logo
Florida's long-awaited budget cuts spending, saves money for future downturns

Florida's long-awaited budget cuts spending, saves money for future downturns

Yahoo14-06-2025
TALLAHASSEE — After weeks of infighting and stalled negotiations, Florida's legislative leaders released a slimmed-down budget for the next fiscal year on Friday.
The $115.1 billion spending plan is supposed to limit what lawmakers say has been a trend of runaway spending in Tallahassee and counter uncertainty over federal funding from Washington.
Lawmakers are slashing more than 1,700 vacant positions across state government and stashing millions of dollars for the state's rainy day fund, but are still funding priority projects with millions of dollars.
'We thought this day would never come, but it did,' Senate budget chairperson Ed Hooper said Friday.
Lawmakers are set to vote on the budget Monday evening, ending one of the most contentious legislative sessions in recent memory and setting up a potential clash with Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.
Unlike a typical year, where lawmakers produce a budget within Florida's usual 60-day session, lawmakers took 102 days to put together their final product.
That's partly because legislators have been feuding with DeSantis since January, when he called lawmakers in for a special session to address immigration without any clear goals or proposed legislation.
The three special sessions ate up critical time that would have been used to work on the budget.
'There were contributing factors that largely were out of the control of either chamber,' said Republican Rep. Lawrence McClure, the House budget chairperson.
DeSantis, who has been ruthless in cutting lawmakers' projects in happy times, has until the end of this month to issue vetoes. Earlier this year, amid the feud with DeSantis, the House overrode some of his budget vetoes from last year. The Senate did not.
Although lawmakers didn't give DeSantis everything he wanted in the amounts he wanted — including money for his priority Hope Florida program — they still gave him millions for the Florida State Guard and the Florida Job Growth Grant Fund. Millions also stayed with first lady Casey DeSantis' cancer research fund.
The idea that 'the governor's priorities are being funded at a lower rate' is wrong, McClure said.
Overall spending was smaller across the board, he said.
Despite producing a smaller budget than the year prior, Florida's budget has still grown by more than 26% since DeSantis came into office in 2019. The budget's growth has outpaced population increases and often outpaced inflation.
House Speaker Daniel Perez, R-Miami, pushed for a leaner budget this year, saying state government spending had swollen and run afoul of conservative values.
'We spend every new dime of recurring revenue while congratulating ourselves for giving easy-to-fund, non-recurring sales tax holidays,' Perez said on the opening day of the session in March.
McClure blamed too much federal money in previous years for Florida's 'not sustainable' spending habits.
About a third of the state's budget is federal money. But lawmakers are now facing a potentially abrupt reversal from the feds.
Under President Donald Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress, federal lawmakers could pass major cuts to Medicaid, food assistance and other social programs. There are also discussions about ending the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Senate President Ben Albritton said that if the federal government cuts costs, he thinks Florida wouldn't be able to avoid shouldering some of the burden.
State lawmakers are also preparing for a potential recession, socking away at least $750 million for the state's rainy day fund and proposing making the annual funding permanent through a constitutional amendment next year.
The last time the fund was used was during the Great Recession, prompting lawmakers at the time to consider raising taxes.
'I never want a future Legislature to have to be in that position,' Perez said last week.
But some Democrats have raised concerns about this year's budget tying the state's hands.
'I think that the state actually should be preparing to help carry its people through that tough time, not looking for ways to cut funding,' said House Democratic Leader Fentrice Driskell.
House lawmakers this year took particular interest in DeSantis' spending habits and governance, focusing in part on the thousands of vacant positions across state agencies.
To slim the budget, they're slashing many of those positions for the next year, including more than 1,000 in Florida's health care agencies, including the Department of Children and Families and the Department of Health.
Lawmakers also set aside a smaller amount of money than usual for teacher and school employee raises — $100 million instead of previous years' roughly $250 million.
And they're also not funding $2 million for DeSantis' Hope Florida program, which is supposed to steer constituents in need from state services to local churches and nonprofits.
Lawmakers' scrutiny has caused DeSantis to rage against them in news conferences and online videos this year.
But he's still getting much of what he requested. For the Florida Job Growth Grant Fund, lawmakers set aside $50 million, $25 million less than he wanted. A state cancer grant fund, backed by the first lady, got $60 million.
And while the Legislature put more than $500 million toward the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, it fell short of the more than $600 million DeSantis wanted, with lawmakers pointing to how much of the prior funding remained unspent.
Some of the ideas in the budget popped up in the final days of negotiations, including a $3 million fund to give grants to local jails that contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for immigration enforcement.
The Florida Senate also put aside $23 million to fund the Florida State Guard, which DeSantis has used as a tool in his immigration enforcement and deportation plans.
But Hooper, R-Clearwater, said that the funding had more to do with the possibility of FEMA being dissolved than it had to do with immigration enforcement.
Both chambers together supported more than $100 million to increase the nursing home reimbursement rate.
About $28 million will go toward a farmer food share program prioritized by Albritton, along with about $104 million for another priority of his: citrus research.
Lawmakers this year are cutting taxes — but mostly for businesses.
Legislative leaders are eliminating the business rent tax, saving companies across the state about $900 million per year. DeSantis also proposed eliminating it in his budget.
They're not taking any action to reduce property taxes, however, and the House's plan for a sweeping sales tax cut has been whittled down to a limited sales tax reduction plan, which includes making the back-to-school sales tax holiday a permanent event every August and permanently exempting taxes on some items, like sunscreen and life jackets.
Though lawmakers initially billed the tax package as being targeted to benefit Florida families, the final package exempts or reduces taxes on things like NASCAR tickets, card rooms and slot machine licensing fees.
The final tax bill also sets aside $1 million for Florida's Office of Economic and Demographic Research to do a study on the state's property taxes.
DeSantis has proposed cutting or eliminating property taxes, which could leave local governments without a critical revenue source. But he proposed no concrete ideas for how to do that.
The governor in March offered a temporary plan to use $5 billion to give people a $1,000 homestead property tax rebate. But neither the House nor the Senate took up the idea.
A month into the legislative session, Perez made a surprise announcement that the House wanted to cut the state's sales tax from 6% to 5.25%. It would have been the largest state tax cut in Florida's history, saving Floridians nearly $5 billion per year.
But the Senate wouldn't go along with the plan. When asked why lawmakers decided to give businesses the largest tax break this year, Perez said the ultimate goal was to cut the amount of money lawmakers could spend.
'We have become accustomed to spending recurring dollars,' Perez said, adding: 'What we are trying to do is stop that from happening into the future.'
Times reporter Jeffrey S. Solochek contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amy Klobuchar Promotes Law Against Deepfakes While Denying She Said Sydney Sweeney Has ‘Perfect Titties'
Amy Klobuchar Promotes Law Against Deepfakes While Denying She Said Sydney Sweeney Has ‘Perfect Titties'

