Australia strategic reserve to counter China's mineral monopolies
Many of these minerals lie under Australian soil. Australia is able to produce 9 out of 10 mineral elements required to produce lithium-ion batteries, such as lithium, nickel and cobalt. It also has the highest total reserves of battery minerals.
But at a time of major geopolitical upheaval, critical minerals are also contested. China controls many critical mineral supply chains, allowing it to dominate clean energy technologies. The ongoing United States–China trade war has intensified competition for access to critical minerals.
It's against this backdrop that Labor has proposed a A$1.2 billion (US$765.7 million) strategic reserve of critical minerals. It's a timely and welcome step in the right direction.
Critical minerals are vital to the industries of the future. But supply can be hard to secure and disruptions can be devastating.
After US President Donald Trump jacked up tariffs on China, Beijing responded by clamping down on critical mineral exports. Almost 80% of US weaponry depends on Chinese critical minerals.
China now dominates mining and refining of many critical minerals. Beijing controls 90% of the world's rare earth refining, 80% of lithium refining and 68% of nickel refining. The US and other nations are belatedly trying to catch up.
Mining has long been a major Australian industry, particularly iron ore and coal. But Australia has huge reserves of many critical minerals, producing the largest volume of lithium ore in the world as well as stocks of cobalt, manganese, rutile and others. Australian miners Lynas and Australian Strategic Materials are two of the few rare-earth mining companies not owned by China.
That's where this strategic reserve comes in. If it comes to fruition, the federal government would buy agreed volumes of critical minerals from commercial projects or establish an option to purchase them at a given price. It would then keep stockpiles of these key minerals to prevent market manipulation by China and stabilise prices by releasing or holding stocks strategically.
The reserve would give Canberra more leverage in negotiating with trading partners and enable a rapid response to supply disruptions. Government backing for the industry would boost onshore processing, scale up domestic production and encourage more high-wage, high-skill jobs in regional areas.
Which minerals will be stockpiled? That's yet to be determined. The list of 'critical minerals' can vary between countries, and a mineral critical to one nation may not be to another.
Australia lists 31 critical minerals while Japan lists 35, the US lists 50 and the European Union 34. Australia's list is unique in that it reflects global demand, not domestic dependency.
The minerals most commonly included in these lists include cobalt, gallium, indium, niobium, tantalum, platinum group minerals and rare earth elements.
In 2023, major miners produced close to a billion tonnes of iron ore in Western Australia.
By contrast, critical mineral volumes are small. For instance, only 610 tonnes of gallium were mined in 2023. Major miners such as Rio Tinto, BHP and Vale don't tend to bother.
Critical mineral markets are often opaque and highly concentrated. The barrier to entry is high. Globally, the market for the 31 critical minerals on Australia's list is valued at around A$344 billion (US$219.5 billion) – about the size of the global aluminum market.
That leaves it to mid-tier and small miners to bridge the gap between rapidly growing demand and supply. The problem is, raising capital is often very difficult. The price of critical minerals can fluctuate wildly. The price of lithium and nickel have fallen sharply over the last two years due to market oversupply.
The strategic reserve would make it easier for these miners by providing access to capital through loans from Export Finance Australia and private investors, reducing financial uncertainty and cost overruns and acting as a buffer against market volatility.
For instance, mid-tier miner Illuka Resources is building Australia's first rare earths refinery in Western Australia. The project already has significant government support, but it is likely to need more.
Despite Australia's significant mineral resources, it faces an uphill battle to gain market share. China's dominance has been driven by low production costs; low environmental, social, and governance standards; and a competitive labour market.
But intensifying geopolitical competition between China and the US means Australian minerals would likely be sought by the US.
In volatile market conditions, cheaper operations have a significant advantage, while new mines face an uphill battle.
Australia's critical minerals hub framework could help offset capital costs. Smaller miners could form cooperatives to share infrastructure and manage logistics, processing and access to international markets. Sharing infrastructure such as roads, rail, energy and ports would reduce the investment risk.
There are other challenges to overcome, such as the long lead times of 10 years or more to go from discovery to production, limited access to low-cost renewable energy and a shortage of technical and scientific capabilities.
Labor's strategic reserve would help. But it won't be enough to make Australia into a critical mineral giant. The government should consider: building more regional processing hubs with shared infrastructure and microgrids
offering royalty exemptions, tax incentives and energy subsidies early on
giving incentives to retrofit facilities to produce critical minerals found alongside main ores, such as cobalt found alongside copper and antimony with gold
encouraging models where rare earths are concentrated in Australia and processed overseas in partner countries
establishing Centers of Excellence on critical minerals and creating shared libraries of intellectual property to support research, avoid duplication and optimize resource allocation.
