
How dangerous are wildfires and how can we stop them from getting worse?
Wildfires directly kill hundreds of people around the world each year. Though they may seem apocalyptic, the death toll is far lower than from floods, which kill thousands, and from heatwaves, which kill hundreds of thousands.
But when you factor in smoke, the human cost rises rapidly. The latest study estimates that the air pollution spewed by wildfires kills a staggering 1.5 million people each year. The toxic fumes can reach so far that tendrils of smoke from Australian bushfires have menaced South America, while smoke from Canadian fires – which regularly suffocate cities across the US – have fouled the air in Europe.
Many things can spark a wildfire: natural causes such as lightning, faulty infrastructure such as downed power lines, or people behaving badly. Devastating blazes in recent years have been started by smokers tossing cigarette butts, tourists failing to put out campfires, and even arsonists intentionally setting nature alight.
But whether those sparks turn into small fires or raging blazes depends on the weather. Fires need hot, dry fuel to burn, and they spread further with strong winds.
Fossil fuel pollution has heated the planet by about 1.3C, raising the risk of prolonged heat that turns forests and grasslands into tinderboxes. In some regions, such as the Mediterranean, global heating is also fuelling droughts that dry out lush greenery.
Scientists have found that such shifts have made the wildfires that have happened this year in places including California, South Korea and Australia more likely – in some cases doubling the chance of extreme weather conditions that help fires spread.
Even as the planet has heated up, the area torched by fires has fallen. This is because people have taken nature that used to burn freely and turned it into farms or cities – in recent decades mainly in Africa – that stop the spread of flames. The latest models find land use changes and other human drivers have shrank the burned area by 19.1% since 1900, while climate changes increased it by 15.8% – resulting in a small decline of 3.3% overall.
The conditions for ferocious fires are expected to worsen as the planet bakes. Two separate indices of fire weather project a steady rise in the number of days with high fire danger as temperatures inch higher, a recent study found.
By the end of the century, the total burned area is projected to rise by 40% even in an optimistic scenario for cutting carbon pollution, according to a separate study. In a worst-case scenario, it is set to double.
The danger that wildfires pose to people and property can drop sharply by managing land better. This can include creating fire breaks to stem the spread of an inferno, stopping new settlement in places prone to fires, and even sending herds of goats into abandoned farmland to graze away overgrown vegetation.
In some places firefighters are trying the technique of intentionally burning land to avoid a buildup of fuel that could lead to catastrophic fires – a long-running Indigenous practice in Australia and North America that European fire experts are starting to adopt.
If you live somewhere at risk of wildfires, put a plan together before disaster strikes. This could include identifying safe routes and nearby shelters, and packing an emergency bag. Some fire services recommend creating a safe zone around your home that is free from leaves and flammable materials.
Experts say you should vacate immediately if authorities tell you to – or if your home is at risk but warnings have not come. To avoid the smoke, keep windows closed and use respirator masks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
A-level results: Why did boys outperform girls for top grades?
