Ghana journalist awarded $18m in US after suing ex-MP
A US court awarded Ghanaian investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas $18m (£14m) in damages, after a jury said he was defamed by former Ghanaian MP Kennedy Agyapong.
The case stems from comments Agyapong made about Anas after his BBC investigation in 2018 that exposed football corruption in Ghana and elsewhere.
The court heard that Agyapong, among other accusations made on a podcast, had called the reporter a "criminal" and alleged he was behind the murder of fellow journalist Ahmed Suale
Anas lost a similar legal action in Ghana seven years ago. But after the release of the podcast episode in 2021 Anas went to court in the US state of New Jersey where Agyapong has a property.
The politician was in New Jersey when he was interviewed for the Daddy Fred Show podcast, according to court papers filed by his lawyers.
Last week's initial verdict was confirmed on Tuesday. The $18m in damages was the result of a unanimous decision by an eight-member jury in Essex County Superior Court in New Jersey, finding Agyapong liable for defamation.
The figure included $8m in punitive damages.
"Justice has prevailed. This victory is not just for me, but for truth, press freedom, and every journalist who risks everything to expose corruption and wrongdoing," Anas said in response.
"No amount of intimidation or falsehood will silence the pursuit of accountability even in the face of assassination. Our work continues, undeterred and unafraid."
The journalist, who has won multiple international awards for his reporting, has vowed to continue fighting corruption and holding wrongdoers accountable.
Agyapong's lawyers had unsuccessfully argued that the case should not have been brought in the US in the first place. They also said that the comments made on the podcast were the kinds of things other courts had described as hyperbole and opinion and were not subject to a defamation case.
Meanwhile, police in Ghana have arrested a suspect in connection with the murder of Anas' colleague, Ahmed Hussein Suale, who was killed in 2019.
The suspect allegedly shared pictures of the undercover journalist with a popular Ghanaian politician before his death.
The death of Ahmed was also linked to a football corruption exposé.
The investigation sought to expose corruption in African football and was reported by BBC Africa Eye.
Betraying the Game: African officials filmed taking cash
Ghana dissolves football association after BBC investigation into corruption
Players union welcomes life ban for Gabon football coach over sexual abuse
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Africa Daily
Focus on Africa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Rescuers Have Message for Owner Who Dumped Sick Dog: 'In a Lot of Pain'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. After saving a skinny, urine-stained dog from the streets, the Animal Rescue League of NH (New Hampshire) shared a heartfelt message for the people who abandoned her, hoping to inspire others in a similar position to reconsider their actions. "We want you to know that your little girl was found and is safe," writes the rescue in a Facebook post shared on Sunday, captioned "A Letter to 'Rae's' Previous Owners," which has received over 1,000 likes and 109 comments on the platform. "We are sure that it was frustrating watching her constantly pee and bleed in your home. We are sure she damaged floors and rugs, and it was a lot to clean up. She didn't want to be a disappointment in that way. We are sure she loved you, she seems to love everyone. She was in a lot of pain," the post continues. Naomi Stevens, chief operating officer of the Animal Rescue League of NH in Bedford, New Hampshire, told Newsweek that on May 20, they arrived at the shelter to find that the police had dropped off a small stray dog in the overnight kennels, which are accessible only to police departments. "I knew immediately that something was off. She was really skinny, covered in urine staining, and straining to urinate, and it was small amounts that were dark and bloody," Stevens said. "We checked lost reports and scoured the lost and found Facebook groups and the police compared her description to any licensed dogs in the town. But to no avail. It was clear someone wasn't looking for her. They either abandoned her or she got out and they just thought it was easier to let someone else deal with her situation." After getting the Shih Tzu an X-ray, they found a giant bladder stone filling the entirety of the organ, which had possibly been growing for months, and could have killed Rae had she spent more time outside with no medical help. "We are fortunate to have our shelter veterinarian, Dr. Stephanie Magnarelli, who was able to operate to successfully remove the stone as well as spay her and bring all of her vaccines current. She is recovering beautifully from her surgery. She was always a sweet little girl, but now her big, bubbly personality is shining through," Stevens said. Pictures shared by the shelter show Rae with shaved fur after her surgery (L) and wearing a sweater to keep her warm. Pictures shared by the shelter show Rae with shaved fur after her surgery (L) and wearing a sweater to keep her warm. Animal Rescue League of NH Not only has Rae been given a new lease on life, but she may have already found a new loving family as well. "Her finder who called the police to bring her to us expressed interest in adopting her, and is coming this week to meet her and hopefully finalize an adoption," Stevens said. While they have a strong suspicion of where Rae came from, the shelter's message to the people who abandoned her is one of empathy and support. "Very sad that they went this route, but we wanted to reach them in a nonjudgmental way and speak to not only them but to others who might find themselves with a pet with a medical condition they can't manage or afford," Stevens said. "We have programs to help. We want to put the welfare of the animals first, but we can't support the animals without helping the people who love them as well. Casting harsh judgment and/or criticism will only make people less comfortable coming to us when they do need our help, potentially resulting in more 'Raes.'" Each year, 5.8 million pets enter U.S. shelters, according to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. The length of time dogs, especially large dogs, spend in shelters before being adopted has increased over the last five years. Around 607,000 surrendered animals are euthanized every year. Shelters are striving to minimize euthanasia rates by promoting adoption campaigns, spaying and neutering programs, and behavior rehabilitation. Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? Send them to life@ with some details about your best friend and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Unpacking Trump admin's new hiring plan for federal workers — including question about implementing presidential policy
Claim: U.S. President Donald Trump's 'Merit Hiring Plan' asks applicants for federal government jobs to write an essay naming their favorite Trump policy or executive order and how they would implement it. Rating: Context: The specific question in the new 'Merit Hiring Plan' for federal employees states: 'How would you help advance the President's Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role? Identify one or two relevant Executive Orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired.' In late May 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump's administration announced a "Merit Hiring Plan" for the federal bureaucracy. Soon after its announcement, critics claimed the hiring process was actually not merit-based but a "loyalty test" to the Trump administration in which applicants would be asked to write essays about their favorite Trump policy. According to a Facebook post from the account Alt National Park Service: Loyalty tests have officially arrived in the federal hiring process. The Trump administration just unveiled a so-called "Merit Hiring Plan", which includes a quiz asking job applicants to name their favorite Trump policy or executive order. Yes, seriously. You're expected to write an essay explaining your "loyalty" to Trump. But here's the truth: the oath federal workers take is to the Constitution, not to a president, not to a political party, and definitely not to a list of executive orders. If you're applying, remember: it's your choice how to respond 😉. Once hired the law requires you to swear to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. It does not require personal loyalty to Trump. We looked closely at the U.S. Office for Personnel Management's (OPM) memorandum titled "Merit Hiring Plan" and found specific language asking applicants to write an essay detailing administration policies that were "significant" to them and executive orders they would implement. While the question does not overtly ask people to declare their loyalty, it does ask them to discuss Trump's policies that they would support and implement. As such, we rate this claim as true. We reached out to the White House and the OPM to learn more about their reasoning behind this question in the application process. We will update this story if we get more information. On May 29, 2025, the OPM released the "Merit Hiring Plan" directing federal agencies to add four "short, free-response" essay questions in their hiring practices. One question stated, as seen on the Chief Human Capital Officers Council (CHCOCs) — a federal agency responsible for coordinating human resources departments — web page: How would you help advance the President's Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role? Identify one or two relevant Executive Orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired. The above question asks applicants for the federal workforce to select from Trump's specific policies and executive orders that they would choose to implement, thus asking them to wade into politically contentious territory. Trump's executive orders have been polarizing, many resulting in court orders to block them from being implemented and 258 lawsuits challenging the administration's actions. The introductory paragraph to the questions note that — the hiring portal for the federal government — will amend its standard language for job announcements to emphasize "efficiency" in the hiring process. The four questions all apply to job vacancies "graded at GS-05 or above," referring to specialized positions that require at least a college degree. The application's other prompts are: How has your commitment to the Constitution and the founding principles of the United States inspired you to pursue this role within the Federal government? Provide a concrete example from professional, academic, or personal experience. In this role, how would you use your skills and experience to improve government efficiency and effectiveness? Provide specific examples where you improved processes, reduced costs, or improved outcomes. How has a strong work ethic contributed to your professional, academic or personal achievements? Provide one or two specific examples, and explain how those qualities would enable you to serve effectively in this position. The same Merit Hiring Plan also calls for hiring "patriotic Americans" through their list of priorities (emphasis ours): Reforming the Federal recruitment process to ensure that only the most talented, capable and patriotic Americans are hired to the Federal service; Implementing skills-based hiring, eliminating unnecessary degree requirements, and requiring the use of rigorous, job-related assessments to ensure candidates are selected based on their merit and competence, not their skin color or academic pedigree; Streamlining