Federation calls for immediate reconstitution of State-Level Backward Classes Commission in Puducherry
In a statement, G. Sugumaran, secretary of FPR, said the SLBC, a permanent body constituted in conformity with the Constitution of India and established in Puducherry in 1998, has played a critical role in the implementation of reservation policies by the government.
The SLBC is normally reconstituted once in three years. The Commission has been reconstituted six times and the life of the sixth reconstituted Commission ended in May, 2018. However, the SLBC has become non-functional in the last seven years, the federation said.
As a consequence of the dysfunctional state of the SLBC, complaints and representations submitted by the public to the Commission remain unattended in the absence of a regular Chairman and a body. Though the files relating to the reconstitution of the body had been forwarded by the authorities concerned to the Chief Minister's office, they have been gathering dust, Mr. Sugumaran said.
Though repeated representations have been made by political parties and various other organisations to reconstitute the Commission, no action has been taken so far, he said.
Mr. Sugumaran said the caste census cannot be conducted till the SLBC is reconstituted. Under these circumstances, the government should immediately reconstitute the SLBC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ex-TMC MP seeks urgent Calcutta HC hearing on EC's move to collect BLA details for SIR a year before Bengal Assembly polls
Former Trinamool Congress MP Subhasish Chakraborty's counsel challenged the Election Commission's decision to seek information on Booth Level Agents (BLAs) a year before the West Bengal Assembly elections at the Calcutta High Court. The counsel for Chakraborty, who was a Rajya Sabha member, mentioned the matter on Monday before the single bench of Justice Amrita Sinha, seeking an urgent hearing. According to Chakraborty's counsel, Arko Nag, it is not within the Commission's jurisdiction to seek this information now. Nag submitted: 'The EC (Election Commission) has announced that they will implement SIR (Special Intensive Revision) in West Bengal. District Magistrate has given notice to all political parties to submit names of BLAs. It was usually done seven days prior to voting day. Now, they are asking to disclose names of BLAs one year prior to elections. It is beyond the power of EC as per the People Act. DMs, acting as District Election Officers, are asking political parties to submit names.' Justice Sinha observed: 'So where is privacy involved here? It is not only for you but for all other parties as well.' Nag submitted, 'We are assailing the cause. Others might have accepted it.' The Election Commission in August had sent a letter to the CEO of West Bengal stating that the list of BLAs should be submitted to the Commission. The Commission directed political parties to keep a list of booth-level agents ready so that if anything unusual happens during the SIR, it could be 'easily noticed'. At the same time, parties were also told to send that list to the Commission in advance. Nag submitted in court that since the Commission has announced SIR in the state, the case should be heard quickly. However, the court rejected the request for an urgent hearing, with a possibility of it happening next week. On Sunday, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar at a press conference in Delhi stated that the SIR of electoral rolls in West Bengal and other states will be announced in due course. He said the SIR exercise was aimed at removing shortcomings in the voter list, and that it is a matter of 'grave concern' some parties are spreading 'misinformation' about it, 'firing from the Election Commission's shoulder.' The Trinamool Congress has expressed doubts about the 'efficacy' of the SIR exercise in Bengal and vowed to oppose any move by the EC to delete names of genuine voters.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Vice President elections scheduled for September 9
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) National President JP Nadda named Maharashtra Governor CP Radhakrishnan as the party's candidate for the upcoming vice presidential elections, scheduled for September 9. The votes will be counted on the same day. Also Read: Jagdeep Dhankhar, the most controversial constitutional V-P in post-1947 India The parliamentary board of the BJP reportedly took a unanimous decision, after discussing with alliance partners and the opposition parties to ensure a smooth VP election. Chandrapuram Ponnusamy Radhakrishnan has been serving as the 24th Governor of Maharashtra since July 31, 2024. He previously served as the Governor of Jharkhand from February 2023 to July 2024. He also held additional charge as the Governor of Telangana and Lieutenant Governor of Puducherry between March and July 2024. Also Read: CP Radhakrishnan is NDA's VP Pick: Rajnath seeks Kharge's support. Who will INDIA bloc field? A veteran BJP leader, Radhakrishnan was twice elected to the Lok Sabha from Coimbatore and previously served as the Tamil Nadu BJP state president. The last date for filing nominations is August 21, while candidates can withdraw their nominations until August 25. Although the Vice President serves a five-year term, the position became vacant when Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned on July 21, the opening day of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, citing health concerns. The elections of the Vice President are governed by the provisions of Articles 64 and 68 of the Constitution. The Election Commission notifies the VP polls by the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952. The Vice President of India is chosen through an indirect election conducted by an electoral college consisting of both elected and nominated members of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. Also Read: CP Radhakrishnan vs who? How numbers stack up for NDA, INDIA VP candidates in Parliament As per Article 66(1) of the Constitution of India, the election of the Vice President shall be held by the system of proportional representation using single transferable vote, and the voting at such election shall be by secret ballot. Importantly, MPs are not bound by any party whip during this process. To be eligible for the post of Vice President of India, a candidate must be an Indian citizen, at least 35 years old, and qualified to be a member of the Rajya Sabha. They must not hold any office of profit. For the nomination to be valid, it must be supported by at least 20 proposers and 20 seconders, who are electors from the electoral college. The election of the Vice President shall be held by the system of proportional representation using single transferable vote. The Vice President serves a five-year term but can remain in office beyond that period until a successor is elected. The Constitution places no limit on the number of terms one can serve, meaning a former Vice President is free to run again, whether immediately after a term ends or after a gap.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Decentralising SC, HC benches much-needed approach
