A quarter of major US corporate backers pull out of Dublin Pride over Trump fears
More than one-quarter of the
US
multinational firms that sponsored past Dublin
Pride
events have pulled out this month due to the shift in US attitudes towards diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies, organisers have said.
Pride's co-chief executive Jed Dowling said 12 of 42 US firms that had recently been involved stepped away.
He said 10 did so because of concerns over the
Trump administration's
threats to sanction firms with DEI policies it did not approve of.
Speaking at a Pride at Work event, hosted by the Department of Justice on Friday, Mr Dowling said two of the 12 firms stated they could not offer financial support this year because of cuts to discretionary budgets related to wider financial performance or falls in share prices.
READ MORE
However, he said the event overall would be bigger this year because more new firms and community groups had become involved.
Mr Dowling declined to name the firms that have withdrawn support. However, recruitment firm Indeed and Mastercard are known to be among those that have stepped away.
He said most of the major US firms from the banking and pharma sectors that have previously backed the event will again be involved. Those partnering again this year include Citibank, Bank of America, Dell, Pfizer and Abbvie.
Some of those that have departed remain supportive, with Indeed understood to be one such firm.
In a statement on Friday another traditional backer, EY Ireland, said it was 'very much looking forward to once again participating in
Dublin
Pride' and would be organising a number of events around it.
Trayc Keevans, who advised major multinationals on investment in Ireland for international recruitment firm Morgan McKinley, said the departure of some firms did not necessarily mean a shift in corporate values.
'The reduction in public sponsorships reflects a broader shift in how multinational organisations are supporting DEI initiatives,' she said.
'Rather than wavering on their overall commitment to DEI, we are seeing they are being more intentional about deploying resources where they can have the most meaningful impact, particularly through internal programmes that directly benefit their employees and local communities while balancing that with the complex regulatory environment their parent companies are operating within.'
Firms, she said, were conscious of the need to be able to continue to bid for public sector contracts in the US and were adapting their support for inclusion programmes and initiatives to ensure they avoided sanctions.
Addressing the Pride at Work meeting, Mr Dowling said the organisation was launching individual memberships in an attempt to keep people involved with the organisation even if their employer has disengaged.
[
Trump's vanity takes a hit as modest crowd for military parade overshadowed by 'No Kings' protests across country
Opens in new window
]
'Where your connection to the community has been facilitated by your company, what happens when you're in one of those dozen American companies who say 'we don't support diversity and inclusion anymore, we don't have that anymore', and suddenly your whole connection is gone?,' he said.
This year's Dublin event culminates in the traditional parade through the city centre on June 28th, which thousands of people are expected to participate in. Events are being billed as a celebration of the 10th anniversary of Ireland's vote in favour of marriage equality.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor. June 16th: On Israel's war with Iran, benefits of cycling and recycling
Sir, – Israel aspires to being a parliamentary democracy, yet the Knesset was not consulted or informed in advance of the attack on Iran, effectively a declaration of war. This at a time when Israeli troops are already engaged in the destruction of Gaza. Israeli citizens are now trying to cope with the inevitable military response from Iran without their public representatives having the opportunity to give their opinion. It appears that only the US has been afforded that facility. Indeed, the Israeli prime minister has said that he is seeking regime change in Iran, something even the US refrained from pursuing in the first Gulf war. It is no coincidence that the day before the attack on Iran, the Israeli government just managed to reject an opposition Bill to dissolve parliament. This legislation would have enabled Israeli voters to finally have their say on the war in Gaza and to participate in an election which opinion polls indicate Mr Netanyahu would lose. READ MORE It is now clear that the Israeli government has abandoned all pretence of democratic accountability or adherence to international law. The title of rogue state is hardly misplaced. – Yours, etc, MARTIN MCDONALD, Terenure, Dublin 12. Sir, – Brendan Butler (Letters, June 14th) thinks Israel needs to be brought to justice for flouting international law. International law is regularly invoked to be