Man posts photo of ‘iridescent' critter on website. It's a new species in Brazil
iNaturalist is a website and app for amateur researchers to share photos of creatures from around the world with other like-minded citizen scientists.
But amateurs aren't the only ones taking a look at the catalogue of images. Now, photos from Brazil have been used to identify a new species.
In 2023, a man identified as S.M. Martins took a photo of a katydid in his hometown in the Caatinga of northeastern Brazil and posted it on iNaturalist, according to a study published Aug. 19 in the peer-reviewed Journal of European Taxonomy.
A group of researchers noticed the 'uniqueness' of the insect and reached out to the man to arrange an opportunity to collect a specimen of the katydid, according to the study. With the insect in hand, they knew they had a species that had never been described before.
They weren't the only ones.
Unbeknownst to the research group, another group of scientists had also reached out to the man and came to the conclusion of a new species themselves, causing a hiccup in the ability to be first to publish the discovery, according to the study.
The groups connected, and 'after discussions, we respectfully decided to merge the studies, thereby enhancing the significance of the material and promoting collaboration among researchers of orthopteroid insects in Brazil,' researchers said.
The new species is the first of its genus, or group of species with similar physical characteristics and evolutionary history, and it was named Metallacantha, according to the study.
They can be identified by the 'large and wide spines with a metallic iridescent shine' on the back legs of the katydid, researchers said. The genus name is derived from Latin words meaning 'metallic' and 'spines.'
The katydid was given the species name aculeata, 'meaning 'spiny' in reference to the many distinct spines of this katydid, especially the enlarged ones on its hind legs,' according to the study.
Metallacantha aculeata, the metallic-spined katydid, is generally light and dark green with 'terracotta pink' coloration on the antennae and parts of the legs, researchers said.
The insect has a white stripe and a 'dark salmon to purplish' strip while the feet are light brown.
Like other katydids, the new species is 'generally camouflaged with coloration and shape matching their environment,' with some 'possessing a very realistic leaf appearance,' researchers said.
The katydids were found on top of bushes or under the foliage, either foraging or calling into the night, according to the study.
'Their green color matches with the color of the leaves, showing some camouflage despite their large body size,' researchers said. 'When handled, the individuals presented a warning display, raising their hind legs, ready to strike and push with the tibial spines if touched. Both sexes of (the metallic-spined katydid) produced strong hissing sounds when disturbed.'
The species also has 'significantly reduced hind wings' which may be a product of their dry and arid environment in the Caatinga, according to the study.
The region is poorly explored, researchers said, so there is a high likelihood other species live in the area and are yet to be discovered.
The Caatinga is in eastern Brazil.
The research team includes Victor M. Ghirotto, Phillip W. Engelking, Marcos Fianco, Samuel M. Martins, Rafael Sobral, Alberto M. da Silva-Neto and Diego M. de Mello Mendes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
7 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Man posts photo of ‘iridescent' critter on website. It's a new species in Brazil
Social media and the internet have connected different parts of the world more than ever before. And while some people use online platforms to share fun vacation pictures or late-night thoughts, others have taken to a specific platform to share their love of animals. iNaturalist is a website and app for amateur researchers to share photos of creatures from around the world with other like-minded citizen scientists. But amateurs aren't the only ones taking a look at the catalogue of images. Now, photos from Brazil have been used to identify a new species. In 2023, a man identified as S.M. Martins took a photo of a katydid in his hometown in the Caatinga of northeastern Brazil and posted it on iNaturalist, according to a study published Aug. 19 in the peer-reviewed Journal of European Taxonomy. A group of researchers noticed the 'uniqueness' of the insect and reached out to the man to arrange an opportunity to collect a specimen of the katydid, according to the study. With the insect in hand, they knew they had a species that had never been described before. They weren't the only ones. Unbeknownst to the research group, another group of scientists had also reached out to the man and came to the conclusion of a new species themselves, causing a hiccup in the ability to be first to publish the discovery, according to the study. The groups connected, and 'after discussions, we