Overall, the proposed reserve is an excellent idea. Government intervention will be necessary to absorb and mitigate risks from price fluctuations and geopolitical shocks.
Mohan Yellishetty, Professor, Co-Founder, Critical Minerals Consortium, and Australia-India Critical Minerals Research Hub, Monash University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US underestimating China's AI progress, OpenAI's Sam Altman says
'I'm worried about China,' the 40-year-old Altman was quoted as saying on Monday in a report by American business news channel CNBC. He indicated that the AI arms race between the US and China was more complex than it appeared. 'There's inference capacity, where China probably can build faster,' he said. 'There's research, there's product; a lot of layers to the whole thing. I don't think it'll be as simple as: is the US or China ahead?' His assessment marks the latest sign that Chinese AI companies have been narrowing the gap with their US peers by using an open-source approach, making the source code of AI models available for third-party developers to use, modify and distribute. Open-source models from Chinese start-ups like DeepSeek and MoonshotAI , along with those from mainland Big Tech firms led by Alibaba Group Holding , have seen increased adoption across the industry on the back of their low-cost appeal and innovative features. Alibaba owns the South China Morning Post.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's trade war could push Asia to pivot more towards home
Export-oriented countries in Asia are about to bear the brunt of the US trade war . Early August tariffs are starting to rack up costs for importers and consumers, along with disrupted trade flows, rising prices for goods and ultimately falling demand. Amid this pain lies an opportunity to pivot towards a consumer-led economy. Countries in Asia that rely too heavily on US markets can create a path towards more sustainable growth and insulate their economies against the vicissitudes of capricious US policies Trump's new tariff regime, one not seen in nearly a century, is now taxing most of the goods coming into the United States. Consumers and importers are taking notice as core inflation and producer prices are rising . There was a temporary import surge to get ahead of the new tax regime. Once that initial flush of economic activity fades, the deep ruts of a slowdown will become readily apparent. For many countries in the region, China's recent struggle with growth adds to the trade uncertainty. China's domestic market was sizing up to be a growth engine on a par with, and possibly exceeding, the US with increasing trade flows. However, recent economic indicators, coupled with constraints on domestic demand, suggest China alone is unlikely to buoy the rest of the region in a broader slowdown in exports to the US. Amid all the uncertainty, many countries in Asia have an opportunity to reconsider their export-led economic policies of the past. Where political forces have favoured the status quo, a dramatic downturn in trade opens the door to alternative economic models. Countries including Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia, as well as advanced economies such as Japan and South Korea, can turn to their underdeveloped domestic markets as opportunities as the US sours. There is ample room for consumer-led growth . More than two-thirds of US gross domestic product value is attributable to domestic consumption. Household consumption in Asian countries accounts for roughly 48 per cent to 58 per cent of their GDP, according to World Bank data. China comes in at only 40 per cent. Every percentage point is billions of dollars in economic activity.
HKFP
2 hours ago
- HKFP
Australia probes Nauru-China business deal
Australia was Tuesday investigating whether Pacific microstate Nauru breached a security treaty by inking a lucrative business deal with a Chinese company. Nauru last week announced it had signed a US$650 million economic development agreement with the China Rural Revitilisation and Development Corporation. Australian Minister for Pacific Island Affairs Pat Conroy said officials were looking into whether that deal complied with a recent security pact between Canberra and Nauru. '(Australia) is engaging with the government of Nauru about whether it activates parts of our treaty,' Conroy told reporters. 'That is a really important treaty for us — that helps position us as a security partner of choice with Nauru.' Australia and Nauru announced a landmark security treaty in December last year, advancing Canberra's aim of blunting China's growing regional influence. Under the deal, Nauru must seek Australia's agreement before it signs any bilateral accords on maritime security, defence and policing. Nauru also agreed to consult Australia if other parties look to strike agreements granting them access to critical infrastructure such as ports and airfields or its banking sector. In return, Nauru receives tens of millions of dollars to prop up its government budget and bolster its stretched police force. Nauru last year surprised many Pacific watchers when it abruptly severed diplomatic links with Taiwan in favour of Beijing. Nauru's Foreign Affairs Minister Lionel Aingimea travelled to Beijing to sign the business deal last week. The China Rural Revitilisation and Development Corporation agreed to invest in key sectors such as agriculture and fisheries, according to a Nauru government release. Nauru, population 12,500, is one of the world's smallest countries with a mainland measuring just 20 square kilometres (7.7 square miles). It is considered especially vulnerable to climate change.
