ChatGPT took on a 50-year-old Atari — and lost
Atari 2600
, first launched in 1977, outperformed
ChatGPT
in a recent experiment to the point that the AI chatbot conceded.
The experiment was set up by cloud computing engineer Robert Jr. Caruso after ChatGPT itself insisted on playing chess against an Atari following a conversation about AI in chess.
OpenAI
's chatbot "claimed it was a strong player in its own right and would easily beat Atari's Video Chess", Caruso said in a LinkedIn post. He expected it to be "a lighthearted stroll down retro memory lane" for the AI. His hopes were deflated once the match began.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Roteirizador Pathfind - O planejador de rotas mais completo do mercado
Sistema TMS embarcador
Saiba Mais
Undo
ChatGPT and its various AI models are being used for everything from answering emails, generating images and conducting in-depth research. Meanwhile, Atari 2600 sports an 8-bit, 1.1 MHz CPU which could only think 1–2 moves ahead.
Live Events
ChatGPT got absolutely wrecked on the beginner level, Caruso wrote. Despite being given a baseline board layout to identify pieces, ChatGPT confused rooks for bishops, missed pawn forks, and repeatedly lost track of pieces. The AI chatbot first blamed the Atari icons as too abstract to recognise, then failed to improve even after switching to the standard system of recording chess moves.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
At times, ChatGPT worked — analysing moves, explaining options and offering solid advice. At others, it made absurd suggestions — like sacrificing a knight to a pawn — or tried to move pieces that had already been captured, even during turns when it otherwise had an accurate view of the board, Caruso wrote.
He said he had to stop ChatGPT from making awful moves and correct its board awareness multiple times per turn over 90 minutes. The modern tech kept promising it would improve 'if we just started over.' Eventually, it conceded the challenge to Atari.
Technology has been better at chess than humans since the IBM Deep Blue supercomputer defeated the erstwhile champion and renowned grandmaster Gary Kasparov in 1997. The latest Stockfish
chess engine
have an estimated 3,600 points on the Elo chess ranking system, whereas the current world number one Magnus Carlsen has the highest rating among humans at around 2,800.
One response to Caruso's post argued that ChatGPT does not employ artificial general intelligence (AGI), and only emulates human examples. Thus, it was unfair to test it in a game of logic like chess. Another pointed out that ChatGPT is not a chess engine, unlike Atari 2600, which despite being archaic, tracks the board and formulates moves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Gamblers now bet on AI models like racehorses
Now that AI developers are getting paid like pro athletes, it's fitting that fans are placing big bets on how well they're doing their jobs. On Kalshi, Polymarket and other sites where people wager 'predictions" on real-world events, gamblers lay down millions each month on their picks for AI's top model. The AI arms race is playing out in plain sight on social media, ranking sites and obscure corners of the internet where enthusiasts hunt for clues. The constant buzz makes the topic appealing for wagers, though not every scrap of information is meaningful. Foster McCoy made $10,000 in a few hours in early August by betting against the success of OpenAI's GPT-5 release. The 27-year-old day trader noticed people were misreading an online ranking site that appeared to hype GPT-5, so he put $4,500 on its competitor, Google's Gemini, to be 'Best AI This Month." As more bettors fell in line with his call, he cashed out. That's just another day for McCoy, who has traded $3.2 million on Kalshi since the start of 2025—making $170,000. He's part of a growing contingent of bettors making hundreds of trades a week on AI markets, on a range of wagers such as 'Best AI at the end of 2025," 'AI regulation becomes federal law this year," and 'Will [Chief Executive] Sam Altman be granted an equity stake in OpenAI this year?" Trading volume across AI prediction markets has surged to around $20 million this month. Kalshi, the only platform currently available in the U.S., is seeing 10 times the volume on AI trades compared with the start of the year, a spokesman says. Each bet, or 'contract," is priced in cents to reflect the odds: McCoy bought thousands of Gemini contracts at around 40 cents, meaning it had a 40% chance of winning. If the bet had settled and Gemini won, McCoy's 40 cents would become a dollar. If Gemini lost, McCoy would lose it all. But much of the action happens before the final outcome. As more people piled into the Gemini bet, the contract price rose. McCoy sold when it had reached 87 cents. It's like betting on a sports match, only with the option to cash out when the odds rise in favor of your bet. 'You're just betting against what the other guy knows," says McCoy, who credits his success to 'being chronically online." He trades from home on a triple-monitor setup tuned to the holy trinity of AI betting: X, Discord and LMArena, a leaderboard where people rate AI model performance in blind tests. Social-media beefs can be gold for gamblers. After GPT-5's debut, a flurry of Elon Musk posts claiming the superiority of his xAI Grok chatbot sent the 'Grok to Win" market up more than 500% within hours. Before long, it had fallen nearly all the way back down. Bettors end up down rabbit holes hunting for more obscure tidbits. Harvard undergraduate Rishab Jain often scans X accounts of lesser-known researchers. The day before GPT-5's release, OpenAI's Sam Altman posted an image of the Death Star from 'Star Wars." When a researcher from Google's DeepMind replied with an image of the killer globe under attack, Jain read it as a sign of confidence from Gemini's makers. Jain also scrapes source files from Google's apps and monitors public GitHub repositories tied to its products, looking for back-end changes that might signal a soon-to-be-released Gemini model. 'I'm almost obsessively up-to-date with what's going on in this world," Jain says. 'Google has so many products that need to integrate a new model before it officially launches, and you can see those changes happening in the back end if you know where to look." Since starting in June, he has won $3,500. Strategies vary. Some bet on the big industry players, others buy low on less-known or soon-to-be-updated models. Some compare odds on Kalshi and Polymarket to find arbitrage opportunities in the odds. As volume for these AI trades continues to grow, the incentive for good information will only increase, and the squeeze on casual bettors will get tighter, says Robin Hanson, a professor of economics at George Mason University. 'When you have better information in these kinds of markets, you can make better decisions," Hanson says. 'If you know a little more, you make more money." For now, the markets still draw a mix of sharks like McCoy and Jain along with casual bettors. 'I'm just a dude that likes tech and has some time and money," says James Cole, a 35-year-old who recently shut down a company he founded. 'I'm speculating with mostly instinct and 10 minutes of research." He says he's up for the year…so far. Write to Ben Raab at
