Te Ara Mokopuna - Treasury's 2025 Long-Term Insights Briefing Published
The briefing emphasises that monetary policy remains the primary tool for managing economic upturns and downturns. However, there may be circumstances in which fiscal policy has a role to play in responding to shocks and cycles, such as:
- Ensuring critical services and infrastructure are maintained or rebuilt.
- Addressing the distributional impacts of shocks on communities.
- Providing economic stabilisation when monetary policy has less room to move or is constrained by extremes (e.g., near-zero interest rates).
The briefing also underscores that when fiscal interventions are required, they should be timely, temporary and targeted, with clear exit strategies in place. The briefing provides an overview of effective and less effective tools, with lump-sum payments, wage subsidies, and targeted adjustments to benefits or fees seen as more effective; and tax changes, new infrastructure investments, and permanent public consumption increases due to timing and reversibility challenges as less effective.
Reflecting feedback from the consultation period, the LTIB notes that the involvement of other stakeholders, including private businesses, communities and local government is critical. Fiscal policy should not undermine the incentives for others to prepare for shocks.
"Feedback highlighted there may be an increasing frequency and complexity of shocks, particularly due to climate change, and the important roles of insurance and local authorities in responding to natural disasters," Iain Rennie said.
"The Treasury agrees that maintaining the resilience of the private sector is important, and that responses to shocks requires the involvement of other stakeholders, including local government and private businesses, and encourages others to prepare for these events."
Treasury Secretary Iain Rennie noted that the ability to use fiscal policy to respond to shocks highlighted the need for governments to keep debt at prudent levels.
"New Zealand's economy is particularly vulnerable to ups and downs because of our small size, reliance on overseas markets, and high household debt.
"As a country, we need to have the capacity to respond to economic shocks when they occur. This will require successive governments to build a buffer - by setting sustainable medium-term fiscal intentions and running operating surpluses between shocks and downturns.
"Internationally we can see that governments tend to increase spending in a downturn or after a shock but fail to offset this with savings when times are good. This has also been the case in New Zealand, contributing to our rising level of public debt over time.
"The final 2025 Long-term Insights Briefing represents the Treasury's commitment to promoting fiscal sustainability and improving wellbeing for future generations of New Zealanders," Iain Rennie said.
Te Ara Mokopuna reflects feedback received in a two-phase consultation process. The first phase (June-July 2024) sought input into the briefing's scope, and the second phase (April-May 2025) focused on the draft briefing. This involved public submissions and targeted engagement including with macroeconomic and fiscal experts.
"I would like to thank everyone who made submissions and those who contributed during consultation on the briefing.
"The feedback has been valuable in helping to shape the final briefing. Contributions will also help to inform our future policy advice and development of the Treasury's forthcoming stewardship reports," Iain Rennie said.
Feedback reflected the critical role of our institutional arrangements in delivering sustainable and effective fiscal policy, and also focused on lessons learned from recent fiscal responses to shocks and cycles, the respective roles of monetary and fiscal policy in responding to the business cycle, and the role of the Crown's balance sheet, including public investments, in managing our exposure and preparedness to shocks.
A summary of the consultation feedback and changes made to the briefing as a result of this feedback can be found at Te Ara Mokopuna 2025 - Submissions.
A short version of Te Ara Mokopuna 2025 is also available.
The Treasury has two further stewardship reports due for publication which will build on the themes raised in the LTIB. The 2025 Long-term Fiscal Statement will consider long-term pressures on New Zealand's fiscal position and the choices available to successive governments to return to a fiscally sustainable path. The Investment Statement will consider how governments' management of the Crown balance sheet, including debt levels and investments, can support New Zealand's living standards across generations. These are due to be published in the coming months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Adrian Orr's Reserve Bank hiring spree unwound, with proposal for 1 in 4 jobs to be cut
Its restructure was prompted by Willis declining its request for a substantial funding increase over the next five years. In April, the bank and Willis agreed to a $775 million funding envelope for 2025-2030 – an 8% increase from the previous five years. The bank initially bid for more than $1 billion. When Willis and the Treasury said this was too much, the Reserve Bank board was happy to back down – but Orr wasn't, and quit abruptly in March. Orr feared the Reserve Bank wouldn't be able to do its job properly with the level of funding the Government was willing to stump up. However, a spokesman for the bank on Tuesday said the board was confident the bank would be able to continue fulfilling its legislated objectives. 'I can confirm that no work programmes have been cut and the board remains confident that the bank will be able to deliver the work programme outlined in our Statement of Intent under the new 2025-2030 Five-Year Funding Agreement,' the spokesman said. 