logo
Rising govt debt under control, directed at development, says Anwar

Rising govt debt under control, directed at development, says Anwar

The Star18 hours ago
KUALA LUMPUR: Rising government debt is under control and directed towards development rather than operating expenditure, amid scrutiny of Putrajaya's fiscal management, says Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.
Responding to concerns over the national debt, the Prime Minister said borrowings were necessary and responsibly managed, with a clear focus on long-term infrastructure and social development, particularly in education, healthcare and underserved areas.
'In macroeconomic terms, national debt is closely linked to the budget deficit. As long as we run a deficit, debt will continue to grow. That's why our strategy is to reduce the deficit gradualy,' he told the Dewan Rakyat during Minister's Question Time on Tuesday (Aug 5).
Anwar acknowledged that Malaysia's debt had grown in line with past deficits, but stressed that this trend is being reversed.
'As we approach the third year of the Madani administration, our commitment to fiscal reform has led to a consistent reduction in the deficit — from 6.4% in 2021 to 5.5% in 2022, 5.0% in 2023, and an estimated 4.1% this year,' he said.
He added that the narrowing deficit has enabled the government to reduce its annual borrowings.
'In 2021, new borrowings were around RM100bil. This fell to RM99bil in 2022, RM92.6bil in 2023, and we expect it to drop further to RM76.8bil in 2024.'
Anwar said the government's fiscal discipline has made national debt growth more sustainable while boosting investor confidence.
'This growing confidence is clearly reflected in the ringgit's performance. So far this year, the ringgit has strengthened by nearly 5% against the US dollar, reaching RM4.23 as of Aug 5 — making it one of the best-performing currencies in Asia,' he said.
The government, he said, is committed to reducing the deficit in stages to avoid disrupting essential public spending.
'If we cut too abruptly, critical sectors such as education, Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR), and healthcare would suffer,' he said, noting that education spending has been raised to RM64bil, while the health budget has increased from RM41bil to RM45bil — the highest allocations to date.
'If we don't make these investments, problems like hospital overcrowding, bed shortages and a lack of doctors and nurses will persist.'
Anwar warned that unchecked spending would lead to unsustainable debt levels.
'If we continue spending recklessly, our debt will balloon. Only a firm and courageous government can make the tough decisions. If we prioritise popularity, the debt will grow and the burden will fall on future generations.'
On the federal debt position, Anwar said total debt is projected to reach RM1.247bil by the end of 2024, or 64.6% of GDP, up from RM1.079bil in 2022.
However, he stressed that the increase is tied to development spending, not day-to-day operations.
'We are not borrowing to fund operating expenditure. We are borrowing — and at a reduced amount — for development. Why? Because of the conditions of our schools, hospitals, rural infrastructure and the urgent need for flood mitigation,' he said.
He added that these priorities are already clearly laid out in the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP).
Anwar was responding to Datuk Iskandar Dzulkarnain Abdul Khalid (PN-Kuala Kangsar), who had questioned whether the government was managing the debt responsibly given its recent increase.
'This is a fiscally responsible government, and that is why investor confidence — both domestic and foreign — remains strong,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tariff-wise, we could have done worse
Tariff-wise, we could have done worse

