The Brief – $750bn for US fuel… Weren't we meant to be buying less of this stuff?
Listen to her energy commissioner Dan Jørgensen: 'We have said that we want to move away from oil, gas and coal, so we should maintain our focus on doing so instead of paying more for things that we say we don't want.'
But that was in June, and a month is a long time in politics – let alone in the topsy-turvy world of Trumpian trade policy.
In fact, we haven't merely 'said' we don't want more fossil fuels: it is implicitly codified in the European Climate Law, which requires net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Legislators are now negotiating a bill that would oblige them to get 90% of the way there by 2040.
Maintaining current levels of fossil fuel use is not an option, even in the relatively short term, unless the EU plans to follow Trump out of the Paris Agreement.
But what if – as officials claim – US oil and gas will merely replace imports from Russia? Even for that to happen, the EU may have to tear up – or at least neuter through small print – its Methane Regulation.
From 2027 (coincidentally the deadline the Commission has proposed for Europe to stop indirectly funding the Kremlin's war machine), this piece of climate legislation will block imports from suppliers who do not apply the same strict monitoring and leakage controls as European producers.
So far the Commission has said it is not planning to review the regulation – but the US is already applying pressure, and several EU governments are already on board. How much? Far be it from Euractiv to suggest that the US president plucked the figure of $750 billion – to be delivered during the remainder of his tenure at the White House – out of thin air.
But if there was any rigorous analysis behind it – more rigorous, say, than the back-of-a-beer-mat job behind the 'reciprocal' import tariffs he unveiled on 'Liberation Day' – it remains for now obscure.
Or does it? Actually, Trump himself pointed out during the press conference at his Turnberry golf resort that the annual trade deficit with the US is $235.6 billion – round that up to a cool two-fifty, triple it, and see what you get…
The US exported a world-beating 123 billion cubic metres of LNG last year, and Europe bought the lion's share of it. But even if we'd bought the lot, it would only have cost around $50 billion.
Good news, if the aim is to replace Russian LNG imports with what von der Leyen called 'more affordable and better LNG' from America. But the rest of the money?
Analysts have had a field day showering ridicule (see here or here) on a headline number that implies the EU would also buy well over half of its coal and oil from the US – whose energy firms, one assumes, do not have a Europe-sized stockpile they've been trying in vain to shift until last weekend.
Adding to the the drip-feed of information since von der Leyen's pilgrimage to Trump's golfers' paradise, a commission spokesperson said today that the headline figure would also nuclear technology, not just fuel – which is unlikely to go down well in Paris.
European Commission officials are 'confident that these numbers are not unrealistic' – and we've got US trade tariffs down from 1% to 15%, so who are we to quibble? Roundup Gaza stirs Europe's conscience – Amid a relentless barrage of reports of a rising death toll in Gaza and shocking photographs of starving Palestinians – including many children – politicians across Europe have come under intense pressure to act.
Burying the bad news – Cuts to farmer subsidies are larger than the Commission had let on. But the unpalatable news is hidden by inflation and ambiguity surrounding the budget's new structure.
SAFE deadline tonight – Nine countries have formally expressed interest in borrowing from the EU's €150 billion SAFE military procurement programme ahead of Tuesday night's soft deadline to send proposals to Brussels. Across Europe Corruption probe hits former Spanish finance minister – Spain's former Finance Minister Cristóbal Montoro allegedly received €673,000 in kickbacks from gas industry lobbyists during his time in office, according to a police report seen by Spanish media on Tuesday.
Bringing Belgium on board – Spanish defence firm Indra would welcome Belgium as a new partner in the joint European Future Combat Air System (FCAS) project, despite vocal public opposition from French aerospace contractor Dassault Aviation.
