logo
Used In Op Sindoor, Brazil 'Interested' In Akash Air Defence System Ahead Of PM Modi's Visit

Used In Op Sindoor, Brazil 'Interested' In Akash Air Defence System Ahead Of PM Modi's Visit

News1830-06-2025
Last Updated:
Operation Sindoor was largely successful as India thwarted a series of aerial attacks from across the border using air defence systems like Akash among others
Ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit for the BRICS Summit, India on Monday said Brazil has expressed interest in the Akash air defence system that was recently deployed during Operation Sindoor.
Operation Sindoor, the mission under which the Indian armed forces struck terror targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, was largely successful as India thwarted a series of aerial attacks from across the border using indigenous air defence systems like Akash among others.
The ministry of external affairs (MEA), during a special briefing, outlined the key agendas during Modi's five-nation tour starting July 2 to Ghana, Trinidad and Tobago, Argentina, Brazil, and Namibia. It said India will hold discussions on defence cooperation with Brazil.
'There's going to be talk on defence cooperation, avenues for joint research and training… they are interested in secure communications system on battlefield, offshore patrol vessels, partnership for maintaining their Scorpene-class submarines, Akash air defence system, coastal surveillance system and Garuda artillery guns…" secretary (East) P Kumaran said.
During his tour, the Prime Minister will hold meetings with leaders of Ghana, Trinidad and Tobago, Argentina and Namibia to strengthen bilateral ties with the visit ending on July 9. He will be in Brazil from July 5 to 8 to attend the 17th BRICS Summit 2025 followed by a State Visit.
WHAT DEFENCE SYSTEMS DID INDIA USE DURING OP SINDOOR?
On the intervening night of May 7 and 8, Pakistan attempted to engage a number of military targets in northern and western India, including Awantipora, Srinagar, Jammu, Pathankote, Amritsar, Kapurthala, Jalandhar, Ludhiana, Adampur, Bathinda, Chandigarh, Nal, Phalodi, Uttarlai, and Bhuj, using drones and missiles. These were neutralised by the Integrated Counter UAS (Unmanned Aerial Systems) Grid and Air Defence systems.
Air defence systems detect, track, and neutralise threats using a network of radars, control centres, artillery, and both aircraft- and ground-based missiles. On the morning of May 8, the armed forces targeted air defence radars and systems at a number of locations in Pakistan.
India used battle-proven air defence systems like the Pechora, OSA-AK and LLAD guns (low-level air defence guns), as well as indigenous systems such as the Akash, which demonstrated stellar performance.
WHAT IS THE AKASH DEFENCE SYSTEM?
AKASH is a short range surface-to-air missile system to protect vulnerable areas and vulnerable points from air attacks. It can simultaneously engage multiple targets in group mode or autonomous mode. It has built in electronic counter-counter measures (ECCM) features. The entire weapon system has been configured on mobile platforms.
First Published:
June 30, 2025, 18:20 IST
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The rhetoric and real costs of trade wars
The rhetoric and real costs of trade wars

