Ex-Philadelphia officer sentenced and immediately paroled after conviction in traffic stop shooting
Judge Glenn Bronson sentenced Mark Dial to 9 1/2 months in jail, and immediately granted Dial parole because he had already been jailed for 10 months following his arrest in 2023.
A jury in May acquitted Dial, 29, of murder charges, and instead convicted him of voluntary manslaughter, reckless endangerment and possessing an instrument of crime in the fatal shooting of 27-year-old Eddie Irizarry.
Brian McMonagle, Dial's lawyer, said the judge did the right thing for a 'dedicated public servant' who 'risked his life every day for perfect strangers.'
District Attorney Larry Krasner said the judge went 'way below' sentencing guidelines in handing down a sentence that set Dial free. The low end of the standard range of sentencing guidelines for the conviction was 4 1/2 to nine years in prison, he said.
Krasner declined to criticize the judge but said he was 'deeply disappointed with a verdict that I think makes people lose faith in the criminal justice system.'
Zoraida Garcia, an aunt of Irizarry's, told reporters after the sentencing that if she had committed the crime, 'I would have been doing life in prison. But he's a cop, so he gets the OK.' Another aunt, Ana Cintron, said, 'my nephew's life doesn't matter at all.'
In court, Bronson said the shooting was not 'a classic voluntary manslaughter case,' that Dial's conduct was 'demonstrably out of character' and that Dial was not a threat to the public, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported.
He also said that Dial, after shooting Irizarry six times, rushed Irizarry to the hospital.
'I've never seen that happen in a voluntary manslaughter case,' he said.
Dial's lawyers have insisted that the 2023 shooting was justified.
They say Dial thought Irizarry had a gun when he approached Irizarry's car after officers spotted the car being driven erratically and followed it for several blocks before it turned the wrong way down a one-way street and stopped.
Police body camera video of the shooting shows Dial getting out of a police SUV, striding over to Irizarry's car and firing his weapon six times at close range through the rolled-up driver's side window.
The video shows Irizarry holding a seven-inch knife before he was shot.
Another officer yelled 'knife' as they had approached the vehicle, according to the video, but Dial's attorneys disputed those assertions, saying the other officer yelled 'Gun!,' that the knife resembled a gun and that Dial had acted lawfully and in self-defense.
Dial was released from custody in 2024 after prosecutors withdrew a first-degree murder charge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The News Is Filled With Stories About Co-Workers Biting People — WTF Is Happening?
You don't often get to choose who you work with. You might have to fend off managers who dismiss you, colleagues who discredit you –– and in some rare cases, a co-worker who bites you? According to multiplereports, a New York City-based summer law associate at a prestigious law firm got dismissed after biting several colleagues. In Above the Law, the outlet reported that the bites were 'not in an aggressive, 'we're beefing' way,' but that they were more than just a 'nibble.' HuffPost reached out to Sidley Austin, the firm where the associate reportedly worked, and has not heard this is not the first time a person has been accused of chomping on the flesh of their colleague in recent days. In June, 'Cobra Kai' actor Alicia Hannah-Kim accused her co-star Martin Kove of biting her arm hard after she tapped him on the shoulder to greet him at a VIP section. Kove later issued a public apology to his 'Cobra Kai' co-star.'I was being playful in the moment but went too far and there is absolutely no excuse for my behavior,' Kove stated in his apology. Biting your colleagues, no matter for what 'playful' reason, is wrong, and yet the number of reported instances suggests that a public service announcement is needed on what kind of platonic touch is acceptable between colleagues at work. Managers who have experience with difficult or bizarre colleagues shared what they think might be going on here. What Might Drive A Co-Worker To Bite Alison Green, who has been giving workplace advice for over a decade on her 'Ask A Manager' site, has firsthand experience with a workplace biter. In 2017, Green received a letter from a person who was driven to bite her toxic office manager when he blocked her path and refused to get out of her way. In an update, the letter writer stated that she still hadn't left her job, nor had she been fired, and the biting was 'crazy,' but an appropriate response to abusive working conditions filled with name-calling and cursing.'I certainly haven't done it again and don't plan to. But in the long run, my office manager is a raging jerk,' the biter wrote. 'Please, show me you can do better. In the end I feel bad... but not that bad.'In this way, biting doesn't just raise alarm bells about your person; it might also indicate that you are in a toxic job where rude, aggressive behavior is being normalized. 'In my letter-writer's case, it sounded like she had been working in a dysfunctional, combative office for so long that her norms had been thrown off, and the urge to bite was a form of breaking under that pressure,' Green told HuffPost. 