Show of force: China to parade military hardware with Putin in attendance
The event, marking 80 years since the end of World War II, will see President Xi Jinping inspect troops in Beijing's Tiananmen Square, with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin and other world leaders expected to attend.
Millions of Chinese people were killed during a prolonged war with imperial Japan in the 1930s and 40s, which became part of a global conflict following Tokyo's attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941.
The ruling Communist Party has held a series of blockbuster events in recent years to commemorate its wartime resistance.
On September 3, China's military will showcase its latest equipment, 'reflecting the evolution of modern warfare', said Major General Wu Zeke, an official at China's military commission.
'All of the weapons and equipment taking part in this review were selected from domestically produced, currently active main battle systems, with a significant proportion being newly unveiled equipment,' Wu told reporters at a briefing.
These will include strategic heavy weapons, hypersonic precision systems, as well as unmanned and counter-unmanned equipment making their first public debut, he added.
The parade, which will last around 70 minutes, will 'fully showcase our military's powerful capability to prevail in modern war', Wu said.
It will also feature ground troops marching in formation, armoured columns, aerial echelons and other high-tech fighting gear.
The Kremlin has confirmed Putin will attend, and Chinese officials said other world leaders are also expected to take in the scene.
China in March raised its defence spending for 2025 by 7.2 per cent.
The increase comes as Beijing's armed forces undergo rapid modernisation and eye deepening strategic competition with the United States.
China has the world's second-largest military budget, but lags well behind the United States, its primary strategic rival. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
4 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
India test-fires Agni-5 missile capable of striking any part of China
NEW DELHI, Aug 21 — India said yesterday it had successfully test-fired an intermediate-range ballistic missile which, when operational, should be capable of carrying a nuclear warhead to any part of China. The Agni-5 missile was successfully launched in India's eastern Odisha state, with authorities saying it 'validated all operational and technical parameters.' India and China, the world's two most populous nations, are intense rivals competing for influence across South Asia and relations plummeted in 2020 after a deadly border clash. India is also part of the Quad security alliance with the United States, Australia and Japan, which is seen as a counter to China. India's bitter rival Pakistan has nuclear weapons as well and the two countries came to close to war in May after militants killed 26 people in Indian-administered Kashmir, an attack New Delhi blamed on Islamabad. But Pakistan denied any involvement. Caught in global trade and geopolitical turbulence triggered by US President Donald Trump's tariff war, Delhi and Beijing have moved to mend ties. Last October, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping for the first time in five years at a summit in Russia. Modi is expected to make his first visit to China since 2018 later this month to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) -- a regional security bloc. Ties between New Delhi and Washington, meanwhile, have been strained by Trump's ultimatum that India end its purchases of Russian oil, a key source of revenue for Moscow as it wages its military offensive in Ukraine. The United States says it will double new import tariffs on India from 25 percent to 50 percent by August 27 if New Delhi does not switch crude suppliers. The Agni-5 is one of a number of indigenously produced short- and medium-range Indian ballistic missiles aimed at boosting its defence posture against Pakistan, as well as China. — AFP
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump dangles Ukraine security guarantees, risks backlash from own base
WASHINGTON: Donald Trump's newfound if vague willingness to entertain security guarantees for Ukraine could be a game-changer, but the US president's right-wing base is already warning him not to go too far. After a campaign last year spent bashing predecessor Joe Biden over billions of dollars in aid to Ukraine, and Trump's public upbraiding of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in February, Trump has considered promises to Kyiv to end the Russian invasion. He has ruled out ground troops as well as Nato membership, siding with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in blaming Ukraine's aspirations for the Western alliance for the February 2022 invasion. But after Trump welcomed Putin to Alaska on Friday, Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff said the Russian president had agreed to a "concession" of the United States offering "Article Five-like protection" for Ukraine, referring to Nato's binding promise that an attack on one is an attack on all. Some observers doubted Witkoff's understanding of Putin, noting that Moscow publicly has insisted on guarantees for Russia. But Trump has said "we'll give them very good protection" and has spoken of providing US airpower to enforce any agreement. Little is known about what US airpower would entail, but it could support a deployment of European troops to Ukraine mulled by France and Britain. If the United States agreed to enforce control of the Ukrainian skies, it would be an "incredible green light for greater ambition" by Europeans on security, said Kristine Berzina, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund. European leaders showed