Video of Trump saying Africa's mineral resources belong to US is fabricated
A block of text over the clip reads: 'Breaking News: Trump says all mineral in Africa belongs to the U.S! Africa, let's unite and fight this'.
The video has been shared more than 6,000 times since it was published on May 10, 2025.
Image
Screenshot of a Facebook post with the altered clip taken on May 15, 2025
'Ibrahim Traore of Burkina Faso is becoming a traitor, and I can't sit back. I watch him unite Africa because the unity of Africa will make our children to travel (sic) to Africa for greener pasture in the nearest future. Hiding in Russia won't save you; all that can save you is to listen to the demand of USA or France,' Trump appears to say in the clip.
"No African country should be ruled by military slash African mineral resources belong to us," he added.
However, these were not words spoken by Trump. The video was altered using artificial intelligence (AI) tools.
Altered audio
The first clue that the video had been tampered with, is that the words are not in sync with the movement of Trump's lips.
Secondly, the language in the clip sounds unnatural and some parts are grammatically incorrect such as "make our children to travel to Africa" rather than "make our children travel to Africa".
At one point, Trump appears to read out a punctuation mark - saying slash (/) - when he purportedly states: 'No African country should be ruled by military slash African mineral resources belong to us.'
This would not happen in natural speech or if a person was reading from a script.
A reverse image search using keyframes extracted from the video led to a clip posted on a YouTube account on September 4, 2024 (archived here), in which Trump is heard calling on people to vote in the presidential election.
A keyword search based on information from the video then showed that the same clip was also posted on Trump's verified Instagram and TikTok pages on the same day in September 2024 (archived here and here).
This was two months before the US presidential election held in November of the same year.
Several similarities can be noticed between the original video and the altered video, including the US flag to the right of Trump, the building visible through the window and his unbuttoned shirt collar.
Image
Screenshot showing the similarities between the original YouTube video (left) and the altered Facebook video
In the 27-second clip, Trump called on his supporters to participate in the election to "save" the US.
For the duration of the video, he does not mention Traore, Africa or mineral resources.
AFP Fact Check extracted the audio from the altered clip and ran it through Loccus.ai – an audio tool that looks for specific forensic traces left by voice generators.
The result showed a 99 percent probability that the audio was generated with an AI tool.
Image
Screenshot of the Loccus.ai detection result interface, taken on May 15, 2025
Burkina Faso's military leader Traore swept into power following a coup in September 2022 amid growing anti-French sentiments in the Sahel region (archived here).
Traore is a frequent topic of viral social media posts in which supporters cast him in a positive light, but observers say his online rise has been accompanied by a flood of misleading and false claims.
Both Trump and Traore have been the subject of altered videos shared online, including recent examples here and here.
More AFP fact-checks related to artificial intelligence can be found here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
Trump raises pressure on central bank, calls for Fed governor to resign
"Cook must resign, now!!!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, while sharing a Bloomberg news report on how the Federal Housing Finance Agency's director has called for greater scrutiny of Cook over a pair of mortgages. FHFA director Bill Pulte -- a staunch ally of Trump -- had reportedly written a letter to the US attorney general calling for an investigation of Cook while suggesting that she might have committed a criminal offense. The Trump administration has pursued allegations of mortgage fraud against high-profile Democrats who are seen as political adversaries of the president. It was not immediately clear if such a probe will take place targeting Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the central bank's board. The president is also limited in his ability to remove officials from the central bank. A Supreme Court order recently suggested that Fed officials cannot be taken out of their jobs over policy disagreements, meaning they have to be removed for "cause," which could be interpreted to mean wrongdoing. 'A disaster' The US leader's targeting of Cook, who sits on the Fed's rate-setting committee, comes after his repeated broadsides against Powell while the central bank kept the benchmark lending rate unchanged this year. On Tuesday night, Trump again called for a "major rate cut," saying there was "no inflation" and claiming that the Fed's policymaking was harming the housing industry due to elevated mortgage rates. He called Powell "a disaster" in a social media post. Although the US consumer price index, a key inflation gauge, was steady at 2.7 percent in July, it remains higher than it was a few months earlier. Fed officials have been trying to ensure inflation is kept in check -- despite the effects of Trump's sweeping tariffs -- while balancing risks to the labor market as they mull the right time for further rate cuts. Cook took office as a Fed governor in May 2022 and was reappointed to the board in September 2023. She was sworn in later that same month for a term ending in 2038. She has previously served on the Council of Economic Advisers under former president Barack Obama. Earlier this year, Trump suggested that what he called an overly costly renovation of the Fed's headquarters could be a reason to oust Powell, before backing off the threat. Powell's term as Fed chair ends in May 2026.
