Staying on message and away from ‘knuckleduster politics' pays off at polls for the PAP
News analysis Staying on message and away from 'knuckleduster politics' pays off at polls for the PAP
SINGAPORE – A disciplined campaign focused on the core issues and the absence of hardline tactics were key reasons behind the resounding mandate that the PAP received on May 3.
The ruling party also harvested the fruits of groundwork over the past five years and efforts to assuage voters' concerns on matters such as the cost of living, while tailoring its campaign with constituency-specific plans for different towns.
These decisions helped deliver 65.57 per cent of the vote to Prime Minister Lawrence Wong in his first election as head of government and secretary-general of the PAP, and cemented his leadership of party and country.
The ruling party won 87 out of 97 seats in the next term of Parliament, and improved on 61.24 per cent of the popular vote at the 2020 General Election.
Drumming home the fundamentals
Fronted by PM Wong, the PAP's campaign had a consistent message that was reiterated every day at rallies across the island – from Choa Chu Kang and Sembawang to Punggol and Sengkang – as well as at the lunchtime Fullerton rally and May Day Rally.
This was: that a strong government led by the PAP is necessary to meet the challenges of a changed world, and that going with the team with a proven track record would give the Republic the best chance of continuing to succeed.
PM Wong was reinforced on the key themes by Senior Ministers Lee Hsien Loong and Teo Chee Hean, noted Institute of Policy Studies senior research fellow Gillian Koh.
This included articulating the PAP's thinking on key issues like multiracialism and job creation, as well as tackling the Income-Allianz deal when it was brought up during the hustings, and whether raising the goods and services tax was necessary in an inflationary environment, said Dr Koh.
Left largely unsaid in the Prime Minister's call for Singaporeans to send all of the PAP's ministers – as well as its cohort of 32 newcomers – to Parliament was that the election was about his leadership, and whether Singaporeans approved of the fourth-generation (4G) team's succession.
On this, he capitalised on the goodwill he had generated as the face of the government task force that tackled the Covid-19 pandemic.
That was when PM Wong rose to national prominence, and Singaporeans came to be familiar with his style of communication and leadership – though he was not anointed leader of the 4G until 2022.
Singapore Management University law don Eugene Tan said: 'The PAP kept to a disciplined campaign. They were not unduly defensive and also kept their focus on their key campaign messages.'
No knuckledusters
This election was also notable for how 'gentlemanly' the PAP was in its campaign, noted Associate Professor Tan.
In the pre-2000s, the party at times used hardline tactics against opposition figures, including WP politicians Tang Liang Hong, J.B. Jeyaretnam and Francis Seow, said former PAP MP Inderjit Singh, who retired from politics in 2015.
These included public accusations about their character and beliefs, defamation suits, as well as legislative changes that appeared to target them.
During the 2025 hustings, the PAP did not bring up leaked text messages containing expletives that Mr Andre Low – the WP's candidate in Jalan Kayu SMC – had sent to a group of friends.
There was also no direct mention by the ruling party about the saga surrounding former WP MP Raeesah Khan's lying in Parliament, nor of WP chief Pritam Singh's subsequent conviction for lying to a parliamentary committee in this matter.
It was different during the 2020 election campaign, after some of Ms Khan's old social media posts surfaced and became the subject of police reports.
Even after a public apology by Ms Khan, the PAP had asked the WP to state its stand on her posts and questioned its choice to field her for election.
By keeping to a 'clean' campaign and not reacting defensively to the opposition's volleys, the ruling party came out ahead, said Prof Tan.
'It contested like a ruling party, with an overwhelming majority, rather than as a party under siege,' he said.
In doing so, it exuded 'quiet confidence', helped by the WP's strategy against Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, he added.
DPM Gan was the subject of WP's criticism across its rallies – including over his move from Chua Chu Kang GRC to Punggol GRC on Nomination Day.
PM Wong responded by expressing disappointment at the WP's attacks, and later said it had been 'cavalier and irresponsible' to Singaporeans to downplay the potential loss of an experienced minister.
