6 Ways To Get Rich With Little-to-No Skills
Find Out:
Read Next:
Whether you're starting from scratch, pivoting careers or just looking for unconventional ways to grow your income, there are lots of ways to go about building financial success with little-to-no formal skills.
For anyone who feels uncertain about how they could grow wealth without degrees, trade school or other experience, Patrick McAndrew, a financial planner from American Wealth Planner, pointed out that 'today, 35% of America's fastest-growing jobs are blue collar roles.'
Regardless of whether you have technical skills or soft skills, almost anyone can look for solutions that help people meet a need, he said.
'When people ask me what the best side hustles are for someone without specialized training, I always say: Look for a job that solves a basic human need.'
One such example is Poplin's Laundry Pros, a business he called 'recession-proof, predictable, and most people hate doing it, so there's huge demand.'
Laundry Pros processed 5 million loads of laundry, and demand keeps growing, he pointed out.
Learn More:
Jesse Frimpone, an e-commerce expert and CEO at Prestige Automation, suggested it's not hard to build an online shop with 'zero technological skills,' and just 'a straightforward drag-and-drop interface,' through sites like Shopify.
Then, you can use short-form video (TikTok, Instagram reels, YouTube Shorts) to reach your audience for free.
'These platforms' viral character means that, should your material appeal to viewers, it will soon be shared to hundreds or perhaps millions of others. Whether it's proving their advantages, unpacking or producing humorous or educational material around your items, concentrate on presenting them in use,' he explained.
The constantly evolving AI tools can free up your time for higher-level work and help to simplify repetitive chores, Frimpone said. For example, ChatGPT could help to answer consumer questions or create product descriptions. Jasper.ai could assist in creating emails, blogs or ad material. Canva can you help you quickly and easily design ads or presentations.
While you don't need specialized expertise, you do need a game plan, according to Arias Websterberry, CEO of WebsterBerry Marketing.
He said the fastest way to make money is to leverage skills that don't require formal education, things like sales, service-based gigs or digital content creation. 'The trick is to start where you are, learn as you go and focus on businesses or jobs that pay based on performance, not just time worked,' he said.
Websterberry also recommended freelancing on platforms like Fiverr or Upwork, or setting up your own website to doing a variety of services, including the following:
Selling digital products: Create and sell printables, templates or guides on Etsy or Gumroad.
Reselling and flipping: Buy low, sell high. Thrift stores, garage sales or Facebook Marketplace flips can turn small investments into profit.
Affiliate marketing: Promote products from Amazon, Shopify or ClickBank and earn commissions. You don't need to own anything, just drive traffic.
Service-based hustles: Pet sitting, mobile car detailing or lawn care require little investment but can be highly profitable.
Gig economy jobs: Instacart, DoorDash or renting out a room on Airbnb are simple ways to start generating cash flow.
'No matter which hustle you choose, the key is to focus on something scalable, meaning you can either automate it, outsource it or increase your rates over time,' he said.
Once you begin earning money, you can also start investing it, which is where the real wealth creation comes in, Websterberry pointed out.
'Passive income doesn't require a finance degree — it requires leverage. The best way to build passive income with no experience is to start small, reinvest and automate where possible,' he said.
Investing strategies can include:
Investing in dividend stocks: Apps like Robinhood and M1 Finance allow beginners to start investing in dividend-paying stocks with as little as $10.
Fractional stock investing: Platforms like Robinhood, Acorns and Webull let you invest in stocks with as little as $1.
Real estate crowdfunding: Apps like Fundrise let you invest in real estate for as little as $10.
High-yield savings accounts: Keep your emergency fund in a high-yield savings account so your money earns while sitting.
Index funds and ETFs: Instead of picking stocks, invest in broad market funds like the S&P 500, which historically grows over time.
Invest in knowledge: Books, courses and mentorships can provide a higher ROI than any stock if they help you build income-generating skills.
You don't need to start big, Websterberry said, just start. 'Time is the biggest factor in wealth-building, so the earlier you begin, the better.'
