Netflix defies Trump's movie tariffs with $1 billion investment: 'Nothing short of extraordinary'
Netflix is making a huge international investment, despite President Donald Trump's wishes.
The streaming giant's CEO, Ted Sarandos, announced a $1.14 billion investment to help produce a pipeline of new shows in Spain.
He made the declaration during a press conference in Tres Cantos, Spain, on Tuesday. Sarandos said the money will flow into the region between 2025 and 2028.
It comes after the President said in May that he would slap a 100 percent tariff on any movie produced outside of the US.
Netflix first started making content in Spain in 2015, producing well-watched shows like Money Heist.
The major film and TV producer has continued to build production capacity, including a 10 soundstage studio complex in Madrid.
'Alongside your rich cultural heritage, vibrant entertainment industry and brilliant creative talent, Spain is also a great place to do business,' Sarandos said to an audience of journalists, movie producers, and local politicians. 'The last 10 years have been nothing short of extraordinary.'
Trump's tariff announcement earlier this year has confused film production leaders, and offered little detail about how the levy would work in practice.
'Other countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States,' the President claimed on his Truth Social platform.
'Hollywood and many other areas within the USA are being devastated.'
Like the sweeping tariffs placed on other industries — like 50 percent steel and aluminum levies or 25 percent automotive import fees — President Trump believes that the higher taxes will motivate increased investment in US production.
Netflix's stock tumbled the day after the social media post.
But it's impossible to know the knock-on impacts if Trump's policy was implemented.
The White House hasn't revealed how it plans on assessing the value of international films before the tariff is applied.
'Although no final decisions on foreign film tariffs have been made, the Administration is exploring all options to deliver on President Trump's directive to safeguard our country's national and economic security while Making Hollywood Great Again,' White House spokesman, Kush Desai, said.
In 2024, film industry experts reported a schedule of 5,048 total film and TV shoot days in Hollywood. That is good for a 36.4 percent drop from the five-year average. Other US production hubs, like Atlanta and Austin, have seen slower growth.
President Trump recently threatened studios producing content outside the US with a 100 percent tariff - but his social media post didn't detail how the administration would administer the tax
Netflix has fought back against regulators in other countries, including France, as it tries to expand into new markets
Analysts worry that Trump's potential policy could make streamers slow down the number of shows they could produce.
'There's also a risk of retaliatory tariffs against American content overseas,' Barton Crockett, an analyst with Rosenblatt Securities, told Reuters.
'Raising the cost to produce movies could lead studios to make less content.'
Hollywood production companies had already been in the crosshairs of back-and-forth tariff threats in the US trade war with China.
Beijing is restricting the number of movies produced in Hollywood that can play in China, a move that can destroy the bottom line for multiple major US producers.
Netflix's investment in Spain also comes as the company wrangles with regulators in other countries.
In April, the company published an open letter asking French authorities to change their media chronology rules.