France 24
6 hours ago
- France 24
Russia says must be part of Ukraine security guarantees talks
NATO military chiefs were meanwhile scheduled to hold a virtual summit on security guarantees for Ukraine, the latest in a flurry of global diplomacy aimed at brokering an end to the nearly three-and-a-half year conflict. Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that "seriously discussing security guarantees without the Russian Federation is a utopia, a road to nowhere". Moscow signed the Budapest Memorandum in 1994, which was aimed at ensuring security for Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan in exchange for them giving up numerous nuclear weapons left from the Soviet era. But Russia violated that first by taking Crimea in 2014, and then by starting a full-scale offensive in 2022, which has killed tens of thousands of people and forced millions to flee their homes. On Tuesday, top US officer Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held talks with European military chiefs on the "best options for a potential Ukraine peace deal," a US defence official told AFP. In eastern Ukraine, far from the diplomatic deliberations, Russian forces claimed fresh advances on the ground and Ukrainian officials reported more deaths from Russian attacks. Diplomatic flurry US President Donald Trump brought Zelensky and European leaders to the White House Monday, three days after his landmark encounter with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Russia's long-serving foreign minister downplayed the meeting between Trump and European leaders at the White House, describing it as a "clumsy" attempt to change the US president's position on Ukraine. Trump, long a fierce critic of the billions of dollars in US support to Ukraine, earlier said European nations were "willing to put people on the ground" to secure any settlement. He ruled out sending US troops but suggested the country might provide air support. Russia has long said it will never tolerate the presence of any Western troops in Ukraine. While Trump said Putin had agreed to meet Zelensky and accept some Western security guarantees for Ukraine, Russia has not confirmed this. Lavrov also cast doubt on an imminent meeting between the sworn enemies, saying that any summit between Putin and Zelensky "must be prepared in the most meticulous way" so it does not lead to a "deterioration" of the situation surrounding the conflict. Fresh Russian strikes Russia's defence ministry said on Telegram Wednesday that its troops had captured the villages of Sukhetske and Pankivka in the embattled Donetsk region. "Our units are engaged in heavy defensive battles against superior Russian forces," said Ukraine's commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky. Six civilians were killed by Russian attacks across eastern and southern Ukraine Wednesday, local authorities said. One person died in Russia's western Bryansk region as a result of a Ukrainian drone strike, the local governor said. Russia's aerial attacks on the northeastern town of Okhtyrka in the Sumy region wounded at least 14 people, including three children, according to regional governor Oleg Grygorov. Zelensky said these latest strikes showed "the need to put pressure on Moscow", including through sanctions.
Euronews
8 hours ago
- Euronews
US government pushes for 10% Intel stake amid US-China chip war
The US government could become the largest shareholder in Intel, one of the most important US technology companies, marking the first time Washington has sought ownership in a Silicon Valley icon. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday confirmed the US government is vying for a 10% stake in Intel, part of an unusual deal that would deepen the Trump administration's financial ties with the major chipmaker. The move comes weeks after US President Donald Trump called for Intel's CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign due to what he claimed was a conflict of interest. This allegation was linked to Tan's previous role as a venture capitalist in China. Although rare, it is not unprecedented for the US government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the recession in 2008, when the government injected nearly $50 billion (€42.94bn) into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker when it was on the verge of bankruptcy. At the time, even that bailout was seen as controversial despite GM's hardships because it was perceived as blurring the lines between state control and US free market principles. Unlike many European companies, US ones have insisted on a complete separation between government and private ownership of enterprises. The government ended up with a roughly $10bn (€8.6bn) loss after it sold its stock in GM. A misreading of the CHIPS act? Intel historically led the world in semiconductor production, tied in particular to PC production and Microsoft. When the iPhone launched in 2007, Intel-dominated PC chips nonetheless failed to win a foothold in smartphones and tablets. ARM-based chips, which are used by Apple and Samsung, became the mobile standard, leaving Intel stuck in the declining PC market. Intel has also lagged in the AI race, with their traditional central processing units not being well-suited for AI workloads. On the other hand, competitors like Nvidia have surged ahead. The CHIPS and Science Act, often referred to as just the CHIPS Act, was a bill passed in August 2022 by former US President Joe Biden in order to boost the local US semiconductor industry. COVID-19 supply chain disruptions and US–China tech tensions highlighted how dependent the US had become on foreign-made chips, not just for consumer electronics, but also defence, cars, AI and infrastructure. In November 2024, the US Department of Commerce finalised an agreement to grant Intel up to $7.86bn (€6.75bn) in direct funding through the CHIPS Act to support their semiconductor manufacturing and advanced packaging operations across Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio and Oregon. Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the program, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the CHIPS program. The company has received about $2.2bn (€1.89bn) of the $7.8bn (€6.75bn) pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve US taxpayers if it is turned into Intel stock, which he said would be in the form of non-voting shares so the government wouldn't be able to use the stake to sway how the company is managed. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC as he explained why Trump is pushing for the deal. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.' The notion of the US government holding a huge stake in Intel would have seemed inconceivable back in the company's heyday when its processors were powering a personal computer boom that began in the mid-1970s. But Intel's ongoing struggles also means the US government is taking on a risky investment. US government as biggest shareholder The US government's negotiations to become a major Intel shareholder are coming on the heels of a $2 billion (€1.7bn) investment Japanese technology giant SoftBank Group, disclosed late on Monday. SoftBank is accumulating its 2% stake in Intel at $23 (€19.70) per share — a slight discount from the stock's price when its investment was announced. Intel's shares surged nearly 7% to close at $25.31 (€21.74) on the news of SoftBank's big bet on Intel, coupled with Trump's plans for the company. SoftBank invests in an array of companies that it sees as holding long-term potential. It has been stepping up investments in the United States since Trump returned to the White House. In February, its chairman Masayoshi Son joined Trump, Sam Altman of OpenAI and Larry Ellison of Oracle in announcing a major investment of up to $500bn (€429.38bn) in a project to develop specific artificial intelligence infrastructure for OpenAI called Stargate. 'Semiconductors are the foundation of every industry," Son said in a statement. 'This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role.' Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the US, which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world since he returned to the White House earlier this year for his second term in office. 'We want Intel to be successful in America,' Lutnick said during his CNBC interview. Intel is valued at about $110bn (€94.4bn), meaning a 10% government stake would equate to roughly $11bn (€9.44bn) at current prices. Other major shareholders include Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street. A 10% US government stake would almost certainly vault Washington ahead of Vanguard as Intel's largest single shareholder, unless structured as non-voting shares outside the normal count.