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
US Big Tech Firms Accused Of Bending H-1B Rules With Newspaper Job Listings: Report
Last Updated: In recent months, big tech companies such as OpenAI and Instacart have put job ads, asking applicants to send their resumes to the immigration or 'global mobility' departments. Companies that hire H-1B foreign workers and want to sponsor them for a green card must advertise those jobs to American workers. But a media report said that the job ads placed in local newspapers are aimed at immigrants instead. In recent months, big tech companies such as OpenAI and Instacart have put job advertisements in the San Francisco Chronicle, asking applicants to send their resumes to the immigration or 'global mobility" departments, Newsweek reported. a website that looks for H-1B job postings to share with Americans, told Newsweek that most Americans don't even realise big tech firms are regularly discriminating against them. 'At a time when unemployment for college graduates is shifting sharply upward, it is important to call out hiring discrimination that could keep Americans unemployed," they said. also said that recruitment for these roles is done separately from the firms' standard recruitment process. 'These unusual application methods are likely to drive fewer applications than normal processes like posting ads on the company job board or on mainstream career sites like LinkedIn," they said. Another tech company, Instacart, advertised several jobs and also asked applicants to apply through a similar department. Udemy, the online learning platform, posted a job for a Director of Marketing Analytics and Data Science, telling applicants to send their resumes to 'immigration@ according to the Newsweek report. The H-1B program lets US companies, especially tech firms, hire skilled foreign workers for specialised jobs. A large number of H-1B visas go to Indian nationals each year, and the programme is an important way for many students from US universities to move into full-time jobs. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
H-1B visa hiring gap revealed: Why top US tech giants favour immigrants over citizens
For many US students, a degree in STEM, whether in computer science, artificial intelligence, or data analytics, is considered a golden ticket to the top of the tech world. Universities spend millions on cutting-edge labs, top faculty, and internship programs to ensure graduates are 'job-ready. ' But recent revelations about H-1B visa hiring practices suggest that even well-prepared American graduates are often missing out on key opportunities at leading tech firms. Hidden recruitment channels give immigrants an edge Tech companies sponsoring foreign workers for green cards are legally required to post positions publicly. However, reports indicate that some firms structure postings in ways that effectively funnel applications to H-1B visa holders. Jobs may be routed to 'global mobility' or 'immigration' departments, bypassing standard recruitment channels like LinkedIn, Indeed, or company career pages. For example, a director-level posting at Udemy reportedly asked candidates to apply via 'immigration@ while similar roles at OpenAI and Instacart have followed comparable practices. While technically compliant with regulatory requirements, this approach reduces the visibility of openings for US-born applicants. Many American students may never even be aware that these roles exist, let alone have a fair chance to compete. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo The education-opportunity mismatch This creates a growing disconnect between what students are trained for and the jobs they can realistically access. American universities invest heavily in STEM education, equipping students with skills that are supposed to prepare them for the most advanced and competitive roles in tech. Yet the practical reality shows a different story: some of the most coveted positions are effectively 'hidden' behind visa-specific application channels. Students may graduate with degrees in AI, cloud computing, or data science, only to find that roles requiring these very skills are disproportionately directed toward international applicants. This mismatch undermines the promise of STEM education and raises questions about how well universities are preparing graduates for the real job market. International students are often better positioned Ironically, international students sometimes have a natural advantage. They are more likely to understand the H-1B visa process, global mobility offices, and immigration-driven recruitment pathways. Many arrive on campus already aware of these channels, or they learn about them through peer networks and advisors. As a result, international graduates, even those who studied in the US, can navigate hidden recruitment paths more successfully than American-born peers. The effect is striking: in roles where skill levels may be similar, visa-aware applicants are often the ones securing the positions. Why transparency and guidance matter These hiring practices have broad implications. Universities, career advisors, and policymakers need to confront the reality that top STEM jobs may not always be accessible in ways students expect. Greater transparency from employers, better guidance from universities, and awareness of H-1B recruitment channels can help domestic talent compete fairly. It also raises questions about fairness and equity in the tech sector. Should access to high-level roles depend on knowledge of visa processes rather than purely on skill and merit? How can universities ensure that students' years of preparation translate into real opportunities? Navigating the system: what students can do Despite these challenges, the tech sector remains full of opportunities. Awareness is key. Students should: Learn about H-1B visa pathways and global mobility offices. Research which companies favour certain application channels and adjust their job searches accordingly. Seek guidance from career offices about hidden or specialised application routes. Network with alumni and peers who have successfully navigated visa-sponsored roles . Understanding these unspoken rules can make the difference between landing a top tech job and missing out, even with a strong academic record. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