'It alarmed me that she didn't see it more clearly as a sign that something was very, very wrong in that office.'But whether this is a misguided and inappropriate 'playful' bite or a reaction made under extreme duress, you should still keep your teeth to yourself at work. This is what Green advised the alleged summer associate biter, which is good advice for any would-be biters:'Don't bite anyone at work ever again! It's a form of assault, and the fact that she thought it was OK says she probably needs some serious remedial education in how to relate to people at work,' Green said. 'The only people you should ever bite are those who have given their explicit consent, and at work that should never even be under discussion!' Case closed. Never bite your co-worker. And be cautious about how you touch them in general. Stories of workplace biters are thankfully rare. You may go your whole career without a colleague mashing their teeth into your arm, but it's much more common to deal with the conundrums of whether or not to hug or pat your colleague on the back. Know that the most acceptable form of touch in a workplace is a routine handshake. They are familiar enough 'in business that I don't think people need to worry about getting explicit consent before offering a handshake,' Green Dudley, a psychologist and behavioral expert, said that a high-five or fist bump can also satisfy the same positive desire of 'hooray, we're on the same team' that a handshake does. But beyond these simple greetings, be cautious. Patting someone on the back or shoulder after they do great work may seem harmless to you, but many people don't enjoy being touched at work, especially by people in positions of power over them. Dudley said to consider whether the touch you want to give can be reciprocated before you do it: 'Who touches whom is a function of who has the power. So we want to make sure, whenever we touch someone... that we touch them in a way that invites them to touch us back the exact same way.' If you're a boss, you may have the power to pat your direct report's shoulder, but they cannot pay you back because of the power dynamic between your positions, Dudley in doubt, watch how your co-worker interacts with their peers and bosses before offering them anything more than a handshake. 'Aside from handshakes, I'd say default to not touching coworkers,' Green advised. 'If someone has shown themselves to be a hugger, for example, they're probably someone who will be more welcoming of a congratulatory pat on the shoulder. But otherwise, or if you haven't seen enough to be sure, err on the side of no physical touch.''There are other ways to express warmth at work — through words, tones, smiles,' Green continued. 'Very few people will say they're disappointed that their colleague didn't touch them; far more people will say they felt uneasy when someone did.'If only the biters among us took this advice to heart. Related... Everyone Is Ridiculing The 'Gen Z Stare' Online. Here's What They're Missing. 6 Signs Your Boss Might Be A Narcissist How to Tell When Your 'Tough Boss' Is Really A Toxic Boss
Forbes
32 minutes ago
- Forbes
Family Sues Roblox, Discord After Child Raped By Predatory User
Parents assume online games for kids such as Roblox are safe, but a new lawsuit claims the apps give ... More predators access to our kids. Most Parents are aware of concerns about social media and children, but often perceive games marketed to children like Roblox as safe. A lawsuit filed in California on July 17, 2025 alleges that Roblox misrepresents itself as safe while allowing a platform that makes children easy prey for pedophiles. The lawsuit was filed against Roblox and Discord on behalf of an 11-year-old girl, identified as Jane Doe R. M., of Miami-Dade County, Florida. According to the lawsuit, her mother allowed her to use the apps Roblox and Discord because she believed there were proper safeguards in place. While using the apps, the young girl was targeted by a child predator, who groomed her over time and eventually convinced her to meet in person. In April 2022, the predator drove to the child's grandfather's house in Florida, lured her into his vehicle, then took her to a nearby neighborhood where he violently raped her. The predator was later convicted of his crimes. Roblox, Discord And Explicit Content This isn't just one tragic story. In May the San Antonio Express reported on a Texas girl who was allegedly raped by a man who groomed her on Roblox and then traveled to her home. In 2022, Fox5 Atlanta reported on a similar case involving a 13-year-old Kansas girl. As lead attorney on the lawsuit Matthew Dolman comments, 'In allowing apps of these kinds to operate with virtually no restrictions, monitoring or age verification processes in place, we open 'worlds' designed for children to depraved individuals with unimaginable intentions and all the resources at their fingertips.' The lawsuit alleges that the apps actively misrepresent themselves as safe to parents. The court filing outlines a broader failure within Roblox's digital playground, alleging widespread graphic sexually explicit material as well as reports of avatars engaging in sexual activities in 'condo games,' virtual bathrooms and strip clubs. Additionally, the law group states its investigation uncovered hundreds of games with names referencing child sex trafficking themes inside the Roblox platform with names such as 'Diddy Party,' 'Survive Diddy,' 'JeffEpsteinSupporter' and 'Escape to Epstein Island.' FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder Meanwhile, the lawsuit also names Discord as playing a role in giving predators access to children. Discord is a communication app that links to many popular video games. For Roblox communities, Discord is a place where users can move their interactions and offers chat, voice, video, photo