used against Israel but for some reason such calls are absent when it comes to Israel's enemies. When Hamas and Hizbullah were attacking Israel it was greeted by the international community with a collective shrug until Israel hit back. When the regime in Tehran stated again and again its goal of eradicating Israel, outside of a handful of countries, there was barely a peep. Our government decided this was no big deal and opened a new embassy there. If people invoke international law when Israel acts but are silent when its enemies are acting against Israel they really aren't serious about international law and just see it as a stick with which to beat Israel. – Yours, etc, PAUL WILLIAMS, Kilkee, Co Clare. Sir, – In its statement criticising Israel, Russia said that: 'Unprovoked military strikes against a sovereign UN member state, its citizens, peaceful cities, and nuclear energy infrastructure are categorically unacceptable.' Who said irony is dead? – Yours, etc, PAUL KEAN, Conyngham Rd, Dublin 8. Sir, – I noted that at United Nations it was stated that (yet again) that Israel has the right to defend itself against attack. The implication seems to be that other countries have no right to defend themselves from Israeli aggression. – Yours, etc, GILL MCCARTHY, Shillelagh, Co Wicklow. Sir, – With the escalation of the Israel and Iran war and the possibility of a nuclear war US president Donald Trump is to be congratulated on his supplying bombs and missiles to Israel which will certainly make his birthday one to remember if anyone survives. – Yours, etc, DAVID MURNANE, Dunshaughlin, Co Meath. The price of oil Sir, – The average price of 500 litres of home heating oil on June 10th was €447. Israel struck Iran on the 12th. The price today, the 13th, is €459 and climbing rapidly. The oil in the storage tanks already in Ireland, or the oil currently on the high seas in tankers cannot possibly have become more expensive. This is a scam. Needless to say the decline in prices (if it comes), will be agonisingly slow. What government agency is supposedly in charge of this rip off? – Yours, etc, LIAM MCMULLIN, Co Roscommon. In defence of Greta Thunberg Sir, – Regarding Finn McRedmond's column of June 12th ('Greta Thunberg is hard to like, but don't dismiss her '). There is a great deal to like about Greta Thunberg: her truthful, fearless climate doomerism, the omni-cause activism, the annoyance she inspires in the worst corners of the conservative media, the enviable assurance that without urgent attention the planet is doomed. Through a carefully managed coalition of an exploitative establishment she is undermined at every turn but Thunberg holds a status based on the consistency, simplicity and directness of her rhetorical approach. And we are fortunate to have among us a messianic young person who is unafraid to speak truths such as 'the world is getting more grim by the day' and that it is facing 'a sixth mass extinction' event. – Yours, etc, FINTAN DRURY, Sandymount, Dublin 4. Bloomsday and holidays Sir, – I note with interest the proposal in Frank McNally's An Irishman's Diary (June 11th), Bloomsday should be declared a national holiday. Might I have the temerity to suggest that it should be almost declared one as virtually everyone with whom I discuss the book has almost read it, myself included. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL GLEESON. Killarney, Co Kerry. Sir, – Joe Dunne proudly trumpets his personal and crucial modus vivendi approach to tackling Ulysses, googling galore as he goes. ( 'A novel way of reading Ulysses', Letters, June 13th). Preserving his literary sanity by sitting in front of a computer he engages the labyrinthine trajectory that is Joyce's masterpiece by inviting Mr Google along the enchanted way – a 'not-for-the faint-hearted' cognitive camino of multitudinous creative caverns. I would suggest he could better take it all in with his eyes closed, reclining at ease and spare his laptop the hassle, by tuning in to RTÉ's archival radio version from 1982 which captures all nuances in a compelling enacted reading of same 'wonder-book'. Letting it all seep in via the professionally modulated airwave version is 'yer only man'. – Yours, etc, JIM COSGROVE, Co Waterford. Regional development Sir, – Debate has for many years been focusing on pressures within Dublin as the capital city regarding housing supply and public transport. More recently, there has been much discussion on the Dublin Airport passenger cap which is expected to be exceeded. While all of the four Dublin local authorities, as well as Oireachtas members for the region, will of course be expected to continue to strive to tackle these challenges, another somewhat more minimised dimension in mainstream discourse on these matters concerns balanced regional development. Most strikingly for a national standpoint, there ought to be much more of a focus within Government as regards why a mainstream city such as Galway city, which has all the necessary infrastructure to