Why Cyril Ramaphosa failed in the US
US President Donald Trump proved to be a political rottweiler of Afrikaners and white farmers falsely claiming genocide in SA.
There was a moment when Cyril Ramaphosa might have conjured a victory.
All it would have taken was a smidgeon of humanity and a teaspoonful of courage. Sadly, even so low a bar was too much for a president who invariably fails to rise to the occasion.
The opportunity occurred during what the media melodramatically describes as Donald Trump's 'ambush' of the SA team. By definition, ambushes are unexpected. But you'd have to be remarkably complacent not to have anticipated this particular ambush.
After all, Trump had for months made fanciful claims of white genocide. He had then granted refugee status to 59 Afrikaners.
What exactly was then unexpected about being sat down to watch a montage of news clips showing black South African political leaders, mainly Julius Malema but also Jacob Zuma, threatening to exterminate whites?
Ramaphosa was pole-axed. He sat squirming uncomfortably, eyes mostly averted, only sneaking momentary glances at the public relations disaster unfolding. The body language was not good: he repeatedly mopped his face; his mouth alternated between an unfortunate smirk and an embarrassed rictus.
ALSO READ: WATCH: Donald Trump ambushes Cyril Ramaphosa in Oval Office
Was it trepidation? Maybe Ramaphosa was waiting for the footage of him, as ANC party president, claiming at a 2017 rally, 'the land must be returned without any payment or compensation'. He could, of course, have escaped quite easily.
The leap to safety would be for him at the end of the video to firmly address Trump with something resoundingly statesmanlike. Something along the lines of 'I agree with you Mister President that these are terrible threats but they are unfortunately protected Monday 10 26 May 2025 by the constitution.
However, I and my ANC colleagues reject such divisive sentiments and will henceforth vigorously enforce the hate speech prohibitions that exist in our law.' Instead, Ramaphosa sat slack-jawed and dull-eyed.
The best he could eventually manage was the limp-wristed response that the violence promised on the videos was 'not government policy', and that whites were not being 'disproportionately' killed. It beggars belief that the SA team didn't anticipate this political theatre.
Surely, by now, the Trump modus operandi is obvious? Trump takes a real issue. He then exaggerates it and portrays himself as the caped avenger who'll pull down the wrath of God on the perpetrators unless the matter is resolved. So, when Ramaphosa said he thought that the visit had gone 'very well', he may be right.
After enduring the ritual humiliation, SA may well end up with a workmanlike compromise. Such a deal could conceivably involve Ramaphosa taking the kind of leaderly actions to reassure minorities, as well as easing race quotas in employment and softening our anti-US posture.
Possibly the US would in return encourage the investment and grant the tariff breaks we need. Any agreement remotely along those lines would be a no-brainer that we should grab with both hands. But the problem is that even if Ramaphosa wanted to, it is by no means clear that he could sell even such a mild deal to his party.
So there are at least two possible reasons why Ramaphosa failed to seize the opportunity provided by his Oval Office debut to be a statesman rather than a petty politician.
One is because he is not the great conciliator that he portrays himself to be. Alternatively, it's because he knew that his party would nail him to one of those white crosses had he dared.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa says Trump meeting a success despite ambush [VIDEO]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
33 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Five nations and EU urge Trump not to impose new aircraft tariffs
Five nations and the EU, as well as airlines and aerospace firms worldwide, have urged the Trump administration not to impose new national security tariffs on imported commercial aircraft and parts, documents released on Tuesday showed. Airlines and aircraft manufacturers have been lobbying President Donald Trump to restore the tariff-free regime under the 1979 Civil Aircraft Agreement that has yielded an annual trade surplus of $75bn (R1.32-trillion) for the US industry. The documents made public by the US commerce department bared concerns about the fallout of possible new tariffs expressed by companies as well as Canada, China, Japan, Mexico and Switzerland, besides the EU. 'As reliable trading partners, the EU and US should strengthen their trade regarding aircraft and aircraft parts, rather than hinder it by imposing trade restrictions,' the EU wrote. It would consider its options 'to ensure a level playing field', it added. Trump has imposed tariffs of 10% on nearly all aircraft and parts imports. 'No country or region should attempt to support the development of its domestic aircraft manufacturing industry by suppressing foreign competitors,' the Chinese government wrote. Separately, US manufacturer Boeing cited a recent trade deal unveiled in May with Britain that ensures tariff-free treatment for aircraft and parts. 'The US should ensure duty-free treatment for commercial aircraft and their parts in any negotiated trade agreement, similar to its efforts with the UK,' Boeing told the commerce department in a filing. Mexico said in 2024 it exported $1.45bn (R25.7bn) in aircraft parts, a 10th of the total, to the US. The EU said it took US exports of aircraft worth about $12bn (R212.72bn), while exporting about $8bn (R141.82bn) of aircraft to the US. In early May, the commerce department launched a 'section 232" national security investigation into imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines and parts that could form the basis for higher tariffs on such imports. Last week, Delta Air Lines and major trade groups warned of tariffs' impact on ticket prices, aviation safety and supply chains. 'US tariffs on aviation are putting domestic production of commercial aircraft at risk,' Airbus Americas CEO Robin Hayes said in a filing. 'It is not realistic or sensible today to create a 100% domestic supply chain in any country.' Boeing said it had been increasing US content in its aircraft over the past decade and its newest models, the 737 MAX 10 and 777X, would have 'more than 88% domestically-sourced content'. The United Auto Workers union, which represents 10,000 aerospace workers, said it supports tariffs and domestic production quotas, adding US aerospace employment has fallen to 510,000 in 2024 from 850,000 in 1990. 'To safeguard the aerospace supply chain across the commercial and defence sectors, comprehensive tariffs and production quotas on several products are needed,' it said. JetBlue Airways opposed new tariffs, however, saying: 'Trade policy should reinforce, not destabilise, the proven systems that keep our aircraft flying safely and affordably.'
