China lifts ban on Japanese seafood imports, but Fukushima and Tokyo still excluded
Japan began gradually releasing treated wastewater from the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean in 2023.
The move was backed by the International Atomic Energy Agency but drew sharp criticism from Beijing, which banned imports of Japanese seafood as a result.
Samples from long-term monitoring of nuclear-contaminated water from Fukushima had 'not shown abnormalities', China's General Administration of Customs said in a statement Sunday.
As a result, China 'decided to conditionally resume' seafood imports from Japan, with the exception of imports from 10 of the country's 47 prefectures, including Fukushima and Tokyo, which remain banned.
In 2011, a huge earthquake triggered a deadly tsunami that swamped the Fukushima nuclear facility and pushed three of its six reactors into meltdown.
China, whose ties with Japan have long been strained by Tokyo's imperial legacy, vociferously opposed the release of the treated wastewater, casting it as environmentally irresponsible.
Production companies that had suspended imports must reapply for registration in China and would be 'strictly' supervised, Beijing's customs administration said Sunday. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Show of force: China to parade military hardware with Putin in attendance
BEIJING, Aug 21 — China will unveil a slate of new domestically produced military hardware that will showcase its 'powerful capability to prevail in modern war' at a parade next month, officials said Wednesday. The event, marking 80 years since the end of World War II, will see President Xi Jinping inspect troops in Beijing's Tiananmen Square, with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin and other world leaders expected to attend. Millions of Chinese people were killed during a prolonged war with imperial Japan in the 1930s and 40s, which became part of a global conflict following Tokyo's attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. The ruling Communist Party has held a series of blockbuster events in recent years to commemorate its wartime resistance. On September 3, China's military will showcase its latest equipment, 'reflecting the evolution of modern warfare', said Major General Wu Zeke, an official at China's military commission. 'All of the weapons and equipment taking part in this review were selected from domestically produced, currently active main battle systems, with a significant proportion being newly unveiled equipment,' Wu told reporters at a briefing. These will include strategic heavy weapons, hypersonic precision systems, as well as unmanned and counter-unmanned equipment making their first public debut, he added. The parade, which will last around 70 minutes, will 'fully showcase our military's powerful capability to prevail in modern war', Wu said. It will also feature ground troops marching in formation, armoured columns, aerial echelons and other high-tech fighting gear. The Kremlin has confirmed Putin will attend, and Chinese officials said other world leaders are also expected to take in the scene. China in March raised its defence spending for 2025 by 7.2 per cent. The increase comes as Beijing's armed forces undergo rapid modernisation and eye deepening strategic competition with the United States. China has the world's second-largest military budget, but lags well behind the United States, its primary strategic rival. — AFP
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
No relief on exports front despite July surge
The forecast remained challenging for exports in the second half of 2025. PETALING JAYA: The latest trade data released on Tuesday point to challenging times ahead – not just for the country's exporters but also the domestic economy. This is as a combination of tariff uncertainties and slower growth crimp consumer demand both abroad and at home, following a drop in intermediate and consumption goods imports. The forecast remained challenging for exports in the second half of 2025. This is despite the unexpected boost to July exports in the face of market consensus projecting another month of contraction as overseas businesses ramped up their purchases ahead of US reciprocal tariffs that became effective on Aug 8. United Overseas Bank (M) Bhd said despite the July exports surprise, in which total exports increased 4.3% year-to-date (y-t-d), the country's trade outlook remains subject to downside risks for the rest of the year and into 2026. This is underpinned by spillover risks stemming from breakdown in US-China trade talks, signs of weaker demand due to contractions in intermediate and consumption goods, sectoral tariff risks and the effects of the reciprocal tariffs. Maybank Investment Bank Research noted that 'the devil is in the details' for sectoral tariffs, of which semiconductor goods continue to be the most at-risk for Malaysia, a major export to the US market. 'Expect continued choppy external trade numbers as US tariff uncertainties shift from reciprocal tariffs to product-specific tariffs, namely on semiconductors,' it added. Besides the downside risks from semiconductor tariffs, CGS International Securities said palm oil exports could be in danger of losing market share in India to Indonesia, with palm oil exports falling flat and only higher crude palm oil prices providing some buffer. CIMB Securities pointed to the shifting trends in the trade balance in July, where the trade surplus despite narrowing y-t-d, became increasingly concentrated in the United States, Hong Kong and Singapore, which together accounted for 197% of total surplus from 153% in 2024. 'However, these gains were nearly fully offset by wider structural deficits with mainland China, Taiwan and South Korea (189% of total surplus), highlighting Malaysia's reliance on upstream electrical and electronic inputs,' it said. The research house added that exports growth to the United States, Hong Kong and Singapore was partly driven by tariff-related front-loading, while higher imports from mainland China and Taiwan point to stockpiling of intermediate goods. 'Meanwhile, lower energy import bills from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Brazil provided only limited relief. Overall, the trade balance remains fragmented, shaped by temporary tariff distortions and entrenched structural deficits,' it said. TA Research anticipates the drag from the reciprocal tariff may only materialise with a lag effect, likely in the late third or fourth quarter of the year, as supply chains adjust and exporters recalibrate orders.
