Warning state pensioners may have to pay tax even if they have no other income
Many pensioners may have to pay Income Tax in the future even if they have no other sources of income, a top pensions expert warns. This is largely due to modifications in the triple lock system, which boosts the amount received by everyone on the State Pension.
The Government is bound each year to increase the sum it pays out in pensions, thanks to the triple lock. Despite debates over its hefty cost to the state, it remains in place for the foreseeable future, having been enshrined in a Labour manifesto pledge.
This stipulates that State Pension payouts must rise in line with one of three measures: wage growth, inflation, or a flat 2.5 percent, whichever is highest, every April. However, Steve Webb, a partner at pensions firm LCP, has suggested that the State Pension is set to exceed the Personal Allowance Income Tax threshold from April 2027.
The shift is anticipated to come into effect on April 6, marking the start of the new tax year. Consequently, the Express reports that even if a pensioner with no other income receives the benefit, HMRC might still tax part of their State Pension.
Currently, the State Pension disburses a total of £11,973 annually to those on the full new State Pension who have a complete National Insurance record of qualifying years (typically around 35 years).
Meanwhile, the current Income Tax Personal Allowance threshold sits at £12,570, which means State Pensioners without any other income will narrowly avoid the Income Tax threshold in 2025-2026 by just £597.
Pensioners already face Income Tax obligations, but generally require extra income on top of the State Pension to surpass the tax-free limit. At present, nobody relying solely on State Pension payments would face tax on them - though this could alter in years to come.
Steve Webb explained to the Express: "This is because the triple lock formula provides a floor of 2.5% increases, meaning the rate will rise at least £236 in April 2026 and £241.90 in April 2027. The April 2027 rate is £12,578 per year, just above the £12,570 tax threshold.
"This could mean hundreds of thousands of pensioners are taxed on just £8 per year, with a tax bill of £1.60. If tax-free personal allowance then rises by CPI but the State Pension rises by more, then this situation will continue indefinitely.
"A combination of an increasing State Pension and frozen tax thresholds means we will soon be in the nonsensical situation where the new State Pension will be just a few pounds above the income tax threshold. This means that people whose only income is the standard new State Pension will be dragged into income tax. Long gone are the days when retirement meant no longer having to deal with the tax office."
Despite the incredibly low tax - potentially as little as £8 - any change would still signify a tax imposition by HMRC, and the amount would rise annually unless there are changes to the Government thresholds.
One possible solution could be to increase the Personal Allowance threshold, which has been unchanged for years. However, Labour has pledged to keep tax thresholds frozen until 2028 - a position it may need to reassess sooner if it wants to avoid headlines about taxing all pensioners.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP will give state pensioners £5,740 tax-free and there is no means-testing
Attendance Allowance is a benefit from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) for people of State Pension age and over. It's not means-tested so it doesn't matter what other money you get State pensioners are being offered £5,740 which isn't means-tested. The Attendance Allowance i sn't affected by any other income you receive or how much you have in savings - there's no limit. This won't impact your state pension and you can claim it even if you're still working and earning money. A lengthy claim form needs to be filled out when applying for Attendance Allowance. It might seem intimidating initially, but assistance is available from your local Citizens Advice, so don't let the form deter you from applying. In other news, Nationwide wil l pay £760 into accounts of customers who do one thing. Attendance Allowance is a tax-free benefit provided by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). You'll be exempt from the Benefit Cap, meaning no money will be deducted from any other benefits, reports Birmingham Live. To claim Attendance Allowance, you need to have reached State Pension age. Additionally, you need to have a disability or illness that makes self-care difficult. Many people are eligible for Attendance Allowance but lack sufficient knowledge about it to claim. You could receive between £73.90 and £110.40 per week - the amount depends on the level of help you require. The money can be spent as you wish - it could assist you in maintaining independence in your own home for longer. Claiming Attendance Allowance may also entitle you to additional support - for instance, you might qualify for a council tax reduction (this depends on your personal circumstances). Betty, 79, who suffers from arthritis in her knee and hip and also has a heart condition, shared: "I use some of my Attendance Allowance to visit my friend, Nancy, who lives a few miles away. I used to get 2 buses and it took an hour and exhausted me but my Attendance Allowance means I can get a taxi there in 10 minutes." She explained: "I also get a taxi to go to appointments, like the doctor or a consultant, or even the hairdresser. I still have enough money to pay for a cleaner once a week. It's made a huge difference to my life." David, 82, who is living with dementia, said: "I struggle to make ends meet on my pension so I use my Attendance Allowance to help with bills. It means I don't have to worry about having the heating on if I'm cold." "The money also means I can see more of my grandchildren. They mean the world to me and it would be difficult to see them without the extra money as I can't get public transport on my own," he added.
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Do politicians understand the internet?