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
EFF slams Ramaphosa's call for national dialogue as publicity stunt
EFF said it will engage in the dialogue but insists the country already held one in May 2024. President Cyril Ramaphosa's call for a national convention to set the agenda for a national dialogue has drawn mixed reactions, with the EFF slamming it as a 'meaningless publicity stunt by a limping President'. In his announcement on Tuesday night, Ramaphosa stated that the national dialogue has been discussed by various national leaders and other stakeholders for some time. National dialogue The national convention is scheduled to take place on 15 August. Ramaphosa mentioned that the national dialogue will drive progress toward the country's Vision 2030 and lay the foundation for the next phase of South Africa's National Development Plan. 'We expect that the National Convention will finalise a compact that outlines the roles and responsibilities of all South Africans.' ALSO READ: Ramaphosa announces 'Eminent Persons Group' to guide national dialogue – These are the people appointed National dialogue nothing new The EFF said while it will participate in all aspects of the national dialogue, including attending every government programme, South Africa had its national dialogue in May 2024. 'That national dialogue led to the people of this country reducing the former liberation movement into just one of many political parties in this country without a majority mandate to lead, because they have failed!' 'False impression' The party said the national dialogue is yet 'another attempt to give the country a false impression of work being done.' 'The EFF views the pronouncement of a national dialogue as a meaningless publicity stunt by a limping president who is leading a limping former liberation movement. 'Furthermore, the EFF rejects completely and with contempt the appointed individuals who will form part of what is referred to as Eminent Persons, as there is nothing eminent about most of these individuals,' the red berets said. ALSO READ: 'What has gone wrong?' – Mbeki, Biko foundations call for national dialogue amid 'political crisis' 'Long overdue step' Good Party secretary-general Brett Herron said Ramaphosa's announcement of a national dialogue is a 'long-overdue step toward renewing South Africa's social contract'. 'The president's recognition that South Africans from every sector of society must have a voice in shaping our future is significant. However, we must guard against a process that becomes performative or elite-driven. 'A truly people-led dialogue must reach beyond the boardrooms and podiums, into townships, rural villages, informal settlements, and inner-city blocks, where the most urgent issues are felt most acutely, Herron said. ALSO READ: Mbeki says issue of renewal of ANC 'not an invention' [VIDEO] 'Forging unity' The ANC welcomed Ramaphosa's announcement of a national dialogue, stating the initiative marks an important national effort to 'forge unity, rebuild trust, and renew the country's collective commitment to social and economic transformation'. National spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu said the ANC has always placed dialogue at the centre of the struggle for liberation and nation-building. 'The ANC calls on its members, alliance partners, mass democratic formations, and all South Africans to actively participate in this National Dialogue. It is through open, principled engagement that we will define a renewed national vision and construct a new social compact anchored in shared responsibility'. Mbeki proposal The national dialogue was first proposed by former president Thabo Mbeki on the eve of the country's national and provincial elections in May 2024. Mbeki, while on the campaign trail, suggested to the ANC that it convene a national convention after the elections to address the country's problems. Diversity Ramaphosa said the national dialogue will represent the diversity of the South African nation, including representatives from government, political parties, civil society, business, labour, traditional leaders, religious leaders, cultural workers, sports organisations, women, youth and community voices, among others. The president said South Africans will, in the months following the national convention, be encouraged to be in dialogue to define the nation's path into the future. He stated that the views, concerns, and proposals that emerge from this conversation will be compiled and presented at a second National Convention, scheduled to take place at the beginning of 2026. NOW READ: Ramaphosa defends transformation: 'We must dispel the false notion'
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Elon Musk admits Donald Trump X tirade 'went too far'
Elon Musk, the world's richest person and Donald Trump's former advisor, said on Wednesday he regretted some of his recent criticisms of the US president, after the pair's public falling-out last week. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' Musk wrote on his social media platform X. Musk's expression of regret came just days after Trump threatened the tech billionaire with 'serious consequences' if he sought to punish Republicans who vote for a controversial spending bill. Their blistering break-up – largely carried out on social media before a riveted public on Thursday last week – was ignited by Musk's harsh criticism of Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful' spending bill, which is currently before Congress. Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk – one of the Republican Party's biggest financial backers in last year's presidential election – to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' Trump, who also branded Musk 'disrespectful,' told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. By Garrin Lambley © Agence France-Presse
