auxiliary nurse and carer, are still struggling with bills. They have just £300 a month after bills and Michael, who is battling cancer, faces frequent hospital visits for scans, radiation, and chemotherapy, which have added significantly to their monthly outgoings. Despite owning their home outright and having no debts, the couple have no savings to fall back on. "We were cold all winter," Norah admitted, explaining how they huddle under blankets to avoid turning on the heating - a situation that worsens her COPD and is far from ideal for her husband's fragile health. "What upsets us is we've never, ever put in for anything," she said. "We're not asking for much - we've paid into the system for decades."