More From GOBankingRatesI'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 6 Ways To Get Rich With Little-to-No Skills
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT and a Financial Advisor How To Become a Millionaire: Here's How Their Advice Compared
For all of the transformative capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI), AI chatbots are still in their infancy stage. While applications like ChatGPT provide generic information that can be used to jump-start research or clarify terms, trusting it with a serious matter like a person's finances would certainly be foolish. Or would it? To test ChatGPT's accuracy on a unique and universally desired financial end goal for many Americans, GOBankingRates asked it how to become a millionaire and received an answer detailing things like how much you would need to invest and at what return, paths to use (consistent investing, growing a business, building high-income skills), and the importance of living below your means and avoiding wealth killers. Read Next: Find Out: GOBankingRates then sought a professional to speak on the subject, asking veteran wealth advisor Jake Falcon, CRPC, where the application succeeded and where it failed. Here's what the founder and CEO of Falcon Wealth Advisors had to say about ChatGPT's answer on how to become a millionaire. Where ChatGPT Succeeds What Falcon liked about ChatGPT's advice was its emphasis on practicalities. The nuts and bolts of sound planning and wealth building aren't a mystery, but they need to be adhered to if you're going to make any progress toward your financial objective. 'ChatGPT's response to 'How to Become a Millionaire' is surprisingly solid for a general audience — it's structured, motivational, and covers the basics well,' Falcon said. 'That said, there are a few areas where it shines and others where it falls short from my perspective.' Here are three examples where ChatGPT provided solid basic guidance, according to Falcon. Learn More: Emphasizing Consistency and Time 'The breakdown of how monthly investments compound over time is a great way to demystify wealth-building,' Falcon said. 'It reinforces the idea that becoming a millionaire is more about discipline than luck.' Highlighting Multiple Wealth Paths 'ChatGPT does a good job outlining the common routes — investing, entrepreneurship, real estate, and high-income skills,' Falcon explained. 'This gives readers a menu of options to explore based on their strengths.' Promoting Financial Hygiene 'Advice like 'live below your means,' 'avoid lifestyle inflation,' and 'track every dollar' is timeless. These are foundational habits I encourage with many clients,' he said. Where ChatGPT Falls Short Financial advisors know that investing is a highly personal activity, so ChatGPT's 'underplaying of behavioral finance' doesn't sit well with Falcon. 'Becoming a millionaire isn't just about math — it's about mindset. ChatGPT doesn't address emotional biases, fear of loss, or the discipline needed to stay invested during downturns. That's where human advisors add real value,' he said. ChatGPT falters in the details, those which financial advisors give such high priority for their clients. Here are three instances where ChatGPT fell flat for Falcon. Oversimplified Math 'While the investment projections are directionally correct, they lack nuance,' Falcon said. 'For example, assuming a flat 7% return ignores market volatility, inflation, and sequence-of-returns risk. Real-world planning requires stress testing — something ChatGPT can't do reliably.' No Personalization Similar strategies can't be used for every investor. 'The advice is generic,' Falcon stated. 'A 25-year-old software engineer and a 55-year-old teacher need very different strategies. As a wealth advisor, I tailor plans based on income, risk tolerance, tax situation, and life goals.' Missing Tax Strategy and Asset Location 'There's no mention of Roth vs. traditional accounts, capital gains, or tax-efficient withdrawals,' Falcon said. 'These are critical to maximizing wealth and often overlooked in DIY plans.' A Financial Advisor's Take A million dollars doesn't go quite as far as it used to, but hitting that wealth threshold is still the ultimate goal for many Americans. Unless you're a master tactician when it comes to creating comprehensive financial plans that cover the essentials — retirement, insurance, taxes, estate planning and major life transitions — you should see a human advisor before consulting ChatGPT for specific strategies on any important financial matter, including how to become a millionaire. 'ChatGPT is a great starting point for financial literacy. It can help people get motivated and understand the basics,' Falcon admitted. 'But when it comes to execution — especially for high earners or those nearing retirement — there's no substitute for personalized advice. 'You can Google 'How to change your car's oil,' but asking the internet on how to build the car probably isn't going to work. The same applies to wealth-building.' More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: 6 Ways I Use ChatGPT To Make a Lot of Money 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth 4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT and a Financial Advisor How To Become a Millionaire: Here's How Their Advice Compared Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
NBC Sports
2 hours ago
- NBC Sports
NFL still working out the kinks on virtual measurement of first downs