Gizmodo

time2 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Amy Klobuchar Promotes Law Against Deepfakes While Denying She Said Sydney Sweeney Has ‘Perfect Titties'

Democratic Senator from Minnesota Amy Klobuchar recently appeared on social media in a video saying that actress Sydney Sweeney had 'perfect titties' and that Democrats were 'the party of ugly people.' It was a deepfake, of course, and Klobuchar never uttered those words. But the senator has now written an op-ed in the New York Times to discuss the video and is calling for new legislation against deepfakes. 'The A.I. deepfake featured me using the phrase 'perfect titties' and lamenting that Democrats were 'too fat to wear jeans or too ugly to go outside.'' Klobuchar wrote in the New York Times. 'Though I could immediately tell that someone used footage from the hearing to make a deepfake, there was no getting around the fact that it looked and sounded very real.' The video of Klobuchar was originally from a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on data privacy that had been altered to make her look like she was talking about Sweeney. A recent ad from American Eagle featuring the actress became controversial because she talked about 'good genes,' to discuss denim from the company, a play on the word jeans. Critics said it was a reference to eugenics, and President Donald Trump even weighed in after he learned that she was a registered Republican, praising the actress. Klobuchar wrote that the fake video had gotten over a million views, and she contacted X to have it taken down or at least labeled as AI-generated content. 'It was using my likeness to stoke controversy where it did not exist. It had me saying vile things. And while I would like to think that most people would be able to recognize it as fake, some clearly thought it was real,' Klobuchar wrote. 🚨BREAKING!!!: Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota weights in on Sydney Sweeney's new American Eagle ad. — andy (@reapingandy) July 31, 2025But Klobuchar writes that X refused to take it down or label it even though X has a policy against 'inauthentic content on X that may deceive people,' as well as 'manipulated or out-of-context media that may result in widespread confusion on public issues.' Anyone who's spent time on X since Elon Musk bought the platform knows that he doesn't really care about manipulated content as long as it serves right-wing interests. But there's also the question of why any manipulated video would need to be labeled if most people could tell it was fake. X reportedly told Klobuchar to add a Community Note, and she was miffed that the company wouldn't help her add one, according to her op-ed. Klobuchar ends her article by promoting the No Fakes Act (Nurture Originals, Foster Art, and Keep Entertainment Safe Act), which has cosponsors across party lines, including Democratic senator Chris Coons of Connecticut and Republican senators Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee. The senator from Minnesota writes that the bill 'would give people the right to demand that social media companies remove deepfakes of their voice and likeness while making exceptions for speech protected by the First Amendment.' As the EFF notes, the No Fakes Act is deeply flawed, creating what it calls a new censorship infrastructure. The latest version of the law has carve-outs for parody, satire, and commentary, but as the EFF points out, having to prove something is parody in a court of law can be extremely costly. The irony in Klobuchar drawing attention to the deepfake video is that a lot more people are now going to know it exists. And it's getting posted more on X in the wake of her op-ed. In fact, Gizmodo had difficulty finding the tweet Klobuchar says got 1 million views, but we did find plenty of other people re-posting the video now.

