Orphaned in Mandi's flash flood, 10-month-old Neetika finds a mother in her aunt
Many people from across the country and abroad expressed their willingness to adopt Neetika; however, her father's sister has taken the child under her care, Balh Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Samritika Negi said.
Tara Devi, the aunt, called Neetika her "daughter" and ruled out any option of giving her up for adoption, officials said.
The infant's father, Ramesh Kumar (31), was trying to block the flow of water gushing into their home when the cloudburst occurred. His body was later found in the debris. Neetika's mother, Radha Devi (24), and grandmother, Purnu Devi (59), went out to search for Ramesh but have yet to be located.
Prem Singh, the family's neighbour, spotted the crying infant all alone and took her to Ramesh's cousin, Balwant, a personal security officer for former chief minister and Leader of Opposition Jai Ram Thakur.
The sub-divisional magistrate, who received numerous calls from people wanting to help after hearing about the tragedy, initiated the opening of a bank account in Neetika's name.
Negi further informed that two bank accounts were opened in the Himachal Co-operative and the Punjab National Bank for Neetika. The money deposited in these accounts will be preserved for her education, which she can access when she turns 18.
Currently, Neetika is with her relatives, and government agencies are making every effort to ensure her well-being, officials added.
Thakur visited Neetika's home on Saturday to enquire about her condition. He mentioned that an NGO proposed to take responsibility for her education, and the child's family will make the final decision on this matter.
Thakur highlighted that although there have been many incidents of loss of life and property due to the rains, the case of a little girl losing her family is particularly heart-wrenching. He urged the state government to fulfil its obligation and provide benefits under the Chief Minister Sukh Aashray Yojana for the child.
Under the Sukh Aashray Yojana, the government offers comprehensive care to thousands of orphans and destitute children across the state, effectively acting as their guardian. These children have been designated as 'Children of the State.'
Meanwhile, search operations are still underway to trace the 27 who were washed away after 10 cloudbursts, flash floods, and landslides wreaked havoc in various parts of Mandi on the intervening night of June 30 and July 1 and resulted in the deaths of 15 people.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Vikas Barala's appointment as law officer a reflection of govt's values, says Varnika
A day after the appointment of former Haryana BJP president Subash Barala's son Vikas Barala, who is facing trial in the infamous 2017 stalking case, as assistant advocate general by the Haryana government, the complainant, Varnika Kundu, called it a reflection of 'values and standards' of the authorities. Varnika Kundu wrote that perhaps the questions should be directed at the authorities whose ethics and standards allowed this decision to be made. (HT Photo) Kundu, daughter of retired IAS officer VS Kundu, vented out her anger on an Instagram post, writing, 'Appointing someone to a public position of power is not just a political decision, it's a reflection of values and standards.' She went on to write that perhaps the questions should be directed at the authorities whose ethics and standards allowed this decision to be made. 'Our policy makers run the country; the rest of us are just hoping they remember they work for the Indian citizen,' she wrote. 'Faith in judiciary has wavered' Kundu also spoke about the case and the never-ending adjournments in court, which have resulted in a long delay. The case made headlines in 2017 and has been crawling in Chandigarh's district courts at a snail's pace. '...despite months of national media attention, it has dragged on for this long with little progress. Although we seem no closer to a conclusion than we were five year ago, I continue to hold faith in the judiciary until the verdict is announced, but I won't deny that faith has wavered,' she further wrote. The case was registered on August 4, 2017, under Sections 354-D, 341, 365, 511 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code when Varnika Kundu, then a disco jockey (DJ), was allegedly stalked by accused Vikas and his friend Ashish. She was headed home when she noticed a car following her. As per the case, the two accused attempted to block her path and tried to enter her vehicle. Police had added sections of kidnapping after widespread criticism of police functioning. 102 court hearings in seven years The Chandigarh Police had filed a 200-page chargesheet in the stalking case on September 20, 2017. A district court had framed charges on October 13, 2017, and trial began on October 27, 2017. Ever since, there have been over 100 hearings in the trial court, but repeatedly adjourned on various grounds. In February this year, the case was transferred to the court of judicial magistrate first class where it is currently being heard. It will next come up for hearing on August 2. I am out to get justice, says Varnika Having quit as DJ two years ago, Kundu, 36, has since found new found passion in baking. Running a bakery business 'Chonky' from home, she admits life has changed after the incident. 'I am out to get justice,' she says. 'Someone had to stand up for those silent women without power,' she says. Kundu, who knew martial arts before the stalking incident, has now also trained in firearms. In 2018, Google Maps renamed Chandigarh's 'Geri Route', the stretch between Sectors 10 and 11, to 'Azadi Route', following a movement sparked by the stalking incident, under the banner 'Bekhauf Azaadi', to reclaim public spaces.
Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Former Punjab Police SP gets 10-yr RI in 1993 fake encounter case
A CBI court in Mohali sentenced former Punjab Police officer Paramjit Singh, 67, to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment in a 32-year-old fake encounter case in which two constables were declared militants and killed. The court also imposed a fine of ₹50,000 on the convict, who was then the station house officer (SHO) of Beas. Kin show pictures of two constables killed in fake encounter by Majitha police 32 years ago. (HT Photo) Four others— then inspector Dharam Singh, 77, ASI Darbara Singh, 71, and ASI Kashmir Singh, 69 — were acquitted due to lack of evidence. Another accused, ASI Ram Lubhaya, died during the course of the trial in 2002. Delivering the judgment, special CBI Judge Baljinder Singh Sra held that the 1993 case had shocked the state for its brazen misuse of power. As per the CBI investigation, on April 18, 1993, constable Surmukh Singh, a resident of Muchhal village of Baba Bakala, Amritsar, was taken from his home around 6 am by a police party led by inspector Paramjit Singh. Later that day, around 2 pm, another constable, Sukhwinder Singh of Amritsar's Khiala village, was picked up by a team led by SI Ram Lubhaya. Two days later, on April 20, Sukhwinder's parents, Balbir Kaur and Dildar Singh, visited the Beas police station, but were denied access to their son. On April 22, the Majitha Police claimed that two unidentified militants had been killed in an encounter. FIRs were registered under IPC Sections 307/34, Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, and Section 5 of the TADA Act. The bodies were cremated without identification. Shockingly, within a week, SHO Dharam Singh filed an 'untraced report,' claiming the bodies were unidentified and no further investigation was required. However, a subsequent CBI probe established that the 'unknown militants' were, in fact, the two constables picked up days earlier by the Beas Police. The investigation revealed that the encounter was staged and police documents were fabricated to make it appear genuine. CBI public prosecutor Anmol Narang, assisted by advocates Sarabjit Singh Verka, Pushpinder Singh Natt, and Jagjit Singh, represented the complainant families. The accused were represented by advocates KS Nagra and Janpal Singh. The case was among several related to mass cremations of unidentified bodies in Punjab that were handed over to the CBI by the Supreme Court in the 1990s. Following the apex court's directions, a preliminary inquiry was registered by the CBI on December 26, 1995. During the probe, Balbir Kaur testified that her son, Sukhwinder Singh, was taken away by police and never returned. She alleged he had been killed and cremated as 'lawaris' (unclaimed). Charges in the case were formally framed on September 9, 1999. However, the trial saw repeated delays due to stays granted by higher courts from 2001 to 2016 and again from 2016 to 2022, owing to what the victim's counsel termed 'frivolous petitions' filed by the accused. These petitions were ultimately dismissed. Due to the prolonged trial, only 27 witnesses could be examined — several had died in the intervening years, while others allegedly turned hostile under pressure. After more than three decades of legal struggle, the court has finally delivered its verdict. 'Justice has been delayed, but not denied,' said Sarabjit Singh Verka, counsel for the victims' families. 'Despite every attempt by the accused to delay and derail the process, truth has prevailed.'
Hindustan Times
11 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Court cites ‘consensual relationship' while granting bail to teacher accused of sexually assaulting student
MUMBAI: The 40-year-old female teacher of a prominent Mumbai school who was booked under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for engaging in sexual activity with one of her students, was granted bail on the ground that the boy was over 16 years of age, and evidence shows there was a 'consensual relationship subsequently.' According to the FIR, from January 2024 to February 2025, the woman had sex with the boy at various five-star hotels and also in her car. (Shutterstock) As reported earlier by HT, the teacher had been arrested for allegedly sexually assaulting the minor student on multiple occasions for over a year and for luring him to five-star hotels, plying him with alcohol and then engaging in sex with him. She was arrested last month after the boy's family complained to the police. In a detailed order, the special court for cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act noted that the accused's resignation from the school last year—during which the alleged sexual assaults took place-- had diluted the 'student-teacher dynamic.' Special judge Sabina Malik also said the trial will take time to commence, so keeping the woman behind bars would not serve any purpose. The court granted the woman bail after considering that she is the mother of two minor children. The accused has denied all the allegations, claiming the FIR was 'motivated' and filed at the insistence of the boy's mother who disapproved of their relationship. In her bail plea, she stated that the boy was emotionally attached to her and referred to her as his 'wife'. She also claimed that he had sent her affectionate messages and handwritten notes, and had a tattoo of her name on his body, adding that these facts were deliberately omitted from the police complaint. The teacher also claimed that she had resigned from the school in April 2024 to distance herself from the boy and insisted that she would only meet him with his mother's permission. However, he continued to contact her, she alleged. According to the FIR, from January 2024 to February 2025, the woman had sex with the boy at various five-star hotels and also in her car. She allegedly also gave him alcohol and medication for anxiety, and used a female colleague to persuade him to meet her. She then resigned from the school last year after the boy passed Class 11. In the bail order, the court noted, 'As the accused had resigned from the school, the relationship of a teacher and student no longer existed and, hence, the influence was diluted.' The court also took note of the accused's contention that the police had provided the grounds of her arrest to her in Marathi, a language she does not understand, and that she was made to sign the documents without a translation. The court recorded this as part of its reasoning while noting improper compliance with arrest procedures under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). In her bail plea, the accused pointed to her responsibilities as a single mother of 11-year-old twins—one of whom suffers from a respiratory condition—as grounds for leniency. She submitted her daughter's medical records and argued that her incarceration was affecting the children's education and mental health. Opposing bail, both the prosecution and the complainant cited trauma, threats, and concerns over tampering with evidence. However, the court said these risks could be addressed through strict bail conditions. 'The potential risk to the victim, if any, could be catered to by imposing necessary terms and conditions,' the court order stated, while also warning that 'breach of any condition will amount to cancellation of bail'. The teacher was granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000, with one or more solvent sureties of the same amount. She was directed not to contact the victim or witnesses, tamper with evidence, or leave Mumbai without the court's permission. The accused was earlier booked under sections 123 (sexual assault), 351(2) (aggravated sexual assault by person in authority), and 3(5) (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, along with relevant sections of the Pocso Act and the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