striking unity and solidarity by coming together to Washington on Monday to back Zelenskyy in talks with Trump, she said. "For there to be a meaningful difference on the ground in Ukraine, it can't just be diplomatic alignment. It can't just be the heads of state being in lockstep for a few days at a time," she said. "Instead, they have to be ready to actually move and to show to Trump, 'We have everything ready; we just need x from you to make this work.'" Trump, however, could also authorise a much smaller air deployment, such as one focused on reconnaissance that would see limited numbers of US planes in the Ukrainian skies. "President Trump said some things in his meetings with the European leaders and Zelenskyy and I am betting a huge sum of money that there are people around Trump who are going to spend a lot of time walking that back," said Debra Cagan, a former senior US policymaker now at the Atlantic Council. "What I mean by that is that they're going to try a very de minimis approach to security guarantees, to do as little as possible to carry that out," she said. She said that any successful strategy needed to have components on land and air as well as sea, including keeping the crucial Black Sea ports open for Ukraine. Trump retains a strong hold on the Republican Party, but has already seen some dissent within his hard-right base, which backed him in part for his dismissive attitude to foreign involvement. Outspoken Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who earlier criticised Trump for bombing Iran, said she believed voters would be "appalled" by more support for Ukraine as they struggle with day-to-day concerns. "America is broke," she told conservative host Megyn Kelly. "At some point we have to start saying no to the rest of the world." Trump-aligned Senator Tommy Tuberville said it would be an "impossible sell" to voters still shaken by the Iraq and Afghanistan wars to start another long-term US military commitment, according to The Hill newspaper. Trump, however, has tried hard to portray the war as belonging to Biden and has spoken openly of his desire for the Nobel Peace Prize.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Trump Ukraine security shift faces base backlash over vague promises
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's newfound and vague willingness to consider security guarantees for Ukraine represents a potential policy shift. His right-wing base is already warning him against moving too far from his previous isolationist stance. Trump spent much of last year's campaign criticising predecessor Joe Biden over billions in aid to Ukraine. He publicly upbraided Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky back in February. Trump has now reportedly considered making promises to Kyiv aimed at ending the Russian invasion. He has firmly ruled out sending American ground troops or supporting NATO membership for Ukraine. Trump sides with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in blaming Ukraine's Western alliance aspirations for the 2022 invasion. Following Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska, his envoy Steve Witkoff claimed a Russian concession. Witkoff stated the US might offer 'Article Five-like protection' for Ukraine, referencing NATO's mutual defence clause. Some observers immediately questioned Witkoff's interpretation of Putin's position. Moscow has publicly insisted it requires security guarantees for Russia, not Ukraine. Trump himself has said 'we'll give them very good protection' and mentioned providing US airpower. The specifics of what US airpower would entail remain largely undefined. It could potentially support a deployment of European troops to Ukraine being considered by France and Britain. US enforcement of Ukrainian air control would be an 'incredible green light for greater ambition' by Europeans, said Kristine Berzina of the German Marshall Fund. She noted the striking unity European leaders showed by backing Zelensky in Washington talks with Trump. 'For there to be a meaningful difference on the ground in Ukraine, it can't just be diplomatic alignment,' Berzina explained. 'It can't just be the heads of state being in lockstep for a few days at a time.' She added that European leaders 'have to be ready to actually move and to show to Trump, 'We have everything ready; we just need x from you to make this work.'' Trump could authorise a much smaller air deployment focused solely on reconnaissance. This would see only limited numbers of US planes operating in Ukrainian airspace. Former senior US policymaker Debra Cagan predicts Trump's team will try to walk back his statements. 'I am betting a huge sum of money that there are people around Trump who are going to spend a lot of time walking that back,' Cagan stated. 'They're going to try a very de minimis approach to security guarantees, to do as little as possible to carry that out.' She emphasised that any successful strategy needs land, air, and sea components, including keeping Black Sea ports open. Trump retains a strong hold on the Republican Party but faces dissent within his hard-right base. This base backed him largely for his dismissive attitude toward foreign military involvement. Outspoken Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene said voters would be 'appalled' by more Ukraine support. 'America is broke,' Greene told conservative host Megyn Kelly. 'At some point we have to start saying no to the rest of the world.' Trump-aligned Senator Tommy Tuberville called it an 'impossible sell' to voters wary of long-term military commitments. Trump has worked hard to portray the war as belonging to Biden and openly desires a Nobel Peace Prize. Berzina suggested Trump could frame this to his base as 'about America keeping peace and not about America making war.' - AFP