Right now, the company must wait 15 months between releasing films in theatres and launching them on their platform. Netflix wants the country to trim down the timeline.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Australia to work closely with US on review of Biden-era submarine pact
SYDNEY, June 12 (Reuters) - Australia's Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Thursday his government would work closely with the United States while President Donald Trump's administration conducts a formal review of the AUKUS defence pact. "It is natural the administration would want to examine this major undertaking including progress and delivery," a spokesperson for Marles said in a statement. Australia in 2023 committed to spend A$368 billion ($239.3 billion) over three decades on AUKUS, Australia's biggest ever defence project with the United States and Britain, to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines. Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet Trump for the first time next week on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada, where the security allies will discuss tariffs and a request from the United States for Australia to increase defence spending from 2% to 3.5% of gross domestic product. Albanese had previously said defence spending would rise to 2.3% and has declined to commit to the U.S. target, saying Australia would focus on capability needs. Under AUKUS, Australia was scheduled to make a $2 billion payment in 2025 to the U.S. to help boost its submarine shipyards and speed up lagging production rates of Virginia class submarines to allow the sale of up to three U.S. submarines to Australia from 2032. Britain and Australia will jointly build a new AUKUS class submarine expected to come into service from 2040. Britain recently completed a review of AUKUS. It has not released the results publicly, but it announced plans this month to increase the size of its nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet. Marles' spokesperson said AUKUS would grow the U.S. and Australian defence industries and generate thousands of manufacturing jobs. John Lee, an Australian Indo-Pacific expert at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank, said the Pentagon review was "primarily an audit of American capability" and whether it can afford to sell up to five nuclear powered submarines when it was not meeting its own production targets. "Relatedly, the low Australian defence spending and ambiguity as to how it might contribute to a Taiwan contingency is also a factor," Lee said. ($1 = 1.5380 Australian dollars)
Metro
12 minutes ago
- Metro
All the celebrities slamming Trump's immigration raids
Hollywood stars are coming out in force against Donald Trump after the U.S. President ordered the deportation of illegal immigrants. Last week mass protests broke out in Los Angeles after ICE units – Immigration and Customs Enforcement – descended on Hispanic neighbourhoods and began arresting people. Soon after protestors hit the streets, Trump sent in National Guard soldiers and Marines to support immigration raids in the city, which is now in lockdown. On Tuesday afternoon, Trump defiantly declared: Generations of army heroes did not shed their blood on distant shores only to watch our country be destroyed by invasion and third-world lawlessness. 'What you're witnessing is a full-blown assault on peace and public order. We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean and safe again.' Meanwhile moments earlier California Governor Gavin Newsom filed an emergency motion in federal court to block Trump from using National Guard soldiers and Marines to support immigration raids in the city, which have been slammed by a string of famous faces. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Eva Longoria has said she 'kept crying' before composing a message to her fans. 'I don't want it to be about me and my emotions about it, but it is so humane, hard to watch, and hard to witness from afar,' she said. 'I can't believe it's happening all over the country. It's un-American. 'We all can agree nobody wants criminals in our country, nobody wants rapists, nobody wants drug dealers, nobody wants bad actors in our country – that's not what's happening.' She continued: 'These roundups are happening in birthday parties, in elementary graduations, Home Depots – those are not criminals. I just hope that everybody has more compassion to this issue and realise we had industries dependant on immigrant labour. These are people who feed us and take care of us and our children, and our communities and we can't deny them as humans,' she said. 'These are hardworking people and they want to come here and work and provide for their families.' Saying she would 'continue to post and speak out', Eva went on to list of organisations that offered legal services to immigrants. During the BET Awards in Los Angeles earlier this week, rapper Doechii used her acceptance speak to address 'what's happening right now outside of the building'. 'There are ruthless attacks that are creating fear and chaos in our communities in the name of law and order. 