&w=3840&q=100)
IMF disburses $1.023 bn tranche to Pak; to hold discussions about budget
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
AI may not be the job killer many feared: Signs of a balanced future with automation
Early Fears of Job Losses More Nuanced Outlook from Industry Leaders You Might Also Like: AI is choosing AI over humans: New study sounds alarm on what this bias means for human intelligence and creativity Gradual Shifts Instead of Dramatic Losses The rise of artificial intelligence has sparked intense debate about its impact on employment . While early predictions focused on mass layoffs and large-scale worker displacement, recent research and labor data suggest a more measured reality. Instead of wiping out entire professions, AI may be gradually reshaping roles, creating demand for new skills, and driving efficiency in ways that could benefit both workers and businesses over AI tools such as ChatGPT entered the mainstream in 2022, business leaders quickly warned of potential disruption. Executives from Amazon, Anthropic, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicted that automation could displace large numbers of workers, particularly in white-collar and administrative CEO Andy Jassy indicated that AI could reduce the company's corporate workforce, while Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei went further, suggesting that half of entry-level office jobs might disappear. The IMF similarly cautioned that AI adoption could result in a 'painful transition' for many all leaders share this bleak outlook. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has noted that while some jobs—especially in customer service—are highly vulnerable, society rarely experiences job losses at the scale predicted. Altman has offered one of the starkest assessments of AI's potential disruption. Speaking at a Federal Reserve conference, he said generative AI is not just transforming the workplace but could transform significant parts of it. He singled out customer support as the sector most vulnerable, noting that AI systems are already capable of handling everything from basic queries to complex problem-solving without human acknowledging the potential for AI to support diagnostics and patient care, he made clear that he would not want medical treatment without human oversight. His remarks highlight the limits of automation in areas requiring empathy, judgment, and ethical decision-making. In this sense, AI may serve as a co-pilot for professionals rather than a full replacement, particularly in high-stakes suggested that many of the new roles created may prove more rewarding than those CEO Jensen Huang has argued that AI will affect every role but does not necessarily spell mass job loss. Instead, he emphasized that workers risk being left behind only if they fail to adopt AI widespread concern, the numbers do not currently show mass job losses. Research from the Economic Innovation Group found no evidence of large-scale labor disruption tied to AI adoption. Unemployment among AI-exposed occupations has not spiked, and firms with AI-related roles are still maintaining strong employment levels. Martha Gimbel of Yale University's Budget Lab underscored this, noting that the impact of AI has not yet registered in labor market from MIT's GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 also point to a more selective impact. Workforce reductions have been limited to customer support and administrative processing—areas that were already at risk before AI's rise. In contrast, industries such as healthcare, energy, and advanced manufacturing have reported no significant cutbacks. The report concluded that generative AI's influence on employment remains gradual and than eliminating jobs outright, AI is transforming what employers value in candidates. Companies are now prioritizing AI literacy, with some reporting that new graduates often outperform experienced professionals in this area. Experts believe AI will increasingly handle repetitive tasks, allowing workers to focus on problem-solving, creativity, and higher-value to Daniel Zhao, chief economist at Glassdoor, the long-term outcome is still uncertain. The rapid pace of AI development means its full effect on the labor market may only be felt in the coming years. Columbia Business School professor Stephan Meier expects that AI will transform tasks within jobs rather than eliminate entire positions, but the pace of this change will depend on how quickly businesses integrate the fears of widespread AI-driven unemployment remain strong, current evidence suggests a more balanced picture. The technology is beginning to alter tasks and hiring priorities, but its broader disruption has yet to materialize.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
CPEC 2.0: The death of Pakistani independence
What began as a $62 billion infrastructure project has evolved into something far more ambitious and potentially dangerous for regional stability. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) 2.0 represents a strategic masterstroke that's sending shockwaves through New Delhi and beyond, fundamentally altering the geopolitical landscape of South Asia. Pakistan's Desperate Gamble Pakistan finds itself drowning in economic turmoil, foreign reserves depleted, chronically dependent on IMF bailouts, and structural reforms perpetually delayed. When Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif travels to Beijing this month to launch CPEC 2.0, he's not merely seeking Chinese investment; he's potentially signing away whatever economic independence Pakistan has numbers are staggering: $35 billion in new projects, 2.3 million projected jobs, and Pakistan's audacious goal of capturing $30-50 billion of China's annual $2 trillion import market. They're even projecting that artificial intelligence alone will add $88 billion to their economy by China isn't offering charity—it's offering transformation through integration. Five new economic corridors are designed to embed Pakistan deeper into China's sphere, featuring Special Economic Zones for relocated Chinese factories, agricultural modernization through Chinese agribusiness, and technology partnerships that expand Chinese surveillance Strategic NightmareFor New Delhi, CPEC 2.0 represents nothing short of a strategic nightmare. The corridor runs directly through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in Gilgit-Baltistan, where China is effectively normalising Pakistan's illegal occupation through expanded Special Economic Zones. It's a fait accompli strategy that's both brilliant and deeply real crown jewel—or threat—is Gwadar Port. Officially a commercial facility, Gwadar sits at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, controlling access to crucial shipping lanes. For India's navy, this represents a fundamental shift in Indian Ocean dynamics as part of China's broader "String of Pearls" strategy stretching from Gwadar to Hambantota in Sri Lanka and Kyaukpyu in Myanmar. India is slowly being Afghanistan FactorThe plot thickens with Afghanistan's potential inclusion. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's recent visit to Kabul signals China's readiness to extend CPEC into Afghanistan, creating a trilateral framework that could reshape regional security forever. China gains direct land access to Central Asian markets while addressing Xinjiang security concerns, Pakistan receives a Western economic outlet and Chinese mediation with the Taliban, and Afghanistan gets desperately needed investment and international in the Grand StrategyDespite its ambitious scope, CPEC 2.0 faces significant challenges. In Balochistan, local communities resist Chinese investment that benefits Beijing and Islamabad's elite while marginalising locals. Gwadar residents protest being excluded from development benefits, creating sustainability debt dynamics are equally troubling. CPEC's first phase already saddles Pakistan with billions in Chinese loans, much commercial rather than concessional financing. Most Chinese companies repatriate profits rather than reinvest locally, meaning Pakistan may find itself providing market access while receiving limited long-term economic ImplicationsCPEC 2.0 represents more than regional rivalry, it's about competing visions of international order. China's approach challenges traditional governance frameworks, territorial sovereignty principles, and debt sustainability norms. The success or failure of CPEC 2.0 will influence global development patterns for regional powers assess evolving threats and develop counter-strategies, we're witnessing the construction of 21st-century geopolitical architecture. The stakes couldn't be higher: regional security, territorial sovereignty, economic independence, and the future of rules-based international order all hang in the balance. The question isn't whether CPEC 2.0 will proceed, but how regional and global powers will respond to this fundamental reshaping of South Asian strategic dynamics.- Ends


Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
AI may not be the job killer many feared: Signs of a balanced future with automation
Synopsis Despite widespread fears that artificial intelligence would trigger mass layoffs, new research and labor data show a slower, more selective impact. While sectors like customer support face disruption, studies suggest most industries are seeing gradual changes in tasks and skills rather than widespread job losses. Experts say the challenge ahead lies in adapting to new workplace demands, not preparing for a collapse in employment. AI Seen as a Tool for Change, Not Mass Displacement The rise of artificial intelligence has sparked intense debate about its impact on employment. While early predictions focused on mass layoffs and large-scale worker displacement, recent research and labor data suggest a more measured reality. Instead of wiping out entire professions, AI may be gradually reshaping roles, creating demand for new skills, and driving efficiency in ways that could benefit both workers and businesses over AI tools such as ChatGPT entered the mainstream in 2022, business leaders quickly warned of potential disruption. Executives from Amazon, Anthropic, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicted that automation could displace large numbers of workers, particularly in white-collar and administrative roles. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy indicated that AI could reduce the company's corporate workforce, while Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei went further, suggesting that half of entry-level office jobs might disappear. The IMF similarly cautioned that AI adoption could result in a 'painful transition' for many all leaders share this bleak outlook. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has noted that while some jobs—especially in customer service—are highly vulnerable, society rarely experiences job losses at the scale predicted. Altman has offered one of the starkest assessments of AI's potential disruption. Speaking at a Federal Reserve conference, he said generative AI is not just transforming the workplace but could transform significant parts of it. He singled out customer support as the sector most vulnerable, noting that AI systems are already capable of handling everything from basic queries to complex problem-solving without human acknowledging the potential for AI to support diagnostics and patient care, he made clear that he would not want medical treatment without human oversight. His remarks highlight the limits of automation in areas requiring empathy, judgment, and ethical decision-making. In this sense, AI may serve as a co-pilot for professionals rather than a full replacement, particularly in high-stakes industries. He suggested that many of the new roles created may prove more rewarding than those replaced. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has argued that AI will affect every role but does not necessarily spell mass job loss. Instead, he emphasized that workers risk being left behind only if they fail to adopt AI widespread concern, the numbers do not currently show mass job losses. Research from the Economic Innovation Group found no evidence of large-scale labor disruption tied to AI adoption. Unemployment among AI-exposed occupations has not spiked, and firms with AI-related roles are still maintaining strong employment levels. Martha Gimbel of Yale University's Budget Lab underscored this, noting that the impact of AI has not yet registered in labor market data. Findings from MIT's GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 also point to a more selective impact. Workforce reductions have been limited to customer support and administrative processing—areas that were already at risk before AI's rise. In contrast, industries such as healthcare, energy, and advanced manufacturing have reported no significant cutbacks. The report concluded that generative AI's influence on employment remains gradual and than eliminating jobs outright, AI is transforming what employers value in candidates. Companies are now prioritizing AI literacy, with some reporting that new graduates often outperform experienced professionals in this area. Experts believe AI will increasingly handle repetitive tasks, allowing workers to focus on problem-solving, creativity, and higher-value to Daniel Zhao, chief economist at Glassdoor, the long-term outcome is still uncertain. The rapid pace of AI development means its full effect on the labor market may only be felt in the coming years. Columbia Business School professor Stephan Meier expects that AI will transform tasks within jobs rather than eliminate entire positions, but the pace of this change will depend on how quickly businesses integrate the technology. While fears of widespread AI-driven unemployment remain strong, current evidence suggests a more balanced picture. The technology is beginning to alter tasks and hiring priorities, but its broader disruption has yet to materialize.