Wikipedia loses UK High Court challenge over Online Safety Act
The non-profit Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), along with an anonymous editor known as BLN, wanted the website to be exempt from certain regulations that came into force earlier this year.
They argued that compliance with the new law would mean Wikipedia would have to impose verification on people who did not want it or limit the amount of monthly UK users.
But in a judgment on Monday, the court rejected those claims, saying there may be ways to work within the law 'without causing undue damage to Wikipedia's operations'.
The Online Safety Act has provisions aimed at reducing the spread of harmful content.
Part of the regulations classify some sites as category one, which is defined by the number of monthly users a site has as well as the systems through which information is shared.
Rupert Paines, for WMF, told a previous hearing that the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, who were defending the claim, had made the regulations too broad.
He said that if Wikipedia is to be classified as category one, and verification is to become mandatory for all users, it would make articles 'gibberish' because content from non-verified users would be filtered out.
The regulations were more designed for 'major, profit-making technology companies' such as Facebook, X and Instagram, he argued, while imposing verification on Wikipedia users would be a breach of their human rights.
Cecilia Ivimy, a lawyer for the government, said ministers reviewed Ofcom guidance and considered specifically whether Wikipedia should be exempt from the regulations and rejected that.
She said they decided that Wikipedia 'is in principle an appropriate service on which to impose category one duties' and how ministers arrived at that choice was not 'without reasonable foundation nor irrational'.
Rejecting WMF and BLN's claims, the judge, Justice Johnson, said his decision 'does not give Ofcom and the Secretary of State a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia's operations'.
Doing so would mean the Government would have to justify the imposition as proportionate, he added.
The judge also said that the decision to make Wikipedia a category one service now lies with Ofcom.
If that happens, it may open a possible avenue for further legal action. - Bernama, PA MEDIA/dpa
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
15 hours ago
- The Star
Wikipedia loses High Court challenge against UK government
LONDON: Wikipedia has lost a High Court challenge against the UK government over verification requirements in the Online Safety Act. The non-profit Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), along with an anonymous editor known as BLN, wanted the website to be exempt from certain regulations that came into force earlier this year. They argued that compliance with the new law would mean Wikipedia would have to impose verification on people who did not want it or limit the amount of monthly UK users. But in a judgment on Monday, the court rejected those claims, saying there may be ways to work within the law "without causing undue damage to Wikipedia's operations.' The Online Safety Act has provisions aimed at reducing the spread of harmful content. Part of the regulations classify some sites as category one, which is defined by the number of monthly users a site has as well as the systems through which information is shared. Rupert Paines, for WMF, told a previous hearing that the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, who were defending the claim, had made the regulations too broad. He said that if Wikipedia is to be classified as category one, and verification is to become mandatory for all users, it would make articles "gibberish' because content from non-verified users would be filtered out. The regulations were more designed for "major, profit-making technology companies' such as Facebook, X and Instagram, he argued, while imposing verification on Wikipedia users would be a breach of their human rights. Cecilia Ivimy, a lawyer for the government, said ministers reviewed Ofcom guidance and considered specifically whether Wikipedia should be exempt from the regulations and rejected that. She said they decided that Wikipedia "is in principle an appropriate service on which to impose category one duties' and how ministers arrived at that choice was not "without reasonable foundation nor irrational'. Rejecting WMF and BLN's claims, the judge, Justice Johnson, said his decision "does not give Ofcom and the Secretary of State a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia's operations.' Doing so would mean the Government would have to justify the imposition as proportionate, he added. The judge also said that the decision to make Wikipedia a category one service now lies with Ofcom. If that happens, it may open a possible avenue for further legal action. – PA Media/dpa
The Sun
17 hours ago
- The Sun
Wikipedia loses UK High Court challenge over Online Safety Act
LONDON: Wikipedia has lost a High Court challenge against the UK government over verification requirements in the Online Safety Act, reported PA Media/dpa. The non-profit Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), along with an anonymous editor known as BLN, wanted the website to be exempt from certain regulations that came into force earlier this year. They argued that compliance with the new law would mean Wikipedia would have to impose verification on people who did not want it or limit the amount of monthly UK users. But in a judgment on Monday, the court rejected those claims, saying there may be ways to work within the law 'without causing undue damage to Wikipedia's operations'. The Online Safety Act has provisions aimed at reducing the spread of harmful content. Part of the regulations classify some sites as category one, which is defined by the number of monthly users a site has as well as the systems through which information is shared. Rupert Paines, for WMF, told a previous hearing that the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, who were defending the claim, had made the regulations too broad. He said that if Wikipedia is to be classified as category one, and verification is to become mandatory for all users, it would make articles 'gibberish' because content from non-verified users would be filtered out. The regulations were more designed for 'major, profit-making technology companies' such as Facebook, X and Instagram, he argued, while imposing verification on Wikipedia users would be a breach of their human rights. Cecilia Ivimy, a lawyer for the government, said ministers reviewed Ofcom guidance and considered specifically whether Wikipedia should be exempt from the regulations and rejected that. She said they decided that Wikipedia 'is in principle an appropriate service on which to impose category one duties' and how ministers arrived at that choice was not 'without reasonable foundation nor irrational'. Rejecting WMF and BLN's claims, the judge, Justice Johnson, said his decision 'does not give Ofcom and the Secretary of State a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia's operations'. Doing so would mean the Government would have to justify the imposition as proportionate, he added. The judge also said that the decision to make Wikipedia a category one service now lies with Ofcom. If that happens, it may open a possible avenue for further legal action. - Bernama, PA MEDIA/dpa
The Star
21 hours ago
- The Star
Govt acts on child protection
KUALA LUMPUR: The government is intensifying efforts to safeguard children from sexual crimes through legislative improvements and more comprehensive implementation strategies. These include amendments to the Sexual Offences Against Children Act, the expansion of special criminal courts and ongoing training for legal officers, said Thiyagu Ganesan, deputy director-general (Legal Reform Sector) of the Legal Affairs Division (BHEUU) under the Prime Minister's Department. He said several key amendments were made to the Act in 2023, which include replacing the term 'child pornography' with 'child sexual abuse material', introducing new offences such as the livestreaming of sexual crimes and sexual extortion, and mandating compensation for victims. 'Additionally, the government has recently passed the Online Safety Act, which places the responsibility on digital platforms to remove child sexual abuse content. 'It also introduces the safety-by-design concept to ensure a safer online environment for children,' he said during an interview on Bernama TV's Apa Khabar Malaysia programme yesterday, as reported by Bernama. To broaden access to justice for victims, Thiyagu noted that the number of Special Courts for Sexual Crimes Against Children has been increased to 81 nationwide, along with the introduction of child-friendly mobile courts. 'These mobile courts are equipped with a child witness room and will travel to where the child is located, eliminating the need for the child to travel to a physical courtroom, which may be distressing,' he said. Thiyagu also underscored the importance of specialised training for prosecutors, judges and lawyers to improve the handling of child-related cases, in line with the 2023 legal reforms regulating the manner in which child witnesses are examined, cross-examined and re-examined in court. He said the BHEUU is actively expanding awareness campaigns related to Section 19 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act, which mandates all individuals to report suspected cases of child sexual crimes to the authorities. Touching on the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) Act, he said amendments in 2023 led to the creation of a full-time position for a chief children's commissioner, along with two children's commissioners and one additional commissioner, all dedicated to strengthening oversight of government policies related to child protection. 'Their role is to provide assistance, commentary and recommendations on government plans and policies, as well as to announce improvements. 'If issues arise, they will actively speak out to ensure continuous progress,' he added.
