2 Ways To Break Out of A Couple ‘Conflict Loop,' By A Psychologist
If both people listen and work through these moments with respect, it can benefit the relationship in many ways, such as creating an increasing understanding between partners, and helping them learn what matters to the other person and why.
In short, a healthy conflict serves as a reminder that the relationship can survive tough moments and even deepen because of them.
However, it can get unhealthy when you keep having the same kind of fight. You might notice that no matter what sparks the fight, be it dishes, tone of voice or texting habits, it somehow always circles back to the same emotional pain points and the real issue never ends up getting addressed.
This is a 'conflict loop,' a pattern where you're just replaying old hurts and unfinished conversations.
You might feel pulled into protecting your ego, wanting to be right, proving a point or 'winning' the argument. While in the moment that can feel satisfying, it often comes at the cost of truly hearing each other. The real goal of the conversation shifts from understanding to defending.
This cycle, over time, erodes trust and a sense of safety in the relationship. The relationship might start to feel less safe because both people begin to anticipate the next fight before it even happens.
To come out of this loop, it's important to recognize its existence in the first place. Here are two signs that your relationship is stuck in a conflict loop.
1. You're Fighting About Surface Issues
Often in a relationship, without even realizing it, one partner or even both can start feeling unseen, unheard or unappreciated.
Ideally, the healthy way is to address it early on through open communication. But it's possible you don't recognize these feelings for what they are or aren't able to express them in the moment. As a result, such emotions can get pushed aside, which can build resentment.
This happens because deeper needs often feel too vulnerable to name in the moment, and so, they stay hidden. When they're not addressed, every new argument becomes another way of expressing the same old hurt.
This can resurface later as small irritations, passive-aggressive remarks or arguments over things that don't seem like the 'real' problem.
On the surface, it may look like you're fighting about a specific behavior. But underneath, it could be about something deeper, maybe a need for respect, closeness or emotional safety that isn't being met.
In a 2023 study, researchers tested a psychological theory called 'control-mastery theory.' It suggests that couples with chronic conflict are often part of a 'relational vicious circle' where each partner is unconsciously 'testing' deep and harmful beliefs about themselves, which are also called pathogenic beliefs. The other partner's reaction ends up confirming those beliefs instead of disproving them.
Researchers wanted to see whether feelings of interpersonal guilt (guilt about hurting, disappointing or burdening the other person) are more present during couple conflicts.
They worked with 11 couples in therapy, with four experienced therapists using session transcripts (word-for-word records) from the couples' psychotherapy. Nine trained judges read these transcripts and rated them, comparing conflictual and non-conflictual segments of conversations.
Researchers found that in conflicts, both partners showed more 'testing' behavior, essentially trying to see if their partner would disprove their deep fears (such as 'I'm unlovable' and 'I'm not important') but instead getting responses that confirmed those fears. Conflictual moments also carried more interpersonal guilt than calmer moments.
For instance, if you have an underlying belief that you are not worth prioritizing, you might test your partner by noticing if they listen or show care during a disagreement. But if the fight stays focused on surface issues instead of addressing the deeper need, that test fails and it leaves you feeling exactly what you feared: that you do not matter.
This means that conflict can reinforce the original wound instead of repairing it. The key to dealing with this is to move past the surface issue and get curious about the real need underneath; both yours and your partner's.
Instead of aiming to 'win' the argument, try to notice what belief might be getting tested in that moment. Start by asking yourself what you're afraid this conflict might 'confirm' about you, and move your focus to understanding what your partner is afraid it'll confirm about them.
When you slowly learn how to respond instead of reacting to the current issue and face fear instead of giving into frustration, you give each other a chance to disconfirm those old beliefs.
2. Every Fight Brings Up Past Issues And Hurt
You can tell you're in a conflict loop when arguments start carrying more weight than the situation deserves. A small disagreement, let's say, about being late, forgetting a chore or a slightly sharp tone, could snowball into airing every past disappointment.
This often sounds like 'You always do this,' or 'This is just like last time' or 'And remember when you…'
What starts as one conversation can slowly turn into a replay of your entire conflict history.
This is also called 'kitchen sinking,' where instead of dealing with the present conflict, you pile all your unresolved hurt into it. This makes the issue at hand feel unfixable, because you're not just solving today's problem but you're also trying to resolve a backlog of emotional debt in one go.
Previous studies have shown that recalling positive shared memories (like a great trip or a sweet moment) can make couples feel closer and warmer toward each other.
However, in a 2024 study published in the Journal of Social and Personal Psychology, researchers wanted to flip the lens. They wanted to learn what happens when couples recall negative memories instead, and whether remembering relationship conflicts decrease feelings of intimacy in the present.