grow more economically including a well-established university, train station and surrounding roads network does not appear to figure more in region-by-region population forecasting. At present, the population of Galway city is about 85,000 where in comparison the population under the remit of the Dundrum Area Committee alone of Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown is by itself about a population of 100,000, which will sharply expand in the decade ahead. Galway city is also a gateway city to the wider west of Ireland region as a whole. While I was born and raised in south Dublin, I did spend three years living as a child for a time in Ennis in Co Clare and in such an urban location there are an abundance of shops, school places, playing fields and municipal services provisions as well as housing units with generally a greater typical amount of square footage. There are many other similar towns around Ireland offering such resources and amenities yet the mainstream focus in debate remains most persistently on Dublin. One of the impacts with more housing construction in Dublin for instance is that at many more stops in the future the already overcrowded Luas will become almost impossible for passengers for board, necessitating a doubling of bus frequency for many bus routes to be overseen by the National Transport Authority. If there were to be better meaningful balance in population growth strategy nationwide, such pressures may not become as acute. – Yours, etc, CLLR JOHN KENNEDY (FG), Dún Laoghaire. Co Dublin. Happy Birthday Sir, – Would it be curmudgeonly of us not to wish dear leader Kim Don Un a Happy Birthday! – Yours, etc, CATHY TRACEY, Dublin. Cycling and transport Sir,– The Government has conceded that it won't reach its target of one million electric cars on Irish roads by 2030. Good. Not only was this target wildly ambitious, it was also deeply irresponsible. Yes, we should electrify all cars, but we should not pursue a target that seeks to add more, and larger, cars to our roads. Electric or not, planning for more cars means more congestion, more inactivity, and yes, even with electric vehicles, continued problems with local air pollution, to name a few negatives. It should be clear by now that cars cannot be the future of transport. So what about a different target? I propose a million people cycling daily by 2030. Wildly ambitious? Yes, but the health benefits, the reduction in emissions, and the improvements in air quality would be enormous. Would this require a massive investment in active transport infrastructure? Yes, but remember, the benefits of cycling are almost endless. It is worth it. – Yours, etc, DR OLA LØKKEN NORDRUM, Irish Doctors for the Environment, Dublin 4. Recycling problems Sir, - With all the publicity given to recycling nowadays, not much is given to the problem of two or more types of material in the same item. I have just used some cooked turkey which came in a pack consisting of one side paper and the other plastic and the price sticker (paper) stuck on the plastic. Trying to disentangle this is almost impossible. What happens when these items arrive in the recycling centre? Are they painstakingly separated by the workers there? My guess is that they go into the discard pile. However, this is more than likely a non-issue. The recent news that about 90 per cent of the plastic recovered in our Deposit Return Scheme is exported is a serious indictment of our commitment to recycling. We need to take responsibility for our own waste. It is costly and environmentally unfriendly to rely on exports and we have no control over the final treatment (or plain dumping) of our rubbish. – Yours etc, EITHNE O'CALLAGHAN, Dublin 4.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
In tech, when things get tight, culture dies first
There was a time when the employee perks in tech looked like a Wes Anderson fever dream: kombucha on tap, nap pods, yoga Wednesdays, and ping-pong tables. Companies threw buzzwords like 'employee experience' and 'wellbeing culture' around like venture capital confetti. But peel back the branding, and something darker emerges: the steady, deliberate murder of employee-centricity. In today's tech sector, burnout isn't a bug — it's a feature. And beneath the glossy facade of 'workplace innovation', the only metric that truly matters is the stock price. But let's get one thing clear: employee-centricity was always more marketing than mission. Sure, the concept — putting people before profits — sounds noble. But corporate responsibility in the US has always been subordinate to shareholder primacy. When things get tight, culture dies first. We saw this during the pandemic. Companies that once waxed poetic about 'employee empowerment' suddenly demanded unpaid overtime and weekend hustle under the guise of remote productivity. When the Zoom windows closed, so did the empathy. And then came the layoffs. From Amazon to Meta, the last two years have been a bloodbath. More than 104,000 tech employees