
How the FCA uses sandboxes to dig out AI fintech solutions
The parent of this play area is the City regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and it allowed Zilch, and the dozens of other fintech firms that took part, to play around, or experiment, without causing consumers any harm or falling foul of any regulations.
Zilch's rapid rise since illustrates the valuable role that regulators can play to encourage innovative start-ups to disrupt existing markets with new approaches. Sandboxes are also a vital tool in the armoury of policy makers in their attempts to protect Britain's competitive edge in fast-moving sectors, ranging from life sciences to space exploration.
After using the sandbox for 12 months, Zilch launched in 2020 with a licence from the FCA and has since been used by over 4.5 million customers. Desmond McNamara, its chief risk officer, said: 'The sandbox programme allowed us to go through that process of regulation whilst we were building the business. If we had to build the whole business, then apply, it would have been harder.'
The FCA has doubled down on its approach with financial services, launching last month what it has called a 'supercharged sandbox' to help facilitate the rapid introduction of AI-powered financial services.
In essence, a sandbox gives technology companies a controlled environment to test systems safely. In the case of the AI sandbox, announced last month, the FCA is letting businesses test AI applications such as fraud detection, real-time credit scoring and enhanced customer service. Companies use dummy data created by the FCA, such as fake card numbers and bank account details, and also have access to computing power that they might not otherwise be able to afford. The FCA has struck a deal with the chipmaker Nvidia to provide access to its data centres and also some of its software. The application period is now open and the first companies are expected to start experimenting in October.
Alex Kirkhope, partner at Shoosmiths, a law firm which advises companies on how to use sandboxes, said: 'It's a space that allows businesses, especially smaller businesses, the ones who don't have the infrastructure or the access to computing power, to be able to do that themselves, whether they're developing those systems themselves or whether they are looking to deploy them and understand how they operate.'
Kirkhope said it was significant that Nvidia has chosen to partner with the regulator on this project. 'Their chips are some of the most advanced processing that exists in the world today. Their involvement, investment and interest in the UK economy and UK fintech space has to be seen as a positive because if they weren't talking to us, they would be talking to China, US, and probably other major European nations,' he said.
McNamara from Zilch said the sandbox was particularly attractive to start-ups, which are typically still learning what they can do and what the regulator will allow them to do. 'The regular authorisation process is more naturally tailored to firms who are already authorised and they were adding to their authorisation,' he said. 'Whereas the regulatory sandbox allows firms who are starting out, because there is a more natural startup culture, you don't have to come with the answer to everything at the start, it's much more of an interactive process.'
Francesco Fulcoli, the chief compliance and risk officer at Flagstone, a savings platform, is one of those considering using the new testing environment. Flagstone already manages £16.2 billion in people's savings and it is hoping to use the FCA sandbox to test its use of AI for customer support, anti-money laundering and a fully automated process for new customers starting an account. 'Working with many other regulators across the globe, this was a good move. Not many regulators are going that direction,' he said. 'I think it's a good step ahead and will help the fintech environment to keep growing in the UK.'
Nicky Goulimis, co-founder of Tunic Pay, a fintech company that helps banks stop fraudulent bank transfers, is another hoping to use the sandbox to help build out its AI. Goulimis said she was particularly encouraged by the FCA's inclusion of agentic AI, which uses reasoning to autonomously make decisions and perform tasks.
'It's going to massively encourage innovation because it's unlocking new use cases that would otherwise not be possible. My interpretation is that this is the FCA saying, we are open for business around agentic systems, which has historically not been the perspective,' said Goulimis.
Tunic Pay has already started using AI and is hoping access to the sandbox will help the company collaborate with the government and 'push the imagination' of what can be done with AI agents for scam detection and prevention.
• Mandelson wants the UK to make a tech 'moonshot'. Can we do it?
Financial services is not the only area of the economy where regulators are using sandboxes to let startups experiment. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology has funded sandboxes to help industry and academics work on wireless technology, engineering biology and novel space activities.
