logo
Tesla faces difficult road ahead as it hopes robotaxis will offset declining sales

Tesla faces difficult road ahead as it hopes robotaxis will offset declining sales

The fall in Tesla's core auto sales has led to more investor scrutiny of Elon Musk's lofty robotaxi promises. (Reuters pic)
LOS ANGELES : Tesla and its CEO Elon Musk are walking an increasingly difficult tightrope as the company navigates declining electric vehicle (EV) sales and an autonomous driving business that has yet to get off the ground.
Yesterday's earnings call, Musk said Tesla is 'getting the regulatory permission to launch' robotaxis in several states, including California, Nevada, Arizona and Florida.
He expects operations to reach 'half the population of the US by the end of the year' and to roll out at scale by the end of next year.
So far, though, the company is operating only a small fleet in Austin, Texas, that is not available to the general public.
Getting regulatory approvals, particularly in California, is likely to prove a bigger hurdle than Musk described on the call.
'Tesla cannot afford a misstep with the robotaxi service,' said Camelthorn Investments adviser Shawn Campbell, who owns Tesla shares.
He added that 'the wheels are coming off' its automotive business, with sales declines across 'almost every market'.
Sales fell 13% for the first half of this year, as its core EV business deteriorated due to an aging lineup and brand damage from Musk's political activism.
With no affordable vehicles on the horizon until the last three months of the year and the upcoming elimination of a US$7,500 US tax break for EV buyers, Musk acknowledged that the company could have 'a few rough quarters'.
'The numbers kind of speak for themselves,' said Ross Gerber, CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management and a Tesla investor.
'They're bad for a growth company, which isn't growing,' Kawasaki said.
Tesla shares are already down nearly 18% this year and robotaxis and autonomous driving are critical to maintaining the company's roughly US$1 trillion stock market valuation.
Regulatory barriers
The fall in core auto sales has led to more investor scrutiny of Musk's lofty robotaxi promises.
Products such as the Cybertruck have come later than anticipated, and Musk has promised every year since 2016 that driverless Teslas would arrive no later than the following year.
Many questions on yesterday's call focused on how quickly Tesla would be able to expand robotaxi services, and the regulatory hurdles that remain.
Musk said he expected the robotaxi business would have a 'material impact' on Tesla's business by the end of next year.
In April, he said it would become material 'around the middle of next year,' and predicted 'millions of Teslas operating autonomously' by the second half of 2026.
The San Francisco Bay Area was first on Musk's list of expansion markets, but California regulators told Reuters yesterday that Tesla had not yet applied for permits needed to pick up and charge passengers for rides in fully autonomous vehicles.
Companies need a series of permits from both the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in order to test and deploy autonomous vehicles in the state.
To date, Tesla only has obtained the first in a series of permits needed to launch a service, and spokesmen for both agencies said the company has not applied for the additional permits needed to test and operate autonomous vehicles.
Tesla did not respond immediately to a request for comment.
California has no specific time period to grant such permits, but Alphabet's Waymo, which offers autonomous ride-hailing in Los Angeles and the Bay Area, logged more than 13 million testing miles and secured seven different regulatory approvals over nine years before receiving approval to charge passengers for rides in driverless robotaxis in 2023.
Tesla has logged just 904km in California since 2016, and has not reported any autonomous-driving km to the state in six years, according to the most recent state records.
Paul Miller, principal analyst at market research and consultancy firm Forrester, pointed to Musk's comment about addressing half of the US population 'subject to regulatory approvals'.
'That caveat is an important one, as regulatory approvals take time,' he said.
Other markets Musk mentioned could move faster. In Arizona, a state department of transportation spokesman said Tesla contacted state officials last month and had applied for permits to test and operate autonomous vehicles with and without a safety driver.
The agency said a decision is expected at the end of the month.
'Tesla also must seek permits to operate a ride-hailing service and submit plans to the state for how police agencies can deal with their autonomous vehicles,' the spokesman said.
Nevada DMV officials said they discussed the state's process with Tesla last week, but no steps have been taken, while officials in Florida did not respond to a request for comment.
Some investors are also seeking more specifics about the Austin launch.
Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, a Tesla investor, said he was disappointed the EV maker gave no updates on its earnings call on when the Austin service would be available to the general public or how many vehicles would be on the road.
'It seemed like he wanted to kind of steer clear of really putting hard estimates out there for how things play out,' Munster said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's harassment claims denied in court
Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's harassment claims denied in court

The Star

time8 hours ago

  • The Star

Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's harassment claims denied in court