Trump to join Washington patrol while feds deploy checkpoints around city
Trump to join Washington patrol while feds deploy checkpoints around city

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump to join Washington patrol while feds deploy checkpoints around city

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump plans to join a Thursday evening patrol in the nation's capital as federal authorities deploy checkpoints around the city and sometimes ask people for their immigration status after stopping them. 'I'm going to be going out tonight with the police and with the military," the Republican president told Todd Starnes, a conservative commentator. Trump's presence during his controversial crackdown, which has lasted for two weeks, would be the latest show of force from the White House. Hundreds of federal agents and National Guard soldiers have surged into Washington this month, leaving some residents on edge and creating tense confrontations in the streets. Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday visited some of the troops at Union Station, showing their support while protestors chanted 'free D.C.' Although the city has historically struggled with crime, statistics show the problem was declining before Trump declared there was a crisis that required his intervention. Immigration enforcement has been a core part of the crackdown, rattling people in some of the city's neighborhoods. A daycare was partially closed on Thursday when staff became afraid to go to work because they heard about federal agents nearby. An administrator asked parents to keep their children at home if possible. Other day cares have stopped taking kids on daily walks because of fears about encountering law enforcement. Since Aug. 7, when Trump began surging federal agents into the city, there have been 630 arrests, including 251 people who are in the country illegally, according to the White House. Trump has been ratcheting up the pressure since then, seizing control of the D.C. police department on Aug. 11 and deploying more National Guard troops, mostly from Republican-led states. Soldiers have been largely stationed in downtown areas, such as monuments on the National Mall and transit stations. However, federal agents are operating more widely through the city. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser acknowledged the proliferation of traffic checkpoints on Thursday. 'The surge of federal officers is allowing for different types of deployments, more frequent types of deployments, like checkpoints,' Bowser said. Not a normal traffic stop On Thursday morning, as Martin Romero rode through Washington's Rock Creek Park on his way to a construction job in Virginia, he saw police on the road up ahead. He figured it was a normal traffic stop, but it wasn't. Romero, 41, said that U.S. Park Police were telling pickup trucks with company logos to pull over, reminding them that commercial vehicles weren't allowed on park roads. They checked for licenses and insurance information, and then U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents came over. Romero said there were two agents on one side of his truck and three on the other. He started to get nervous as the agents asked where they were from and whether they were in the country illegally. 'We just came here to work,' Romero said afterwards. 'We aren't doing anything bad.' Two people in his truck were detained and the agents didn't give a reason, he said. He also saw three other people taken from other vehicles. 'I feel really worried because they took two of our guys," he said. "They wouldn't say where they're taking them or if they'll be able to come back.' Romero said he called his boss, who told him to just head home. They wouldn't be working today. Enrique Martinez, a supervisor at the construction company, came to the scene afterwards. He pondered whether to call families of the detained men. 'This has never happened to our company before," Martinez said. "I'm not really sure what to do.' Checkpoints are legal, to a point The Supreme Court has upheld the use of law enforcement and government checkpoints for specific purposes, such as for policing the border and for identifying suspected drunk drivers. But there are restrictions on that authority, especially when it comes to general crime control. Jeffrey Bellin, a former prosecutor in Washington and professor at Vanderbilt Law School who specializes in criminal law and procedures, said the Constitution doesn't allow 'the government to be constantly checking us and stopping to see if we're up to any criminal activity.' He said checkpoints for a legally justifiable purpose — like checking for drivers' licenses and registrations — cannot be used as 'subterfuge' or a pretext for stops that would otherwise not be allowed. And though the court has affirmed the use of checkpoints at the border, and even some distance away from it, to ask drivers about immigration status, Bellin said it was unlikely the authority would extend to Washington. Anthony Michael Kreis, a professor at Georgia State College of Law, said the seemingly 'arbitrary' and intrusive nature of the checkpoints in the capital could leave residents feeling aggrieved. 'Some of the things could be entirely constitutional and fine, but at the same time, the way that things are unfolding, people are suspicious — and I think for good reason,' he said. From Los Angeles to D.C. There are few places in the country that have been unaffected by Trump's deportation drive, but his push into D.C. is shaping into something more sustained, similar to what has unfolded in the Los Angeles area since early June. In Los Angeles, immigration officers — working with the Border Patrol and other federal agencies — have been a near-daily presence at Home Depots, car washes and other highly visible locations. In a demonstration of how enforcement has affected routines, the bishop of San Bernardino, California, formally excused parishioners of their weekly obligation to attend Mass after immigration agents detained people on two parish properties. Immigration officials have been an unusually public presence, sending horse patrols to the city's famed MacArthur Park and appearing outside California Gov. Gavin Newsom's news conference last week on congressional redistricting. Authorities said an agent fired at a moving vehicle last week after the driver refused to roll down his window during an immigration stop. The National Guard and Marines were previously in the city for weeks on an assignment to maintain order amid protests.