Kirkhope said the latest AI sandbox is just one piece of the puzzle for harnessing AI. 'The government needs to invest in and encourage the build-out of AI infrastructure, particularly compute and data processing, data centre capacity within the UK. And I don't think we should underestimate that challenge. Unless it all works together, we can only get so far,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
25 minutes ago
- The Sun
World's ‘most expensive bungalow' is being DEMOLISHED in UK seaside beauty spot after two-year battle
AN ENTREPRENEUR who spent £13.5 million on the "worlds most expensive" bungalow has been given the greenlight to demolish it. Tom Glanfield, 46, bought the property on Dorset's exclusive Sandbanks Resort, described as a millionaire's row, in March 2023. 7 7 He had planned to knock down the cottage and replace it with a modern family home. Planners had other ideas however and recommended his application be refused. They claimed that it would "result in the total loss of the non-designated heritage asset." Planners also believed that it would cause "significant harm" to the Sandbanks Conservation Area. Mr Glanfield, who lives in Poole, Dorset, said that the current house was no longer "fit for purpose." He claims he designed a family home that was "sympathetic to the beautiful surroundings of the conservation area." During a meeting with planners today, July 18, Mr Glanfield had a breakthrough after insisting he was "not a property developer" and was not " flipping the bungalow for profit." He said: "I'm not a property developer looking to put in a big block of flats here. I'm not flipping this for profit. "I am very much a family man who is trying to make a family home. I will probably die in that home. "I care deeply about the environment. I have a renewable energy recruitment firm that I built from scratch. "This property is currently energy rated F. It would become energy rated A. "The house's current state also isn't good. I don't allow my kids down to the harbour wall because it is dangerous. "Instead, I am creating a living sea wall at great expense. I won't even see that from the property - it's all for public benefit. "So the proposal would improve the environment. 7 7 7 "Currently, the property looks out of place. On either side of it you have flat-roof modern houses. "And in my opinion the property isn't of any heritage significance - it was the servant quarters to the main house which has since been demolished. "It's been altered significantly over the years with permitted developments and extensions. "It's time for it to be developed. You actually all have an opportunity with me, without sounding arrogant, in that I've got the time, energy, and money to make this something you can all be proud of. "So I really hope you grant it." Planners took his words on board and granted him the permission he had sought for two long years. Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (BCPC) officers granted Mr Glanfields proposal by seven to one. Many said they did not consider the current property as a "heritage asset" - adding that, if it was, it was of "very limited value." Others said the loss of the heritage asset would be justified as the "benefits outweigh." One councillor listed the benefits of Mr Glanfield's proposal as: "Energy efficiency, ecological benefits provided by the living sea wall, bringing the property back into local use, and a design that is more sympathetic to the environment than what is currently there." Mr Glanfield now hopes to transform the bungalow, dubbed the "world's most expensive" into a sustainable two-storey family home. He said that the property currently suffered with a leaking roof, mould and mildew. The new-build, the entrepreneur says, will be complete with renewable power and a desalination facility - and will see the sea wall, which is currently "unsafe", "unsightly", and crumbling, enhanced and restructured. 7 7 He previously said: "My dream is to build a family home that will not only retain the modest beauty of the plot but will also stand the test of time." Mr Glanfield received significant backing for his proposal from the local community - with 38 letters of support submitted to the council. Among those was one from neighbour Ros Smart, who labelled the plans as an "outstandingly innovative design for an iconic site." She continued: "The modern sleek appearance is entirely in keeping with houses in the surrounding area and is totally suitable for the conservation area." Others agreed that the design was "sympathetic" to the location - describing the "modern sleek appearance" as "entirely in keeping with houses in the surrounding area". Planners however argued that the proposal should be refused on "conservation grounds" and said alternative options "involving the retention of the cottage" could have been explored. Planning officer Babatunde Aregbesola told the meeting that the existing building was considered very important to the Sandbanks Conservation Area (CA) given its age, which he described as "very early Edwardian, one of the oldest in the area." He said: "The proposal by reason of the demolition of the existing cottage would result in the total loss of the non-designated heritage asset causing significant harm and failing to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Sandbanks Conservation Area." He also argued that the benefits proposed by Mr Glanfield do not outweigh the harm. He said: "The applicant, via legal representation, identifies the following public benefits: visual and environmental enhancements from a proposed sea wall and landscaping; design choices including use of local materials and a sedum roof; and improved energy efficiency (F to A rated). "But while the scheme would deliver a more energy efficient home and some economic activity, it would replace an existing, habitable dwelling and would not increase housing supply. "The reduced flood risk benefits are private in nature. These benefits are modest and do not outweigh the identified heritage harm "The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and its significance. "The proposal would also cause harm to non-designated heritage assets which adds further substantial weight against the development. "In conclusion, the