Protestors stand against CoreCivic ICE facility in Leavenworth
The CoreCivic Opposition Group of Leavenworth (CCOG – LV) led the 'Pots and Pans March' at 9:30 a.m., protesting the proposed opening of a private, for-profit ICE facility. The march was organized by Leavenworth residents, as well as some from around the area.
CoreCivic would make $4.2M a month running ICE detention center in Leavenworth
One of the organizers, Mike Trapp, described how he's seen the group grow over time.
'There were four of us at our first meeting,' he explained.
'Then we had a roundtable discussion where we brainstormed ways we could impact and got more people involved, and out of that event, this march arose.'
Others who attended the protest explained their reasons for protesting, sharing that immigrants are 'neighbors, not criminals.'
'I grew up in a very immigrant-dominant community and have so many immigrant family members and friends,' said Lynzie Clark, a demonstrator who came in to protest from out of town.
'I've watched my whole life the immigrant struggle and the impossible obstacles they put against the most loving and hard-working communities. None of these people deserve to be jailed for their birthplace. They are just like all of us. They're people.'
Around three dozen people were seen protesting CoreCivic and its attempt to turn a former private prison into an ICE detention center.
The protest comes after a Kansas City District Court judge temporarily blocked CoreCivic's plan. The judge sided with the City of Leavenworth that CoreCivic must first get the city's permission through zoning laws.
'I think it's great that they have actually responded well to trying to postpone and hold off and allowing them to roll in and take over with the CoreCivic facility,' said Nate Davis, who was seen at the protest.
'I hope that we can be the first of many for a rising movement for local communities to stand up to the authoritarian take down and the rule of law,' Trapp echoed.
Judge hears motions from CoreCivic in Leavenworth lawsuit
However, CoreCivic says they don't need that permission.
'We maintain the position that our facility, which we've operated for almost 30 years, does not require a Special Use Permit to care for detainees in partnership with ICE,' a release from Saturday reads.
'CoreCivic respects the judicial process and looks forward to the next steps in presenting our position to the court.'
According to CoreCivic's website, a partnership with ICE would generate 300 new jobs, $2 million annual payouts to the city and no detainees would be released in Leavenworth.
'The overall economic impact on the community and local jobs seekers would be significant,' a spokesperson for CoreCivic shared Saturday.
'MRRC serving as a partner to ICE would create about 300 new, good-paying jobs with a starting salary of $28.25/hour. We've had a positive response from jobs seekers interested in these positions. As of July 1, we've had over 2,000 unique applicants who submitted over 3,000 applications for the open positions at MRRC. About 115 employees have been hired.'
However, Trapp is standing strong.
'Leavenworth knows CoreCivic well and Leavenworth says no,' he said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Deportations — And Detentions — Are Incredibly Unpopular
Immigration was once one of President Donald Trump's strongest issues but is increasingly less so, in the wake of his administration's aggressive — and hard-line — policies. In general, approval of his handling of the subject has plummeted in recent months as he's backed inhumane detention facilities and ramped up deportations of undocumented immigrants, many of whom have no criminal history. According to a CBS News/YouGov poll conducted between July 16 and July 18, while 46% of U.S. adults disapproved of his approach to immigration in March, that figure has surged to 56% in July. Similarly, a CNN/SSRS poll conducted between July 10 and July 13, found that 58% of U.S. adults disapprove of his handling of immigration. That dissatisfaction has coincided with numerous reports of abysmal conditions at immigration detention sites, and growing scrutiny of Immigration and Customs Enforcement tactics as agents conduct brutal raids and ambush immigrants at their homes and workplaces. Public support for Trump's efforts to deport undocumented immigrants has declined since February, when 41% of Americans disapproved of these actions, per the CBS News poll. Now, 51% of Americans disapprove. In the CNN poll, 55% of U.S. adults say that Trump has gone too far with his deportations of undocumented immigrants, a double-digit jump from 45% who said the same in February. And a majority of Americans in the CBS poll — 56% — now think Trump is prioritizing deportations of people who are not dangerous criminals as ICE agents have targeted high school students with no criminal records and longtime small-business owners in various communities. Popularity of immigration enforcement policies declines notably when people are asked about removing immigrants who've been in the U.S. for many years, and who don't have any criminal history, CNN notes. Trump's policies on immigration detention also garner serious levels of pushback, which come as he's touted horrific circumstances in Florida at a state-led Everglades detention site, citing the alligators in the area that would prevent immigrants from escaping. Per the CBS News poll, 58% of Americans oppose how Trump is using detention facilities, and in the CNN survey, 57% opposed the construction of new facilities to detain as many as 100,000 undocumented immigrants. Trump's floundering approval numbers on the issue point to a potential opening for Democrats who now have a larger proportion of voters highlighting immigration as one of their top issues, according to CNN. Related... CNN Data Chief Says Americans Have 'Turned' Against Trump Over This Key Issue The GOP's Big Bill Is Massively Unpopular — If People Actually Know About It National Pride Is Dramatically Declining In America, Finds Stark New Poll
New York Times
6 minutes ago
- New York Times
Hundreds of NASA Employees, Past and Present, Sign Letter of Formal Dissent
A public letter from NASA employees on Monday urges leaders of the space agency not to carry out deep cuts sought by the Trump administration. 'We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety, scientific advancement and efficient use of public resources,' the employees wrote in the letter. It is addressed to Sean Duffy, the secretary of transportation, whom President Trump appointed this month as acting NASA administrator. Cuts to NASA programs have been arbitrary and in defiance of priorities set by Congress, the NASA employees said. 'The consequences for the agency and the country alike are dire,' they wrote. NASA did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The NASA letter follows similar letters of criticism by federal employees at the National Institutes of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the N.I.H. director, said he welcomed respectful dissent, but the E.P.A. placed 144 employees who signed that agency's letter on leave. 'We're all scared that we're going to get laid off,' said Monica Gorman, an operations research analyst at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. 'We're scared of retaliation. We huddle in the bathroom. We go to the bathroom to talk to each other, and look under the stalls to make sure that no one else is there before we talk.' Ms. Gorman is one of 287 current and former NASA employees who signed the letter, although more than half did so anonymously. More than 15,000 people work at the space agency. Prominent scientists outside of NASA, including 20 Nobel Prize winners, also offered their names in support. Read the NASA 'Voyager Declaration' Letter of Dissent Hundreds of current and ex-employees of NASA signed a formal dissent letter protesting the Trump administration's proposed cuts to the agency. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
Colbert's first post-cancellation ‘Late Show' is tonight — will he speak out against CBS?