Iowa Democrats consider bringing back lead off caucuses, even if it means going 'rogue' in 2028
Iowa Democrats consider bringing back lead off caucuses, even if it means going 'rogue' in 2028

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Iowa Democrats consider bringing back lead off caucuses, even if it means going 'rogue' in 2028

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Just days before national Democrats gather for their annual summer meeting, Iowa's state party officials on Thursday said it was a mistake for the party to have abandoned Iowa in the 2024 early nominating calendar and opened up the possibility of going rogue the next time around. In 2022, President Joe Biden ordered a shake-up of the 2024 election calendar, moving South Carolina's primary ahead of contests in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada. The move forced Iowa Democrats to ditch the five-decade, first-in-the-nation caucus where community members publicly signal their support for a candidate, a process that was plagued with problems in 2020. The state party's criticism came with an open threat of defying the national party's orders in 2028 as Iowa Democrats look to bring the once-competitive, Midwestern state back on the radar of a party questioning its values, direction and future leaders. 'It was a big mistake in the Biden calendar to know that Iowa Republicans are going first here in this state and that, as Democrats, we sat and watched all this attention and the millions of dollars being spent in the state without those kinds of resources to push back on the Republican agenda," said Rita Hart, state party chair. 'That did not help us here in Iowa and it did not help us long term for the national Democratic cause.' Hart said that would be reflected in her own response to the state party's new survey, designed to solicit feedback from Democrats across the state on the priorities for 2028, including on the tradeoffs of the traditional caucus process and potential threats from the Democratic National Committee. Officials in the traditionally four early-voting states — and many others — are readying themselves to campaign for top billing, even though it's likely still two years before the Democratic National Committee actually solidifies the order. Iowa Democrats said Thursday that Ken Martin, chair of the Democratic National Committee, might unveil the process for states to make their 2028 pitch at next week's biannual meetings. Democratic officials said they expect to have preliminary conversations next week. But Iowa's Scott Brennan will no longer be a member of the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee, which deals with the nominating process. That leaves Iowa without a seat at the table for the first time for the better part of 25 years, Brennan said. Brennan, former state party chair, said Iowans are 'rule followers by nature' but reiterated Thursday that last cycle's process was not fair as he conveyed his own wishes for 2028: "Full speed ahead and damn the DNC." Last year, Iowa Democrats held caucuses eight days before any other state's contest, as is required by Iowa law. But Democratic voters had cast their 2024 presidential preference ballots by mail, with results released that March on Super Tuesday alongside other states. Meanwhile, New Hampshire rebelled in 2024, holding an unsanctioned primary in January, but the DNC ultimately dropped its threat to not seat the state's national convention delegates. Even as the Iowa Democratic Party considers going forward with a first-in-the-nation contest once again, it will still come with logistical questions. The survey includes questions on how the party should handle issues of inclusion and accessibility for the process, which has historically required participants to be registered with the party and physically present, sometimes for hours, in the evening during the heart of the Midwest winter. While Hart said the survey is designed to better understand Iowa Democrats' values to guide their approach to 2028, she suggested there are 'too many moving pieces' to say now how that approach will look. For now, 2028 prospects are making visits to the historically early states, including Iowa. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz reemerged after the 2024 election loss with a town hall in Des Moines in March; Biden's Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who performed well in the 2020 Iowa caucuses, stopped by a VoteVets Action Fund gathering in May; and Sen. Ruben Gallego of Arizona spoke to hundreds in eastern Iowa earlier this month. 'The fact of the matter is is that Iowa law requires that we be a caucus,' he said, "and I think we intend to be a caucus.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store