Researchers found that recalling positive memories increased closeness, while negative memories reduced warmth.
Feelings of closeness also declined when the conflict felt personally significant and when participants had used avoidance or self-distraction to cope at the time. This means that the emotional cost is even higher if the conflict was never well-processed in the first place.
This is exactly why kitchen-sinking feels so damaging in the middle of a fight, because you're not only digging up the past but also reactivating its emotional impact. It can make you feel less connected in the moment, probably when you most need connection.
When an old hurt comes up during a disagreement, pause and ask yourself if it's about today or if you're trying to use something from the past to prove that you're right. Start noticing the pattern and understand if you often bring up the past to strengthen your argument.
If so, try shifting the focus. Maybe slow down and ask yourself, 'What is the actual issue here, right now?'
By separating the past from the present and aiming to understand the core problem, you give the current conflict a fair chance to be resolved.
Start by learning to respond consciously to the current argument and eventually, in a calmer moment when you can both reflect mindfully, try focusing on the bigger issue at play.
Conflict loops can only break when you start dealing with what's actually happening or what's been hidden for long.
Both partners need to learn to strike a balance between knowing when to stop digging into the past and being able to spot the patterns that keep resurfacing. The goal isn't to ignore history. You just need to recognize which old issues are worth addressing later and which are just being pulled in to win today's argument.
In the moment, aim to understand the real need or fear underneath, for both you and your partner. This way, the conversation can move toward repair instead of repetition.
When resolution becomes the focus, even hard conversations can bring you closer instead of pushing you apart.
Wondering if you and your partner resolve conflict productively or destructively? Take the science-backed Ineffective Arguing Inventory to find out.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Weaponized incompetence is back, and it's driving modern women out of their marriages
Mila had been dating her boyfriend for a year when she got pregnant. They had been keen to have a child together, but shifting into "nesting mode" gave Mila fresh eyes. Her boyfriend would constantly dodge basic tasks like grocery shopping, she said, telling her he didn't know "how to do it," even if she gave him an itemized list. She said she shouldered the cooking and cleaning, even as intense pregnancy symptoms left her sick and depressed. "You know everything, inside and out, about your favorite car. All the things that you truly care about, you know all the details," Mila recalled thinking about him. "But when it comes to basic necessities like getting groceries, buying stuff for our child, remembering things about us, you act as if you're incompetent." Mila's ex-boyfriend didn't return a request for comment from Business Insider. Her surname has been withheld to protect her family's privacy. Already feeling like a single mom, Mila left her boyfriend when she was about three months pregnant. About one year after welcoming her daughter, while scrolling on her phone, she came across the term "weaponized incompetence," and the unsettled feeling in her gut crystallized. "I'm like, that's what I've been dealing with for so long," she said. "It was so nice to put a name to it." The term "weaponized incompetence" emerged in the mid-2000s. Two decades later, it reenters viral discourse every few months. Stories like Mila's are littered across Reddit and TikTok, usually pertaining to heteronormative relationships. People — mostly women — vent about the people in their lives — mostly men — who seem to excel at the office, at school, or in their fantasy football draft, but regularly drop the ball at home. Despite measurable advances in gender equality, the workload is not shifting at home, the Pew Research Center found in a 2023 report. Dennis Vetrano, a divorce and family attorney in New York, said he's been hearing a familiar complaint from female clients increasingly over the past five years, "and that is the failure of their husband to be a true partner in their relationship." "In fact," Vetrano added of weaponized incompetence, "that's become one of the core issues or one of the leading reasons for divorce these days." Matt Lundquist, psychotherapist and founder of Tribeca Therapy, echoed Vetrano's observation and timeline. "I see this in my work with female patients, I see this in my work with straight couples," he said, noting that the pandemic reignited tension over the division of housework. The widespread lockdowns, which confined many working couples to their homes, raised questions of whose paid work is "more valuable" and deserving of undivided attention — such that a whining toddler or the chimes of a dryer in its final cycle will go unheard, or worse, ignored. "The sum of all of this was, for many couples, regressive. The default party responsible for domestic labor again became women," Lundquist said. Even now, with return-to-office mandates in full swing, the psychological ripples remain. "It feels like we've gone backward a couple of steps." Incompetence becomes 'weaponized' when 'I don't know' really means 'I don't want to' Feminists have been studying weaponized incompetence for decades. In her 1989 book, "The Second Shift," Arlie Hochschild describes how women tend to assume the unpaid labor of cooking, cleaning, caregiving, and emotional maintenance, even after returning home from their paid jobs. The concept went mainstream in the aughts, when The Wall Street Journal's Jared Sandberg coined the phrase "strategic incompetence," as a useful way to "deflect work one doesn't want to do — without ever