For the past seven years, girls have outperformed boys in securing the highest A-level grades. But this year it's the boys who have taken the lead in getting the top marks. The percentage of boys' grades that were A* or A was 28.4%, narrowly beating the 28.2% achieved by girls. It marks a reversal of last year's 0.4% lead for female students. Boys also strengthened their advantage at the very top of the scale - 9.9% of their entries were awarded an A*, compared with 9.1% for are slim margins, but not insignificant ones. Factors including a surge in the popularity of STEM subjects - science, technology, engineering, and maths - are likely to have contributed to this swing. These subjects have been on the rise for a number of years and are significantly more popular with boys than girls. For the 12th year in a row, maths is the most popular A-level - and the number of entries is up more than a fifth since 2016 and has increased from last year. There's also a clear gender divide in who studies it - boys account for nearly two-thirds (63%) of entries and the divide is only getting bigger. Jill Duffy, chairwoman of the JCQ board of directors and chief executive of the OCR exam board, explains that "proportionally there are fewer girls taking the subject than in 2019". Boys' performance in maths improved very slightly this year from 42.5% of entries marked A* or A last year to 42.6% this year. In comparison, girls' results dipped from 41.2% last year to 40.2% this Harry, executive director of qualifications and assessment at WJEC exam board, says maths is a "significant contributor" to high A-level grades 16.7% of all maths entries scored an A* this year, compared to 9.4% of entries for all A-levels. 'Don't speculate too much' Executive director of regulation and compliance at the AQA exam board, Claire Thomson, says that while the percentage of girls achieving A* and A grades is lower this year than their male counterparts, nearly 19,000 more females achieved at least an A due to more girls entering for A-levels in general. Girls made up 54% of all entries. "It is important not to speculate too much about what has led to any differences between males and females as the figures are small, they do bounce around a bit over time and the causes will be multi-faceted and complex," she says. Zoe Lewis, Principal and Chief Executive of the Middlesbrough College Group, agrees and says it's still too early to tell if this is significant but "is something to keep an eye on in the coming years". She adds that the swing is likely due to the "continued growth in STEM subjects and bias towards studying maths". "There's a lot more information about subject choices and that's perhaps attracting more boys to it." Business rises, humanities fall Maths isn't the only subject that continues to rise in popularity. Business studies and economics entries have also increased and Thompson suggests that social media influencers may be fuelling the interest in those explains that both subjects have "a real world relevance" and that students are following influencers in "gaining some entrepreneurial skills so that they can go out and emulate the people that they see all the time on social media".Figures published by the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) for England, Wales and Northern Ireland show a 5.5% increase in entries for A-level economics compared to 2024, while business studies entries are up 0.6%. Ola, a recent engineering graduate, shared a video on social media about why she chose to study A-level business and how it helped her in her degree. She says that things she studied during A-level business, like accounting, were in her university degree, which made that module "a breeze". One student at Oaklands College in Hertfordshire shared her business grade on social media, explaining that she chose the subject as it would open up opportunities in the future. However, humanities like English, history and some modern languages have seen a drop in popularity. It is the first time since at least 2000 - the earliest available archive data - that no arts or humanities subjects have appeared in the top five most popular the proportion of entries in arts subjects such as drama and music has fallen by 31% since 2010 and is "approaching a one-third collapse", according to an analysis by the charity Campaign for the charity says the arts have been "systematically underfunded and undervalued" in recent years, particularly in English state secondary schools. The conversation around boys' academic struggles and fears they are "being left behind" in education has been around for many years, but there was a renewed interest this year with the release of hit Netflix series Adolescence which tells the story of a 13-year-old boy arrested for the murder of a classmate. Exploring themes of toxic masculinity and the psychological pressures faced by teenage boys, there's been a greater discussion around how boys are supported emotionally and about whether this renewed focus on helping boys achieve, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson acknowledged the pressures boys and young men face. "They face challenges in their lives and external pressures can give rise to some challenges," she said. "I want to celebrate the success of many young men who have gotten the grades they needed." However, she added that there are fluctuations every year "so there isn't anything to take away at this point".


