Trump withdraws Biden-era policy on warning against cryptocurrency 401(k) retirement investing
1 of 2 | The policy shift arrived as U.S. President Donald Trump (seen March 7 at a Digital Assets (Crypto) Summit at the White House in Washington, D.C.) has enthusiastically embraced the crypto world while the Trump's crypto wealth has ballooned on paper through his own meme coin and as his two eldest sons pursue other crypto-related business ventures amid calls for Ethics Investigations. File Photo by Chris Kleponis/UPI | License Photo
May 28 (UPI) -- The Trump administration on Wednesday revoked Biden-era guidance on cryptocurrency-related 401 (k) plans and other digital assets.
President Donald Trump's U.S. Labor Department withdrew full guidance put in place in 2022 by then-President Joe Biden's administration. It advised American companies to exercise "extreme care" prior to allowing crypto-related retirement investments as an option for employees.
It cited "serious concern" over the level of negative exposure for investors given reports of "significant risks of fraud, theft and loss" and with crpyto linked to ISIS and other acts of international terrorism.
Now, the department says it's "neither endorsing, nor disapproving of" employers who opt to add cryptocurrency to a list of 401 (k) investments, adding that Trump's policy change will extend to a "wide range" of other digital assets such as tokens, coins, crypto assets "and any derivatives thereof."
On Wednesday, U.S. Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said the Biden White House attempted to "put their thumb on the scale" to discourage crypto investing.
Trump's Labor Department said in a compliance assistance bulletin that prior to Biden's 2022 guidance, the department had "usually articulated a neutral approach to particular investment types and strategies."
"We're making it clear that investment decisions should be made by fiduciaries, not DC bureaucrats," the secretary posted to social media.
It said a standard of "extreme care" cited by Biden's Labor Department was reportedly "not found" in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA, which gives a fiduciary duty to employers that oversee 401(k) investments.
"In reality, it's saying we should treat crypto like any other asset," Philip Chao, a certified financial planner and retirement investment consultant, told CNBC.
The shift arrived as the White House has exuberantly embraced the crypto industry while the president's crypto wealth has ballooned on paper through his own meme coin and as his two eldest sons pursue other crypto-related business ventures amid calls for ethics investigations.
Last month, the U.S. Department of Justice ended its National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team and redirected focus away from targeting crypto fraud.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said DOJ will "no longer pursue litigation or enforcement actions that have the effect of superimposing regulatory frameworks on digital assets" as Trump allegedly has "actual regulators do this work outside the punitive criminal justice framework."
On Tuesday, Trump's Truth Social platform announced its plans to establish a $2.5 billion "bitcoin Treasury."
Meanwhile, Vice President JD Vance was scheduled Wednesday to deliver a keynote address at a bitcoin conference in Las Vegas.
Chao, founder of Experiential Wealth in Cabin John, Md., says crypto is "such a new thing and there's no regulation or protection, even a reasonable understanding of it."
"And there still isn't enough," Chao stated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
15 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Aides Insist That Tariffs Will Remain, Even After Court Ruling
President Trump's top economic advisers stressed on Sunday that they would not be deterred by a recent court decision that declared many of the administration's tariffs to be illegal, as they pointed out a variety of additional authorities that the White House could invoke as it looks to pressure China and others into negotiations. They also signaled that Mr. Trump had no plans to extend an original 90-day pause on some of his steepest tariff rates, raising the odds that those duties — the mere announcement of which had roiled markets — could take effect as planned in July. 'Rest assured, tariffs are not going away,' Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, said during an appearance on 'Fox News Sunday.' Asked about the future of the president's so-called reciprocal tariffs, first announced and quickly suspended in April, Mr. Lutnick added, 'I don't see today that an extension is coming.' The president's tariff strategy entered uncharted political and legal territory last week after a federal trade court ruled that Mr. Trump had misused an emergency economic powers law in trying to wage a global trade war. The decision would have put a quick halt to those duties, which form the centerpiece of the president's strategy of pressuring other countries into trade talks. But an appeals court soon granted the government a brief administrative pause to sort out arguments in the case, which is expected to reach the Supreme Court. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Did The U.S. Air Force Cancel The F-22 Raptor?