and improving the job application process; and Reducing time-to-hire to under 80 days by emphasizing the use of talent pools and shared certificates and streamlining the background check process. The Merit Hiring Plan is the implementation strategy of Trump's January 2025 executive order, titled, "Reforming the Federal Hiring Process and Restoring Merit to Government Service." Critics of the Trump administration, including U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., called the above question a "loyalty test" to Trump. Lynch wrote in a letter to the OPM: "Every federal worker is legally required to take an oath of office that they will 'support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.' The oath does not require federal workers to swear to protect and defend executive orders or policy initiatives." The above questions are in line with those proposed by Project 2025, a conservative coalition's hiring plan for a Trump administration bureaucracy that we reported on in 2024. We found similar "loyalty tests" were part of Project 2025's proposal. We also learned during Obama's first term (January 2009 to January 2013) that his administration required extensive vetting of applicants for high-ranking, politically appointed positions. That process also included a questionnaire asking participants to elaborate on past public statements, social media posts and potential conflicts of interests, as well as share things about their personal lives, like whether they own guns. In our reporting, we asked a former U.S. President Joe Biden aide about the Obama-era questionnaire. The aide said it was not comparable to Project 2025's system. The latter was a "loyalty test" to Trump, the aide said, while Obama's survey was more of a background check. Bravender, Robin. "Trump Administration to Prioritize 'Patriotic Americans' for Federal Jobs." Politico, 30 May 2025, Accessed 4 June 2025. Ibrahim, Nur and Aleksandra Wrona. "What to Know About Project 2025, the Pro-Trump Plan to Overhaul US Government." Snopes, 7 Nov. 2024, Accessed 4 June 2025. Lynch, Stephen. Letter to Charles Ezell, OPM. Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 2 June 2025, Accessed 4 June 2025. Magtulis, Prinz. "How Trump Unleashed Executive Power." Reuters, 7 May 2025. Accessed 4 June 2025. "Merit Hiring Plan." CHCOC. Accessed 4 June 2025. "Reforming The Federal Hiring Process And Restoring Merit To Government Service." The White House, 21 Jan. 2025, Accessed 4 June 2025.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mayor Lumumba addresses council's hiring freeze, says recent hires were about serving residents
Jackson Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba defended two recent hires made during the final weeks of his second term — decisions that prompted the Jackson City Council to pass an ordinance implementing a hiring freeze on most city positions through the end of June. Lumumba recently appointed Tariq Abdul-Tawwab as deputy director of the Public Works Department and former Hinds County Supervisor David Archie as a staff assistant in the mayor's office. Abdul-Tawwab previously served as 'chief experience officer' at JXN Water in 2023 but left later that year. His wife, Candace Abdul-Tawwab, is a director at the People's Advocacy Institute, a nonprofit founded by the mayor's sister, Rukia Lumumba. Archie, who ran against Lumumba in the April 1 primary, endorsed the mayor ahead of the April 22 runoff, according to a Facebook post shared by Lumumba on April 18. Council President and Ward 7 Councilwoman Virgi Lindsay, who introduced the hiring freeze ordinance on May 20, previously confirmed the two appointments influenced her decision to bring the legislation forward. Speaking after the council's Tuesday meeting, Lumumba initially declined to comment, saying, 'I don't have any thoughts,' when asked about the council's hiring freeze. But he later defended the hires, saying both positions were vacant and essential to city operations. "Both of those positions were vacant and they both serve the community and our responsibility is to serve the community until the end," Lumumba said. "One vacancy deals directly with constituent complaints every day, so if people are in need of water at senior centers, if people need somebody to come check out their pothole — I would imagine that the residents don't want me to leave them with 60 days of not responding to those issues." Lumumba also pushed back on criticism that the hires were politically motivated. "It's not a political thing. It's a responding thing. So both of those positions are about responding to residents needs," Lumumba said. Before Lumumba addressed the hiring freeze, the council approved an amendment to the original ordinance during its regular meeting to allow for additional hires. The original ordinance, obtained by the Clarion Ledger, freezes all vacant positions — and those expected to become vacant — within the executive branch, except for roles specifically assigned to the Jackson Police Department and Jackson Fire Department. Lindsay introduced the amendment to allow JPD to hire critical positions, such as 911 dispatchers. It also permits the hiring of seasonal workers in the Department of Parks and Recreation, including an educational specialist and three zookeepers at the Jackson Zoo, two lifeguards and park maintenance staff. The amendment further allows the city to hire CDL drivers for the Division of Solid Waste and two employees in the Department of Finance and Administration, positions Chief Financial Officer Fidelis Malembeka said he is prepared to fill. The council passed the amended ordinance in a 6-0 vote. Ward 3 Councilman Kenneth Stokes was not in attendance when the vote was called. The hiring freeze remains until June 30. This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Jackson MS mayor Lumumba defends hires as council tweaks city hiring freeze
