From Pakistan Poisoning Wells To US Attack: Rumours Circulating During 1971 Indo-Pak War
Last Updated:
A widely shared report claimed Pakistani paratroopers would land in Delhi, Agra, and Amritsar. Though it never happened, panic rose after airbases were bombed on December 3, 1971
During the 1971 war, as India and Pakistan engaged in intense combat, cities across India experienced blackouts and air raid sirens, while citizens stayed glued to their radios. With no access to the internet or television, unofficial reports and unverified updates spread rapidly.
The sources of these reports were often unclear, but many appeared aimed at instilling fear, creating unrest or undermining trust in the government. Some were believed to be part of Pakistani propaganda, while others stemmed from local anxiety or misinformation.
One widely circulated report claimed that Pakistani paratroopers were expected to land in Delhi, Agra and Amritsar. Although such an attack never materialised, panic intensified after Pakistan bombed Indian airbases on December 3, 1971.
However, such claims were refuted by the government through All India Radio and national newspapers. Some false reports also suggested that the Indian Air Force had bombed Rawalpindi and Karachi.
While the Air Force did carry out strikes on Karachi port and certain military installations, there was no major bombing of Rawalpindi. The war officially ended on December 16, 1971 with the surrender of General Niazi in Dhaka.
Another widely circulated claim suggested that Pakistan possessed an 'Islamic bomb" and could launch a nuclear attack on India. In reality, Pakistan did not have nuclear capability at the time; it conducted its first nuclear test in 1998.
There were also concerns that China might open a front along India's northeastern border, reminiscent of the 1962 conflict. In response, the Indian Army heightened vigilance along the Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh borders. However, China refrained from any military action and instead extended verbal support to Pakistan.
Another major claim that caused widespread alarm was that the US Navy's Seventh Fleet was preparing to attack India. While it was true that the United States deployed its Seventh Fleet, including the USS Enterprise, to the Bay of Bengal in support of Pakistan, it did not engage in any action against India.
The presence of the Indian and Soviet navies, along with diplomatic pressure, prevented any intervention. Public anxiety grew amid comparisons to US involvement in the Vietnam War, but the Soviet Union's backing and Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's strong leadership helped ease tensions and dispel fears.
Some reports falsely claimed that the Pakistani Army had entered Indian territory, which was not the case. The Indian Army secured decisive victories on both the eastern and western fronts within just 13 days.
There were also unfounded claims that the government would confiscate property or shut down ration shops. In reality, while certain policies were tightened due to the ongoing economic crisis, the supply of grain and oil remained steady. The war concluded with a historic Indian victory marked by the surrender of 93,000 Pakistani soldiers.
First Published:
May 07, 2025, 17:00 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
35 minutes ago
- News18
'Need Ties With Both India & Pakistan': US Central Command Chief Gen Kurilla
Last Updated: General Michael Kurilla, who is set to retire this summer, commended Pakistan as an 'outstanding partner' in counterterrorism US Central Command (CENTCOM) chief General Michael Kurilla recently underscored the importance of the United States maintaining relationships with both India and Pakistan. Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee, Kurilla emphasised Pakistan's critical role in counterterrorism efforts against the Islamic State-Khorasan Province (IS-KP), as reported by the Hindustan Times. General Kurilla, who is set to retire this summer, commended Pakistan as an 'outstanding partner" in counterterrorism. This statement comes at a time when India has been increasing its diplomatic efforts to highlight Pakistan's involvement in cross-border terrorism, particularly after the Pahalgam terror attack of April 22. Indian officials, including external affairs minister S Jaishankar, have consistently cautioned against equating victims and perpetrators of terrorism. Kurilla clarified that the US relationship with India and Pakistan is not mutually exclusive. 'We need to have relationships with both Pakistan and India. It is not a binary choice where having one relationship excludes the other," he stated, encouraging lawmakers to recognise the benefits of each relationship. The CENTCOM chief detailed Pakistan's actions against IS-KP, a group based in Afghanistan that he characterised as highly active in planning global terrorist activities, including those targeting the US. He explained that while the Afghan Taliban has taken action against IS-KP, many fighters have relocated to the tribal areas along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. 'Through an excellent partnership with Pakistan, they have targeted and eliminated dozens of IS-KP members. With the intelligence we provide, they have captured at least five high-value IS-KP individuals," said Kurilla. He also highlighted Pakistan's extradition of Mohammad Sharifullah, alias Jafar, who was involved in the August 2021 Kabul airport attack that killed 13 American soldiers. Kurilla revealed that Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, Asim Munir, personally informed him of Jafar's capture and the willingness to extradite him. General Kurilla stressed that Pakistan's partnership in countering terrorist threats in Central and South Asia 'will only become more significant as the Taliban continues to face security challenges within Afghanistan". First Published:
Economic Times
36 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Modi 3.0 has got inflation & growth right but jobs, land reforms are still a challenge