Mr Inderjit Singh said hardline tactics attacking one's opponents are not workable in this new era, and that political parties here have to win the hearts and minds of voters to be victorious.
Dr Koh added: 'In GE2025, it was a great relief that we did not see a return to the knuckleduster politics of the early decades of political history.'
Walking into prepared ground
The PAP's success this round rested not just on its campaign strategy, but also on its decision to strengthen its groundwork following GE2020.
At the biennial PAP conferences in 2022 and 2024, both SM Lee and PM Wong drove home to the party faithful the need to look after residents and their communities, and to be attuned to their problems and how to improve their lives.
Before the first rally speech was uttered, the PAP had ensured it was going into battle well-prepared, where all policy and groundwork levers had been pulled for this objective.
In Budget 2025, for instance, PM Wong made sure to address the cost of living – one of the central policy issues of the election – while also announcing moves for large families and workers facing job insecurity.
Dr Koh said that by doing so, the PAP had set itself on 'the best footing possible', knowing that 'this would be Mr Lawrence Wong's first campaign and that such maiden elections are always risky'.
She highlighted data from market research company Blackbox that showed growing positive sentiment on core economic, social and political issues ahead of the election.
While concerns about these issues were not perfectly assuaged, the PAP could remind voters of its plans and policy track record, she added.
The PAP did this by stepping up its 'ground game', campaigning on a local level.
Mr Inderjit Singh said: 'I think one of the most significant improvements by the PAP was the ground game not just during the nine days, but the last five years.
'Many incumbents developed goodwill, and this helped win voters.'
He said: 'In places where incumbents had stepped down, they turned up to help new candidates campaign, and their goodwill definitely helped to woo voters.'
As the incumbent in most constituencies, PAP ministers also announced local town plans for better infrastructure and services.
This included, notably, Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat's promise to fight for a hawker centre for his residents in Bishan.
The PAP's presence and attention to the ground – its strength both as the incumbent as well as the dominant ruling party – came amid a return to physical campaigning, after a pause in 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
After that election, PM Wong – then a minister and member of the party's central executive committee – had told activists that the party had not done so well in the digital arena, and not all of its content connected with netizens.
Prof Tan said that, this round, the party struck the right balance in working the online and physical ground.
'So it did matter that GE2025 was not primarily digital.'
In all, the PAP's vote share shows it managed to win over many middle-ground voters.
Besides maintaining the support of its base – approximately 40 per cent of the electorate – it had to win over at least half of voters not tied to any party, or about 20 per cent to 25 per cent of the electorate, said Prof Tan.
That it managed to do so at this election reflects both the PAP's performance legitimacy, and that it had campaigned fairly and in a gentlemanly manner, he added.
This electoral performance will give PM Wong confidence and a 'free hand' in forming his Cabinet, said Mr Inderjit Singh.
He said: 'It now remains for the PM and the 4G team to consolidate the confidence and trust of Singaporeans and work on improving the lives of Singaporeans in the next five years.'