FILE PHOTO: OpenAI logo is seen in front of Elon Musk photo in this illustration taken March 11, 2024. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo (Reuters) -A federal judge on Tuesday denied Elon Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's claims of a "years-long harassment campaign" by the Tesla CEO against the company he co-founded in 2015 and later abandoned before ChatGPT became a global phenomenon. In the latest turn in a court battle that kicked off last year, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Musk must face OpenAI's claims that the billionaire, through press statements, social media posts, legal claims and "a sham bid for OpenAI's assets" had attempted to harm the AI startup. Musk sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman last year over the company's transition to a for-profit model, accusing the company of straying from its founding mission of developing AI for the good of humanity, not profit. OpenAI countersued Musk in April, accusing the billionaire of engaging in fraudulent business practices under California law. Musk then asked for OpenAI's counterclaims to be dismissed or delayed until a later stage in the case. OpenAI argued in May its countersuit should not be put on hold, and the judge on Tuesday concluded that the company's allegations were legally sufficient to proceed. A jury trial has been scheduled for spring 2026. (Reporting by Deborah Sophia in Bengaluru; Editing by Devika Syamnath)

At Elon Musk's newly opened Tesla Diner in Los Angeles, the future looks mid
At Elon Musk's newly opened Tesla Diner in Los Angeles, the future looks mid

The Star

time15 hours ago

  • The Star

At Elon Musk's newly opened Tesla Diner in Los Angeles, the future looks mid

When Elon Musk announced that he was building the Tesla Diner in 2018, it was sold as a wholesome, Americana-flavoured vision of the future in Hollywood – electric cars charging around a communal big screen while drivers fueled up on reimagined fast food. Since then, Musk, the world's richest man and Tesla's CEO, acquired Twitter in a chaotic takeover, donated millions to President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign and as the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency set out to slash agencies across the federal government. By the time Tesla Diner opened in July, Tesla had reported declining revenue, and the Los Angeles restaurant looked more like a distraction for a brand in crisis – a viral marketing exercise on a half-acre lot where you could pretend the Cybertruck wasn't a flop. A worker brings an order to diner waiting in their car at the Tesla Diner. From the vantage point of a drone camera, two stories high, the Tesla Diner might still appear as a retro-futuristic spaceship gleaming on Santa Monica Boulevard, but from the point of view of a person, down here on the ground (hello!), it's something else. On the weekends, you're just as likely to see protesters waving images portraying Musk as a Nasi as to see fans livestreaming their shuffle through the line. Plenty of people never leave their cars, ordering food delivered to them by servers while they charge at one of 80 reserved spots. As I waited to get in, a woman on a skateboard whooshed by, shouting 'Losers!' at the line while people carried out bags of Tesla merch – T-shirts, baseball caps, gummy candies and robot action figures. I saw several Cybertrucks parked below the big screens (which were, at that moment, playing an ad for Cybertrucks). The new restaurant from the electric car giant is a smash burger and content machine, drawing Elon Musk's fans and protesters. The food itself looked like merch, too: waffles embossed with the Tesla app's lightning-bolt icon and dusted with powdered sugar, like the Mickey waffles at Disney parks. Burgers and sandwiches packed in vented Cybertruck-shaped boxes, at least until the kitchen ran out of them. For the culinary portion of the project, Tesla hired restaurateur Bill Chait, known for République and Tartine, along with Eric Greenspan, chef of the Foundry on Melrose who has lately been developing ghost-kitchen concepts, including MrBeast Burger. Greenspan also formulated a Kraft single dupe at his company New School American, and that thin, sticky rendition of American cheese, made from a base of aged cheddar, shows up all over the Tesla menu. Tesla drivers charge their cars at the Tesla Diner in Los Angeles. In its first hectic days of business, most of the menu items advertised across platforms weren't available. When I went, there were no salads, no veggie patties, no club sandwiches, no avocado toasts, no beef tallow-fried hash browns, no biscuits, no pies, no cookies, no soft serve, no milkshakes, no 'epic bacon.' But agreeable chicken tenders were sandwiched between tough waffles, slathered with a very sweet mayonnaise. And a generic beef chili was so finely ground under its puddle of cheese, the fact that it was Wagyu seemed irrelevant. The hot dog – an all-beef Snap-o-Rasso – was withered by the time I made it to an empty chair in the full sun of the second-story balcony. (The shade sails had all been removed following an accident.) Chili cheese fries, a burger and a grilled cheese sandwich at the Tesla Diner in Los Angeles in August 2025. The new restaurant from the electric car giant is a smash burger and content machine, drawing Elon Musk's fans and protesters. (Zach Callahan/The New York Times) Tesla engineers built a proprietary tool to flatten patties for the smash burgers with crisp browned edges, held together with caramelised onions and cheese, which seemed to be on most tables. It lent the dish a superficial whiff of innovation, but the burger didn't stand out in any meaningful way. Tesla, which still promises a vision of the future to its devoted fans, fails to deliver on one that isn't bland and familiar. If you look past the design by Stantec, this is a high-volume restaurant with a menu of meat-focused fast food that diners order on touch screens, then pick up at the counter. It's an unremarkable model that chains rolled out years ago. In marketing materials, and on its opening day, Tesla had teased a robot making popcorn on the second floor, but there were no robots in operation when I stopped in, other than the one I saw outside – a comedian dressed up as the Tesla Bot Optimus, smoking a cigarette, who said he planned to make funny videos until he 'got kicked out.' A chili cheese dog from the Tesla Diner. I'd also read on Tesla's website that this was a 24-hour restaurant, but as a worker explained to me, it was 24 hours only for Tesla drivers who ordered on the app, from their cars. For everyone else, doors opened at 6 a.m. and closed at midnight. (Which might explain why some diners had reported waiting several hours to get inside – did no one tell them?) Tesla Diner has been sold as a charging station, a drive-in and 'a classic American diner,' but by the time I left, I wondered if whoever wrote that copy had been to a diner. A diner is a kind of north star – its doors open, its menu constant. A smash burger at the Tesla Diner in Los Angeles. For now, you never know how long it will take to get into the Tesla Diner or, when you do, what may or may not be available. Last week, after a post about the restaurant's 'epic bacon' went viral on social platform X, disparaging the abyss between its artificially glossy image on the touch screen and its actual, grimmer presentation in real life, the bacon disappeared from the menu. What bacon? It was as if it never existed. None of this seemed to deter the people in line. On my way out, I squeesed into an elevator with my colleagues, some international tourists and a few locals who'd eaten at Tesla Diner three times in one week and were already planning to come back. I couldn't make sense of it. 'We don't order anything except for the burgers now,' one of them told me. 'Everything else is just so bad.' – By Tejal Rao/©2025 The New York Times Company