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Drug that slows onset of type 1 diabetes licensed for use in UK-first
A groundbreaking drug that slows down the development of type 1 diabetes has been licensed for use in the UK. Teplizumab can allow patients to live 'normal lives' without the need for insulin injections. Experts hailed the decision by the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) as a 'breakthrough moment' that represents a 'turning point' in how the condition is treated. About 400,000 people in the UK have type 1 diabetes, a lifelong condition which causes the immune system to attack insulin-producing cells in the pancreas. Insulin helps the body use sugar for energy, and without this hormone, blood sugar levels can become dangerously high. Type 1 diabetes needs constant management to keep blood sugar within range, with patients required to take insulin through injections or pumps. Teplizumab trains the immune system to stop attacking pancreatic cells. It is taken by an IV drip for a minimum of 30 minutes over 14 consecutive days. The drug, which is already approved in the US, has been authorised for use by the MHRA to delay the onset of stage three type 1 diabetes in adults and children aged eight or over by an average of three years. Ahmed Moussa, general manager of general medicines UK and Ireland at Sanofi, which makes teplizumab, said: 'One hundred years ago the discovery of insulin revolutionised diabetes care. Today's news marks a big step forward.' The UK is the first country in Europe to be granted a licence. Type 1 diabetes develops gradually in three stages over months or years. Stage three is usually when people start to experience blood sugar problems and are diagnosed with the condition. According to the MHRA, teplizumab is used in people with stage two type 1 diabetes, which is an earlier stage of the disease during which patients are at a high risk of progressing to stage three. Parth Narendran, a professor of diabetes medicine at the University of Birmingham and The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, said: 'Teplizumab essentially trains the immune system to stop attacking the beta cells in the pancreas, allowing the pancreas to produce insulin without interference. 'This can allow eligible patients to live normal lives, delaying the need for insulin injections and the full weight of the disease's daily management by up to three years. It allows people to prepare for disease progression rather than facing an abrupt emergency presentation.' Following the decision by the MHRA, the cost-effectiveness of teplizumab will be assessed by NHS spending watchdog the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) to determine if it can be rolled out on the health service. Karen Addington, chief executive of the charity Breakthrough T1D, said: 'I am personally delighted and welcome the MHRA's approval of teplizumab. 'After years of research, clinical trials and drug development, we have an incredible breakthrough.' Reacting to the announcement, Dr Elizabeth Robertson, director of research and clinical at Diabetes UK, said: 'Today's landmark licensing of teplizumab in the UK marks a turning point in the treatment of type 1 diabetes. 'For the first time, we have a medicine that targets the root cause of the condition, offering three precious extra years free from the relentless demands of managing type 1 diabetes.' Dr Robertson added that the 'next steps are critical'. 'To ensure teplizumab reaches everyone who could benefit, we need it to be made available on the NHS, and the rollout of a screening programme to identify those with early-stage type 1 diabetes,' she said.


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
The common deadly fan mistake experts say people do at home that could trigger heart attacks
WITH August's scorching weather showing no signs of letting up, staying cool at home has become more essential than ever. This is why an electric fan is likely to become your new best friend for the coming weeks, while you try to take the edge off and feel cooler. 2 2 But a new study from Australia suggests using the humble device could do more harm than good by increasing your risk of a heart attack. Scientists from the University of Sydney recruited 20 people to test how fans affect body temperature, heart rate, sweating and comfort when used in a hot and humid environment. They also wanted to find out whether hydration levels made any difference, since it's already known that fans can sometimes make heat stress worse. The participants completed the experiment in a climate-controlled chamber set to 39.2C with 49 per cent humidity. In two of the sessions, they were well hydrated, having consumed the recommended amount of fluids for 24 hours beforehand, and were also allowed to drink during the trial. In the other two sessions, they were deliberately dehydrated by avoiding fluids and foods with high water content for 24 hours and were not permitted to drink during the trial. Each hydration state was tested both with and without the use of a fan. A series of temperatures were measured, including their heart rate, rectal temperature, whole body sweat rate, thermal discomfort, and thirst level. The results revealed that fan use while dehydrated can worsen heart strain, which can eventually lead to heart attacks. The experts concluded that using a fan increased sweat losses by about 60 per cent, which could mean using a fan is more harmful if you are dehydrated. How to stay cool during hot weather The study lead, Connor Graham PhD said: "Most extreme heat decedents do not have air conditioning but often own electric fans. "Fan use can reduce heat-related elevations in thermal and cardiovascular strain at temperatures up to approximately 39 to 40C. "In hotter conditions, fans should be turned off, as they can worsen heat stress.' This, Connor said, is because the high temperature of the air causes the body to heat up faster than it can cool itself by sweating. This isn't the first time fans have been linked to an increased risk of heart issues. Previous research has found that fan use can reduce heat and heart strain in temperatures up to around 39C, but once the mercury edges past 40C it's better to turn them off. Researchers have previously also recommended only using fans when it's below 39C for healthy adults below 40 years old and 38C for older adults 65 or older. They also warned fans should only be used in temperatures above 37C in older adults on anticholinergic medications like oxybutynin for bladder control.