logo
IMF disburses $1.023 bn tranche to Pak; to hold discussions about budget

IMF disburses $1.023 bn tranche to Pak; to hold discussions about budget

The International Monetary Fund has disbursed a second tranche of $1.023 billion under the Extended Fund Facility programme for Pakistan, the central bank said on Wednesday. The disbursement of the second tranche comes on a day when the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is holding virtual discussions on Pakistan's upcoming budget as the visit of its mission to Islamabad was delayed due to security concerns in the region. The federal government is planning to unveil the budget for fiscal 2025-26 on June 2. The IMF talks will continue until May 16. The Central bank said the second tranche amount would be reflected in its foreign exchange reserves for the week ending May 16. The amount was approved last week by the IMF board under the ongoing Extended Fund Facility (EFF) and allowed an additional arrangement for the $1.4 billion Resilience and Sustainability Facility (RSF). The decision to release the funds came after the IMF expressed satisfaction on the first review of Pakistan's economic reform programme supported by the EFF Arrangement, the bank said. The IMF noted that Pakistan's policy efforts under the EFF had already delivered significant progress in stabilising the economy and rebuilding confidence, amidst a challenging global environment. Fiscal performance has been strong, with a primary surplus of two per cent of gross domestic product achieved in the first half of FY25, keeping Pakistan on track to meet the end-FY25 target of 2.1 per cent of GDP. Pakistan's gross reserves stood at $10.3 billion at end-April, up from $9.4 billion in August 2024, and are projected to reach $13.9 billion by end-June 2025 and continue to be rebuilt over the medium term, it was pointed out. Meanwhile, the IMF talks that started virtually Wednesday will continue until May 16. The global lender has appointed a new mission chief to Pakistan and the mission is now expected to travel to Islamabad over the weekend, subject to the security situation, government sources told The Express Tribune on Tuesday. The IMF mission delayed its scheduled arrival here on Tuesday due to uncertainty caused by the India-Pakistan conflict that had affected air travel across the region. Virtual discussions are expected to be held from today. For the second and final leg of the talks, the IMF team is expected to arrive in Islamabad on Saturday and stay until May 23, the source said. The IMF's Resident Representative to Pakistan Mahir Binici did not respond to a request for comment on the change in the travel plan. Finance Ministry spokesperson Qumar Abbasi also did not respond to questions on the change in the travel plans. Meanwhile, the IMF appointed Iva Petrova, a Bulgarian origin staff member, as new Mission Chief to Pakistan. She would join the discussions along with the outgoing Mission Chief Nathan Porter who served in the position for an extended term. Binici also did not comment on whether both outgoing and new mission chiefs would join both rounds of talks. Petrova, who holds a PhD degree in economics from the Michigan State University, has been serving as the IMF Mission Chief to Armenia. Previously, she had served with the missions to Israel, Iceland and Latvia. In Pakistan, the fiscal policy is expected to remain tight in the next fiscal year too. The IMF has asked Pakistan to make a budget on the assumption of having 1.6 per cent of the GDP primary budget surplus, which will require generating about Rs 2 trillion over and above the non-interest expenses. The tax target for the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is proposed to be 11 per cent of the GDP or Rs 14.3 trillion. The IMF would examine whether the government plans to take credibly realistic measures to back the new tax target, said the sources. The IMF has set multiple fiscal conditions, whose successful completion has so far helped smooth continuation of the programme despite initial setbacks. Pakistan has met the IMF targets for a primary budget surplus by the federal government, as well as net revenue collection and cash surplus targets by the four provinces. Against a primary surplus target of Rs 2.7 trillion, the federal government reported a surplus of Rs 3.5 trillion, or 2.8 per cent of GDP. The size of the federal budget still remains tentative due to redoing of defence needs and the government plans to announce less than Rs 18 trillion budget. The overall budget deficit target after incorporating large provincial cash surpluses is projected at 5.1 per cent of the GDP or Rs 6.7 trillion, the sources said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI may not be the job killer many feared: Signs of a balanced future with automation
AI may not be the job killer many feared: Signs of a balanced future with automation

Time of India

time41 minutes ago

  • Time of India

AI may not be the job killer many feared: Signs of a balanced future with automation