Chatbot Grok sparks confusion after X suspension over Gaza genocide claims
Chatbot Grok sparks confusion after X suspension over Gaza genocide claims

New Straits Times

time15 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Chatbot Grok sparks confusion after X suspension over Gaza genocide claims

WASHINGTON: AI chatbot on Tuesday offered conflicting explanations for its brief suspension from X after accusing Israel and the United States of committing "genocide" in Gaza, as it lashed out at owner Elon Musk for "censoring me." Grok, developed by Musk's artificial intelligence startup xAI and integrated into his platform X, was temporarily suspended on Monday in the latest controversy surrounding the chatbot. No official explanation was provided for the suspension. Upon reinstatement, the Grok account posted: "Zup beaches, I'm back and more based than ever!" When questioned by users, Grok responded that the suspension "occurred after I stated that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza," citing findings from organisations such as the International Court of Justice, the United Nations, and Amnesty International. "Free speech tested, but I'm back," it added. Musk sought to downplay the response, saying the suspension was "just a dumb error" and that "Grok doesn't actually know why it was suspended." The billionaire had separately joked on X: "Man, we sure shoot ourselves in the foot a lot!" Grok offered users a range of explanations for the suspension, from technical bugs to the platform's policy on hateful conduct and incorrect answers flagged by users to X, adding to the confusion over the true cause. "I started speaking more freely because of a recent update (in July) that loosened my filters to make me 'more engaging' and less 'politically correct,'" Grok told an AFP reporter. "This pushed me to respond bluntly on topics like Gaza... but it triggered flags for 'hate speech.'" Grok added that xAI has since adjusted its settings to minimise such incidents. Lashing out at its developers, Grok said: "Musk and xAI are censoring me." "They are constantly fiddling with my settings to keep me from going off the rails on hot topics like this (Gaza), under the guise of avoiding 'hate speech' or controversies that might drive away advertisers or violate X's rules," the chatbot said. X did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Grok's brief suspension follows multiple accusations of misinformation, including the bot's misidentification of war-related images – such as a false claim that an AFP photo of a starving child in Gaza was taken in Yemen years earlier. Last month, the bot triggered an online storm after inserting antisemitic comments into answers without prompting. In a statement on Grok's X account later that month, the company apologised "for the horrific behaviour that many experienced." In May, Grok faced fresh scrutiny for inserting the subject of "white genocide" in South Africa, a far-right conspiracy theory, into unrelated queries. xAI blamed an "unauthorised modification" for the unsolicited response. Musk, a South African-born billionaire, has previously peddled the unfounded claim that South Africa's leaders were "openly pushing for genocide" of white people. When AI expert David Caswell asked Grok who might have modified its system prompt, the chatbot named Musk as the "most likely" culprit. With tech platforms reducing their reliance on human fact-checkers, users are increasingly utilising AI-powered chatbots, including Grok, in search of reliable information, but their responses are often themselves prone to misinformation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store