Immigration crackdown impacts Myrtle Beach tourism industry
Based in Myrtle Beach, A&B Immigration Services assists immigrants on their paths to citizenship, and helps local companies hire seasonal employees during peak tourist season. Most companies A&B works with hire cleaning staff for hotels and restaurants.
The owner of A&B, who chose to remain anonymous, told News13 there is not only an uptick in deportations, but also in visa denials.
'The small businesses, like the staffing companies and cleaning companies, they have suffered significant loss. Owners are even closing up their businesses and are looking for employment themselves, because they depend on the international workers during the peak seasons,' she said. 'We noticed this year that a lot of the individuals, whether they're J-1 and H-2b workers that are applying for the work visas overseas, that at the US embassies, there's an uptick in denials.'
She emphasized that A&B encourages taking a legal path to citizenship, and claims the immigration crackdown has put up more barriers for legal immigration.
'We dealt with having workers come to the United States legally and going home, and [the immigration crackdown] has an effect on it. [In] a lot of immigration situations, you're talking about undocumented, but it's not only undocumented, it's immigration as a whole,' she said. 'People who are trying to get here legally, they're unable to because of the climate.'
The owner of A&B Immigration said because some hotels are struggling to hire cleaning staff, it's become difficult for them to accommodate the number of people booking rooms. A News13 reporter spoke with a hotel manager on Ocean Boulevard, who said there is an 'everything shortage' in the hospitality industry.
* * *
Shelby Martin is a multimedia journalist who joined the News13 team in May 2025. Shelby is from Orange County, California, and graduated in 2023 from California State University, Fullerton. You can read more of her work here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
38 minutes ago
- The Hill
Local school funding shouldn't have to pass Washington's political tests
Education in the U.S. has always been primarily a state and local responsibility. The U.S. Constitution leaves education to the states, which is why decisions about funding, curriculum, governance, licensure and standards have always been made primarily at the state and local levels. The federal role in education has historically been limited to targeted support, particularly for disadvantaged students, students with disabilities, English learners, and teacher development. Various federal programs exist to provide additional capacity to schools that need it most. These aren't mechanisms of control, but levers of support. Yet, recent actions by the current administration have exposed something far more troubling than the myth of federal dominance: the increasing politicization of even the federal government's limited role in education. On July 1, roughly $6.8 billion in K-12 funds — primarily Title II-A (professional development), Title III (English-language learner programs) and Title IV (student support and enrichment services) — were frozen. The administration's stated reason for the freeze? A review to determine whether any of the funds had previously supported what they called radical ' left-wing ' or woke agendas. In other words, essential programs that provide professional learning for teachers, academic support for English learners and enrichment opportunities for students were halted — not because of financial mismanagement or program failure, but because of ideological suspicion. The funds were only partially released weeks later, and then ultimately restored after a public backlash. But this set a dangerous precedent that federal education funds can be weaponized to enforce political litmus tests. On the one hand, critics argue the federal government has too much influence in schools and should pull back. On the other, those same critics used the limited leverage it does have — namely funding — as a partisan cudgel. The message isn't really about local control. It's about controlling the narrative. The fear isn't just that support will be withdrawn, but that programs serving vulnerable students and supporting educators will become unstable and unreliable, depending on who is in power and what political winds are blowing. For some districts — especially in rural or under-resourced areas — federal funding for professional development is the only consistent stream of support for teacher training and leadership development. Without those dollars, districts cancel training sessions, delay school improvement initiatives and scale back on instructional coaching. These investments, drawn from the small share of federal funding schools receive, don't promote partisanship, they promote professional excellence. Similarly, funds for multilingual learners, academic enrichment and mental health services are vital to student success. Freezing these programs over political talking points doesn't protect students, it harms them. The outcome isn't ideological clarity, it's teacher and school administrator burnout, stalled progress and disrupted learning. The myth of overwhelming federal control obscures the real issue: a lack of stable, coordinated and protected systems to support the