'Trump is using military forces to stop a protest, and I want y'all to consider what kind of government it appears to be when every time we exercise our democratic right to protest, the military is deployed against us. What type of government is that?. After being applauded by the audience, she went on: 'People are being swept up and torn from their families. I feel like it's my responsibility as an artist to use this moment to speak up for all oppressed people…we all deserve to live in hope and not fear. I hope we stand together. Attending the protest in Los Angeles, Billie Eilish's brother Finneas said a few days ago that he was tear-gassed by the National Guard. After going to a protest at the weekend, the singer-songwriter posted on social media: 'Tear gassed almost immediately at the very peaceful protest downtown – they're inciting this,' he wrote. Since then, he's shared a series of posts about the raids and supporting the protests. Kim Kardashian, who has previously expressed support for Trump, surprised many when posting a statement about what is unfolding in her home city. Posting a statement on Instagram, she wrote: 'When we're told that ICE exists to keep our country safe and remove violent criminals – great. But when we witness innocent, hardworking people being ripped from their families in inhumane ways, we have to speak up. We have to do what's right,' she wrote on Instagram. 'Growing up in LA, I've seen how deeply immigrants are woven into the fabric of this city. They are our neighbors, friends, classmates, coworkers, and family. 'No matter where you fall politically, it's clear that our communities thrive because of the contributions of immigrants. We can't turn a blind eye when fear and injustice keep people from living their lives freely and safely. There HAS to be a BETTER way.' During the latest episode of his late-night talk show, presenter Jimmy Kimmel blasted the U.S. President. 'I'm very angry. I cannot believe what's going on. I knew it was going to be bad. I did not know it was going to be this bad. People who have lived here their whole lives, people who have been in this city longer than I have, the vast majority of whom have never done anything wrong are being abducted – which is the correct word to use – by agents in masks hiding their identities. Grabbing people off the street and at work and sending people to detention centers.' 'And to protest that, which is not only our right as Americans, it's our responsibility, Los Angelenos have been gathering to demonstrate – with very few exceptions, peacefully demonstrate – to voice their opposition to this disgusting and unnecessary abuse of power instigated by our president.' Kimmel went on to add that Trump was 'dead-set on exacerbating this'. 'He actually wants conflict. He is intentionally inflaming and lying to make it seem like there's a war going on here. He is purposefully pitting Americans against each other.' Actor Mark Ruffalo posted a lengthy statement on Instagram, writing: 'When you have working class people going after the poor and other working class people you know you are living in an oligarchy.' 'You want to get rid of the people picking who are picking your food, without a care in the world for who is poisoning your bodies with chemicals that aren't ever meant to be in nature,' Mark said in the beginning of his post. 'You want to drive out those who make your life easier but not question those who dull your minds with lines and disinformation meant to confuse you and destroy brotherly and sisterly love for us here? You're pointing your guns in the wrong direction,' he continued. Mark went on to take aim at Trump, adding: The billionaire up top is stealin you blind and you are worried about the poorest of the poor ruining your life? You are pointing your guns at the wrong direction.' Actress and singer Renee Rapp didn't mince her words, posting online: 'F*** ICE, f*** this administration, f*** all of y'all who are complicit in ensuring that this happened this is a f***ing disgrace.' Demi Lovato also weighed in on the ongoing protests, sharing: 'What's happening in Los Angeles and across the country is heartbreaking. Immigrants are a vital part of our community and the fabric of our country. While I feel powerless, I stand with those living in fear and hope these resources can help in some way. Let's please continue to show up for one another and support our neighbours.' Director Ava DuVernay, best known for films including Selma and Origin, wrote on Instagram: 'I'm witnessing tear gas and non-lethal rounds being unleashed on peaceful protesters in DTLA. More Trending 'People of all ages and stripes from all over the city, raising their voices. And being treated worse than January 6 terrorists.' It comes after she advised people in May to resists a 'criminal' U.S. President at a time when 'truth itself is under revision.' Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Dakota Johnson had bizarre asparagus murder dream about Glastonbury headliner MORE: Watch Me (Whip/Nae Nae) rapper Silentó sentenced to 30 years for killing cousin MORE: Sabrina Carpenter sparks huge backlash over 'disturbing' new album cover
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Fact check: 2025 spending review claims
This round-up of claims from the 2025 spending review has been compiled by Full Fact, the UK's largest fact checking charity working to find, expose and counter the harms of bad information. On Wednesday Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves delivered the Labour Government's first spending review, outlining its spending plans for the next few years. We've taken a look at some of the key claims. How much is spending increasing by? At the start of her speech Ms Reeves announced that 'total departmental budgets will grow by 2.3% a year in real terms'. That headline figure doesn't tell the full story, however. Firstly, 2.3% is the average annual real-terms growth in total departmental budgets between 2023/24 and 2028/29. That means it includes spending changes that have already been implemented, for both the current (2025/26) and previous (2024/25) financial years. The average annual increase between this year and 2028/29 is 1.5%. Therefore, as