Malaysiakini

time28 minutes ago

  • Malaysiakini

Tariff-wise, we could have done worse

YOURSAY | 'Negotiations with the US must be sustained. It's a marathon, not a sprint.' COMMENT | Ginormous RM1t bill for small tariff cut OrangePanther1466: I often do not agree with what you write, P Gunasegaram, but in this instance, you are spot on. Well done, mate. You have backed up your criticisms with facts and figures. Perhaps the next step would be for countries with 19 percent or more tariffs to consider mutually beneficial cooperation in pressuring the United States to ease the tariffs. I know it's easier said than done, as each has its peculiar circumstances, but we could find some common ground. For instance, insist on the US to include all current account elements in the calculation of the balance of payments. A notable exclusion was the services' element (non-tangible goods) that the US 'exports'. Royalty, franchise fees, IP licence fees, financial product fees like insurance, advisory fees, and so on. The continued pivot to the Brics bloc, discussions about setting up a rival development financial institution and adoption of an alternative trade settlement mechanism and currency should be intensified to mitigate reliance on Western economies, particularly the US. Discussions with the US must be sustained to work down the tariff rate and the list of products subjected to it. This should be a marathon and not a sprint. The jury is still out on the 'success' achieved by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Trade and Industry Minister Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz thus far in this regard. Coward: The headline trade items feel like trade that would have happened regardless of whether there is a tariff in place. In short, it looks like a repackaging of a known fact so that someone looks good. As for the over-the-top praise for Anwar, it started with US President Donald Trump. He used it to butter up Anwar for the deal. I don't think there is any sincere praise from Trump for Anwar's Thailand-Cambodia border peace effort. Again, it is exploited by him to make Anwar more agreeable. Anwar himself is not the victim here. He also uses it to butter up his image. As for the customary over-the-top praise by others on Anwar? Bread and butter from the same crowd of professional 'angkat' people. Rukun_Negara: International trade is about finding synergies and developing mutual interests and gains. In this case, I see the 19 percent tariff outcome as a win-win situation. Had the US slapped Malaysia with a 24 to 30 percent tariff, our exporting businesses (to the US) would have started losing big time against other countries in terms of 'relative competitiveness'. Quigonbond: One can also say we could have done worse with tariffs at 25 percent. It's about paying to stay in the game, not about a rational outcome. Easy to say it's a bad deal when done in hindsight and not being at the negotiation table. This is reality and a demonstration of Malaysia's position in the world. The 19 percent tariff is nine percentage points more than the global 10 percent tariff. Is it great? No. Is it bad? Not so. It's ok. The pain will translate to (if no retrenchment at some US export-dependent businesses) reduced employment, less profit, less tax to pay the government, less/no increment/bonus, less money to be recycled through the local economy - so yes, the economy will take some hits. But it won't be fatal. I'd prefer to focus on what we must do now, aka increase our competitiveness and productivity. RedGecko6275: Tariffs just make goods more expensive for the American people themselves. They are taxing their people. Does it make our goods less competitive? Yes, if we are the only country to impose a tariff on the US. But if our goods have a 19 percent tariff and all other countries have the same as well, it doesn't make our goods less competitive. Scoop: Sorry, Gunasegaram. Your premise is that Malaysia is going to follow through on these promises to buy x billion of this or that and invest x billion in the US. Since Trump 1.0, companies and countries have been making similar pledges to get on his good side, but have only made good on a small fraction of those pledges. There are countless examples of pledges that were designed to avoid some kind of punitive action that have come to nought. Koel: Tariffs seem to be a madman's game. While Malaysia's tariff rate was set at 25 percent, both Cambodia's and Thailand's rates were set at 36 percent. Since the so-called ceasefire, all three countries have overnight had their rates uniformly lowered to 19 percent. Trump now claims that he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for bringing the 'war' to an end. Coincidence? Or some manchild's game of Art of the Deal? So, what was the backroom deal struck exactly? Are tariffs some new blackmail tool for persuading smaller countries to help prop up some spurious international credentials for a former TV showman? Open-minded 2281: All the above concessions are known. The question is, are there further concessions which may, for political reasons, be kept hidden? It is unbelievable that Trump agreed that Malaysia did not open the car market to the US without the AP system in place. Meerkat: Whether you love or hate him, Trump is going to upend the traditional way of international trade and relations. That means drastic changes. Unfortunately for Malaysia, it's not geared to respond to such changes because of the system, inefficiency, huge administrative costs and, mostly, corruption. The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. In the past year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. Join the Malaysiakini community and help set the news agenda. Subscribe now. These comments are compiled to reflect the views of Malaysiakini subscribers on matters of public interest. Malaysiakini does not intend to represent these views as fact.

Malaysia, Philippines boost ASEAN cooperation for regional stability
Malaysia, Philippines boost ASEAN cooperation for regional stability

The Sun

time28 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Malaysia, Philippines boost ASEAN cooperation for regional stability

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia and the Philippines are committed to strengthening strategic cooperation to ensure a more peaceful and united future for ASEAN, says Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. In a Facebook post tonight, Anwar said the commitment was among the matters discussed during a phone conversation with Philippine President Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos Jr today. 'The discussion also touched on peace and harmony in international waters and border areas, which are our shared priorities for regional stability,' said the Prime Minister. Anwar said he also shared positive developments regarding the border negotiations between Thailand and Cambodia, which are expected to be finalised this Thursday through the consensus of the two countries' defence ministers during the Extraordinary General Border Committee (GBC) meeting here. The Prime Minister said the development marked another step forward in realising ASEAN's aspirations of becoming a peaceful, stable and prosperous region. Cambodian Defence Minister General Tea Seiha and acting Thai Defence Minister General Natthaphon Narkphanit, along with armed forces chiefs and government representatives of both countries, are expected to attend the GBC meeting. Thailand and Cambodia had agreed to implement a ceasefire effective midnight on July 28 following a special meeting chaired by Anwar at the Seri Perdana Complex in Putrajaya. - Bernama