Chief Justice of India BR Gavai inaugurated the fifth circuit bench of the Bombay high court at Kolhapur on Sunday, which is a welcome step to promote access to justice in Maharashtra. Chief Justice of India BR Gavai on Sunday inaugurated the Bombay high court's new circuit bench in Kolhapur district, calling it a step towards cost-effective and time-bound justice for litigants from south Maharashtra and adjoining Goa and Karnataka. (HT Photo) It was a two-decade-long demand to alleviate the challenges faced by litigants and lawyers, who were required to travel to Mumbai, the primary jurisdictional hub. With time, the population has increased significantly and with that there is a foremost need to fill the vacancy of judges as against the given strength of benches of the respective courts in the country. In India, the overwhelming number of pending cases places a significant burden on both judges and litigants, who are eager to have their cases heard and resolved swiftly. Unfortunately, this goal remains out of reach for many, as cases often either fail to be scheduled or face numerous postponements. By June 2025, the Supreme Court's backlog had reached a staggering 85,204 cases, with thousands more being filed each month, while the pace of case resolution lagged behind. As of January 2025, high courts throughout the nation were contending with over 62 lakh pending cases. This accumulation of unresolved cases results in delayed justice, increased litigation costs, and a decline in public trust in the legal system. The Supreme Court's centralised presence in Delhi presents substantial challenges, particularly for residents of far-off states such as Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, and the North-East. Individuals involved in legal matters navigate the high costs of travel, language barriers, and the difficulty of finding skilled legal representation in the capital. The situation regarding aging cases is notably worrisome. According to figures from the Union law ministry in August 2025, the Calcutta high court accounts for nearly 94% of all cases in the nation that have remained unresolved for over 50 years, with 2,185 out of a total of 2,329 such cases. Setting up regional divisions for the Supreme Court and additional high court benches in different states could serve as a practical, constitutional, and data-driven method to broaden access to justice, expedite the resolution of cases, and modernise court facilities in the locations where individuals live and engage in legal proceedings. Constitution's green signal Article 130 of the Constitution of India explicitly authorises the Supreme Court to hold sessions in Delhi or any other location designated by the Chief Justice of India, with the President's approval. This provision paves the way for establishing regional benches of the Supreme Court. The Law Commission, in its 229th Report (2009), suggested a two-tier system: A Constitution Bench in Delhi and Cassation (appellate) benches in four regions (Delhi, Chennai/Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai) to address non-constitutional appeals. This recommendation aims to ease travel burdens and reduce the backlog of cases. By assigning appellate cases to regional benches and reserving constitutional matters for the main bench in Delhi, the workload on judges is reduced. This strategy allows for the recruitment and deployment of additional judges in areas with the highest demand, thereby improving the judge-to-population ratio and accelerating the pace of case resolutions. Countries like the United States and Germany have adopted decentralised judicial systems, which promote faster case processing and more equitable access without undermining the consistency of supreme court decisions. Easing pendency of cases State-based regional benches of the high court are strategically positioned to effectively supervise subordinate courts, work in tandem with state agencies, and promote improvements in case processing, such as police documentation, forensic analysis, and the implementation of electronic filing systems. The National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) framework already supplies nearly real-time data analytics, which these regional benches can leverage to identify and resolve bottlenecks. At present, litigants and their legal representatives often find themselves travelling vast distances to New Delhi for Supreme Court hearings. The establishment of regional benches can greatly reduce both the time and financial burden of such journeys, thereby increasing the likelihood that cases with merit are pursued to their conclusion. This rationale for improved access was explicitly outlined in the 229th Law Commission report. Wherever courts are established, accompanying facilities such as courtrooms, digital networks, video-conferencing areas, record storage, and bar amenities are developed. India's justice system is known for its infrastructure deficiencies; the introduction of new benches serves as a foundation for modern, technology-driven campuses to address these shortcomings. Overall, setting up regional benches would require investments in court facilities, legal assistance, and workforce across various states, thereby enhancing local legal systems and offering opportunities to regional legal professionals. Young advocates and judges would gain from increased involvement and expertise. samrat709@ The writer is an advocate in the Punjab and Haryana high court. Views expressed are personal.