Deccan Herald

time23 minutes ago

  • Deccan Herald

The rhetoric and real costs of trade wars

India misread the tariffs brought on by the United States and, at a broader level, the Trump administration. We were one of the first to approach the US on this matter, and we continued to believe that we would have a favourable deal till recently, given what we felt was a great rapport between Modi and Trump. Mainstream electronic media houses were complicit in driving this narrative. To understand why India got it wrong, it would be useful to connect two disparate data dots. Top that with India's misreading of Trump's desire to be seen as a look at the first irritant and its impact. India exports roughly $90 billion, paying approximately 2 per cent tariffs currently, and imports roughly $45 billion at 12 per cent tariffs. The trade deficit of $45 billion carries a tariff differential of $5 billion per year in India's favour after adjusting for exempted products. We should have seen this imbalance in America's trade deficit and tariffs long ago and proactively addressed this. Modi is now overhauling the tax rates in a bid to boost the economy. This is expected to cost $20 billion, four times the tariff differential India was enjoying. .The other irritant is oil imports. In 2021/22, India imported roughly 2.5 million barrels of oil every day. Under the tacit approval of the West, India's imports from Russia grew from 2 per cent then to 40 per cent today. India buys 45 per cent of the exported oil from Russia, a growth of 1900 per cent from pre-war levels. China buys the same percentage, a growth of 50 per cent from pre-war levels. So why did India need this extra oil suddenly? It was because we processed this extra oil and sold it for a profit overseas. Therefore, the rhetoric is misplaced, as we are profiting and fuelling the Russian war machine. Predicting the flow of events, we should have scaled down our offtake back to the 2022 levels and with that, justify our need to fuel the Indian economy and keep inflationary tendencies in check. We have now started to do this, drawing a balance between the US and predict that the impact of tariffs at 25 per cent is likely to be in the region of $11-12 billion per annum on tariffed goods and about 0.25 per cent on GDP. In the earliest days of cranking up our imports of oil, the difference was around $30 a barrel, leading to a gain of $16 billion. That has now come down to around $5 a barrel after accounting for logistics, etc. The benefit we get is estimated today to be only $3.5 billion, a delta of $8.5 billion from what we lose out on with the long commentators have suggested many responses, ranging from the knee-jerk to keeping the long-term in mind. The real issue is what we do now. There is no pattern in the madness. Why have the four treatments of the BRIC countries been different? Because there is a different playbook with each one. With Brazil, the US has a trade surplus. Why then, do they have tariffs of 50 per cent, which is higher than China and equal to India? Bolsonaro? With China, 150 per cent was brought down to 30 per cent; here, it is about the rare earths. For the quantities required, the ecosystem is expensive, and the returns don't work out for a commercial operation. The CCP subsidised this for leverage and their long-term plans to pursue electric mobility and clean energy. This leverage on supplies was used to resolve the $650 billion of trade at stake between the US and China. .India made public its hypocritical treatment at the hands of the US, as it bought palladium, uranium, etc. from Russia. However, the reality is that US imports from Russia were at best $3 billion, down some 45 per cent from the previous year. India's imports from Russia stood at $70 billion, almost twice what it imports from the must now not get caught in the whirlpool of its rhetoric. And it certainly must not seek to appease China and Russia in a hurry and on the rebound. One can expect that this is short-term. There are many moving parts – Russia and Ukraine could arrive at a truce as early as next month. India has already started to demonstrate it is willing to reduce its import of Russian oil while not displeasing Russia. The midterms in the US could go against Trump, and the US courts could reverse Trump's executive decisions. Importantly, Trump does not define the long-standing US relationship with India. Trump himself may not have a long-term view on this the US, it seems clear. The average tariff on its imports has seen inflows of $28 billion, three times post these levies were collected in June. This aggregates to $350 billion. Add to this DOGE cuts and some others, and we have $500 billion being saved or added to the US treasury. This pays half its annual interest cost of $1 trillion, which, if left alone, is not sustainable. This is good for no one, as it is the world's biggest market by the short term, one sees no harm in subtly managing the relationships and dynamics at play and being practical. In the long term, anyway, as economist John Maynard Keynes said, we are all dead..(The writer is the former managing director of a Tata Company and now runs a Bengaluru-headquartered corporate finance practice)

Should India play cricket with Pakistan? Here's what survey reveals
Should India play cricket with Pakistan? Here's what survey reveals

India Today

time29 minutes ago

  • India Today

Should India play cricket with Pakistan? Here's what survey reveals

In this edition of Political Stock Exchange, the focus is on India's decision to play Pakistan in the upcoming Asia Cup scheduled for September 14th. All this after the Pahalgam terror attack, after Operation Sindoor, after the valour and the might of our armed forces, after India defining a new normal with Pakistan. So should India play cricket with Pakistan? Should India's bat answer Pakistan's bullets or should India pick national pride over sporting spirit? Does the resumption of cricket with Pakistan insult the sacrifices of the armed forces? These were some of the questions posed to respondents in the C-Voter survey. So watch to find out what the survey revealed.

Kota, Bundi celebrate Union govt's approval to new Greenfield Airport
Kota, Bundi celebrate Union govt's approval to new Greenfield Airport

Time of India

time37 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Kota, Bundi celebrate Union govt's approval to new Greenfield Airport

Kota: Lok Sabha speaker Om Birla Tuesday thanked PM Narendra Modi for the cabinet nod to Greenfield Airport coming up close to Kota and Bundi. Birla wrote on X, "This airport will give new impetus to the connectivity not only of the entire Hadauti region (Kota-Bundi) but also of Rajasthan and North India. This will open up countless opportunities for tourism, trade, investment and employment. This will make the state a new hub of air traffic and economic activities." Local Congress MLA Harimohan Sharma expressed appreciation for the inclusion of Bundi name in the airport — missing in the original MoA — in keeping with the public sentiment. Sharma said the previous state Congress govt's commitment to providing 440.06 hectares of land to the Airport Authority of India, aligning with party leader Rahul Gandhi's vision. Naveen Maheshwari, director of Allen Career Institute, emphasized the airport's significance for Kota's coaching industry, which has faced challenges due to limited air connectivity. He believes the new airport will boost both the coaching and tourism sectors, adding a new attraction to the city. Vijay Paliwal, a mechanical engineer and industrialist, expressed that the airport should have been operational years ago, especially as the coaching industry now faces a downturn. Paliwal, along with supporters, had initiated the 'Kota Airport Sangarh Samiti' in 2016, advocating for the airport through online petitions. Kota district BJP president Rakesh Jain, along with party workers, celebrated the project's approval with festivities, extending gratitude to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. Jain highlighted that the airport's stone-laying ceremony is anticipated soon, with the tender process already underway. He expressed hope that the prime minister and Lok Sabha speaker will inaugurate the airport during the current govt term. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store