having to admit it." I see men offering counterpoints in the comment sections of women's viral TikTok videos, arguing that women are simply observing genuine, harmless ineptitude. When I polled a group of my straight, male friends about this buzzword, the majority said they'd never heard of it. One said he hadn't considered how it plays out in the dating world; he added that between mothers and sons, it's "100% a thing." Only one friend could define the term in his own words: "It's like intentionally playing dumb, right?" He sometimes tells his fiancée that he doesn't "know how to make a salad," he said, because he knows she'll do it anyway — but he also insisted that she makes salad more delicious than he ever could. It's true that some people are not natural cooks or don't know how to change a diaper, and find it difficult to learn the right technique. For a man, it's possible that he was raised not to know these things and struggles to break out of that mindset. This incompetence becomes weaponized when he doesn't take the time to learn, improve, or understand how his role as a partner can broaden beyond the patriarchal archetype of "breadwinner" or "provider." "It's the continuous presentation as if, 'I don't know how, this is hard for me,' when in terms of your capacity and capability, you are actually equipped to learn and do it," Bukky Kolawole, a couples therapist and founder of Relationship HQ, told Business Insider. Jordan, who asked for her surname to be withheld for privacy, said that preparing to coparent with her ex-boyfriend illuminated a labor divide that already existed in their relationship. "I was like, I know you know how to clean a bathroom. I know you know how to flush a toilet. I know you know where the laundry goes, or what the bed looks like in the morning," Jordan said. "It was like I was already hanging out with an infant." Colette Nataf, a 35-year-old marketing executive, said she filed for divorce three years ago because she was fed up with "managing another adult" on top of her own life, job, and kids. Her ex-husband declined a request for comment from Business Insider. Nataf said she was married for years before she came to grips with the dirty plates stacked next to the empty dishwasher, or the fruitless pleas to share chores because, paraphrasing her ex-husband, "it's too hard to remember everything." Some men have been coming to terms with the ubiquity of this dynamic. In a 2023 essay for GQ, Sammi Gale described his slow, somewhat agonized epiphany after seeing the hashtag #weaponizedincompetence take off online: "For all my feminist talk, pub probity and pussy hat marches, I realize now I'm not so different to the men getting called out on TikTok." Women are tired of working two jobs without help In her current work as a divorce coach, Nataf said she hears the same from female clients all the time: They aren't reeling from betrayal, falling out of love, or yearning to pursue someone new. They're just tired. "You don't need your husband to financially support you anymore. You're still doing all of the household labor. So now you just have basically an additional child you're taking care of, and that is exhausting," she said. Data shows the average woman is outpacing the average man. As single women continue to gain power and prominence in society — earning more bachelor's degrees, buying more homes, dominating healthy sectors of the workforce, and even living longer than their married counterparts — pushback has manifested in the form of "trad wives" and "manosphere" influencers, most of whom label themselves as anti-feminists and boast about their return to "traditional" gender roles. This kind of content romanticizes and fortifies the conservative ideals that a woman's domain is the home, while men are responsible for bringing home the bacon. Poll after poll shows that Gen Z men are particularly receptive to these ideals, while women of the same age are increasingly resistant, overwhelmingly expressing support for female leaders in politics, preference for female bosses in the workplace, and interest in advancing social causes. As the ideological gap widens between men and women, expectations for the division of relationship admin fall further out of alignment. "Feminism brought women into the workforce, but men haven't had the same social movement into the home," Audrey Schoen, a licensed marriage and family therapist, told Business Insider. Vetrano has seen this mismatch bring couples into his office. "My dad was the primary wage earner. My mom took care of everything in the household. Now, what you're finding is women are more often doctors, lawyers, CEOs running their own companies — high-powered professions that take 40, 50, 60 hours a week, and in addition, they're doing everything else just like my mom did when I grew up," he said. "They're paying the bills, or even the bulk of the bills, and they're doing everything else," Vetrano added of his female clients. "They're getting frustrated and they're getting burned out." This frustration has trickled into the herd mentality of social media. Earlier this summer, a TikTok went viral when a woman showed the disastrous results of asking her boyfriend to help paint a room in their home: visible streaks, stained baseboards, and splatters on the floor. The video has over 10 million views, and a quick scroll through the comments reveals a chorus of disgust: "This is weaponized incompetence omg," "Dump him," "That's not a boyfriend, that's a sworn enemy." The original creator shared a follow-up video with the caption, "We broke up." The top comment? "A HAPPY END FINALLY." So, what can straight couples do? Therapists I spoke with said it's important to remember that it's not always helpful to accuse your partner of "weaponized incompetence." The term implies malicious intent. Yes, there may be a premeditated or even vindictive element to this — if your partner performs a task poorly on purpose, for example, because he's angry you asked him to do