development conflicts with the relevant policies and lacks sufficient public benefit to justify the harm. "The application should therefore be refused." Following Mr Glanfield's speech however, one councillor told the meeting: "The house itself as it stands is not particularly special, charming or dynamic. It's just an ordinary house. "But what is being proposed is a special, ecologically designed property that is going to enhance the area and make a huge difference to what the Conservation Area looks like. "I can't support the officer's recommendation [to refuse the application]." Another said: "I'm struggling to see how this is a heritage asset. Let these people build the home they want and have a positive impact on the surrounding area." He will now be able to push ahead with his new family home. The Sun has contacted BCPC and planners for comment. Do I need planning permission to convert my shed? CONVERTING an existing shed or outbuilding into a self-contained living space will usually require you apply for planning permission. However, there is a "loophole" Brits can use to convert outbuildings into a tiny home without permission. Planning expert Martin Gaine from Just Planning warned the conversion process is far easier than you may think. Speaking to The Sun, the Chartered Town Planner of 14 years' experience explained: " An outbuilding can be built using 'permitted development rights ', meaning it does not need planning permission. "As long as you comply with the various restrictions and conditions." One of these is that the outbuilding can only be used for something 'ancillary' to your main living accommodation - examples include storage, a gym or a pool room. If the outbuilding is existing, converting it then into primary living accommodation IS allowed. Martin explained: "This is because internal changes to an existing building are not considered to be development at all under the Town and Country Planning Act. But like anything, there is one catch. The new living accommodation must still have some connection with your use of the main house. For instance, if your gran is living out there, she must still come into the house to eat.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Water regulator to be scrapped as sewage spills soar
While it is understood that ministers have not yet received the final report, which will be published on Monday, Sir Jon's interim report last month criticised 'deep-rooted, systemic' problems across the water industry, laying the blame at the door of both companies and regulators. Ofwat has been criticised for its part in failing to prevent sewage spills and then allowing water companies to put up bills by almost £10 a month on average to fund improvements in environmental standards. The regulator has also been criticised for failing to hold Thames Water to account before it slipped into crisis. Thames Water nationalisation Britain's largest water company – Thames Water, which is saddled with debt – faces the prospect of government control, with its boss warning this week that it will take at least a decade to turn the company around. Environment Agency figures showed a sharp jump in pollution incidents in England, with Thames Water, Southern Water and Yorkshire Water the worst offenders. Ofwat declined to comment, while a government spokesman said: 'We are not going to comment on speculation'. Mark Lloyd, chief executive of the Rivers Trust, which represents trusts across the country, welcomed the proposed overhaul. He said: 'The problem for Government is clear: economic and environmental regulation of the water industry has been very muddled since privatisation and is the root cause of many of the issues with the sector. 'Greater clarity, consistency, certainty and accountability of regulation are urgently needed for water companies to improve their performance and to attract investment. They therefore face a choice between reforming the current regulatory framework to make it work better or creating a new, single regulator.' Thames bondholders also welcomed proposals to scrap Ofwat, pointing to the regulator's failure to rein in Thames Water's debt binge.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Brentford attempt to open contract talks with Wissa
Brentford have attempted to open contract talks with Yoane Wissa but he is understood to prefer a move away from the club this Bryan Mbeumo expected to join Manchester United, the Bees' attentions are turning to resolving the future of 20-goal forward Tottenham and Nottingham Forest are among those with a firm interest in the DR Congo have tried to pre-empt the developing issue by starting contract talks with the 28-year-old, who moved to west London in 2021 from French club sources have indicated that, as things stand, Wissa has no inclination to discuss improved terms and privately has made his intentions to explore options elsewhere three interested clubs can offer him European football next season and it is understood agreeing personal terms, particularly with either Tottenham or Newcastle, will not be an issue. With that in mind, Brentford's valuation of Wissa is emerging as a factor in his have no intention of losing both Mbeumo and Wissa this summer but, in reality, with Wissa turning 29 in September, the scenario of a depreciating asset – who this summer could command in the region of £40m, if not more - will likely be a he has just 12 months left on his current deal, though there is an option to activate by a further year, is another factor to mull all parties, there appears merit to finding a resolution – whether that's a sale or contract renewal – sooner rather been a summer of upheaval at the G-Tech Community Stadium - manager Thomas Frank joined Spurs, goalkeeper Mark Flekken was sold to Bayer Leverkusen, captain Christian Norgaard has left for Arsenal and now star forward Mbeumo is set for a move to Old have already started the process of replenishing their forward options with an unsuccessful £35m offer made to Ipswich for attacker Omari also extensively watched Bournemouth forward Dango Ouattara last matter how Wissa's future develops, it will be a challenging start for new boss Keith Andrews who is preparing for his first season as a manager at any level of professional football.