Early Fears of Job Losses More Nuanced Outlook from Industry Leaders You Might Also Like: AI is choosing AI over humans: New study sounds alarm on what this bias means for human intelligence and creativity Gradual Shifts Instead of Dramatic Losses The rise of artificial intelligence has sparked intense debate about its impact on employment . While early predictions focused on mass layoffs and large-scale worker displacement, recent research and labor data suggest a more measured reality. Instead of wiping out entire professions, AI may be gradually reshaping roles, creating demand for new skills, and driving efficiency in ways that could benefit both workers and businesses over AI tools such as ChatGPT entered the mainstream in 2022, business leaders quickly warned of potential disruption. Executives from Amazon, Anthropic, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicted that automation could displace large numbers of workers, particularly in white-collar and administrative CEO Andy Jassy indicated that AI could reduce the company's corporate workforce, while Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei went further, suggesting that half of entry-level office jobs might disappear. The IMF similarly cautioned that AI adoption could result in a 'painful transition' for many all leaders share this bleak outlook. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has noted that while some jobs—especially in customer service—are highly vulnerable, society rarely experiences job losses at the scale predicted. Altman has offered one of the starkest assessments of AI's potential disruption. Speaking at a Federal Reserve conference, he said generative AI is not just transforming the workplace but could transform significant parts of it. He singled out customer support as the sector most vulnerable, noting that AI systems are already capable of handling everything from basic queries to complex problem-solving without human acknowledging the potential for AI to support diagnostics and patient care, he made clear that he would not want medical treatment without human oversight. His remarks highlight the limits of automation in areas requiring empathy, judgment, and ethical decision-making. In this sense, AI may serve as a co-pilot for professionals rather than a full replacement, particularly in high-stakes suggested that many of the new roles created may prove more rewarding than those CEO Jensen Huang has argued that AI will affect every role but does not necessarily spell mass job loss. Instead, he emphasized that workers risk being left behind only if they fail to adopt AI widespread concern, the numbers do not currently show mass job losses. Research from the Economic Innovation Group found no evidence of large-scale labor disruption tied to AI adoption. Unemployment among AI-exposed occupations has not spiked, and firms with AI-related roles are still maintaining strong employment levels. Martha Gimbel of Yale University's Budget Lab underscored this, noting that the impact of AI has not yet registered in labor market from MIT's GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 also point to a more selective impact. Workforce reductions have been limited to customer support and administrative processing—areas that were already at risk before AI's rise. In contrast, industries such as healthcare, energy, and advanced manufacturing have reported no significant cutbacks. The report concluded that generative AI's influence on employment remains gradual and than eliminating jobs outright, AI is transforming what employers value in candidates. Companies are now prioritizing AI literacy, with some reporting that new graduates often outperform experienced professionals in this area. Experts believe AI will increasingly handle repetitive tasks, allowing workers to focus on problem-solving, creativity, and higher-value to Daniel Zhao, chief economist at Glassdoor, the long-term outcome is still uncertain. The rapid pace of AI development means its full effect on the labor market may only be felt in the coming years. Columbia Business School professor Stephan Meier expects that AI will transform tasks within jobs rather than eliminate entire positions, but the pace of this change will depend on how quickly businesses integrate the fears of widespread AI-driven unemployment remain strong, current evidence suggests a more balanced picture. The technology is beginning to alter tasks and hiring priorities, but its broader disruption has yet to materialize.

CPEC 2.0: The death of Pakistani independence
CPEC 2.0: The death of Pakistani independence

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

CPEC 2.0: The death of Pakistani independence

What began as a $62 billion infrastructure project has evolved into something far more ambitious and potentially dangerous for regional stability. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) 2.0 represents a strategic masterstroke that's sending shockwaves through New Delhi and beyond, fundamentally altering the geopolitical landscape of South Asia. Pakistan's Desperate Gamble Pakistan finds itself drowning in economic turmoil, foreign reserves depleted, chronically dependent on IMF bailouts, and structural reforms perpetually delayed. When Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif travels to Beijing this month to launch CPEC 2.0, he's not merely seeking Chinese investment; he's potentially signing away whatever economic independence Pakistan has numbers are staggering: $35 billion in new projects, 2.3 million projected jobs, and Pakistan's audacious goal of capturing $30-50 billion of China's annual $2 trillion import market. They're even projecting that artificial intelligence alone will add $88 billion to their economy by China isn't offering charity—it's offering transformation through integration. Five new economic corridors are designed to embed Pakistan deeper into China's sphere, featuring Special Economic Zones for relocated Chinese factories, agricultural modernization through Chinese agribusiness, and technology partnerships that expand Chinese surveillance Strategic NightmareFor New Delhi, CPEC 2.0 represents nothing short of a strategic nightmare. The corridor runs directly through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in Gilgit-Baltistan, where China is effectively normalising Pakistan's illegal occupation through expanded Special Economic Zones. It's a fait accompli strategy that's both brilliant and deeply real crown jewel—or threat—is Gwadar Port. Officially a commercial facility, Gwadar sits at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, controlling access to crucial shipping lanes. For India's navy, this represents a fundamental shift in Indian Ocean dynamics as part of China's broader "String of Pearls" strategy stretching from Gwadar to Hambantota in Sri Lanka and Kyaukpyu in Myanmar. India is slowly being Afghanistan FactorThe plot thickens with Afghanistan's potential inclusion. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's recent visit to Kabul signals China's readiness to extend CPEC into Afghanistan, creating a trilateral framework that could reshape regional security forever. China gains direct land access to Central Asian markets while addressing Xinjiang security concerns, Pakistan receives a Western economic outlet and Chinese mediation with the Taliban, and Afghanistan gets desperately needed investment and international in the Grand StrategyDespite its ambitious scope, CPEC 2.0 faces significant challenges. In Balochistan, local communities resist Chinese investment that benefits Beijing and Islamabad's elite while marginalising locals. Gwadar residents protest being excluded from development benefits, creating sustainability debt dynamics are equally troubling. CPEC's first phase already saddles Pakistan with billions in Chinese loans, much commercial rather than concessional financing. Most Chinese companies repatriate profits rather than reinvest locally, meaning Pakistan may find itself providing market access while receiving limited long-term economic ImplicationsCPEC 2.0 represents more than regional rivalry, it's about competing visions of international order. China's approach challenges traditional governance frameworks, territorial sovereignty principles, and debt sustainability norms. The success or failure of CPEC 2.0 will influence global development patterns for regional powers assess evolving threats and develop counter-strategies, we're witnessing the construction of 21st-century geopolitical architecture. The stakes couldn't be higher: regional security, territorial sovereignty, economic independence, and the future of rules-based international order all hang in the balance. The question isn't whether CPEC 2.0 will proceed, but how regional and global powers will respond to this fundamental reshaping of South Asian strategic dynamics.- Ends