it — but that's a tough place to start a conversation. "Most people who are accused of weaponized incompetence often feel criticized because that's not their intention," Schoen explained. "Their thought process stops at, 'I don't want to have to do that.' They don't see the next part." It's more important, Schoen said, to focus on the "practical impact," which is real and tangible regardless of intent. "Often," she continued, "I find that when I'm able to bring the partners into view of the totality and the gravity of the impact, it shifts their position." Approach the topic with generosity, Lundquist advised: "If somebody's trying to raise this issue with a partner or a coworker, I think to come in too hot — unfortunately, as much as I think the frustration is justifiable — is a sort of missed opportunity for development and for reorganizing how things work in a culture." For men, that opportunity starts with getting proactive instead of defensive. Take the time to understand where the discrepancy is coming from, then make an effort to bridge the gap, without waiting for your partner to give you a blueprint. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Allow for a learning curve or suggest redistributing tasks — evenly! — to suit different strengths. However, Lundquist said, if your generosity isn't reciprocated and no changes are made over time, it's OK to decide when you've had enough — especially if you have the economic means to go it alone. "Increasingly in relationships, women's expectations are matched by women's earning capacity," Lundquist said. "I think men are going to have to figure out how to catch up with that." Read the original article on Business Insider
CNET
5 hours ago
- CNET
Humanoid Robot FOLDS LAUNDRY in New Figure 02 AI Demo
919 We and ourpartners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting I Accept enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. Selecting Reject All or withdrawing your consent will disable them. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Manage Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage [or the floating icon on the bottom-left of the webpage, if applicable]. Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy. Our Privacy Policy
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman Asks to Join Fiancé's Phone Plan to 'Save Money,' but He Refuses Due to Her Financial 'Track Record'
The 32-year-old says he can't risk taking on more expenses when his fiancée refuses to have open conversations about money NEED TO KNOW A man refuses to share a phone plan with his fiancée, citing her unstable income and lack of financial openness He already pays the mortgage, utilities, and covers other expenses, while she avoids budgeting discussions Past broken promises make him fear he'd end up paying the full phone bill if they combined plans A man turns to Reddit for support following a tense disagreement with his fiancée over something as seemingly small as a phone plan. In his post, the 32-year-old explains that the argument began when his 29-year-old partner told him she was feeling 'very upset' and accused him of not helping her enough financially. 'When I asked what that meant she said she is stressed financially and that we should at least be on the same phone plan so that she can save money,' he writes. He explains that he's currently on his mom's plan because it saves him a significant amount thanks to her nurse discount and other family plan benefits. The man says he doesn't want to combine phone plans without more transparency. 'I told my fiancée I can't join plans together with her until she can at least have an open conversation about finances with me,' he writes. Her current part-time jobs, he notes, are 'very unstable,' and he worries he may be the one footing the entire bill if she comes up "short on cash" one month. "I've tried sitting her down several times in the past to discuss our finances and set a budget because she was falling short on a lot of her expenses," he writes. "She refused each time. I need to see hard numbers on paper like her income, debts, expenses, etc for me to consider being on her phone plan I told her." The man notes that he already supports her in major ways. 'I pay all of the mortgage and utilities on my house that she lives in with me so I feel I'm helping her out tremendously in that way,' he writes. He also does his own repairs on her car, saving her 'thousands by now,' and bails her out financially from time to time. Even with those contributions, he says he's not in a position to take on more. 'I am very hesitant to take on any more extra expenses at this point,' he explains. For him, joining a shared phone plan isn't just a minor step — it's an additional liability he feels he can't afford. In the comment section, one user told him it was "time to immediately tap the brakes on this engagement." "Financial stress is one of the leading cause of divorce," they wrote. "You know what's really expensive? Weddings. You know what's even more expensive? Divorces." Another Redditor joked, 'Sure I'll marry you. Share a phone plan? Slow down I'm not ready for that big of a commitment! LOL.' However, the poster pushed back against the joke, clarifying his position. 'Not at all I'm just not in the best financial spot myself and have a plan to get out of it,' he replied, adding that it would be impossible to set himself up if he is 'overspending to help out when she isn't pulling her own weight financially.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. He points to a history of broken promises as another reason for his reluctance. 'Joining a phone plan with her is a liability at this point given her track record of not paying me back on money that was owed, false promises, etc,' he added. He fears that what seems like a small commitment could lead to a larger financial strain. The post ends with the man questioning whether he is in the wrong for saying no. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