respectfully decided to merge the studies, thereby enhancing the significance of the material and promoting collaboration among researchers of orthopteroid insects in Brazil,' researchers said. The new species is the first of its genus, or group of species with similar physical characteristics and evolutionary history, and it was named Metallacantha, according to the study. They can be identified by the 'large and wide spines with a metallic iridescent shine' on the back legs of the katydid, researchers said. The genus name is derived from Latin words meaning 'metallic' and 'spines.' The katydid was given the species name aculeata, 'meaning 'spiny' in reference to the many distinct spines of this katydid, especially the enlarged ones on its hind legs,' according to the study. Metallacantha aculeata, the metallic-spined katydid, is generally light and dark green with 'terracotta pink' coloration on the antennae and parts of the legs, researchers said. The insect has a white stripe and a 'dark salmon to purplish' strip while the feet are light brown. Like other katydids, the new species is 'generally camouflaged with coloration and shape matching their environment,' with some 'possessing a very realistic leaf appearance,' researchers said. The katydids were found on top of bushes or under the foliage, either foraging or calling into the night, according to the study. 'Their green color matches with the color of the leaves, showing some camouflage despite their large body size,' researchers said. 'When handled, the individuals presented a warning display, raising their hind legs, ready to strike and push with the tibial spines if touched. Both sexes of (the metallic-spined katydid) produced strong hissing sounds when disturbed.' The species also has 'significantly reduced hind wings' which may be a product of their dry and arid environment in the Caatinga, according to the study. The region is poorly explored, researchers said, so there is a high likelihood other species live in the area and are yet to be discovered. The Caatinga is in eastern Brazil. The research team includes Victor M. Ghirotto, Phillip W. Engelking, Marcos Fianco, Samuel M. Martins, Rafael Sobral, Alberto M. da Silva-Neto and Diego M. de Mello Mendes.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
What was the first human species?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. All humans today are members of the modern human species Homo sapiens — Latin for "knowing man." But we're far from the only humans who ever existed. Fossils are revealing more and more about early humans in the genus Homo — ancestors like Homo erectus (Latin for "upright man"), who lived in Africa, Asia and parts of Europe between 1.9 million and 110,000 years ago. Scientists now recognize more than a dozen species in the Homo genus. So what, exactly, was the first human species? The answer, it turns out, is not crystal clear. Fossil finds in Morocco have revealed that anatomically modern humans emerged at least 300,000 years ago. But the oldest human species scientists definitively know about is called Homo habilis, or "handy man" — a tool-using primate who walked upright and lived in Africa between 2.4 million and 1.4 million years ago. However, earlier fossils hint that other Homo species may predate H. habilis. The scarcity of early human fossils makes it challenging to know if unusual specimens are a newfound species or simply an atypical member of a known species. On top of that, evolution can be gradual, so it's hard to pinpoint when a new species emerges, especially when fossils have a mix of features from different species. "The process of evolution is continuous, but the labels we place on it for convenience are static," Tim D. White, a paleoanthropologist at the University of California Berkeley, told Live Science. Related: Why did Homo sapiens outlast all other human species? Earliest Homo Most evolutionary theories suggest that H. habilis evolved from an earlier genus of primate named Australopithecus — Latin for "southern ape" because its fossils were first discovered in South Africa. Sign up for our newsletter Sign up for our weekly Life's Little Mysteries newsletter to get the latest mysteries before they appear online. Various species of Australopithecus lived from about 4.4 million to 1.4 million years ago. It may be that H. habilis evolved directly from the species Australopithecus afarensis — the best-known example of which is "Lucy," who was unearthed at Hadar in Ethiopia in 1974. The fossils of our genus are usually distinguished from Australopithecus fossils by Homo's distinctively smaller teeth and a relatively large brain, which led to the greater use of stone tools. But White noted that traits like smaller teeth and bigger brains must have emerged at times in the Australopithecus populations that early Homo evolved from. "If you had an Australopithecus female, there wasn't a birth at which point she would have christened the child Homo," he said. As a result, there is no fixed point