and text messaging. Roblox And Child Safety Roblox is an extremely popular gaming platform for children and teens, reporting 97.8 million daily active users. Common Sense Media, a non-profit organization that provides information and resources to help families make informed decisions about media and technology, reports that Roblox has more than 32 million daily players under age 13. But Roblox does not have strict age restrictions, so kids under 13 can play alongside teens and adults. According to a page on Roblox's website that explains parental controls to kids, 'When you create a Roblox account, the age you select helps us know what content to show you on Roblox.' The page goes on to explain to kids that users under 13 need parent permission to access certain chat features, while those under 9 need it to access experiences with 'moderate' content maturity. At age 13, the user may now add their phone number, and add friends and join group chats without parental permission. Further, parents are no longer able to manage privacy settings, screen time limits or how much money their child spends in the game. Regarding the lawsuit, a Roblox spokesperson declined to comment on pending litigation but emphasized the company's commitment to child safety. They emphasized Roblox's investment in advanced safety technology and 24/7 human moderation to detect and address inappropriate content, including efforts to share personal information or move conversations off-platform. The spokesperson also pointed to resources for parents provided on the Roblox website. Discord and Child Safety Discord requires users to be at least 13 years old, but it's age verification relies on users self-reporting their age by entering a birthdate. Only if a child is reported as being under 13 will Discord lock down their account. Common Sense Media's Kids Review page is full of reviews by teens warning parents about the racism and sexually explicit material they've encountered on Discord. 13-year-old Riley writes, 'please please please do not let your kid get discord. The amount of sexual assault, grooming and awful pictures/ videos of dead and dismembered body parts is disturbing.' A Discord Spokesperson declined to comment on ongoing litigation, but pointed to a deep commitment to user safety, by removing content, banning users, shutting down servers, and involving law enforcement when needed. In addition, the spokesperson pointed to safety tools for teens and guardians which can be found on their website. Parental Oversight Essential to Keep Kids Safe on Roblox Parents cannot rely on an app's safety claims alone. Roblox markets itself as a child-friendly platform, but this lawsuit highlights how much content may fly under the radar. Parents should not assume the moderation apps deploy is enough. Instead: Keep access to your children's devices, including your young teenagers. If your children argue, remind them that you pay for the phone, tablet, gaming system and wifi, and you have a right to monitor them. Grooming can be subtle. Kids may not recognize it as manipulation because it feels like friendship. Parents can access tools to keep their kids safe at the National Sexual Violence Resource Center's Keeping Kids Safe Online toolkit.
CBS News
32 minutes ago
- CBS News
Pa. State Police asking health care providers for help building case against "imposter nurse"
As the investigation into a woman who used multiple false identities to pose as a nurse at various healthcare facilities across Pennsylvania, state police are asking healthcare companies to review their employment records. Shannon Womack is believed to have used at least 10 different aliases to pose as an LPN, RN, and nurse supervisor at rehabilitation facilities and nursing homes across the commonwealth. Now, state police are asking healthcare agencies and providers to review their employment records for fraudulent activities that may have involved Womack. Investigators confirmed that Womack used the following names: State police are asking providers to call them at 724-223-5200 if any of those names match their employment records. Womack is facing several charges, including corrupt organizations, endangering the welfare of care, unlawful use of a computer, identity theft, forgery, and theft by unlawful taking. Womack was taken into custody earlier this week after it was learned that she used several different identities to work as a nurse, despite not being a licensed professional. "The investigation showcased Womack was using the identification and nursing certifications from four different confirmed nurses from southern states," state police Trooper Rocco Gagliardi said. "She was acting as this RN for about five years now, and that ranges all the way from George to Connecticut. So, you have a bunch of different states in that range." State police provided at least six facilities in Pennsylvania where Womack worked: She worked anywhere from one to 10 shifts at these facilities, and according to a criminal complaint provided to KDKA-TV, she was placed on a "do not retain" list for reasons including professional misconduct, poor performance, and was accused of stealing drugs in some cases. The investigation began when troopers pulled the 39-year-old woman over in Cecil Township on a regular traffic stop in April. She allegedly provided aliases that had numerous active warrants. "The search warrant of the vehicle showcased multiple forms of ID, a lot of medical records were in the car, and a bunch of prescription medications that were attached to residents in health care homes or nursing home facilities," Gagliardi said.