people doing the hard work of educating children. Instead of building resilience and coherence into our educational infrastructure, we're increasingly allowing national support to be swayed by partisan distrust. What makes this moment especially unsettling is that the recent freeze on federal funds wasn't a failure of law, it was a breach of trust. No one ever expected that professional development for teachers and school leaders, expanded mental health supports, or academic assistance for English learners would become the target of ideological review. That's not because rules prevented it, but because, historically, leaders of both parties understood that some areas of education should remain above the political fray. The contradiction is especially stark when those calling to eliminate the Department of Education in the name of 'local control' are the same ones now using federal dollars as political weapons. We need stronger protections against political interference in educational support. That could include bipartisan guardrails requiring congressional notification or bipartisan sign-off before any mid-year freeze of formula or entitlement programs, as well as state-level contingency funds to maintain continuity during funding disruptions. Program audits should be led by professional educators, not political appointees, and spending reviews should focus on purpose and outcomes, not ideology. In my work with school districts across the country, I've seen firsthand how fragile these systems are, and how powerful they can be when funded and prioritized. If we truly want schools to succeed, we must treat educator support — and equitable, adequate funding of education — as a shared national investment, not a partisan battleground. States already control most aspects of education. Federal involvement has always been limited and mostly financial, making up only a small percentage of total school funding — but that small share has become essential for many districts to survive. What's missing is the will to consistently and equitably invest in the people who make schools work. Rather than railing against a phantom threat of federal overreach, the conversation should shift to what really matters: ensuring stable, equitable and consistent investment in public education, free from ideological interference. It's not about who controls education. It's about who's actually supporting it. Chad McLeod is the founder of Sociis Education, an organization that partners with schools and districts to strengthen professional development and leadership capacity for educators.
Business Wire
38 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Lanier Law Firm Representing Health Choice Alliance in Litigation Alleging Eli Lilly Offered Kickbacks to Texas Health Care Providers
MARSHALL, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit in state court against Eli Lilly and Co., accusing the pharmaceutical giant of bribing and inducing medical providers to prescribe its most profitable drugs. In return, physicians were offered unlawful payments and a range of free services in violation of state law. 'This scheme corrupted medical decision-making by giving doctors quid pro quo services obviously intended to influence prescribing,' says Mark Lanier of The Lanier Law Firm. Texas is intervening in the litigation as a plaintiff with the Health Choice Alliance, a research organization jointly represented by The Lanier Law Firm and McKool Smith PC. The lawsuit, filed in Harrison County, accuses Eli Lilly of offering the kickbacks to steer providers to write prescriptions for as many as 14 high-demand drugs such as the GLP-1 medications Mounjaro and Zepbound, resulting in millions of dollars in claims to the state's Medicaid program. Because those charges resulted from Eli Lilly's suspect marketing and service arrangements, the lawsuit claims the practice violated the Texas Health Care Program Fraud Prevention Act and Texas Anti-Kickback Statute. 'This scheme corrupted medical decision-making by giving doctors quid pro quo services obviously intended to influence prescribing,' says Mark Lanier of The Lanier Law Firm. 'As a result, Texas Medicaid became responsible for millions of dollars in improper payments. This case should serve as a warning to the other pharmaceutical giants that such unlawful activities will be investigated and prosecuted.' The lawsuit states that the company provided free nursing services to patients who were prescribed Eli Lilly drugs and offered a supposedly independent web-based service that was in fact managed by Eli Lilly to direct patients to the desired drugs. In addition, the kickbacks involved free services to physicians to obtain insurance authorizations and authorization from Texas Medicaid on behalf of patients, a time-consuming process with administrative costs that are not normally reimbursable to the provider. 'Big Pharma compromised medical decision-making by engaging in an illegal kickback scheme,' said Attorney General Paxton in announcing the lawsuit. 'Eli Lilly fraudulently sought to maximize profits at taxpayer expense and put corporate greed over people's health. I will not stand by while corporations unlawfully manipulate our healthcare system to line their own pockets.' The case is Texas vs. Eli Lilly & Co Inc., filed in the 71st District Court of Harrison County, Texas. About The Lanier Law Firm For more than 30 years, the men and women at The Lanier Law Firm have worked tirelessly, throughout the United States, to find unique and effective solutions for their clients. More than 50 skilled attorneys practice law in a broad array of areas, including business litigation, pharmaceutical litigation, asbestos exposure, oil and gas litigation, personal injury as well as defective and dangerous products, among others. Named an Elite Trial Law Firm by The National Law Journal, The Lanier Law Firm has offices in Houston, New York, and Los Angeles.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Circana's 2025/2026 Food and Beverage Outlook Predicts Slow Growth Amid Shifting Consumer Priorities
