logo
Behind the Curtain: Your smarter fake friends

Behind the Curtain: Your smarter fake friends

Axios13 hours ago
Your fake friends are getting a lot smarter ... and realer.
Why it matters: If you think those make-believe people on Facebook, Instagram and X — the bots — seem real and worrisome now, just wait.
Soon, thanks to AI, those fake friends will analyze your feeds, emotions, and habits so they can interact with the same savvy as the realest of people.
The next generation of bots will build psychological profiles on you — and potentially billions of others — and like, comment and interact the same as normal people.
This'll demand even more vigilance in determining what — and who — is real in the digital world.
A taste of the future: Brett Goldstein and Brett Benson — professors at Vanderbilt University who specialize in national and international security — show in vivid detail, in a recent New York Times op-ed, the looming danger of the increasingly savvy fake world.
They dug through piles of documents uncovered by Vanderbilt's Institute of National Security, exposing how a Chinese company — GoLaxy — optimizes fake people to dupe and deceive.
"What sets GoLaxy apart," the professors write, "is its integration of generative A.I. with enormous troves of personal data. Its systems continually mine social media platforms to build dynamic psychological profiles. Its content is customized to a person's values, beliefs, emotional tendencies and vulnerabilities."
They add that according to the documents, AI personas "can then engage users in what appears to be a conversation — content that feels authentic, adapts in real-time and avoids detection. The result is a highly efficient propaganda engine that's designed to be nearly indistinguishable from legitimate online interaction, delivered instantaneously at a scale never before achieved."
Between the lines: This makes Russia's bot farms look like the horse and buggy of online manipulation. We're talking real-time adaptations to match your moods, or desires, or beliefs — the very things that make most of us easy prey.
The threat of smarter, more realistic fake friends transcends malicious actors trying to warp your sense of politics — or reality. It hits your most personal inner thoughts and struggles.
State of play: AI is getting better, faster at mimicking human nuance, empathy and connection.
Some states, including Utah and Illinois, are racing to limit AI therapy. But most aren't. So all of our fake friends are about to grow lots more plentiful.
A Harvard Business Review study ($) earlier this year found the number one use case of chat-based generative AI is therapy ("structured support and guidance to process psychological challenges") and companionship ("social and emotional connection, sometimes with a romantic dimension").
AI-based therapy, the article notes, is "available 24/7, it's relatively inexpensive (even free to use in some cases), and it comes without the prospect of judgment from another human being."
That research is congruent with what the biggest AI companies are finding: Humans are increasingly turning to AI to be buddies and shrinks. That brings a passel of possible problems — from unregulated robots offering bad advice, to unhealthy human attachment to an artificial thing.
The Wall Street Journal found by examining public chat transcripts that bots sometimes egg on users' false premises. To go along with AI hallucination, clinicians are informally calling this phenomenon " AI psychosis" or "AI delusion."
There's obvious upside, too: Loneliness can be deadly, and good therapy can do great things for someone struggling. Meta, as Axios reported in May, envisions chatbots as " more social" — potentially an extension of your friend network, and antidote to the " loneliness epidemic."
What you can do: Be vigilant. This is all happening now. It's safe to assume AI only gets better, and bad actors more clever. Don't assume every person online is real — much less a real friend.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Too Many Red Flags,' Says Top Investor About Tesla Stock
‘Too Many Red Flags,' Says Top Investor About Tesla Stock

