Need incentives for farmers to adopt non-chemical fertiliser-based farming: Agri secretary
NEW DELHI: There is a need for structuring a comprehensive and fool-proof set of incentives for farmers to voluntarily adopt non-chemical fertiliser-based
farming
practices, agriculture secretary
Devesh Chaturvedi
has said. Addressing an event organised by policy research institute Pahlé India Foundation (PIF), Chaturvedi, secretary in the Department of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare, also suggested that natural farming need not to remain confined to a niche market and said it should be mainstreamed so as to make nutritional products available for the common people.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
Inside Operation Tupac: Pakistan's secret project to burn Kashmir
Who is Asim Munir, the Zia-style general shaping Pakistan's faith-driven military revival
'Looking for partners, not preachers': India's strong message for EU amid LoC tensions
Also speaking at the event, former NITI Aayog Vice Chairman
Rajiv Kumar
said that to achieve nutritional, ecological and health security, a paradigm shift in agriculture is necessary and rigorous empirical research is needed to establish the viability of non-chemical farming in this regard.
Harpinder Sandhu
of Federation University, Australia, and Aditi Rawat, PIF, presented a methodology for a pan-India study to assess the viability and scalability of regenerative farming across diverse agro-climatic zones. The study aims to generate scientific evidence to guide future policy and practices.
Other experts at the event also emphasised the urgent need for scientific data, scalable models, and stronger collaboration among researchers, government, and practitioners to accelerate adoption of regenerative farming across India's agro-climatic zones.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
7 days ago
- News18
Google DeepMind CEO Predicts AI Will Help Humans Colonise The Galaxy Starting 2030
Last Updated: Google DeepMind CEO and Nobel laureate Demis Hassabis said that starting 2030 humans will be able to colonise the galaxy and artificial intelligence will power this revolution. 2024 Nobel Prize winner and Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis told a news outlet recently that humans will be able to 'colonise the galaxy" starting 2030 and the revolution will be powered by artificial intelligence (AI). The Nobel chemistry laureate told WIRED that AI will lead humanity to far into the universe while turbocharging human productivity. Hassabis, who was jointly awarded the Nobel Prize with David Baker 'for computational protein design", said the 'golden era' was only five years away and that AI models set to bring about a renaissance in human existence. 'If everything goes well, then we should be in an era of radical abundance, a kind of golden era. AGI can solve what I call root-node problems in the world, curing terrible diseases, much healthier and longer lifespans, finding new energy sources," Hassabis was quoted as saying in an interview with WIRED. AGI, or Artificial General Intelligence, refers to an AI system with human-like cognitive abilities, capable of understanding, learning, and applying knowledge across a wide range of tasks. 'If that all happens, then it should be an era of maximum human flourishing, where we travel to the stars and colonise the galaxy. I think that will begin to happen in 2030," he said. When asked whether abundance through AI would still result in unequal distribution, Demis Hassabis said the technology could make the world feel 'like a non-zero-sum game." Although AGI has the potential to open vast new frontiers for humanity, Hassabis has previously expressed concern that society may not be prepared for its impact and admitted that the risks and consequences of such powerful technology often keep him up at night. 'It's a sort of like probability distribution. But it's coming, either way it's coming very soon and I'm not sure society's quite ready for that yet. And we need to think that through and also think about these issues that I talked about earlier, to do with the controllability of these systems and also the access to these systems and ensuring that all goes well," he said. He has also advocated for creating a UN-style global body to oversee the development and governance of AGI. 'I would advocate for a kind of CERN for AGI, and by that, I mean a kind of international research-focused high-end collaboration on the frontiers of AGI development to try and make that as safe as possible," he further added.
Time of India
04-06-2025
- Time of India
Bobcat takes down 13-foot Burmese python in Florida, experts shocked
Wildlife just threw us a plot twist straight out of National Geographic (or honestly, a Florida-style action movie). In a rare and wild encounter deep in the Everglades, a bobcat took down a massive 13-foot Burmese python, and we're all here for this unexpected comeback story. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It happened near Naples, Florida, in December 2022. Wildlife biologist Ian Bartoszek and his team from the Conservancy of Southwest Florida were tracking a tagged python named Loki—a 52-pound, 13-foot-long "scout snake" used to find breeding female pythons. These snakes are part of a broader effort to control the invasive Burmese python population that's wreaking havoc in Florida's delicate ecosystem. But instead of finding Loki snuggled up with a lady python, Bartoszek stumbled upon a murder scene straight out of CSI: Wildlife Edition. Loki was dead—head gone, neck chewed, and the severed part was buried under pine needles like some kind of ritual. 'We've been following Loki through six breeding seasons. It was kind of sad and exciting at the same time,' Bartoszek said. So what creature could take down a monster snake like that? Bartoszek suspected a bobcat or maybe even a Florida panther. To get answers, he reached out to wild cat expert David Shindle from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and they set up a trail cam. Sure enough, the very next morning, the killer returned—on camera. An adult bobcat casually strolled in to sniff around the scene, probably checking if its midnight snack was still there. And just like that, the mystery was solved. Now here's the cool part: normally, Burmese pythons eat bobcats, not the other way around. But this time, Mother Nature had other plans. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A cold snap had hit the area, which might've left the cold-blooded python too sluggish to defend itself. It was a golden opportunity for the bobcat, and it took it. Bartoszek described it as a win for native predators. 'Score one for the home team,' he said. And honestly, we love to see it. This isn't a one-time fluke either. Bartoszek's team later found another python killed during a cold snap—this time, probably by a black bear. So it looks like native predators are finally figuring out how to fight back against the python invasion. Over time, this could be a game-changer. As Florida's ecosystem fights to rebalance itself, bobcats, bears, and other native animals are learning that pythons can be dinner—not just danger.
