Renting vs buying property: Why homebuyers shouldn't let FOMO drive their real estate decisions
The rent-versus-buy debate continues. With the risk of project delays, global economic instability, fear of job losses, and the track record of a few developers, it's better to hold off than to make decisions driven by the fear of missing out (FOMO) or influenced by others' timelines, advises a Redditor.
'Rather than feeling late to the real estate party, now may be the perfect time to skip the hype and wait for the market to stabilize. After all, it's your money and your future—don't spend the next 20 years repaying a loan for a decision made out of fear. Be smart, be patient, and most importantly, don't fall for the hype,' the Redditor cautions.
'And let's not forget the bigger picture: We're living in a time of global uncertainty—tariff wars, recession warnings, job market volatility. In times like this, cash is king. You might think you're late to the real estate party. But here's a different perspective: You're actually right on time—to skip this overhyped wave and wait for a correction or stabilization,' the Reddit post noted.
'Just like the stock market eventually cooled off after irrational highs, real estate too will level out. The prices may not crash dramatically, but they will stay in this inflated range for the next 2–3 years. You've already waited this long—what's the harm in waiting a bit more?', the Redditor wrote.
Finally, do not let someone else's timeline dictate your financial decisions. 'It's your money. Your future. Don't spend the next 20 years repaying a loan for a rushed decision made in fear. Be smart. Be patient. And most importantly, don't fall for FOMO,' the post said.
Also Read: Real estate advisory firm Grahm to invest around ₹100 crore in FY26, to expand into seven cities
The Redditor said he has been residing in Bengaluru for six years. 'Like many professionals in this city, I moved here seeking better opportunities and career growth. All these years, I've chosen to stay on rent, not because I couldn't afford a flat, but because I've always believed in financial flexibility over long-term debt,' he explained.
He recalled that between 2020 and 2022, 2bhk apartments from Tier 1 and Tier 2 builders were priced between ₹70 lakh and ₹1 crore. Despite these comparatively lower prices, he held off on making a purchase, pointing to the uncertain job market and steep interest rates as key factors in his decision.
The Redditor admitted that as rental prices nearly doubled in recent years and many of his peers began buying homes in gated communities, the fear of missing out (FOMO) eventually got the better of him.
He booked a 2BHK apartment in East Bengaluru for ₹1.2 crore, influenced by a sales representative who claimed that 80% of the units had already been sold and that prices were expected to rise soon.
However, soon after paying the booking amount, a legal review uncovered several red flags. The buyer learned that the builder had a history of delayed projects and financial mismanagement, raising serious concerns about the investment.
'Worse? The project that was '80% sold' when I booked? A few weeks later, a friend got a call from the same builder offering the same flat for ₹1.10 crore— ₹10 lakh less than what I was quoted,' the post stated.
The buyer then cancelled the booking and faced delays in securing a refund.
Also Read: Brigade Group to add 8 million sq ft of office space, plans to double flex space portfolio
'Bengaluru real estate is already inflated. Don't believe the hype,' the Redditor said. 'If 80% of the flats are sold, why are advertisements and cold calls still happening? Why are discounts offered under the table if demand is really that high?'
With many new projects promising possession dates four to five years down the line, the buyer pointed out that homebuyers could end up paying EMIs long before they even move in. He urged others to research a builder's track record thoroughly, avoid making impulsive decisions, and maintain financial caution, especially given the current global economic uncertainties.
'While homeownership is a goal for many, entering the market without careful planning and patience could lead to long-term financial strain,' the post said.
'The truth is, most of these flats have possession dates around 2028–2030. That's 4-5 years from now! You'll be paying EMIs long before you even get to live in your home. The risk, delays, and stress aren't worth it—especially with Tier 3/4 builders who don't have a strong track record,' the post added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Rejected for being too chill? Indian techie shares bizarre startup interview experience
Social media is full of job seekers sharing bizarre reasons for being rejected by recruiters. Recently, an Indian techie added to the list with a rejection that raised eyebrows, leaving him wondering what actually determines a good candidate. In a post shared with the software developers community in India on Reddit, the techie anonymously revealed that he was shocked by the reason he was given after being rejected for a software development role. "I was interviewing for a company for an SDE role. The rounds were like this: The first round was an introductory round, the second was a take-home assignment, and the third round was a technical round followed by an HR round," he said. According to him, the feedback throughout the process was positive, until he was suddenly told that he was no longer being considered for the role. "I was a little confused as the interview went well. So I asked the recruiter for feedback to know what went wrong because the recruiter attended every interview I gave. The recruiter called me and said everything was good, even my answers were satisfactory, but the HR said that 'I was relaxed during the interview, that's why she thinks I am not a good fit for a startup,'" he revealed. The techie said he was so taken aback by the response that he thought it was a joke and started laughing. "It is such a stupid reason. I have worked my whole career in startups, and this HR thinks that being relaxed during an interview makes me unfit for startups. Even the recruiter was confused by such a statement from HR, and said sorry for wasting my time. Interviews are just normal conversation; there's nothing to be nervous about if you have confidence in your skills. I really don't understand what the companies are looking for right now," he said. The bizarre reason for rejection left many social media users stunned. While some said the techie dodged a bullet, others shared similar stories of being rejected for strange reasons. "You are saved. They were looking for someone they could intimidate or boss around. You gave them a chill vibe, which they don't want around their other employees," said one user. Another wrote, "This one time I got rejected. I was waiting outside the building and met my interviewer. He came out to smoke. He told me I had a drunken accent and seemed too relaxed and not enthusiastic."
