Russia "Immediate" Danger, China "Sophisticated" Challenge: Key UK Report
London:
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government is set to publish the strategic defence review on Monday, which is expected to warn of challenges posed by Russia and China.
The review, a 10-year plan for military equipment and services, will warn of the "immediate and pressing" danger posed by Russia, according to a report by British newspaper The Guardian on Saturday.
The 130-page document, prepared by a team headed by former NATO secretary general George Robertson, will also describe China as a "sophisticated and persistent challenge", which at times has been willing to cooperate with Russia, and two smaller "regional disruptors" - Iran and North Korea, the report said.
Since the war broke out in Ukraine in 2022, Russia has signed key deals with several of the West's adversaries, China, Iran and North Korea.
The review, which was put together by Mr Robertson alongside Fiona Hill, a former US presidential advisor, and Richard Barrons, a former British commander, is also likely to question the size of the British army, which currently is around 1 lakh.
On Saturday, the European Union's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, also said that Europe saw the China-Russia threat as the world's "greatest challenge".
"When China and Russia speak of leading together changes not seen in a hundred years and of revisions of the global security order, we should all be extremely worried," Ms Kallas told an audience at the Shangri-La security conference in Singapore.
"If you are worried about China, you should be worried about Russia," she added.
Six New Weapons Factories In UK
The UK government on Saturday said it will build at least six new factories producing weapons and explosives as part of a major review of its defence capabilities.
The Ministry of Defence said that the Mr Starmer-led government will invest more than £1 billion in 'Digital Targeting Web' to "spearhead battlefield engagements, applying lessons learnt from Ukraine to the UK Armed Forces".
"The hard-fought lessons from Putin's illegal war in Ukraine leave us under no illusions that future conflicts will be won through forces that are better connected, better equipped and innovating faster than their adversaries," Defence Secretary John Healey said in a statement.
"We will give our Armed Forces the ability to act at speeds never seen before - connecting ships, aircraft, tanks and operators so they can share vital information instantly and strike further and faster," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gaurav visits Batadrava before taking charge as APCC chief
1 2 Guwahati: Newly appointed Assam PCC chief Gaurav Gogoi on Monday evening arrived in Guwahati to take charge of the post after being named as the successor of outgoing president Bhupen Kumar Borah. Earlier in the day, he went to the revered Batadrava Than in Nagaon before heading towards Guwahati to assume charge on Tuesday morning. Batadrava is the birthplace of the neo-Vaishnavite saint, scholar and social reformer, Srimanta Sankardeva. "In Batadrava Than, we remembered the message the harmony and unity propagated by Srimanta Sankardeva. We are resolved to march ahead in this path shown by him. Our efforts will be to take his ideology to the people in nooks and corners of Assam and India," Gogoi told the media outside the Than. Gogoi's journey from upper Assam to central Assam's Nagaon and then to Morigaon witnessed some undesirable scenes, with municipal administrations confiscating the banners and hoardings installed by Congress to welcome him, citing "unauthorised installation without permission". Gogoi will visit Kamakhya temple on Tuesday morning before assuming charge as the of the Assam PCC president at state Congress headquarters in Rajiv Bhawan. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like USDJPY đang đi lên không? IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Gogoi said he trusts Congress workers at the grassroots, even as Congress believes in collective leadership. Gogoi said Congress will take key decisions on important issues like alliance formation ahead of 2026 assembly election only after taking to Congress workers at the grassroots and senior party leaders into confidence. "Unless we strengthen our party we cannot be a good ally. To be a good and strong alliance partner, first one has to increase its strength. We also need to seek public opinion on issues they want the alliance to address," Gogoi said. He added that Congress will expose "corruption under the BJP-led govt".Nagaon Municipal Board (NMB) authority in Nagaon town and Guwahati Municipal Corporation removed banners and hoardings installed by Congress on Monday morning, while the Congress workers prepared to accord grand welcome to the new state PCC chief. The banners and hoarding were removed and taken away by enforcement wings of the municipal bodies for installing these "without prior permission". AICC recently named Gogoi Assam PCC chief which is significant as Assam is going to the assembly election early next year. His elevation to the top post in state PCC came at a time when Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma had been attacking him for last few weeks in connection with his British wife's alleged connection with ISI of Pakistan.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