As Prime Minister Narendra Modi enters in his 12th year leading the government, India's economy stands on solid macroeconomic foundations, but economists warn that generating jobs and reviving private investment will be key challenges in the years ahead, TOI has reported. With GDP growth averaging 6.2 per cent over the past 11 years (2014-15 to 2024-25), and inflation largely within the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) comfort zone, the government has pointed to a decade of fiscal prudence and economic stability. If the distortions of the COVID-19 pandemic years (2020-21 contraction and 2021-22 rebound) are excluded, the average growth rate stands at a healthier 7.1 per cent. Even though, the World Bank has brought down India's growth projection at a steady 6.3 per cent, New Delhi continues to be the fastest growing economy in the world, ready to get past the growing global uncertainties. Also Read: Why is India outpacing China, US, EU and Germany? 'The economy delivered an average growth of 6.2% and an inflation rate of 5% over the last 11 years, despite the pandemic,' TOI quoted Crisil chief economist DK Joshi as saying. 'The economy is currently in a healthy shape with inflation under control, corporates and banks having healthy balance sheets, a low current account deficit, and ample forex reserves. Rains and crude oil prices, which are luck factors, are expected to be favorable this year. We expect India's GDP to grow at 6.5% in fiscal 2026, with risks tilted to the downside due to weak global prospects amid heightened uncertainty.' Inflation during the Modi years averaged 5 per cent, compared with 8.1 per cent under the previous UPA government. While part of this can be attributed to better food price management and more responsive supply chains, economists also credit global factors, particularly lower crude oil June 10, 2014, when Modi took office, the Indian crude oil basket cost $107 per barrel (Rs 6,331 per barrel at Rs 59.26/$). Eleven years later, it stood at $67.38 per barrel or Rs 5,711 at Rs 85.60/$, a drop of nearly 11% in rupee Sanyal, chief economist and head of research at Bandhan Bank, highlighted the Centre's cautious approach to spending. 'India demonstrated exemplary commitment to fiscal prudence and discipline over the last one decade despite the unprecedented Covid shock. Accordingly, India's public debt profile turns out to be a strong advantage today, much in contrast to the current global trend. Lower public debt, along with better anchored inflation and current account deficit, political stability and strong domestic demand amidst the current uncertain global economic environment, has enormously enhanced India's attractiveness as a preferred investor destination over the past decade.'Despite the macroeconomic optimism, the biggest concern going forward is the lack of private sector investment and sluggish job creation. Corporates are yet to expand capacity in a meaningful way, a move seen as essential to creating new jobs, particularly in the organised say the government must revive key reforms to unlock private capital. Land acquisition laws and labour flexibility have long been seen as barriers to business investment. Early efforts in 2014 to ease land acquisition rules met with political backlash and were shelved. On labour, the government passed four major codes, but has yet to notify them, citing delays from opposition-led and the rapid rise of AI have further complicated job creation, especially in sectors where automation is replacing entry-level the BJP reliant on coalition partners after the recent election, bold reforms like strategic disinvestment and asset monetisation, key tools for funding capital expenditure, have been pushed to the back burner. However, a surge in political confidence post-election may now allow the government to revisit these decisions. India has been negotiating several free trade agreements, which are expected to bring down tariffs. Experts warn that unless land and labour reforms are addressed in parallel, Indian industry may struggle to compete under these FTAs. (With inputs from TOI)
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
India closely watches US-China trade talks amid rare earth tensions
As trade negotiations between the United States (US) and China near a 90-day deadline, global concerns over rare earth supply chains are intensifying. The US has indicated a possible easing of technology export restrictions in exchange for improved access to rare earth shipments from China, but observers remain cautious about the likelihood of immediate progress. The rare earth dispute has prompted countries to reassess their reliance on Chinese supplies. The US has announced a $39 million investment to develop a domestic rare earth supply chain . India, while not directly involved in the negotiations, is exploring options to reduce its dependence on China, though progress remains limited. Industry impact and government response The Indian automobile and electronics sectors have started to feel the effects of supply constraints. Auto and smartphone manufacturers are reporting falling inventories of rare earth materials and magnets, with potential production cuts expected as early as June. A recent report by Crisil Ratings highlighted the risk to India's electric vehicle (EV) rollout, noting that several new EV models rely on permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) platforms. While most automakers currently maintain four to six weeks of inventory, a continued shortage could impact production schedules from July. Maruti Suzuki is reported to be adjusting its production plans for its upcoming e VITARA model, reducing output targets for the July–September period due to shortages of rare earth magnets. Diversification efforts underway India has responded by stepping up support for Indian Rare Earths Limited and seeking international partnerships. At the India-Central Asia Dialogue held in New Delhi, India and five Central Asian countries expressed interest in collaborating on critical mineral exploration. They also proposed convening the India-Central Asia Rare Earth Forum to advance these discussions. While India is not a direct participant in the ongoing US-China talks, it is assessing the developments and evaluating potential strategies to secure its own rare earth supplies.