'Once the new structure is in place [by October 13], senior leadership will be working with our teams to ensure we work more efficiently and effectively.' The Reserve Bank spokesman said the cuts were deeper in the 'enterprise services' and 'operations' parts of the organisation than the 'money' and 'financial stability' divisions. It appears this means jobs directly related to the bank's core functions – maintaining price and financial stability and running the country's payments system – will be the least affected. The areas covered by the two groups that will suffer shallower cuts include: financial markets, economics, payment services, money and cash, prudential policy and supervision, and enforcement and resolution. The areas covered by the groups that will suffer deeper reductions include: strategy, stakeholder engagement, risk compliance and audit, governance and general counsel, people and culture, technology, information security, finance and data. The restructure has occurred under the leadership of acting Governor Christian Hawkesby, who has declined to comment on whether he has applied to secure the role for a full term. Willis, in a paper prepared for Cabinet on the Reserve Bank's 2025-2030 funding agreement, said a considerable portion of its growth in staff numbers related to 'non-legislative functions'. 'These areas saw a rise from 138 permanent staff members in the 2019/20 period to 378 fulltime equivalents by the end of January 2025,' Willis said. Altogether, staffing levels at the Reserve Bank nearly doubled from 349 people in June 2020 to 660 by January 2025. In this time, the Reserve Bank has been legally required to bolster its regulation of financial institutions and create a depositor compensation scheme, which became operative last month. Covid saw it use new tools (quantitative easing and a term lending facility) to effectively create $78b to suppress interest rates and support the bond market using new tools. This, coupled with the bank progressively bolstering its ability to intervene in the currency market in the event of a crisis, saw the value of its assets increase four-fold to $104b between 2019 and 2023. This has since fallen to $72b, as the bank's Covid-era programmes are being unwound. The Reserve Bank also dealt with a data breach in 2020 and has been exploring ways to upgrade its vaults in the vicinity beneath its offices in central Wellington. It has been criticised by some for looking into creating a digital currency, researching Māori access to capital, and focusing on the impact of climate change on the banks and insurers it regulates. Jenée Tibshraeny is the Herald's Wellington Business Editor, based in the Parliamentary press gallery. She specialises in government and Reserve Bank policymaking, economics and banking.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Christopher Luxon won't discuss poor polls with caucus, Labour not saying anything about tax policy
Luxon said: 'We discuss our internal polling from time to time with our caucus, which is very normal practice, but I'm not focused or polls or talking about myself, I'm focused on New Zealanders and making sure we have the right long-term plan in place.' Luxon said. Luxon confirmed caucus was still receiving internal polls. 'New Zealanders understand we've gone through the biggest recession in the last 30 years. We've got a big Covid hangover as we've seen from the Treasury report last week, we've had some difficult challenging circumstances particularly since April with respect to the tariff situation. 'I think you're seeing across New Zealand - get out of Wellington, you go to the South Island, the primary industries, go to Hawke's Bay, you are seeing good recovery in those parts, but I acknowledge in places like Auckland and Wellington and urban environments it is still pretty tough,' Luxon said. He said things like the InvestmentBoost tax credit and the infrastructure pipeline would lead to a recovery. Chris Bishop said talk of a leadership change was silly. Photo / Mark Mitchell Talk of leadership change 'just silly' - Chris Bishop Senior Minister Chris Bishop said despite the grim polling there was 'no talk' of changing the leader. 'That's just silly. What we're doing as a Government - New Zealand's first three-way coalition government - is working hard to get the economy growing again after years of high inflation, high government spending and high debt,' Bishop said. He said he would 'not even entertain' the idea of a polling threshold at which point National would need to roll its leader. Bishop was one of the National MPs at the heart of a bid to replace then-leader Simon Bridges with Todd Muller in 2020. Like Luxon, Bishop said that the economy had struggled to lift off since US President Donald Trump's announcement of tariffs on Liberation Day in April. Treasury had been forecasting a decent economic recovery before April, but since then, it revised its growth forecasts downwards. The economy is still set to grow, but not as fast. Live GDP estimates from the Reserve Bank suggest the next GDP print will show a quarter of contraction. The threat of tariffs had caused businesses to hold back investment. Bishop said the Government would not make 'reactionary one-off decisions' to pump the polls. 'What we need to do is stick to the course of a long-term economic plan that would set New Zealand up for growth,' he said. He suggested that some of the polling slump was because Labour had no real policy, beyond a promise to repeal things like Three Strikes, the reinstatement of oil and gas exploration, and the future Regulatory Standards Bill. 'It's all easy for Chris Hipkins and the Labour Party to sit off to the side and say life should be better, [but] in their own words, they do not have any policy. 'Life's easy in opposition when you have the luxury of not having any policy... they do not have any policy and they are not planning to release any any time soon,' Bishop said, referring to an admission from Labour finance spokeswoman Barbara Edmonds that the party did not have any substantive cost of living policy. Labour leader Chris Hipkins on his way into his weekly caucus meeting. Photo / Mark Mitchell Hipkins keeps mum on tax policy Labour leader Chris Hipkins was happy with the polls, saying Labour's numbers had 'grown significantly since the last election. 