were laid off between 2022 and 2023. No company was immune, no role sacred. One-click terminations became the norm, with engineers discovering they'd been axed only when their logins failed at 8.59am. Why the sudden purge? Because it turns out that 'employee experience' is incompatible with quarterly earnings. Amazon's layoff announcement was paired with a 12% rise in stock price. Translation: Wall Street clapped while workers cried. These weren't failing companies. They were thriving ones. It means generational expectations are shifting fast. Millennials and gen Z workers have internalised that career security is an illusion. They've watched their mentors get laid off despite stellar reviews and decades of service. The lesson? Don't believe the hype. In a 2023 study, only 28% of tech workers believed their employer had their best interests at heart. The rest? Quiet quitting, resume-padding, and prepping their exit. If you needed more proof that employee-centricity is dead, just look at the return to the office movement. Despite all the productivity gains reported during remote work, executives are dragging workers back into the office, not for collaboration, but for control. Leaders miss seeing people in seats. That's it. It's ego wrapped in rhetoric. If employee-centricity is dying, then diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) has already been buried with no headstone. As soon as market pressure hit, diversity officers were the first out the door. DEI budgets were 'reassessed'. Remember when 'culture fit' was supposed to mean shared values? Now it means 'shut up and ship'. Dissent has been reframed as toxicity. Asking about mental health support is seen as weakness. Ethical concerns about AI development? 'Not a team player.' Cultural Darwinism As Carlton Bonner notes, younger professionals entering the workforce are more socially conscious, and they're clashing with Boomer-era values hardwired into culture. The result? Cultural Darwinism. Only the quietly compliant here's the kicker: killing employee-centricity is bad business. Companies with high engagement see 21% greater profitability and 59% lower turnover. But by commodifying workers, tech has made itself untrustworthy to the very talent it depends on. What happens when your best minds stop believing in your mission? They start their own. Or worse, they leave the industry entirely. Employee-centricity isn't a perk — it's infrastructure. It's not kombucha taps. It's trust, transparency, fair pay, and psychological safety. If tech wants to rebuild that trust, it needs to start by dismantling the systems that made betrayal standard practice. That means: transparent hiring and firing policies, actual DEI accountability, remote flexibility, mental health support beyond webinars and real career paths, not bait-and-switch promotions. It's not complicated. It's just expensive. But as the talent war intensifies, companies will learn the hard way: if you don't build for people, people will build without you.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Republican priest Fr Patrick Ryan dies aged 95
A controversial republican priest who became the first Catholic cleric to contest an election in Ireland has died after a short illness. Fr Patrick Ryan, who was a native of Rossmore, Co Tipperary, died in Dublin on Sunday aged 95. Fr Ryan was ordained a priest in 1954 at the Pallottine College in Thurles. He later served in Tanzania and London. In January 1990, he was dismissed from the Pallottine Fathers. He no longer had permission to say Mass or administer the sacraments. In 1988, Ryan was accused of involvement in Provisional IRA activity, and was the subject of two unsuccessful extradition requests. That year the then British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher dubbed him 'a very dangerous man'. READ MORE An election poster for the priest. Ryan, dubbed The Padre, denied the accusation in an interview with The Tipperary Star, saying he had raised money both inside and outside Europe for victims on the nationalist side in the Troubles but had 'never bought explosives for the IRA or anybody else', and had never been requested by the paramilitary group to do so. The priest allegedly became the main contact for many years between the IRA and one of its main sources of weaponry and finance – Muammar Gaddafi's Libyan regime. His meetings with Gaddafi were documented in journalist Jennifer O'Leary's book The Padre: The True story of the Irish Priest who armed the IRA with Gaddaffi's money. Ryan was the first priest to contest an election in Ireland, when he ran in the 1989 European Parliament election in the Munster constituency as an Independent with Sinn Féin support. He failed to be elected but received over 30,000 votes. In a 2019 interview with the BBC, Ryan was asked if he was involved in any of the incidents of which Ms Thatcher had accused him, to which he responded: 'I would say most of them. One way or another, yes I had a hand in most them – yes, she was right'.