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Forum: Review off-peak car rebate amid high COE premiums
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Off-Peak Cars (OPCs) were introduced to allow lower-usage ownership, with a S$17,000 rebate. But this rebate has not kept pace with soaring COE prices, making the scheme far less attractive. For families with young children, elderly parents, or members with disabilities, a private car is often a necessity for school runs, medical visits, and caregiving. It is time to review whether the OPC rebates should be adjusted to today's market so that Singaporeans who need to own a car will not be left behind. Policies must keep essential car ownership accessible to citizens. Tan Hock Hoe

Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Forum: Address housing needs of vulnerable groups
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox W e are pleased that the Government is reviewing the age floor for singles buying Housing Board flats with a view to lowering it. However, there remain those who, due to their life circumstances, find themselves ineligible or severely restricted from buying an HDB flat as singles. This leaves them in precarious housing situations – often dependent on rental markets they cannot afford, or in temporary arrangements that hinder their ability to rebuild their lives. Four groups merit urgent attention: Unmarried single parents Many are primary caregivers doing the heavy lifting of raising children alone, often with limited income and support. Yet because their children are considered 'illegitimate' under current rules, they cannot form a recognised family nucleus with them, making it harder to secure a home. Transnational parents of children who are Singaporeans or permanent residents These are foreigners who are widowed, divorced, or separated parents who are the caregivers of their children. Despite the children's right to grow up in Singapore, such parents can face significant obstacles in securing stable housing, leaving families in uncertainty. Single survivors of domestic abuse Leaving an abusive relationship is already an act of immense courage, but current housing rules can trap survivors in unsafe environments or force them into unstable arrangements that risk retraumatisation. Access to stable housing for this vulnerable group of people should be prioritised. Young adults leaving residential care homes at 21 Unlike peers growing up with their parents, they lack the support, guidance, or safety net of a family home as they navigate adulthood. At this stage, many are financially precarious – still studying, serving national service, or working in jobs that do not pay very much. HDB could provide the option of affordable rental housing for such young adults to share, giving them a stable starting point in life. The existing eligibility rules for singles do not adequately account for exceptional circumstances where housing is a basic necessity, not a lifestyle choice. We need clearly defined, compassionate exceptions in HDB policy that recognise these groups as urgent cases, allowing them to qualify for public housing regardless of age or marital status. Such provisions would not only address immediate shelter needs, but also prevent downstream social costs. Ensuring that these vulnerable individuals have a secure roof over their heads is a measure of our collective humanity. Sugidha Nithiananthan Director, Advocacy and Research Association of Women for Action and Research
Business Times
14 hours ago
- Business Times
Silver lining in insurance buyers' shift towards investment-linked plans
[SINGAPORE] Insurance participating funds, which provide investment returns for long-term whole life and endowment plans had a good year in 2024. The par funds managed by nine insurers delivered a positive return, based on my compilation for a column this week. That shouldn't be a surprise. Equity markets were in bull territory last year and continued to soar this year. Two things stood out in my research. First, insurers invest in private markets including private equity and debt for their par funds, and say they have been doing so for some time. This is interesting because of the intense interest in private assets lately. But the specific allocations, which are lumped together with equities, isn't publicly disclosed by almost all except HSBC Life. Without more disclosure it's hard to tell whether their private-asset exposure is sizeable enough to make a difference in terms of return enhancement or risk mitigation. In 2022, when stocks and bonds fell in tandem, par funds' losses ranged between 7 and 14 per cent. Second, Life Insurance Association data on new business indicates an apparently decisive shift from par products towards investment-linked plans (ILPs). Unlike par plans where premiums are pooled and invested collectively by the insurers, ILPs enable policyholders to make their own asset allocation and fund choices. Investors bear the risk of losses and do not depend on a 'smoothing' process for returns or dividends. Between 2022 and 2024, ILPs' share of new business rose from 25 to 39 per cent. The trend continues this year. In LIA's latest data for the six months to June, ILPs' share rose from 31 per cent in 2023 to 43 per cent in 2025. Traditionally, Singaporeans preferred par plans. Could the shift towards ILPs prove lasting? The puzzle, however, is this. Both vehicles may leave policyholders in limbo – still under-insured and with far lower net returns than illustrated. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Over the long term, returns from par products especially whole life plans were typically only slightly better than fixed deposits and may not keep up with inflation. As for ILPs, a substantial portion of returns may be eaten up by high annual costs – as high as 4 per cent a year based on my earlier research. As a result, the protection value and overall return may also fall short. Still, a trend towards ILPs suggests a greater awareness of the benefit of calibrating one's portfolio choices towards one's own risk appetite and objectives, and possibly a desire for greater transparency in returns. This is a good thing, especially at a time when choices for self-directed investors have burgeoned, even for the risk averse. Retail investors, for instance, have flocked towards Astrea's latest offering of private equity-linked bonds, which attracted applications worth more than S$3 billion. The popularity of platforms like Endowus, which onboards institutional funds with substantially lower fees than retail funds, is testament to rising awareness of the dilutive effect of high fees. Now what remains is for insurers to simplify their ILPs and lower the recurring costs. That would go a long way towards enhancing returns, which is paramount in helping policyholders to achieve their financial goals.