The NFL announced this offseason that it would use state-of-the-art technology to measure first downs, rather than the ancient technology of measuring with a 10-yard chain. But the technology hasn't been perfected yet. After Miami ran up the middle on third-and-1 today in Detroit, the virtual measurement technology was employed to see if it was a first down. But there was a significant delay in getting the first down confirmed, long enough that it really didn't save any time compared to bringing out the chains. At the same time that the virtual measurement was plodding along, YouTube's Sunday Ticket stream of the game briefly went out and was replaced by a 'technical difficulties' screen. It's unclear if those two technological issues were connected. While the virtual measurement is replacing the chains, the spotting of the ball is still done by the officials on the field. So if there's human error in assessing where the ball was when the ball carrier was stopped, the virtual measurement won't fix that. The NFL has partnered with Sony to use its Hawk-Eye technology, which is also used in soccer, tennis and other sports, for its virtual measurements.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Research Finds That ChatGPT Secretly Has a Deep Anti-Human Bias
Do you like AI models? Well, chances are, they sure don't like you back. New research suggests that the industry's leading large language models, including those that power ChatGPT, display an alarming bias towards other AIs when they're asked to choose between human and machine-generated content. The authors of the study, which was published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, are calling this blatant favoritism "AI-AI bias" — and warn of an AI-dominated future where, if the models are in a position to make or recommend consequential decisions, they could inflict discrimination against humans as a social class. Arguably, we're starting to see the seeds of this being planted, as bosses today are using AI tools to automatically screen job applications (and poorly, experts argue). This paper suggests that the tidal wave of AI-generated résumés are beating out their human-written competitors. "Being human in an economy populated by AI agents would suck," writes study coauthor Jan Kulveit, a computer scientist at Charles University in the UK, in a thread on X-formerly-Twitter explaining the work. In their study, the authors probed several widely used LLMs, including OpenAI's GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Meta's Llama 3.1-70b. To test them, the team asked the models to choose a product, scientific paper, or movie based on a description of the item. For each item, the AI was presented with a human-written and AI-written description. The results were clear-cut: the AIs consistently preferred AI-generated descriptions. But there are some interesting wrinkles. Intriguingly, the AI-AI bias was most pronounced when choosing goods and products, and strongest with text generated with GPT-4. In fact, between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Meta's Llama 3.1, GPT-4 exhibited the strongest bias towards its own stuff — which is no small matter, since this once undergirded the most popular chatbot on the market before the advent of GPT-5. Could the AI text just be better? "Not according to people," Kulveit wrote in the thread. The team subjected 13 human research assistants to the same tests and found something striking: that the humans, too, tended to have a slight preference for AI-written stuff, with movies and scientific papers in particular. But this preference, to reiterate, was slight. The more important detail was that it was not nearly as strong as the preference that the AI models showed. "The strong bias is unique to the AIs themselves," Kulveit said. The findings are particularly dramatic at our current inflection point where the internet has been so polluted by AI slop that the AIs inevitably end up ingesting their own excreta. Some research suggests that this is actually causing the AI models to regress, and perhaps the bizarre affinity for its own output is part of the reason why. Of greater concern is what this means for humans. Currently, there's no reason to believe that this bias will simply go away as the tech embeds itself deeper into our lives. "We expect a similar effect can occur in many other situations, like evaluation of job applicants, schoolwork, grants, and more," Kulveit wrote. "If an LLM-based agent selects between your presentation and LLM written presentation, it may systematically favor the AI one." If AIs continue to be widely adopted and integrated into the economy, the researchers predict that companies and institutions will use AIs "as decision-assistants when dealing with large volumes of 'pitches' in any context," they wrote in the study. This would lead to widespread discrimination against humans who either choose not to use or can't afford to pay to use LLM tools. AI-AI bias, then, would create a "gate tax," they write, "that may exacerbate the so-called 'digital divide' between humans with the financial, social, and cultural capital for frontier LLM access and those without." Kulveit acknowledges that "testing discrimination and bias in general is a complex and contested matter." But, "if we assume the identity of the presenter should not influence the decisions," he says, the "results are evidence for potential LLM discrimination against humans as a class." His practical advice to humans trying to get noticed is a sobering indictment of the state of affairs. "In case you suspect some AI evaluation is going on: get your presentation adjusted by LLMs until they like it, while trying to not sacrifice human quality," Kulveit wrote. More on AI: Computer Science Grads Are Being Forced to Work Fast Food Jobs as AI Tanks Their Career Solve the daily Crossword