The higher the retirement age, the better? It depends
The higher the retirement age, the better? It depends

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

The higher the retirement age, the better? It depends

PETALING JAYA: The extension of the current retirement age from 60 to 65 years old should remain optional and fulfil the needs of the performing industries, say experts. Prof Dr Balakrishnan Parasuraman from Universiti Malaysia Kelantan said the extension should only be for important sectors, especially performing ones, but a blanket implementation for all is needed. 'If you want to see Malaysia grow fast, you should allow senior citizens to continue working because they can help bring this country to the next level. 'For example, we have only some 3,000 professors, so we should allow those in this field to continue because they are contributing to research and development, and are passing on their skills and knowledge to others. ALSO READ : Is there a 'right' retirement age? 'In the civil service, it should be performance-based because you cannot just get rid of someone in this sector easily. Keep the ones who are really helping to shape and change the nation,' said the human resources and industrial relations expert. He said countries like Vietnam, France, Denmark, Japan and Australia have all increased their retirement ages, while Malaysia is just getting into the conversation. Balakrishnan also pointed out that it would be more beneficial to allow senior citizens to fulfil essential roles rather than relying on the younger generation to step up to the challenge. When tabling the 13th Malaysia Plan at Dewan Rakyat recently, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said that the mandatory retirement age limit would be reviewed. Currently, civil servants must retire at the age of 60. This is also the minimum retirement age for private sector workers under the Minimum Retirement Age Act 2012. National Council of Senior Citizens Organisations Malaysia president Datuk Dr Soon Ting Kueh said that extension of the retirement age should remain optional. 'It makes sense (to extend) because older people have certain experiences that should be preserved and continued; their skills can be passed on to the younger generations. ALSO READ : Govt to study 'retirement at 65' proposal 'Make it an option for folk who want to keep working. For those who want to retire, (the same) should also be allowed,' he said. He added that wanting to extend the retirement age coincides with better health conditions among Malaysians and the country's increasing ageing society. However, Soon pointed out that senior citizens must also keep upskilling and reskilling themselves to suit the current needs of the industries and market. Meanwhile, Federation of Malaysian Business Associations vice-chairman Nivas Ragavan said Malaysia must carefully design policies that ensure both seniors and youth are empowered in the labour market. Raising the retirement age, he said, is just one aspect of the solution – it must be integrated with reskilling frameworks, workplace inclusivity and youth employment strategies. 'There is growing hesitation among the youth about joining certain sectors or accepting lower entry-level salaries. 'On the flip side, older workers need to unlearn and relearn rapidly in today's fast-changing work environment. 'This dual challenge must be addressed through intergenerational workplace policies, flexible employment structures, including part-time or consultative roles for seniors and structured national reskilling programmes specifically tailored for older workers.' In terms of employer readiness, Nivas says most employers are open to hiring seniors if they are skilled, adaptable and healthy. But companies may be reluctant to invest in retraining without government incentives or a clear return on investment, he said. A shared-responsibility model, where both government and employers contribute to reskilling costs, could make this more viable, said Nivas, who is also the Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry president. On May 20, amid rising workforce concerns, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said suggested raising the minimum retirement age from 60 to 65. Following this, Anwar acknowledged the importance of the proposal to raise the mandatory retire­ment age, stating that it requi­res comprehensive study before any decision is made. In response, Human Resources Minister Steven Sim said they are currently reviewing the proposal. He added that the matter is being examined by a special committee to seek input and feedback from stakeholders, especially the public sector, workers and emplo­yers, during the study to ensure compliance with international best practices. But the Congress of Unions of Employees in the Public and Civil Services (Cuepacs) urged the government to provide civil servants the option to still retire at 60 if it plans to raise the mandatory retirement age to 65. Its secretary-general Abdul Rahman Mohd Nordin said while raising the retirement age may offer certain benefits, it could pose health, mental and physical challenges for some.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store