
Trump tariffs: Small businesses in America need to pay an extra $202 billion a year
Live Events
Bloomberg
The economic policies passed in the first six months of President Donald Trump 's term may yet bring a Golden Age, but so far they haven't for small farms and businesses. According to an estimate by the right-leaning US Chamber of Commerce, Trump's levies mean that small businesses will have to pay an extra $202 billion a year on tariffs, which works out to about $856,000 per company on average.Small-business optimism soared on Trump's victory and plunged when he announced tariffs; the right-leaning NFIB Small Business Optimism Index has recovered somewhat since 'Liberation Day' but has yet to reach the heights of Trump's first term in office, and response rates to the survey have fallen, suggesting some business owners may be too busy struggling to remain solvent to complete surveys. The Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer index has declined for two months in a row.Compared with large companies, smaller enterprises are struggling to wait out the vicissitudes of Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs. Democratic Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear told me recently that he is already seeing the impact across his state on small businesses, small farms and consumers alike. 'We're all paying a hidden tax in the form of widespread tariffs,' he said. 'Look, it's not just me saying this. If Andy Beshear, [former GOP Senate Minority Leader] Mitch McConnell and [GOP Senator] Rand Paul are all saying this is a bad idea, it's because it's a really bad idea.'Companies with fewer than 500 employees contribute 43.5% of the nation's gross domestic product. Small family farms still constitute 86% of all farms, according to federal data. But they lack the leverage and resources of larger enterprises and can find themselves at the mercy of forces over which they have little influence.'They're what economists call 'price-takers,'' Louis Johnston, an economist and professor at St. John's University in Minnesota told me. 'It means you accept the world as it is. You don't have enough power to affect prices and you don't have much wiggle room on wages. You're stuck.' Big businesses, he said, are price-makers. 'They can eat some costs , pass some to consumers, reduce stockholder dividends or shave a bit off wages,' he said. 'If you're small, all you can do is take the hit.'Investors agree, and publicly traded small companies have seen their stocks become less attractive since Trump unveiled his tariff agenda on 'Liberation Day' in April.Republicans in Congress seem unwilling to place the slightest restraint on a president convinced of his infallibility on tariffs.Many companies are finding themselves in the uncomfortable position of absorbing the increased costs of tariffs, according to Scott Lincicome, director of general economics and trade studies at the Cato Institute. That's not sustainable, especially for smaller businesses, and Lincicome is projecting higher consumer prices this fall. Even before its most recent estimate of tariff costs, the Chamber of Commerce had rung the alarm in a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that warned 'small businesses could suffer irreparable harm' from tariffs. 'The Chamber is hearing from small-business owners every day who are seeing their ability to survive endangered by the recent increase in tariff rates.'The GOP tax bill does grant some benefits to small businesses, such as a permanent extension on deductions. Doug Loon, president of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, told me that those benefits may become a lifeline. 'It would have put a lot of small businesses out of business if those provisions had not happened,' he said.Loon, a longtime Republican, remembers when his party saw free enterprise as an article of faith. He also recalls that the free-trade era carried its own challenges, particularly for smaller businesses that 'didn't always get a fair shake.' Loon believes that targeted tariffs, skillfully applied, 'can be incredibly beneficial.' Trump's broad-based approach 'has created great uncertainty among our businesses. And that is where disparities can occur.'Trump portrays tariffs as free money paid by countries that have 'ripped off' America . His new levies have already begun sending billions to the US Treasury. But the reality is that tariffs are a hidden tax mostly borne by US companies and consumers. According to Goldman Sachs data, US consumers have paid 22% of the cost of Trump's tariffs. Only 14% of the cost has been borne by foreign exporters.The other 64%? Eaten by American businesses Trump has reset the table on trade. Unfortunately, in his hands, tariffs are a blunt instrument used to punish enemies, reward friends and bully other nations. He substitutes threats and intimidation for negotiations and diplomacy. The deals, such as they are, remain vague, with details often disputed by trading partners.It was just seven months ago that the International Monetary Fund declared the US economy would continue to lead the world in 2025. IMF officials said the US was growing at a faster clip than its economic competitors, with more productive workers and a more welcoming business environment, leaving Trump and the GOP well positioned to capitalize politically on those economic gains.Now, several key economic indicators are pointing in the wrong direction — a scenario largely of Trump's own making. Businesses are struggling to adapt to his ever-shifting landscape of tariffs. Farmers are getting clobbered by higher inputs and they've lost markets thanks to an administration that ended foreign food aid and cut nutrition programs.Meanwhile, the president brags about the revenue tariffs are bringing, as if everyone didn't already know who is really footing the bill.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
How a Trump-Putin-Xi world resembles the one envisioned in Orwell's 1984
How a Trump-Putin-Xi world resembles the one envisioned in Orwell's 1984 John Authers Bloomberg Updated: Aug 16, 2025, 18:51 IST IST The present world order resembles one envisioned in the classic. The US, Russia and China trying to consolidate power, while countries like India might yet take different sides. Vladimir Putin 's encounter with Donald Trump in Anchorage summons bad memories of past summits in Munich or Yalta, in which the destiny of smaller Eastern European nations was decided by greater powers without their participation. But a fictional model from the postwar era seems more prophetic. George Orwell's 1984, written in 1948, tells of a world divided into three great powers. They are:
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
‘Bizarre and self-destructive': Sachs warns Trump's tariffs risk isolating America, hails India's measured response
Renowned economist Jeffrey Sachs has sharply criticised US President Donald Trump's tariffs on India, calling them 'bizarre' and 'very self-destructive of US foreign policy interests.' In an interview with ANI, Sachs said the tariffs undermine years of work to strengthen US-India relations and reflect a 'shocking level of incompetence' by the Trump administration. He highlighted that the tariffs, including a 50% levy imposed in July on Indian goods over continued Russian oil imports, are not only economically harmful but also potentially unconstitutional. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'He said years of hard work in improving US-India relations is being undermined by the Trump administration. 'It's a shocking level of incompetence. I see incompetence in the US government, I'm never surprised, but I'd say that this reached this level that I have to admit actually surprised me,' he said, answering a query regarding the Trump administration imposing 25 per cent secondary tariffs on India. Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods in July, even as there were hopes of an interim India-US trade deal that would have otherwise helped avoid elevated tariffs. A few days later, he imposed another 25 per cent tariff, taking the total to 50 per cent, citing India's continued imports of Russian oil. Sachs highlighted the legal challenges facing the Trump administration in the wake of tariffs.'…Tariffs are wrong in that they're destructive for the US economy. It violates international law. It's a breakdown of our political system in the United States. We have a constitution. We don't have one-person rule," he said, while also referring to powers of the Congress under Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution. 'There's actually a lawsuit now in the US Appellate Court, which says that Trump has violated the law by imposing these tariffs. There's a real possibility that Trump's entire tariff regime will be deemed, as it should be, unconstitutional,' he added. The economist said that from an economic point of view as also geopolitical point of view, Trump's policies 'are doomed to fail'. 'They (tariffs) will not improve the US economy. They will isolate the United States geopolitically. They will strengthen the BRICS and other groups…,' Jeffrey Sachs told ANI. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Trump hates the BRICS. Why? Because they stand up and say to the US, you don't run the world. The world is multipolar and we want to cooperate with you, but we don't want you to run the world. President Lula summarized it best. He said, we don't want an emperor. This is basically the point. Trump thinks he's an emperor,' he added. On India's diplomatic strategy, Sachs praised the government's measured approach. 'India's right. Take a deep breath. Don't do anything dramatic. Don't get too vituperative. I personally would do exactly what Prime Minister Modi's doing. He's flying to meet with President Xi Jinping. He's meeting with President Putin. He's meeting with President Lula. Those are India's real partners, by the way. Not only is the BRICS the fast-growing part of the world economy, but it's also the part of the world that says we don't want an emperor. We want multi-polarity and we want multilateralism,' Sachs said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Sachs praised India's measured diplomatic response, lauding Prime Minister Narendra Modi's strategy of engaging with global leaders including China's Xi Jinping, Russia's Vladimir Putin, and Brazil's Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. 'India's right. Take a deep breath. Don't do anything dramatic… Those are India's real partners. Not only is the BRICS the fast-growing part of the world economy, but it's also the part that says we don't want an emperor. We want multi-polarity and multilateralism,' he said. India and the US began negotiations for a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) in March 2025, aiming to conclude the first stage by October-November 2025. The talks focus on balanced access to sectors such as agriculture and dairy, which provide livelihoods to millions. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal told Parliament that the Indian government is closely examining the impact of Trump's tariffs and will take all necessary steps to safeguard national interests. With inputs from agencies


NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Trump Didn't Lose, Putin Clearly Won": Ex-US NSA John Bolton On Alaska Summit
Former US national security advisor John Bolton said that Russian President Vladimir Putin "clearly won" at the Alaska Summit, although US President Donald Trump "did not lose", regarding the Ukraine peace deal. Trump left the high-stakes three-hour, three-way meet with little more than a commitment to meet again. Bolton told CNN that Trump "didn't come away with anything, except more meetings," while Putin "has gone a long way to reestablishing the relationship, which I always believed was his key goal." Bolton added, "He has escaped sanctions and he is not facing a ceasefire. The next meeting is not set. Zelensky was not told any of this before this press conference." Although the meeting ended without a set direction or outcome, both the leaders said that the talks were "productive". "We didn't get there but we have a very good chance of getting there," Trump said. Bolton went on to dissect Trump's expressions during the summit and said, "And I will say one other thing. I thought Trump looked very tired up there. I mean, very tired," he continued. "Not disappointed, tired. And we'll have to reflect on what that means." He in a post on Truth Social wrote that the meeting in Alaska was "very successful", however, he now wants a direct peace agreement, and not a ceasefire deal. "A great and very successful day in Alaska! The meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia went very well, as did a late-night phone call with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, and various European Leaders, including the highly respected Secretary General of NATO. It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often does not hold up", he wrote. He also said that Zelensky will meet him on Monday, after which the leaders will arrange a meeting with Putin.