'We were at 26% at the last election, we're now polling comfortably across the polls in the mid-30s,' Hipkins said. Asked about Labour's lack of policy, Hipkins said, 'they [National] would definitely like more things to attack us on - that's true'. Hipkins said policy would be announced before the election, but he wanted to make sure he could deliver on it. A column by Vernon Small, a former staffer for Labour Revenue Minister David Parker, in the Sunday Star-Times reported Labour's policy council had resolved to support a Capital Gains Tax as the preferred policy for the next election, beating out the other favoured tax, a wealth tax. It now rests with Labour's governing council and the Parliamentary side of the party to decide what to do with the decision as the party puts its 2026 election policy together. Hipkins has committed to campaigning on progressive tax reform, but said the tax policy was 'not yet resolved'. He said he 'would not discuss the internal machinations of the Labour Party', but said a 'consensus is emerging'. He said a wealth tax and a capital gains tax were 'on the table', but would not commit to Labour's traditional policy of excluding taxing any capital gains accrued on the family home. 'When we have a tax policy to announce we will announce it,' Hipkins said. When asked again he said, 'I'm not getting into that because we haven't announced a tax policy'. Eventually, Hipkins said, 'I've always said taxing the family home shouldn't be taxed, but I'm not announcing a policy that we haven't announced'. Hipkins has been reluctant to shape his party's tax discussions by ruling various things in or out. Labour's 2017 commitment to kick its tax policy to a tax working group was guided by the fact that any capital gains tax would exclude the family home. In an earlier press conference, Hipkins would not rule out the Greens' inheritance tax proposal, although he conceded it would be very unlikely Labour would agree to it. Hipkins got into trouble with his party in 2023 and 2024 for his 'captain's call' to kill the wealth tax proposal, a call some members believed was against party rules - although Hipkins and the party leadership dispute this. Hipkins denied his reluctance to personally shape the tax discussion this time around is because he is being extra scrupulous in light of his previous troubles over captain's calls. 'No,' he said, when asked. 'We'll announce a tax policy when we're ready to announce it, not because you keep asking questions about it,' Hipkins said. Minister of Defence Judith Collins said this is the best Cabinet she has served in. Photo / Sylvie Whinray (file) The most enjoyable Cabinet - Judith Collins Former National leader Judith Collins said she 'didn't even see' the polls. 'I'm just too busy doing my job,' she said. Collins said this was 'a really good coalition Government, I love being part of it'. 'I've been in a few Cabinets, let me tell you, and this is the most enjoyable for me,' she said. 'I find the Prime Minister's leadership excellent, he just lets me get on and do the job,' she said. Collins said Luxon was 'absolutely' the right person to lead the Government.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Labour Leader Chris Hipkins Dismisses Criticism Of Covid-19 Overspending As 'Treasury Spin'
, Acting Political Editor Labour leader Chris Hipkins is dismissing what he calls "Treasury spin" after its analysts said the last government overspent during the Covid-19 pandemic against official advice. Treasury's 2025 Long Term Insights Briefing, released this week, calculated the total cost of the pandemic at about $66 billion, or roughly 20.4 percent of GDP. The report said Treasury advocated for more targeted support in late 2020 into 2021 and explicitly warned "against any further stimulus" by Budget 2022. But responding to questions from RNZ on Friday, Hipkins was unapologetic about his party's economic response to Covid-19. "We prioritised keeping people alive and keeping people in jobs," he said. "I'm never going to claim that we got everything perfect... but prioritising jobs and prioritising lives was the right thing to do." Hipkins claimed other countries also spent up large with the same objectives, but Treasury said New Zealand was near the top of the chart when considering spending as a percentage of GDP. "If you listen to the Treasury spin, then you're going to get one view," Hipkins told RNZ. "If you speak to other economists, you'll get a different view. "Our job was to support New Zealanders through the global pandemic, making sure that we saved lives and kept people's jobs, and we were very successful in doing that: one of the lowest death rates in the world, one of the lowest rates of unemployment in the world, and one of the fastest rates of economic growth in the world." About half of the total Covid-19 response cost was directly tied to the pandemic, such as the wage subsidy scheme, or health initiatives like vaccination, contact tracing and quarantine. The remainder went to a wide range of initiatives like: "tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches". Treasury said that had "a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years". But Hipkins said Treasury had mischaracterised some of that spending, such as the provision of distance-learning for school students. "Making sure that kids could keep learning while they were at home during lockdown was an essential Covid-19 expense," Hipkins said. The report comes during a prolonged economic downturn, with both the government and opposition parties trading blame over its cause. Finance Minister Nicola Willis was quick on Thursday to wield Treasury's findings as evidence that Labour had been undisciplined in its spending, driving up inflation, and fuelling a cost-of-living crisis. "Treasury's language is spare and polite, but its conclusions are damning," she said. "New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach initially intended for a pandemic response. "The lesson from Labour's mishandling of the Covid response is that while there are times when governments have to increase spending in response to major events the fiscal guardrails should be restored as soon as possible." To that, Hipkins scoffed: "By comparison to this government's track record, I'll take our one any day". Hipkins said Willis should stop blaming others and instead accept the consequences of her government's spending cuts. "The wreckage that she is leaving in her wake at the moment is obvious for all New Zealanders to see. Unemployment is going up," he said. "Economic growth has collapsed. Essential services that the public rely on a daily basis are falling into disarray, and this is all on Nicola Willis' watch."