It is the absolute apex of air-to-air combat. It rules the skies like a bird of prey, from which it takes its name. It's one of the stealthiest fighter jets in the world. The Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor is the pinnacle of what air dominance can be. So ... it was canceled. In 2009, the U.S. Department of Defense decided to end production of the fighter after only 186 planes were produced, significantly less than the original order of 750. What happened? Airpower is supposed to be one of the pillars of America's military strength, so why take its best piece off the board? The answer comes down to the fact that the nature of America's threats change and evolve over time, meaning that an asset that seemed critical in one era seems less so in another. Plus, put simply, the F-22 is wildly expensive, so if it's not an absolute must-have, the cost-benefit analysis just doesn't shake out. Read more: These Are The Worst American Cars Ever Made The F-22 was a revelation when it first flew in 1997. With a top speed of an incredible Mach 2.25 (1,726 miles per hour), supercruise capability (meaning it could fly for extended periods above the speed of sound), and a coat of radar-absorbent material, it was more advanced than any other fighter in the world at the time. It was a spaceship in a world full of paper planes. Ironically enough, that was part of its problem. Because Russia and China had nothing comparable in the first decade of the 21st century, the F-22 almost seemed like overkill. At a massive per-unit cost of $150 million, did America really need something that far beyond any of its competitors? For that matter, America's main adversaries at the time had no airpower at all. With the U.S. embroiled in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq against low-tech insurgent forces, a high-cost air-dominance fighter just didn't fit the country's needs at the time. Since even the Pentagon doesn't have infinite money (though it sure seems like it sometimes), it had to make some tough choices over where to put resources. For the budget-draining War on Terror, the F-22 just didn't have an argument to make. Not helping matters was the fact that Congress restricted use of the F-22 to just the U.S. Air Force. Translation: There would be no sales to foreign allies, which cut off a major revenue stream that could have offset its costs. Of course, since the end of production in 2009, a lot has changed. Russia and particularly China have upped their military capabilities, including in the air. With the benefit of hindsight, should the U.S. have kept the F-22 rolling off the assembly line? Not necessarily. For one thing, the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is an even newer fighter jet (though it has problems of its own). While slower and less stealthy than the F-22, it has vastly more advanced sensor capabilities. Not only can it gather a huge amount of information about the battlespace, its true party trick is its ability to disseminate that information to other F-35s and to headquarters. Meanwhile, the Air Force has also moved forward by looking backward. The decades-old F-15 airframe has gotten a major update in the form of the F-15EX. For one thing, it's much cheaper than the F-22 (its unit cost is only $94 million), which is appealing as the Pentagon looks to cut overspending. More importantly, the F-15EX can bring a whopping 12 air-to-air missiles to the fray, compared to the F-22's measly eight. The F-15EX was also designed to carry the newest and most advanced ordnance in the Air Force's arsenal, hypersonic missiles. Given all that, you could argue that the F-22 has lost its crown as the best air dominance fighter ... to a much older, and cheaper, plane. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People Are Sharing Things They Used To Buy Regularly But Now Never Do
@marisasav_ asked people on TikTok what's one thing they used to buy regularly that they'll never buy again. @marisasav_/ For her, it was paper towels. "We used to buy paper towels pretty much every week. We used to spend, I don't even know how much on them, and we will never buy paper towels again. We use napkins, we use t-shirt rags, we've created a system to phase paper towels completely out of our lifestyle," she explained. "A six-pack of paper towels at Target costs an average of $20-22. So, that would mean about $3 per roll on paper towels. If the average American household goes through one roll of paper towels of week, you are looking at over $150 on something you literally use once and throw away over and over and over again," she continued. "This was actually one of the first sustainable switches we made in our home." People in the comments are sharing products they've also abandoned, and here's what they had to say: sheets plates drinks coffee paper Related: 17 "Old" Home Design Trends People Desperately Want To See Make A Comeback popcorn 8.K-Cups dressing scent boosters Related: These 14 DIY Fails Are Just So, Sooooo Bad (And I'm Laughing So, Sooooo Hard) candles and menstrual products soap/dish soap bags water creamer water wash softener air fresheners lastly, "After today it's going to be most things*." *That was posted on "LIBERATION DAY." Also in Nifty: "She Just Wanted To Hang A Picture...": 30 Photos Of People Trying To "Help Out Around The House" That Backfired Spectacularly Also in Nifty: "I Saved An Embarrassing Amount Of Money": Frugal People Are Sharing The Habits They Stick To Year-Round Also in Nifty: People Are Sharing "Expensive" Adult Purchases That They'd Actually Recommend, Despite The Price Tag