Business Insider

time30 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

‘Too Many Red Flags,' Says Top Investor About Tesla Stock

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) stock has faced a rough ride in 2025, with shares sliding sharply before staging a recovery in recent months – yet still leaving investors down about 15% year-to-date. At the heart of this downturn is a slowdown in EV sales, pressured by intensifying competition – particularly from Chinese rivals – and a tarnished brand image fueled by CEO Elon Musk's constant forays into politics. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The sales trend has been moving in the wrong direction for some time: Q2 2025 marked the second straight year-over-year decline, and even the ever-optimistic Musk conceded that the company could be in for a 'rough' couple of quarters. While that's a sobering admission, Tesla's future isn't devoid of promise. The company is working on multiple ambitious fronts, from full self-driving technology to autonomous robots and AI initiatives. But whether Tesla is actually on the right track to capture those opportunities is a point of contention. One top investor known by the pseudonym Noah's Arc Capital Management is worried that Tesla is not positioning itself to take full advantage of these vast opportunities. 'Tesla's growth momentum has faltered, and this downturn was more than just a blip,' explains the 5-star investor, who is among the top 2% of TipRanks' stock pros. It is not just the slowing EV numbers that have Noah's Arc up in arms, but a lack of discipline that the company seems to be demonstrating. The investor is anxious to see Tesla focus more on full self-driving, believing this to be the big money maker going forward. Instead, Noah's Arc is dismayed that Musk is chasing political sideshows and marginal business ventures (such as the Tesla Diner). 'His attention is divided among so many different endeavors, and Tesla is only getting a small share of that,' adds Noah's Arc. That's never an ideal scenario, but it becomes even more damaging when the company's full self-driving ambitions remain far behind Alphabet's Waymo. And yet, even with the most recent drop in share price, Tesla continues to trade at a 'stretched' valuation, with a Forward Price-to-Earnings multiple north of 190x. This, according to Noah's Arc, leaves nary any 'margin for error.' 'I'm double-downgrading Tesla from strong buy to hold due to Musk's distractions and operational risks outweighing prior bullishness,' sums up Noah's Arc. (To watch Noah's Arc's track record, click here) That's right around where Wall Street finds itself as well. With 14 Buy, 15 Hold, and 8 Sell ratings, TSLA has a consensus Hold (i.e. Neutral) rating. Its 12-month average price target of $307.23 implies ~11% downside from current levels. (See TSLA stock forecast) To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights.

Intel CEO appears to win over Trump
Intel CEO appears to win over Trump

Axios

time32 minutes ago

  • Axios

Intel CEO appears to win over Trump

Just four days after demanding Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan resign, President Trump has described a meeting with Tan as "a very interesting one." Why it matters: The president's resignation call over Tan's alleged Chinese ties had threatened to waylay the chip maker's turnaround effort. What they're saying: After a meeting Monday at the White House with Tan, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Trump posted on Truth Social that Tan's "success and rise is an amazing story. Mr. Tan and my Cabinet members are going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week." The context: Trump called for Tan's resignation last week after Sen. Tom Cotton (R.-Ark) said that he had written to Intel's board expressing concerns about what he said were "Tan's investments and ties to semiconductor firms that are reportedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army." Tan had previously served as CEO of Cadence Design Systems, which in July reached a plea agreement with the government over claims of illegal exports to China. Intel's board has supported its CEO. "We are engaging with the administration to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts," Tan wrote to Intel employees on Thursday. "I fully share the president's commitment to advancing U.S. national and economic security, I appreciate his leadership to advance these priorities, and I'm proud to lead a company that is so central to these goals." The bottom line: By moving quickly to engage the White House and to endorse its priorities, Tan has taken a page from Apple CEO Tim Cook and other corporate chieftains on how to best navigate being caught in the Trump spotlight.

Trump meets with Intel CEO after calling for his resignation
Trump meets with Intel CEO after calling for his resignation

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump meets with Intel CEO after calling for his resignation

President Trump met Monday with Lip-Bu Tan, the CEO of Intel, who Trump just days earlier had called on to resign over claims he was 'conflicted.' Trump said he met with Tan, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The president provided few details about their conversations, but indicated he would have more to say in the future. 'The meeting was a very interesting one. His success and rise is an amazing story,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'Mr. Tan and my Cabinet members are going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week.' Trump last week said Tan was 'highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately.' He provided no other details, though Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) had recently written to Intel raising concerns about Tan's ties to China. Cotton also voiced concerns about Tan's previous role as CEO of Cadence Design Systems, which pleaded guilty and paid $140 million last month for violating export controls by selling chip design technology to a Chinese military university. Tan responded the following day, saying he had 'always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards.' Intel is a key company in the United States's chip manufacturing industry. Tan said in his statement the company would be 'ramping toward' making advanced semiconductors later this year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store