India likely to seek removal of US steel tariffs in trade talks rather than immediate retaliation
New Delhi: India may not retaliate immediately against the US over its steep tariffs on steel and aluminium, and may instead seek their removal through the ongoing talks on a bilateral trade agreement (BTA), two people familiar with the matter said. Also Read | US meat, seafood to garnish India-US bilateral trade agreement India, in the first instance, will try to negotiate the issue between 5 June, when a US delegation is expected in New Delhi for talks on the trade agreement, and 8 June, the deadline for India to respond at the WTO. However, India will reserve its right to retaliate. A US notification to the World Trade Organization (WTO), circulated on 23 May, rejected India's claim that the tariffs were safeguard measures under WTO rules. The WTO allows countries to take 'safeguard' measures to protect domestic industries from a surge in imports. Also Read | Will a US-China trade agreement work? Don't count on it The BTA talks are in their final stage, with both sides showing flexibility and making positive progress. Against this backdrop, India is expected to use the trade negotiations to press for a rollback of the Section 232 duties as part of a broader package aimed at improving market access. Section 232 is a domestic US legal provision that allows the president to use tariffs on imports deemed to threaten national security. A high-ranked US delegation is set to start a second round of face-to-face talks with their Indian officials from 5 June in a bid to finalize the deal. Also Read | What the US-China trade agreement means for markets New Delhi had, earlier this month, informed the WTO of its intention to suspend concessions under the Safeguards Agreement in response to the Section 232 tariffs the US imposed in 2018 on national security grounds. This was in response to the 10 February US decision to impose a 25% tariff effective 12 March and its move to subsequently raise it to 50%. India had argued that these duties amounted to safeguard measures and warranted equivalent countermeasures. However, Washington dismissed the claim, insisting that the duties were not safeguard actions but national security measures, and therefore outside the scope of the WTO's Safeguards Agreement. Despite having legal and diplomatic tools at its disposal—such as launching a WTO dispute under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) rules or imposing retaliatory tariffs without WTO authorization—India appears to be opting for a more pragmatic path. 'We have room to discuss all these issues in the ongoing BTA talks. If things don't get resolved there, we will still have the option to exercise our rights through international platform," said the first among the two persons mentioned above. "It's a matter of concern for us. We are reviewing all the options. The right move will be taken at the right time. India's position is not what it used to be, but we believe in handling such critical issues with a sense of perpetuality. We will raise our concerns through structured bilateral engagement instead of fueling any immediate escalation in the midst of ongoing trade talks," the second person said. Both persons spoke on the condition of anonymity. A query sent to the commerce ministry remained unanswered till press time. Ajay Srivastava, co-founder of Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), a think-tank, said, 'While the EU, China, and Canada had resorted to unilateral retaliation, India may be better served by securing a negotiated outcome as part of the FTA." 'Given the fragility of the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism and the US's refusal to recognize adverse rulings on national security measures, a negotiated path may offer more certainty and a quicker resolution," said Srivastava. According to the US response, the tariffs were imposed under Section 232 specifically for national security reasons, covered by the essential security exception under Article XXI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994—not under Article XIX or the WTO safeguard rules. Article XIX is used for economic safeguard measures during import surges, while Article XXI is used for national security exceptions. This distinction matters because Article 8.2 of the Safeguards Agreement only allows a country to suspend concessions if a safeguard measure exists—which the US claims is not the case here. However, Indian exporters have expressed deep concern over the potential loss of key metal product shipments worth over $4.5 billion annually, after US President Donald Trump on Friday announced a sharp escalation in import duties on steel and aluminium, doubling existing tariffs to 50% starting 4 June under the national security provisions of Section 232. Earlier, the tariff on steel and aluminum was increased to 25% on 10 February and came into effect on 12 March. 