The team answers listener questions on the practicalities of the online safety act, a Labour-Lib Dem coalition, and the revival of the commonwealth. Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
‘He's a great negotiator and diplomat': Starmer praised as UK outshines EU in Trump trade talks
As Donald Trump signed a new trade deal with the EU, many Independent readers were less focused on Brussels – and more surprised by how well the UK had done in comparison. With Keir Starmer securing lower tariffs and a visibly warmer reception from the US president, some asked: how did Britain get a better deal than the EU? Commenters were quick to praise Starmer's calm, measured style. One reader described him as a 'great negotiator and diplomat' with a 'forensic' grasp of detail, while another said Trump 'genuinely likes him' and respects that he 'stands up for himself' rather than fawning. In contrast, Europe's performance was seen as lacklustre, with the bloc 'unable to mount an effective response'. The EU-US deal itself drew criticism for being weak and symbolic, accused of rewarding Trump's coercive tactics and reframing tariffs as legitimate economic tools. Several readers lamented that the UK's apparent success would be used to claim a 'Brexit benefit' – while others were content to see the EU embarrassed. Here's what you had to say: A great negotiator and diplomat There's a lot of criticism of Starmer, and some is justified. While he might not be the greatest leader Labour we have had, there's no doubt he's a great negotiator and diplomat. What also helps him is that he has a strong sense of fairness, decency, and dignity. Then there's his obvious legal background, which you see in his forensic thoroughness when debating issues. Can you imagine Kemi Badenoch and that useless lot negotiating with Trump... he'd have a field day. DHC How do you feel about the UK's trade deal compared to Europe's? Share your thoughts in the comments and join the conversation below. Trump is half Scottish Trump is half Scottish and he seems to have a little more respect for his mother's native country. We also don't manufacture anything, and we have long given up the future capacity to be a producing nation. We are customers; Europe, on the other hand, is a competitor. 227detius A weak EU capitulating to Trump The deal has been widely criticised on the European side, viewed by some as a weak EU capitulating to Trump's demands, unable to mount an effective response. While that perception is difficult to counter, the reality is much more complex and nuanced. It's worth noting that the deal isn't a fully fleshed-out trade agreement but, for the time being, one of the many symbolic political deals Trump has announced in recent months. Yet it's not meaningless. It pauses what could have escalated into a full-scale transatlantic trade war and defuses a major source of volatility and anxiety. That said, the real challenge lies ahead – hammering out the details. Without legally binding documents, the door remains open to misinterpretation. We've seen this play out recently with the US-Japan agreement, hastily concluded a few days ago, and already sparking differing interpretations. The same could easily happen with the EU-US deal. The deal is being widely perceived as a big political win for Trump and a defeat for the EU, negatively affecting its image both domestically and worldwide. Unfortunately, this interpretation ultimately praises and legitimises an approach based on aggression and coercion, rewarding tactics that undermine trust and cooperation. Sadly, tariffs – long discredited as a blunt and damaging economic tool – are now being recast as effective policy instruments, which the EU should also wield. It's astonishing how, in only a few months, Trump has managed to frame such a confrontational strategy and unsound economic policies as a success – even with Europe. It's simply self-defeating. But whatever the "final outcome", the misery of this GileadUS administration will continue to affect the lives of billions of people! LeeisBlue I ignore all the Faragist, Corbynite vitriol Starmer really has done well in his dealings not only with Trump but also the EU and his Gaza stance. Additionally, his policies are really changing and improving our lives – e.g. the NHS is performing much better (my wife has benefitted from this). Frankly, I ignore all the Faragist, Corbynite vitriolic attacks on Starmer and co and research for myself what's ACTUALLY happening. All this Reform/Farage/Corbyn propaganda is a distraction, largely irrelevant. voxtrot UK sacrificed bioethanol sector The UK's largest trade partner, by far, in goods is the EU. Don't think EU's higher tariffs from the USA have no effect on the UK. The UK also sacrificed the bioethanol sector, and allowed US beef into the UK, to the detriment of home agriculture, to get those reduced tariffs. I know there is some desperation in some quarters to try and claim some form of #BrexitBenefit, and hope the utter disaster and failure that it is gets forgotten. wolfie Nothing to do with Starmer It's got nothing to do with Starmer. The UK got a better deal with the US than the EU despite Starmer, not because of him. The UK is an independent, sovereign nation again and no longer anchored to the failing, anti-democratic EU political union thanks to Brexit, and we're one of the US's closest allies. Our bond with the US will grow even stronger once the current shambles of a Labour government – that appears to be doing its best to suppress free speech – is booted out at the next election. Kingswood Diversifying the EU's trading partners Yes, but every trading country/bloc has the opportunity of improving their prospects by diversifying their trading portfolio. Perhaps this is what Ms von der Leyen had in mind when making a deal with Trump – i.e. to force the EU to diversify its trading partners. In the longer term, that might be the best solution. Hungubwe Trump swallowed the carrot of a state visit All to do with the vanity of Trump. The state visit was the ultimate carrot that Starmer dangled, and Trump swallowed it hook, line, and sinker. He likes the sense of self-importance which this state visit will bestow on him, and all the pomp and ceremony. Beyond this, it shows that as long as you pander to him, he's happy to tolerate most things. Charles's views on the climate and compassion for migrants would normally have him called a radical lefty by Trump, and likewise, Starmer would also get short shrift, but because they are praising Trump, he's lapping it up – for now. The only constant has been the unapologetic support for Netanyahu, and ultimately it will come to a head when the ethnic cleansing plan is put in place. At that point, the world will have to decide to confront Trump directly or capitulate under fear of tariffs, leaving NATO, etc. I fear the capitulation. Truthonly With Trump you always follow the money The UK has a trade surplus with the USA of about £2 billion. The EU's trade surplus is about £200 billion. That's the difference – it's nothing to do with love of the UK or a Scottish mother or the tactics of the UK government. With Trump, you always follow the money. He does hate the EU's society because it is so much better than the US, so he feels compelled to drag it down to his level. He also knows he can play the UK like a banjo, whereas he fears the EU. We all know he will change his mind at any minute. AnonyMousse Starmer has done well on international issues Starmer has done well on international issues. The problem is that his focus on those things has left his inexperienced underlings to preside over domestic affairs. We have to remind ourselves who they replaced though. Compared to 14 years of Tory corruption and chaos, they are paragons of efficiency. Inkling