in time in which Homo originated; instead, the Homo genus emerged roughly between 2 million and 3 million years ago, White said. Evolving in Africa Since the 1970s, researchers in Africa have discovered fossils that they've attributed to another ancient species, Homo rudolfensis, which challenges the idea that H. habilis was the earliest Homo. H. rudolfensis seems to have been physically much bigger, had a larger brain and a flatter facial structure than H. habilis, which may have made it look more like a modern human. Its fossils are roughly the same age as H. habilis — as much as 2.4 million years old. But "there is only one really good fossil of this Homo rudolfensis," according to the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, so scientists don't know if H. rudolfensis is an unusual H. habilis or even an Austrolopithicus with a larger-than-usual brain. Paleoanthropologist Rick Potts, who heads the Smithsonian Institute's Human Origins program, told Live Science that even older fossils from Africa appear to be from the genus Homo and may predate both of those species. RELATED MYSTERIES —What did the last common ancestor between humans and apes look like? —Are Neanderthals and Homo sapiens the same species? —Why did Homo sapiens emerge in Africa? The oldest of those fossils date from about 2.8 million years ago, but they are only fragments — a few jaw bones and a few teeth — so they are not enough to establish if they came from a different, unnamed species of Homo, he said. A 2025 study found additional teeth dating to 2.59 million and 2.78 million years old that may also belong to this mysterious early Homo species. So it may be that the first human species has not yet been found. "There's a whole lot of excitement, but there is also a lot of uncertainty, about trying to discover more about the origins of the genus Homo," Potts said. Human evolution quiz: What do you know about Homo sapiens? Solve the daily Crossword
USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
Sorry guys, size does matter: Meet the creature dubbed as the 'Genital King'
Four newly-discovered tarantula species were just dubbed the "Genital King," and for tarantulas, size really does matter. The species are all under the genus Satyrex, which loosely translates to the epithet that Tinder dates around the world would love to boast. Still, they would certainly fall short compared to this tarantula, which can be found in southeastern Yemen and southwestern Oman, countries that share a border in Asia on the Arabian Peninsula. A study published by the peer-reviewed scientific journal ZooKeys revealed the discovery of the well-endowed spiders. Spiders don't have penises, but instead have pedipalps, which are secondary sexual organs that deliver sperm to females, said Alireza Zamani, the arachnologist and taxonomist at the University of Turku in Finland, who discovered the spider. Satyrex compared to other tarantulas Most tarantulas' pedipalps are around 1.5 times larger than the carapace, their midsection, according to Zamani. It's "extremely rare," but sometimes pedipalps can be 2.5 times longer. However, for the Genital King, "it is almost four times longer than the carapace," said Zamani. "It's almost as long as the longest legs of the tarantula." If the tarantula swapped roles, and those proportions belonged to a human instead, their penis would be the length of their leg. Why is it so big? How did the spider develop such a big member? Well, researchers don't know, but they have a hypothesis. "This elongation has happened as a result of what we call sexual selection," Zamani said. "The females of this species, and probably others that we are currently considering in this genus, are very, very aggressive." The tarantulas are more aggressive than any species in the Americas. So, the running theory is that the tarantulas have such long pedipalps because it makes it easier for them to administer their sperm into the female and make a quick getaway before the female tarantula can attack. Where did their name come from? The tarantula's Latin name is a combination of Satyr, a mythological creature known for having a large, erect penis, and rex, which means king. "It's interesting for a wide group of people and not just a group of scientists who study them," said Zamani. "So I spent a lot of time thinking about 'What name should I pick?'" "It just was at the back of my mind all the time," said Zamani. It took Zamani and a colleague a month to come up with the name. And, ironically enough, when trying to come up with the name, he kept thinking of a famous quote from Spider-Man. " I usually say this thing that 'With great power comes great responsibility,'" said Zamani. "If you have the power to actually name a species, then you have to be responsible to give it a good name, something memorable, especially if it's something that creates interest." Julia is a trending reporter for USA TODAY. Connect with her on LinkedIn,X, Instagram, and TikTok: @juliamariegz, or email her at jgomez@