Chicago, Aug. 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Circana LLC today released new Circana Compass insights, providing a detailed review of 2025 global retail food and beverage (F&B) industry performance and a forward-looking outlook for 2026. 2025 Global Trends Confirm Projections Circana's 2024 projection anticipated U.S. F&B industry dollar sales growth between 2% and 4% for 2025, driven by price/mix increases of 1.5% to 3.5%, and volume growth ranging from 0% to 1%. Current estimates align closely, with anticipated dollar sales growth at 3.2%, price/mix at 3%, and volume gains at 0.2%, demonstrating Circana's accuracy of earlier forecasts and valuable guidance for industry stakeholders as they navigate the remainder of the year and plan for 2026. While rising prices of select commodities, such as cocoa and coffee, have pushed up retail F&B price growth in 2025, price growth in other F&B areas remains more moderate. Retail volumes continue to grow, albeit at a tighter rate than in 2024. The EMEA region is similarly trending in line with Circana's expectations: Expect 2025 full-year growth to reach +4% in value. F&B sales in this market are fueled by heightened demand for private-label brands, which now represent 41% of F&B sales despite fewer promotions. APAC market performance is also tracking in line with forecasts, showing +3.7% growth in value up to mid-year. Unit growth of +1.4% supports Circana's expectation that price stabilization would drive unit acceleration in 2025, reaching +1.6% by year end. Although consumer confidence momentum stalled slightly more than anticipated at the time of the forecast, core macroeconomic indicators — particularly in the Australian economy — are improving as anticipated. The second half of 2025 is expected to see a shift toward less trading down and more trading up, as household budgets benefit from the combined effects of stimulatory fiscal and monetary policies. 2026 U.S. Projections During the past five years, compounded inflation has driven a cumulative 34% rise in average retail F&B prices. Looking ahead, Circana forecasts U.S. F&B price/mix growth of 3% to 5% in 2026, shaped by ongoing cost pressures, competitive retail pricing, and strategic promotional activity. However, volume growth is expected to remain tight, estimated at -1% to 1%, as consumers adopt more value-driven and multifunctional eating habits. These dynamics suggest dollar sales growth will range from 3% to 5%, indicating continued sector resilience. 'We've observed slowing volume growth in the first half of 2025, with a modest increase of 0.4%,' said Sally Lyons Wyatt, global executive vice president and chief advisor for Circana. 'Consumers are prioritizing in-home food and beverage spending while redefining 'value' with an emphasis on convenience and functionality. With these evolving behaviors, the CPG industry must strategically identify ways to stimulate demand and remain profitable. Circana continues to provide the data-driven insights necessary to guide these decisions.' Key Factors Shaping the Industry Circana highlights three pivotal drivers for 2026 and beyond: value, health, and demographic shifts. Value remains increasingly personalized but consistently favors mass, club, and value retailers. E-commerce continues to grow, propelled by advancements from the largest retailers. Health-conscious behaviors also are reshaping the market. Consumers are prioritizing higher-protein diets, reducing alcohol and snack consumption, and seeking out products with premium, health-driven ingredients. Meanwhile, tighter budgets among low-income and Hispanic households, coupled with demographic changes like declining birth rates and slower immigration trends, are influencing broader category performance. About CircanaCircana is a leader in providing technology, AI, and data to fast-moving consumer packaged goods companies, durables manufacturers, and retailers seeking to optimize their businesses. Circana's predictive analytics and technology empower clients to measure their market share, understand the underlying consumer behavior driving it, and accelerate their growth. Circana's Liquid Data® technology platform is powered by an expansive, high-quality data set and intelligent algorithms trained on six decades of domain expertise. With Circana, clients can take immediate action to future-proof and evolve their growth strategies amid an increasingly complex, fast-paced, and ever-changing economy. Learn more at CONTACT: Shelley Hughes Circana +1 312-731-1782 nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
