The tycoons who profit from India's thirst for Russian oil
About 30 per cent of the crude that Reliance Industries buys comes from Russia.
NEW DELHI – The last time many Americans paid any attention to Jamnagar, a sunbaked industrial stretch on the mud flats on India's Gulf of Kutch, it was thanks to Rihanna.
She performed there in March 2024 for an exclusive audience – Mr Bill Gates, Mr Mark Zuckerberg, Ms Ivanka Trump and the like – at the
prewedding party for Mr Anant Ambani, the younger son of Asia's richest man, Mr Mukesh Ambani.
They were in Jamnagar, which had no international airport or hotel rooms for most of the guests, because its port and oil refineries have become central to the Ambanis' empire and US$115 billion (S$147.8 billion) fortune.
Last week, Jamnagar was the backdrop for a grittier story: Its oil – some of which is imported from Russia – has become a sticking point in US-Indian relations.
Months of back-and-forth over trade between Washington and New Delhi unraveled in July, along with much of the friendly feeling between the world's two biggest democracies.
On July 30, President Donald Trump
slapped India with a 25 per cent tariff . He tossed in an insult, posting on social media that American companies would soon start drilling with India's nemesis, Pakistan.
'Who knows,' he wrote, 'maybe they'll be selling Oil to India some day!'
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Business Keppel to sell M1 unit's telco business to Simba for $1.43 billion
Business Nvidia, AMD agree to pay 15% of China chip sale revenues to US: Sources
Singapore Healthy lifestyle changes could save Singapore $650 million in healthcare costs by 2050: Study
Singapore BTO income ceiling, age floor for singles being reviewed: Chee Hong Tat
World Netanyahu says Israel's new Gaza offensive will start soon
Opinion Anwar's government: Full house but plenty of empty offices
Singapore Man's claim amid divorce that his mother is true owner of 3 properties cuts no ice with judge
Business Singapore can deliver and thrive in a fragmented global economy: Morgan Stanley analysts
One week later, Mr Trump signed an executive order that doubled the punishment. In effect, he pushed India's exporters into peril on the grounds that their government was aiding Russia's war aims in Ukraine by letting Indian companies profit from the international oil trade.
Mr Trump did not name the companies. But all roads lead back to Mr Mukesh Ambani and his company, Reliance Industries.
Its principal refinery in Jamnagar – part of Gujarat, the home state of India's prime minister Narendra Modi – is the biggest in the world.
Many of Reliance's investments there and across India have been planned in consultation with Mr Modi and other politicians. This area, including another refining business nearby, brings in 1.5 million barrels of oil every day, about a third of it shipped from Russia.
The Reliance name is everywhere in India. The company, started by Mr Mukesh Ambani's father in Bombay (now Mumbai) in 1965 as a trading house for polyester, is the nation's biggest conglomerate, composed of dominant players in energy, data and mobile networks, retail, finance and more.
The companies stream HBO, they own one of the world's most valuable cricket teams, they run a legion of charitable foundations, and recently they bought up nearly every haute couture brand in the country.
The Reliance refinery at Jamnagar is internationally rated in the top percentile in terms of complexity. There are many kinds of crude oil, and the Jamnagar facility can easily switch from refining crude from the Persian Gulf, Latin America or wherever the best prices can be found.
Jamnagar had processed 500 types over the past 25 years, a Reliance spokesperson said.
While about 30 per cent of the crude that Reliance buys comes from Russia, a company spokesperson said that 'it is incorrect to attribute profitability only to Russian crude oil discounts'.
He added that the company had been consistently profitable over decades, more so than any regional competitor, before and after the wartime discounts. The money it makes selling refined products to Europe is a small fraction of its total output.
The other big refining business in Jamnagar is Nayara Energy, just a few miles away from Reliance's.
The Nayara refinery is massive and modern, too, though its output is only a third of Reliance's. Since 2017, Nayara has been 49 per cent owned by Rosneft, Russia's state oil company.
One of its other largest stakeholders is a Russian-owned investment firm. That means that a Rosneft-backed entity has been buying oil from Russia, processing it in India and in some cases selling the results back to Europe. Unlike Reliance, it has most of its eggs in one basket.
In the first year of the war in Ukraine, these private refiners became the world's biggest buyers of seaborne Russian crude.
Shut out of the European market, Russia offered discounts to whoever would take its stranded crude. India, along with China and Turkey, stepped in.
For two or three years, Indians and Americans took it in stride. Mr Eric Garcetti, President Joe Biden's ambassador in New Delhi, said at a conference in Washington in May 2024 that 'we wanted somebody to be buying Russian oil', to stabilise the price.
Mr Trump's salvo seemed to come out of the blue.
Mr Pankaj Saran, a former Indian ambassador to Russia who runs the NatStrat think tank in New Delhi, said archly: 'The trigger for the penalty would seem to be an action which has been going on in plain view since 2022.'
To him, Mr Trump's recent talk about Russian oil looks like a red herring.
India, home to 1.4 billion people and the world's fastest-growing large economy, has only modest oil reserves and needs to import 85 per cent of its supply.