New Straits Times
9 hours ago
- New Straits Times
AI will replace most humans in workplace, but then what?
IS technology more job augmenting or job replacing? This has been a long-standing debate. But recent academic work suggests that technology has been a net destroyer of jobs for decades. Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics could rapidly accelerate this trend, with significant implications for inflation, the size of government and United States-China relations. Over the long arc of history, technological advances have enabled industries to emerge, as workers, released from "older" jobs by machines, have been able to transition into newer ones. Indeed, 60 per cent of workers today are employed in occupations that did not exist in 1940, or 74 per cent if we consider just the professional category, which added the most workers during the past eight decades. However, recent academic research suggests we may have reached an inflection point in the US, whereby technology is now destroying more jobs than it is creating. David Autor, an economist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and winner of the 2005 John Clark Bates Medal, argues that since 1980, the jobs replaced by automation have not been fully offset by new jobs created. This reflects the pace of technological change and the fact that advancements are now increasingly focused on "professional, technical, and managerial occupations", Autor notes, rather than lower-skilled work. He finds that machines that are more powerful than an average human (e.g., a tractor) are typically labour-augmenting and productivity-enhancing, while machines that are also smarter than the average human tend to be labour-substituting. And AI is on pace to be a lot smarter than most humans. While forms of AI have been around since the 1940s, the immense computing power resulting from advances in semiconductor technologies has now allowed machines to attain multidimensional intelligence. It is, therefore, reasonable to assume that many workers are going to be replaced by automation in the coming decades, even if the best AI is never as creative or imaginative as the smartest humans. A 2019 OECE report and a 2018 paper by PriceWaterhouseCoopers argue that 15 to 30 per cent of all jobs in developed markets are at risk of being automated. If AI does turn out to be a net job destroyer, what are some of the biggest implications? First, it's likely to be deflationary. High and rising unemployment resulting from ever cheaper and more capable machines should, in theory, lead to structural deflation, as technologies that can rapidly augment the supply of goods and services should reduce demand if they cause massive job losses. Next, the US government will probably get even bigger. In a mass unemployment scenario, the government would likely be compelled to step in to facilitate income and wealth transfers from the owners of robots and tech businesses to the unemployed workers. And which countries will come out on top? The economic winners and losers in the years ahead will likely be determined by who can best create and utilise technology. The US and China, both dominant in cerebral technologies, therefore, appear well positioned to thrive in this environment. Even if the trade war between the US and China is short, the tech war between these two countries could be protracted — and ultimately much more consequential. The tech war, unlike the trade war, is dynamic, meaning it's continually evolving and advancing. My views here are admittedly speculative. But the arguments for why AI and robotics could ultimately be labour-creating are as well. Furthermore, these arguments are often obscured by sloppy references to labour productivity, which is a simple ratio between output and labour input. When calculating this, there is often little explanation of what part of the output should be attributed to the labour input. For example, should subway train drivers account for the value of the entire subway system? Projections based on such questionable assumptions should be viewed cautiously. Finally, it's also true that populations in many developed markets are ageing, so the heavy use of automation could simply offset the shrinkage in the labour force, something we're already seeing in Japan and South Korea. But ageing, like natural evolution in general, is gradual, while computational and technological evolution accelerates at an exponential pace. Because of the convexity in technological advances, it's hard not to bet on technology rather than workers.