Time of India
04-06-2025
- Time of India
Why did Albert Einstein drop out of school at the age of 15? The powerful lesson every student can learn from his exit
Why did Albert Einstein drop out of school at the age of 15? Albert Einstein did not merely drift away from school; he broke from it with the quiet force of a mind unwilling to be shackled. At fifteen, he walked out of Munich's Luitpold Gymnasium–a prestigious secondary school—not in rebellion, but in refusal, a refusal to conform to the rigid, authoritarian machinery of an education system that prized obedience over understanding. It was, in hindsight, the first bold rupture in a life that would come to be defined by its elegant resistance to convention. The boy who would one day upend the known universe with his theory of relativity began by rejecting a far smaller—but no less suffocating—universe, the narrow classroom in which curiosity was subordinate to command. The School That Stifled Genius Luitpold Gymnasium (now Albert-Einstein-Gymnasium) was no ordinary school. It was a bastion of classical Prussian-style education — heavily focussed on rote memorization, strict discipline, and unbending obedience to authority. For the young Einstein, this was not just uninspiring — it was suffocating. Einstein's sister, Maja, later wrote about his inner turmoil. 'The military tone of the school, the systematic training in the worship of authority that was supposed to accustom pupils at an early age to military discipline, was also particularly unpleasant for the boy. He contemplated with dread that not-too-distant moment when he will have to don a soldier's uniform in order to fulfill his military obligations. ' The dread wasn't unfounded. Under German citizenship laws at the time, a male citizen was not allowed to emigrate after age 16 unless he fulfilled his military duty. Failing to do so meant being labeled a deserter. The Smile That Infuriated Authority Einstein's resistance to this environment went beyond quiet discontent — it became a visible defiance. In Subtle is the Lord: The Science and Life of Albert Einstein , author Abraham Pais recounted a striking story from Einstein's classroom days. 'At the Gymnasium a teacher once said to him that he, the teacher, would be much happier if the boy were not in his class. Einstein replied that he had done nothing wrong. The teacher answered, 'Yes, that is true. But you sit there in the back row and smile, and that violates the feeling of respect that a teacher needs from his class,'' he wrote. This wasn't just a matter of behaviour; it was a cultural collision. Einstein's quiet smile, a subtle protest against blind authority, was seen as insubordination in a system where questioning was equated with rebellion. The same teacher had later declared, infamously, that Einstein 'would never get anywhere in life.' A Strategic Escape Einstein, unhappy and increasingly anxious about being conscripted into the military, devised an unusual exit strategy. With help from a sympathetic doctor, he obtained a certificate stating he was suffering from 'mental exhaustion'. Using this as grounds for withdrawal, he left the Gymnasium without a diploma — and without informing most of his teachers. He fled to Italy to rejoin his family, who had moved to Milan months earlier after the collapse of his father's electrical business. He was now, technically, a dropout — but far from defeated. Einstein used his time in Italy to continue self-study, especially in advanced mathematics and physics. Within a year, he applied to the Swiss Federal Polytechnic in Zurich. Although he initially failed the general section of the entrance exam, his exceptional performance in math and physics earned him admission — after completing a year of preparatory schooling in Aarau, Switzerland. A Dropout From Obedience, Not School Einstein's withdrawal from the Luitpold Gymnasium has often been portrayed as an early stumble—a boy disillusioned, a student who could not adjust. But to read it that way is to miss the deeper current shaping his life. This was not retreat; it was realignment. In choosing to walk away from the regimented corridors of a system designed to mold rather than awaken, Einstein took his first deliberate step toward the intellectual independence that would define him. The very atmosphere that sought to contain him—the rote drills, the deference to authority, the absence of curiosity—became the crucible in which his lifelong resistance to conformity was forged. He did not abandon learning. He simply refused to accept that learning must come with submission. In that moment, quietly and without ceremony, Einstein affirmed a principle that would echo through his science and his life: that truth is not handed down by authority—it is discovered by questioning it. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