Traditionally that meant spending hard currency in the Persian Gulf. The pressure those purchases put on India's balance of trade forces the government to take a strong interest in how its thirst for oil can be met.
'We are completely defenseless against energy costs, because we don't have oil,' Mr Saran said. For that reason, 'the government has actively encouraged the refining sector'.
Reliance's balance sheet is such that it does not need the Russian oil trade, and Nayara Energy might not, either. It did not respond to requests for comment.
There are indications that all of India's importers of crude were already scaling back their purchases, as European countries prepared to toughen up their constraints.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
6 minutes ago
- Straits Times
From Van Cleef to Vacheron, luxury gifts at center of probe into South Korea's former first lady
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Lavish items allegedly gifted to South Korea's former first lady Kim Keon Hee include a diamond necklace, a high-end watch and designer shoes. SEOUL – The special counsel investigation into former first lady Kim Keon Hee has turned the spotlight on lavish items allegedly gifted to her during her husband's rise to the presidency and his time in office, including a diamond necklace, a high-end watch and designer shoes. Among the most notable luxury items is a Van Cleef & Arpels diamond necklace, which Ms Kim wore while accompanying then-president Yoon Suk Yeol on their first overseas trip as the presidential couple to the Natosummit in June 2022. The Snowflake Pendant, crafted from 18K white gold and set with brilliant-cut diamonds, is currently listed on Van Cleef & Arpels' official website for approximately 83.5 million won (S$77,400), but at the time Ms Kim wore it, it reportedly sold for 60 million won. Yoon's office initially claimed that Ms Kim had borrowed the necklace from an acquaintance. However, in a written statement to prosecutors in May, Ms Kim said the necklace was a counterfeit. During questioning by the special counsel team on Aug 6, Ms Kim claimed she had purchased the fake in Hong Kong in 2010 as a gift for her mother and later borrowed it for the Nato trip. On Aug 12, the special counsel team revealed that it had obtained testimony from Seohee Construction confirming that the company had purchased the necklace and gifted it to Ms Kim. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Sengkang-Punggol LRT line back to full service: SBS Transit World US trade team will meet Chinese officials in two or three months, Bessent says Singapore From survivable to liveable: The making of a green city Asia DPM Gan kicks off India visit in Mumbai as Singapore firms ink investment agreements Multimedia World Photography Day: Celebrating the art of image-making Business CDL H1 profit rises 3.9% to S$91.2 million; declares 3 cent per share special dividend World Ukraine, sidelined in Trump-Putin summit, fights Russian grab for more territory Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story The investigators have also secured the necklace itself, they added. Also under scrutiny is a Vacheron Constantin watch. Investigators suspect that a Historic American 1921 model from the high-end brand, valued at approximately 54 million won at a Seoul boutique in September 2022, was allegedly delivered to Ms Kim by a businessperson surnamed Seo. He claimed to have purchased the watch at a discounted price of 35 million won through a 'VIP discount'. While Mr Seo claims he was simply running an errand for the former first lady, investigators suspect the luxury watch may have been given in exchange for a business favour. The main reason the special counsel team suspects a quid pro quo is the deal Mr Seo's company signed with the presidential office in September 2022, which was for a pilot program using robot dogs for security. It was found that the Presidential Security Service had allocated 800 million won to buy robot dogs — a plan that was scrapped after it was revealed by the local daily Hankyoreh. Raids on the homes of Ms Kim and her family have also uncovered other luxury items, including shoes from Chanel. The shoes are suspected of having been gifted by people related to the religious group Family Federation for World Peace and Unification. But questions remain over the shoe size, as the Chanel shoes allegedly intended for Ms Kim were size 39 (European), equivalent to about 245mm to 255mm. This is smaller than Ms Kim's reported shoe size of 260mm. Ms Kim was previously embroiled in controversy after accepting a luxury Christian Dior handbag , valued at 3 million won, from a Korean American pastor in 2022. Their meeting was secretly recorded on a hidden camera, and the footage was released by an online media outlet in November 2023. Prosecutors concluded there was no basis for a criminal charge in the case. THE KOREA HERALD/ASIA NEWS NETWORK

Straits Times
6 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Mixed reactions among Malaysian drivers on S'pore's move to clamp down on illegal ride-hailing services
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox According to the LTA, 136 drivers have been caught providing illegal cross-border passenger transport services since 2022. JOHOR BAHRU - Singapore's recent move to clamp down on illegal ride-hailing services within the republic and across the border with Malaysia has sparked mixed reactions among local drivers. While some feel that the move to go after illegal services is within the island nation's right, Malaysian drivers who carpool to work feel victimised, especially with the Singapore Land and Transport Authority (LTA) detaining suspected vehicles for investigations. One driver, who wished to be known only as Mr Tan, said he was just helping send his friends home after work as they live nearby in Skudai when they were detained at the Tuas Checkpoint for several hours. 'I feel that the authorities should give a warning or reminder before seizing my multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) as I am not using it to make money. 'I have been working in Singapore for some time. Each morning, I help send my friends to Singapore before I head to work. Later, I pick them up at the same location to drive back home,' he said. Mr Tan said he is just doing this to help friends who happen to work near his company. 'However, we will split the petrol and vehicle entry permit charges at $35 per day. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Sengkang-Punggol LRT line back to full service: SBS Transit World US trade team will meet Chinese officials in two or three months, Bessent says Singapore From survivable to liveable: The making of a green city Asia DPM Gan kicks off India visit in Mumbai as Singapore firms ink investment agreements Multimedia World Photography Day: Celebrating the art of image-making Business CDL H1 profit rises 3.9% to S$91.2 million; declares 3 cent per share special dividend World Ukraine, sidelined in Trump-Putin summit, fights Russian grab for more territory Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story 'The LTA should go after those who do illegal business for a fee instead of nabbing anyone with a Malaysian-registered MPV,' he added. Asked about the status of his car, Mr Tan said he is still waiting for the outcome of the probe. But he expressed concerns that he could face a fine of S$3,000 for allegedly committing an offence in the island republic. Another car owner, known only as Mr Chung, said he too had his family MPV seized when he was accused of providing an illegal ride-hailing service in Singapore. 'I work in Singapore and send my friends, who all live near my home in Tebrau, to work and back. 'I do not do any door-to-door pick-up services, but just drop off and pick them up along the way,' he said, adding that he does not charge them but accepts any cost sharing from his friends. Mr Chung said he has been having sleepless nights waiting for the outcome of the investigation after being stopped at the Tuas Checkpoint and questioned for several hours. Meanwhile, a Singaporean limousine services operator, known only as Mr Ben, said recent LTA operations at the checkpoints are showing results as they are now getting up to 25 to 30 extra trips daily to pick up and send customers within Singapore or to Malaysia. 'Previously, we would get one or two trips every few days but since the operations began, we have been able to get more customers. 'These illegal operators from Malaysia usually undercut our prices up to 40 per cent and that really hurts our business. 'We also pay higher insurance premiums to cover our passengers, not just in Singapore but also in Malaysia,' he said, adding that many illegal Malaysian operators do not have insurance coverage in Singapore. Separately, the LTA said in a statement that some 19 drivers were caught offering illegal ride-hailing services within Singapore and across the border on Aug 5. They were nabbed after a combined operation with the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority that targeted such activities at a land checkpoint and through LTA's patrols at Gardens by the Bay and Changi Airport. This is the first time both agencies conducted such an operation at a land checkpoint which saw suspected vehicles getting impounded. According to the LTA, 136 drivers have been caught providing illegal cross-border passenger transport services since 2022. Those who have been charged and convicted so far have been fined up to $2,600 and had their vehicles forfeited. Senior Minister of State for Transport Sun Xueling said in a Facebook post on Aug 6 that the LTA was ramping up its enforcement against such illegal services because these drivers do not have proper licence and insurance coverage. 'This put their passengers at risk and affect the livelihoods of law-abiding licensed drivers,' she said. THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK


AsiaOne
6 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
California says Trump sent military to 'silence' LA protests, World News
The US government's unprecedented use of National Guard troops in Los Angeles to protect officers carrying out President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown was illegal and should be ended, a lawyer for the state of California told a federal judge on Tuesday (Aug 12). The lawyer said evidence presented from the landmark trial that began on Monday showed that soldiers had violated a 19th century law that bars the military from civilian law enforcement. "The government wanted a show of military force so great that any opposition to their agenda was silenced," said the lawyer, Meghan Strong of the California Attorney General's Office. Justice Department attorney Eric Hamilton countered that there was "substantial violence" in Los Angeles meriting military intervention and that the troops were only there to protect federal agents and property. Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June in response to days of unrest and protests sparked by mass immigration raids. California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, opposed the move and sued, alleging it violated prohibitions on the use of the military in law enforcement. US District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco will determine whether the government violated the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA). Breyer will also hear arguments on Wednesday on Newsom's legal right to bring the case. The judge has not said when he will rule. The trial comes as Trump said he was taking the extraordinary step of deploying the National Guard to fight crime in Washington and suggested he might take similar actions in other American cities. In the California trial, the administration sought to prove that the military was only used to protect federal personnel or federal property, which the administration said are permissible exceptions to the PCA. California, meanwhile, sought to convince Breyer that troops crossed the line by setting up roadblocks, diverting traffic and making arrests, which Strong described as prohibited policing actions. Government witnesses testified that although those actions are generally prohibited, there are exceptions when federal agents or property are in danger. Breyer appeared sceptical at times of the government's assertion that Trump had sole discretion to decide when troops were needed. The president said in June the protests amounted to a rebellion against federal authority. "Is it a 'rebellion' because the president says it is a 'rebellion'?" Breyer asked Hamilton during the government's closing argument. Many of the troops have been withdrawn from Los Angeles, but California Attorney General Rob Bonta said on Monday that 300 National Guard members are still going on immigration raids and restricting civilian movements in the state. The trial before Breyer will have limited impact on Trump's plan to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington. [[nid:721243]]