Network late-night shows have been losing viewers for years, but 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' is primed for a ratings bump right now. That's because Monday night will be Colbert's first new episode since CBS shocked the media sector by announcing 'The Late Show' will end next May. Colbert is slated to have two Hollywood stars, Sandra Oh and Dave Franco, as his guests. Later in the week, he will interview Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro. Last week's cancellation announcement sparked speculation among fans that CBS might have pulled the plug for political reasons, given Colbert's status as an outspoken critic of President Trump. The network, however, said it was 'purely a financial decision' in a declining broadcast industry. Additionally, as some insiders have pointed out, if CBS was trying to appease Trump, why leave 'The Late Show' on the air for an extra ten months of Trump mockery? Get Reliable Sources newsletter Sign up here to receive Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter in your inbox. ESPN and MSNBC veteran Keith Olbermann, who has been through the TV cancellation wringer several times, made that point on X over the weekend. He responded to a woman who said, 'We are officially at the 'pulling comedians off the air who criticize our dear leader' phase of fascism,' and said, 'Sorry. That's not what happened here. If it had, they wouldn't be keeping him on until next MAY.' The timing coincides with the end of the September-to-May broadcast TV season and the expiration of Colbert's current contract. Jed Rosenzweig, founder of the late-night TV news website LateNighter, told CNN that Colbert 'obviously' won't pull any punches when it comes to Trump. 'But his comments about the show's cancellation last week seemed very carefully chosen — gracious, even — toward his CBS bosses, whom he praised as 'great partners,'' Rosenzweig observed. 'Maybe he meant it. Maybe he doesn't blame his direct bosses for the decision. Or maybe he's just doing what he can not to burn the house down with ten months still to go,' Rosenzweig said. 'He'll be fine, of course — but he also has 200 staffers to think about.' The slow-motion ending of the show led one person close to Colbert to describe it to CNN as a 'casualty of the merger.' CBS parent company Paramount has been struggling to secure approval from the Trump administration for its pending merger with Skydance Media. In an unusual move that Paramount insisted was unrelated, the company settled Trump's legally dubious lawsuit against CBS News earlier this month by agreeing to pay $16 million toward a future presidential library. Colbert bashed that decision on 'The Late Show' last Monday, likening it to a 'big fat bribe.' Last Friday, the Writers Guild of America encouraged the New York State attorney general to investigate Colbert's cancellation as a possible 'bribe' too. The conjecture isn't likely to go away. 'The timing seems so obvious and keeping with Paramount's quid pro quo theme,' a former CBS executive speaking on condition of anonymity told CNN's Jake Tapper. 'If it were just financial, why announce this now?' Networks typically make lots of show renewal and cancellation decisions in the spring, around the time they ask sponsors to make significant ad spending commitments for the upcoming season, a process known as the 'upfronts.' Announcing a drastic change in the middle of the summer is far less common. But the financial pressures are real. Advertisers have been pulling back from late-night spending in response to weakening ratings and growing digital competition, and 'The Late Show' had become unprofitable, according to sources close to CBS. Reactions to the cancellation have generally split right down party lines. An article on the pro-Trump website Breitbart framed the story this way: 'While the left is lamenting the loss of Stephen Colbert, their CBS late-night shill, the network had already given Colbert years of operating at a huge loss before finally cancelling him.' And, of course, Trump celebrated the end of Colbert's show in a Truth Social post last Friday. 'Let's face it: Even if CBS says Trump had nothing to do with it, Trump thinks he did,' Bill Carter, who authored two books about late-night TV and has covered the industry for decades, said on CNN. 'He's already come out and celebrated that Colbert has been 'fired,' because that's what he wanted.' 'It's kind of a dark turn for the country,' Carter said, 'to think, well, 'We can't have people being satiric about our political leaders because they can basically eliminate them if they put pressure on their corporate owners.' It's a bad sign for the country.' With the sustainability of the late-night business model in question, fans are also wondering about the fates of NBC's Jimmy Fallon and ABC's Jimmy Kimmel, though both shows might stand to gain audience share once CBS retires its 11:35 p.m. brand. 'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next,' meaning to be cancelled, Trump wrote in his Truth Social post. Kimmel's most recent Instagram post was a photo from his summer vacation in Jackson Hole, where he attended an anti-Trump protest with his family last week. The comedian held up a sign mocking Trump and declaring, 'MAKE AMERICA GOOD AGAIN.' His wife, Molly McNearney, the head writer and executive producer of 'Jimmy Kimmel Live,' also held up a sign. It read, 'DON'T BEND THE KNEE.' Kimmel and Fallon's shows will both return with new episodes on Monday night. (Though Kimmel has guest hosts all summer long.) But Colbert is certain to elicit the most interest. 'Colbert is one of the greatest practitioners of the winking aside,' Rosenzweig said, 'and I expect we'll all be parsing his words for subtle digs at his predicament and his parent company tonight and throughout the next ten months.'