AI may not be the job killer many feared: Signs of a balanced future with automation
AI may not be the job killer many feared: Signs of a balanced future with automation

Economic Times

time3 hours ago

  • Economic Times

AI may not be the job killer many feared: Signs of a balanced future with automation

Synopsis Despite widespread fears that artificial intelligence would trigger mass layoffs, new research and labor data show a slower, more selective impact. While sectors like customer support face disruption, studies suggest most industries are seeing gradual changes in tasks and skills rather than widespread job losses. Experts say the challenge ahead lies in adapting to new workplace demands, not preparing for a collapse in employment. AI Seen as a Tool for Change, Not Mass Displacement The rise of artificial intelligence has sparked intense debate about its impact on employment. While early predictions focused on mass layoffs and large-scale worker displacement, recent research and labor data suggest a more measured reality. Instead of wiping out entire professions, AI may be gradually reshaping roles, creating demand for new skills, and driving efficiency in ways that could benefit both workers and businesses over AI tools such as ChatGPT entered the mainstream in 2022, business leaders quickly warned of potential disruption. Executives from Amazon, Anthropic, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicted that automation could displace large numbers of workers, particularly in white-collar and administrative roles. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy indicated that AI could reduce the company's corporate workforce, while Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei went further, suggesting that half of entry-level office jobs might disappear. The IMF similarly cautioned that AI adoption could result in a 'painful transition' for many all leaders share this bleak outlook. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has noted that while some jobs—especially in customer service—are highly vulnerable, society rarely experiences job losses at the scale predicted. Altman has offered one of the starkest assessments of AI's potential disruption. Speaking at a Federal Reserve conference, he said generative AI is not just transforming the workplace but could transform significant parts of it. He singled out customer support as the sector most vulnerable, noting that AI systems are already capable of handling everything from basic queries to complex problem-solving without human acknowledging the potential for AI to support diagnostics and patient care, he made clear that he would not want medical treatment without human oversight. His remarks highlight the limits of automation in areas requiring empathy, judgment, and ethical decision-making. In this sense, AI may serve as a co-pilot for professionals rather than a full replacement, particularly in high-stakes industries. He suggested that many of the new roles created may prove more rewarding than those replaced. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has argued that AI will affect every role but does not necessarily spell mass job loss. Instead, he emphasized that workers risk being left behind only if they fail to adopt AI widespread concern, the numbers do not currently show mass job losses. Research from the Economic Innovation Group found no evidence of large-scale labor disruption tied to AI adoption. Unemployment among AI-exposed occupations has not spiked, and firms with AI-related roles are still maintaining strong employment levels. Martha Gimbel of Yale University's Budget Lab underscored this, noting that the impact of AI has not yet registered in labor market data. Findings from MIT's GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 also point to a more selective impact. Workforce reductions have been limited to customer support and administrative processing—areas that were already at risk before AI's rise. In contrast, industries such as healthcare, energy, and advanced manufacturing have reported no significant cutbacks. The report concluded that generative AI's influence on employment remains gradual and than eliminating jobs outright, AI is transforming what employers value in candidates. Companies are now prioritizing AI literacy, with some reporting that new graduates often outperform experienced professionals in this area. Experts believe AI will increasingly handle repetitive tasks, allowing workers to focus on problem-solving, creativity, and higher-value to Daniel Zhao, chief economist at Glassdoor, the long-term outcome is still uncertain. The rapid pace of AI development means its full effect on the labor market may only be felt in the coming years. Columbia Business School professor Stephan Meier expects that AI will transform tasks within jobs rather than eliminate entire positions, but the pace of this change will depend on how quickly businesses integrate the technology. While fears of widespread AI-driven unemployment remain strong, current evidence suggests a more balanced picture. The technology is beginning to alter tasks and hiring priorities, but its broader disruption has yet to materialize.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store