the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has said, 'most departments will have larger real-terms budgets at the end of the Parliament than the beginning, but in many cases much of that extra cash will have arrived by April'. Secondly, it's worth noting that the 2.3% figure includes both day-to-day (Resource DEL) and investment (Capital DEL) spending. Capital spending (which funds things like infrastructure projects) is increasing by 3.6% a year on average in real terms between 2023/24 and 2029/30, and by 1.8% between 2025/26 and 2029/30. Day-to-day departmental budgets meanwhile are seeing a smaller average annual real-terms increase – of 1.7% between 2023/24 and 2028/29 and 1.2% between 2025/26 and 2028/29. Which departments are the winners and losers? Ms Reeves touted substantial spending increases in some areas (for example, the 3% rise in day-to-day NHS spending in England), but unsurprisingly her statement did not focus on areas where spending will decrease. Changes to Government spending are not uniform across all departments, and alongside increases in spending on things like the NHS, defence and the justice system, a number of Government departments will see their budgets decrease in real terms. Departments facing real-terms reductions in overall and day-to-day spending include the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (this factors in reductions in aid spending announced earlier this year to offset increased defence spending), the Home Office (although the Government says the Home Office's budget grows in real terms if a planned reduction in asylum spending is excluded) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Did the Conservatives leave a '£22 billion black hole'? Ms Reeves made a claim we've heard a number of times since it first surfaced in July 2024 – that the previous Conservative government left a '£22 billion black hole in the public finances'. That figure comes from a Treasury audit that forecast a £22 billion overspend in departmental day-to-day spending in 2024/25, but the extent to which it was unexpected or inherited is disputed. The IFS said last year that some of the pressures the Government claimed contributed to this so-called 'black hole' could have been anticipated, but others did 'indeed seem to be greater than could be discerned from the outside'. An Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) review of its March 2024 forecast found an estimated £9.5 billion of additional spending pressures were known to the Treasury at that point in time, but were not known to the OBR as it prepared its forecast. It's true that this review didn't confirm the £22 billion figure, but it also did not necessarily prove that it was incorrect, because Labour's figure included pressures which were identified after the OBR prepared its forecast and so were beyond the scope of the OBR's review. We've written more about how the Government reached the figure of £22 billion in our explainer on this topic. How big is the increase in NHS appointments? Ms Reeves took the opportunity to congratulate Health Secretary Wes Streeting for delivering 'three-and-a-half million extra' hospital appointments in England. The Government has previously celebrated this as a 'massive increase', particularly in light of its manifesto pledge to deliver an extra two million appointments a year. Ms Reeves' claim was broadly accurate – data published last month shows there were 3.6 million additional appointments between July 2024 and February 2025 compared to the previous year. But importantly that increase is actually smaller than the 4.2 million rise that happened in the equivalent period the year before, under the Conservative government – as data obtained by Full Fact under the Freedom of Information Act and published last month revealed. What do announcements on asylum hotels, policing, nurseries and more mean for the Government's pledges? Ms Reeves made a number of announcements that appear to directly impact the delivery of several pre-existing Labour pledges, many of which we're already monitoring in our Government Tracker. (We'll be updating the tracker to reflect these announcements in due course, and reviewing how we rate progress on pledges as necessary). The Chancellor announced an average increase in 'police spending power' of 2.3% a year in real terms over the course of the review period, which she said was the equivalent of an additional £2 billion. However, as police budgets comprise a mix of central Government funding and local council tax receipts, some of this extra spending is expected to be funded by increases in council tax precepts. Ms Reeves said this funding would help the Government achieve its commitment of 'putting 13,000 additional police officers, PCSOs and special constables into neighbourhood policing roles in England and Wales', a pledge we're monitoring here. The spending review also includes funding of 'almost £370 million across the next four years to support the Government's commitment to deliver school-based nurseries across England', which Ms Reeves said would help the Government deliver its pledge to have 'a record number of children being school-ready'. The Chancellor also committed to ending the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this Parliament, with an additional £200 million announced to 'accelerate the transformation of the asylum system'. When we looked last month at progress on the Government's pledge to 'end asylum hotels' we said it appeared off track, as figures showed the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels was higher at the end of March 2025 than it was when Labour came into Government.