Netherlands bars hardline Israeli ministers – The Dutch government on Monday declared the Israeli finance and national security ministers persona non grata only days after a national security report raised concerns about Israeli attempts to influence political discourse in the Netherlands.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
EU environment Commissioner ready to do plastic pollution deal ‘but not at any cost'
The European Union is ready to do a deal to land a groundbreaking treaty on plastic pollution, but not at any cost, the EU's environment commissioner insisted Tuesday. With just over two days left to strike a global accord in talks at the UN in Geneva, Jessika Roswall said it was "time" to clinch a deal between oil-producing countries and more ambitious nations, including EU countries. Five previous rounds of talks over the past two and a half years have failed to seal an agreement, including a supposedly final round in South Korea late last year. The current talks in Geneva opened a week ago but are due to close on Thursday. "The EU is ready to do a deal but not at any cost," Roswall told reporters. "We do like plastic... and we will continue to need it. However, we don't like plastic pollution and it's time to end plastic pollution as quickly as possible," the commissioner said. She said any treaty should give businesses the certainty of a clear global framework in which to operate. Stalled Geneva talks threaten landmark plastic pollution treaty The first week of talks in Geneva fell behind schedule, producing no clear text as countries remained split on step one: the treaty's purpose and scope A cluster of mostly oil-producing states calling themselves the Like-Minded Group – including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia and Iran – want the treaty to focus primarily on waste management. The EU and others want to go much further by reining in plastic production – which on current trends is set to triple by 2060 – and by phasing out certain especially toxic chemicals. Drama in the pipeline Danish Environment Minister Magnus Heunicke admitted that the "wide gap" between the rival camps was making negotiations a challenge but said the work of tackling plastic pollution "will only get harder the longer we wait. So now's the time". "There's going to be a whole lot more drama in the days to come," he said, "but our goal is this drama should end up in a deal", he said, speaking alongside Roswall at the United Nations. He said all parties, including the EU, had to re-examine their red lines and see where they could tweak them in the interests of landing a deal by Thursday. "If we all stick to our red lines then a deal is impossible," he said. "So we have to look at those red lines and we have to negotiate and compromise -- because we will be worse off if we don't succeed in making a deal. "That's not me saying 'a deal at any price': Not at all. But a deal that is legally binding and has strong text and lays the ground for our work in the years ahead in order to tackle plastic pollution." (cp) Plastic promises: EU enters tough talks with petrostates over global treaty No result will be achieved without shifts in position from all sides, an EU official said
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
Commission updates guidance on anti-deforestation law
The European Commission on Tuesday clarified definitions and exemptions related to its anti-deforestation regulation, while maintaining the timeline for enforcement. Under the new anti-deforestation regulation (EUDR), certain products such as soy, cocoa, coffee, livestock, palm oil, timber, and rubber will be banned from entering the European Union – unless they are 'deforestation-free.' After pressure from EU countries and trade partners, the European Commission previously delayed the regulations to December. The updated guidance document follows the current timeline, with micro- and small companies needing to apply the rules as of 30 June 2026. It also clarifies key definitions such as 'negligible risk' – which means that there is solid proof that a product is compliant with the EUDR rules – and reiterates that converting forest to land for non-agricultural use is not considered deforestation under the regulation. Just last week, food importers were seeking clarity on the EUDR, amid speculation about the possibility of re-opening the file. In a June vote, the European Parliament backed the relaxation of the rules, and EU farming chief Christophe Hansen told Euractiv he would support this – especially for products made in the EU. However, Environment Commissioner Jessika Roswall has the final say and Hansen confirmed in July that no decision had been made on easing or delaying the regulation. Potential changes could be included in a simplification package aimed at farmers and foresters due this autumn. Environmental groups hope that this won't happen. 'The update of the guidance is a positive sign that the Commission is still working on supporting the implementation of the EUDR. We hope it means that credibility and legal certainty will prevail over attempts to reopen the EUDR, and that it won't be included in a [simplification] omnibus of any sort,' the NGO Rainforest Alliance told Euractiv. Farming ministers resume push to delay EU deforestation rules Following pressure from EU capitals, the European Commission previously delayed the entry into force of the EU's anti-deforestation regulation (EUDR) to December 2025. But agriculture ministers are now calling for further simplifications. (vib)
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
Europe's game developers took a hit in 2023 – and the pain's not over
Europe's video game developers saw revenues fall in 2023 for the first time, even as the broader European gaming market continued to grow, according to a report published by their trade association on Tuesday. Worth more than €100 billion globally each year, the industry's European market, which includes overseas companies active in the region, grew to €25.7 billion in 2023. But revenue from Europe's own developers fell from €18.9 billion to €18.7 billion, with the report from the European Games Developer Federation (EGDF) citing layoffs and studio closures. The Europe-wide figures were delayed because they rely on slower national-level data, and development hotspots France and Poland are still missing. EGDF Managing Director Jari-Pekka Kaleva said gaps in some national associations' work are hampering collection, and called for more public investment to avoid flying blind on video game policy in Europe. Despite the downturn, developer employment increased from 90,000 in 2022 to 91,000 to 2023. But Kaleva said he is not optimistic about a rebound. Germany's games industry association recently reported a drop in the number of game companies in 2025, following what its managing director, Felix Falk, called 'another very difficult' year. He blamed the former government's U-turns in funding policy, despite the country's gaming market growing. The EGDF report also highlights the fragmented nature of state support for game developers, with countries such as France and Belgium offering extensive funding schemes, while others provide little or none. Kaleva also raised concerns over incoming EU consumer protection rules, though he welcomed the European Commission's approach to the planned Digital Fairness Act. Gamers have coordinated their responses to the Act's public consultation process to press for tougher regulation, including measures to prevent developers from shutting down games. A recent technical glitch revealed that the Commission is preparing a dedicated communication on the video game sector. (de)