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Engineer gets job offer. From his own company. And for his own position. How it happened?
An engineering manager working at a mid-sized environmental consulting firm recently found himself in an unusual situation—he was offered his own job by his own company. The twist? A third-party recruiting agency was behind the mix-up, and they used the engineer's resume as the job description for the position. The incident came to light after the engineer shared the story on Reddit, where it quickly gained attention. According to his post, the company had recently opened a new office and needed to hire someone to fill a managerial role similar to his own. Without an in-house HR team, the company turned to an external recruiting agency to source candidates. To streamline the process, the company shared his resume with the agency as a reference for the ideal candidate. However, instead of creating a job listing with distinct criteria, the recruiters reportedly used the resume nearly verbatim and relied on bots to scan LinkedIn for matches. Unsurprisingly, the system identified the engineer himself as the top candidate—and automatically reached out with an offer. Recruiting Firm Relied Heavily on Automation The recruiting firm, which is based in the U.S. but outsources much of its work overseas, appears to have used AI-driven methods to scan resumes and source applicants. As the engineer explained, these bots matched his qualifications so closely that he was considered a perfect fit for the job—without realizing he already held it. The firm's approach drew criticism online, with commenters highlighting the growing reliance on automation in recruitment and its often comical results. One user remarked that the engineer should at least check if he could get a raise, joking that he was clearly the company's top candidate. Another added that he could 'rubber stamp his own offer.' This is not the only instance of recruiters mistakenly contacting current employees. One Reddit user shared a similar experience from a startup, where a recruiter tried to fill a junior position using an outdated resume of a current team lead. Another described being offered $1.50 more for the same role they already occupied. In that case, the employee informed their boss—who didn't find it amusing—but ended up giving them a raise. Such incidents have exposed issues in the recruitment industry, especially among agencies that prioritize volume over quality. One commenter, a former recruiter, criticized the business model that outsources critical hiring functions to poorly trained or indifferent staff overseas. Another noted that some agencies even advertise misleading job conditions to attract candidates faster. Company Ends Contract with Recruiting Firm Following the incident, the engineering manager confirmed that his company would no longer work with the recruiting firm responsible. The recruiter's failure to properly vet candidates—and the embarrassment of mistakenly pitching a job to someone already employed in that very position—proved enough to sever ties. The broader takeaway, however, reflects a growing frustration with recruitment practices in today's job market . With increasing reliance on automation, combined with limited oversight, even straightforward tasks like hiring a new employee can go unexpectedly wrong.
Economic Times
2 days ago
- Economic Times
Engineer gets job offer. From his own company. And for his own position. How it happened?
Engineer shocked after being recruited for job he already has An engineering manager working at a mid-sized environmental consulting firm recently found himself in an unusual situation—he was offered his own job by his own company. The twist? A third-party recruiting agency was behind the mix-up, and they used the engineer's resume as the job description for the incident came to light after the engineer shared the story on Reddit, where it quickly gained attention. According to his post, the company had recently opened a new office and needed to hire someone to fill a managerial role similar to his own. Without an in-house HR team, the company turned to an external recruiting agency to source streamline the process, the company shared his resume with the agency as a reference for the ideal candidate. However, instead of creating a job listing with distinct criteria, the recruiters reportedly used the resume nearly verbatim and relied on bots to scan LinkedIn for matches. Unsurprisingly, the system identified the engineer himself as the top candidate—and automatically reached out with an recruiting firm, which is based in the U.S. but outsources much of its work overseas, appears to have used AI-driven methods to scan resumes and source applicants. As the engineer explained, these bots matched his qualifications so closely that he was considered a perfect fit for the job—without realizing he already held it. The firm's approach drew criticism online, with commenters highlighting the growing reliance on automation in recruitment and its often comical results. One user remarked that the engineer should at least check if he could get a raise, joking that he was clearly the company's top candidate. Another added that he could 'rubber stamp his own offer.' This is not the only instance of recruiters mistakenly contacting current employees. One Reddit user shared a similar experience from a startup, where a recruiter tried to fill a junior position using an outdated resume of a current team lead. Another described being offered $1.50 more for the same role they already occupied. In that case, the employee informed their boss—who didn't find it amusing—but ended up giving them a incidents have exposed issues in the recruitment industry, especially among agencies that prioritize volume over quality. One commenter, a former recruiter, criticized the business model that outsources critical hiring functions to poorly trained or indifferent staff overseas. Another noted that some agencies even advertise misleading job conditions to attract candidates the incident, the engineering manager confirmed that his company would no longer work with the recruiting firm responsible. The recruiter's failure to properly vet candidates—and the embarrassment of mistakenly pitching a job to someone already employed in that very position—proved enough to sever ties. The broader takeaway, however, reflects a growing frustration with recruitment practices in today's job market. With increasing reliance on automation, combined with limited oversight, even straightforward tasks like hiring a new employee can go unexpectedly wrong.