'It's unfortunate that while BTA negotiations are going on, such unilateral tariff increases should be done. It only makes the work of the negotiators much more difficult and complicated," said Pankaj Chadha, chairman of Engineering Export Promotion Council (EEPC), a commerce ministry body. 'This will definitely impact engineering exports, which are about $5 billion under this head," said Chadha. However, the European Commission has announced its plans to retaliate against President Donald Trump's decision to double tariffs on imported steel and aluminium. 'The US decision to double steel tariffs to 50% is a protectionist move aimed at safeguarding domestic steelworkers, but it will inflict shockwaves across global markets. India is one of the major exporters to the US market, and a 54% tariff on China has given India a better opportunity to export to the US," said Panckaj N. Umrania, executive director, KND Steel, a steel processing company. 'Now, with a 50% tariff on Indian steel, the competition will become more intense, and its ripple effects could be troublesome for small players in India," Umrania said. For India, the impact is immediate and concrete. In FY25, India exported $4.56 billion worth of steel, aluminium, and related products to the US, including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and its products. These exports will now face steep duties, undermining competitiveness in America's already pricey steel market, where rates are projected to shoot up to $1,180 per tonne—far above EU and Chinese benchmarks, as per a GTRI paper. Industry leaders are also pointing to what they see as discriminatory exemptions. 'The UK has been given exemption from Section 232. The same exemption should also be given to India, possibly with some Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) restrictions," Chadha said, even though the US does not currently operate a TRQ regime for Indian steel. The economic impact of these higher tariffs is expected to be significant. US steel prices are already elevated, at around $984 per tonne—far above European prices of $690 and Chinese levels of $392. In FY2025, India exported metal products worth $4.56 billion to the US, while imports from the US in the same category stood at $2.05 billion, resulting in a trade surplus of over $2.5 billion for India. The largest share of exports comprised articles of iron or steel at $3.1 billion, followed by aluminium and related products at $860 million, and iron and steel at around $587.5 million. In contrast, India imported $910.6 million worth of aluminium products and $838.3 million worth of iron and steel from the US, but bought relatively little—just $304 million—in finished articles of iron or steel.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
UK trade minister to meet USTR Greer to discuss implementing tariff deal
LONDON, - Britain's trade minister Jonathan Reynolds will meet U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on Tuesday to discuss the implementation of a trade deal that has been complicated by the announcement of fresh U.S. tariffs on steel. Reynolds will review recently agreed deals with counterparts from the U.S. and EU, Britain's two biggest trading partners, during a three-day trip to Paris and Brussels this week. The deals struck last month are both political pacts rather than formal trade agreements, and the details of their implementation have not been set out. Starmer and U.S. President Donald Trump agreed to reduce tariffs on British imports of cars and steel to the United States, but its delayed implementation means tariffs may go up before they come down. Last week, Trump said that tariffs on imported steel would rise to 50% from 25% from Wednesday. Industry body UK Steel said it understood that British producers would likely be impacted by the change, which would be a "body blow" to the sector. A British government spokesperson said the UK was engaging with the United States on the implications of the announcement ahead of Reynolds' meeting with Greer to discuss implementation timelines of the bilateral agreement in Paris. "We recognise our relationship with G7 allies and EU counterparts must continue to evolve and deliver a better trading environment for our businesses and exporters," Reynolds said in a statement ahead of the trip. Reynolds will also meet Indian Minister of Commerce Piyush Goyal to discuss a recently negotiated Free Trade Agreement, which is still having its legal text finalised and is subject to ratification in both countries, which could take months. After meetings with G7 and OECD counterparts in Paris, Reynolds will hold talks with EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic. As part of efforts to reset ties without fundamentally reopening the Brexit deal, Britain and the EU have agreed to conclude talks to remove red tape on its food trade, but details of the plan have yet to be finalised. In advance of that agreement coming into force, Britain on Monday said it would scrap border checks on fruit and vegetables imported from the European Union, that had been due to be effective beginning in July.
