Labor denounces Dutton's ‘savage' plan to cut net overseas migration by 100,000 if elected
The Labor government claimed Dutton's plan – if it amounted to a further cut on top of its current forecast – amounted to 'savage cuts' which would affect skilled workers crucial to construction, aged care and tourism.
Outside a Bluescope steel factory in Sydney's western suburbs on Wednesday, as the opposition leader released long-awaited economic analysis of his proposed east coast gas reservation, Dutton said that as prime minister, he would move to slash the net overseas migration (Nom) figure from 260,000 to about 160,000 'straight away'.
Net overseas migration counts the difference between those leaving and those entering the country, and includes people on temporary visas. Nom spiked post-Covid, due to pent-up demand for entry to Australia and lower than usual departure numbers.
Permanent migration refers to those given long-term visas, including skilled migrants and family visas.
Dutton has promised to cut migration levels and cap international students, which the Coalition has blamed for the country's housing crisis. But business groups have raised concerns about knock-on effects of skills shortages with such steep cuts, as well as economic downturn.
'I'm not worried about that,' Dutton said on Wednesday when asked about potential backlash from business. 'I've got the first and foremost interest in mind, and that is to get young Australians into housing.'
Dutton, speaking after the Sky News leaders' debate on Tuesday night – where numerous mentions went to migration and migrants – said he remained committed to slashing net migration.
'We can reduce the Nom by 100,000,' the Liberal leader said.
'Straight away. When we get into government, we can deal with Labor's mess.'
The latest federal budget predicted the Nom would drop again to more usual numbers of 260,000 in 2025-26, then settle at a lower 230,000 a year from then.
The home affairs minister, Tony Burke, said the projected 2025-26 drop would already be a reduction of 120,000 from the latest data.
'Is Peter Dutton proposing to cut Nom by less than the government is proposing?' Burke said in a statement on Wednesday.
'Or is he sticking with his 160,000 overall [Nom] target, which would require savage cuts to the people we need with the skills to build homes, work in aged care and keep our tourism industry going?'
In his 2024 budget reply, Duttonfirst promised to cut permanent migration by 25% from 2024-25 – from 185,00 to 140,000 – for the first two years, followed by a step back up to 150,000 and then to 160,000, over the next two.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Shortly after that speech, Dutton also committed in radio interviews to cut the Nom to 160,000, – a cut of 38% from 260,000. But he had since appeared to back away from the commitment, declining to stand by those Nom targets.
In his own 2024 post-budget address, the shadow treasurer, Angus Taylor, gave different Nom targets than Dutton, adding to confusion about the Coalition's goals. Labor at the time accused the Coalition of confusing permanent and Nom numbers.
Asked on Wednesday what figure he would cut the Nom intake to, Dutton said 'it depends on what the Nom figure is at the moment'. But asked specifically if he would seek to cut it from 260,000 to 160,000, he responded in the affirmative.
'If you look at the prime minister, [Labor has] all sorts of wild projections in relation to Nom. None of them achieved … their migration targets always blow out,' Dutton said.
'You wonder why we've got a housing crisis when [Labor have] stopped the supply of housing.'
The Business Council of Australia expressed concern 'about any proposal that reduces temporary skilled migration and undermines our international education sector, through cuts to net overseas migration'.
'These proposals [capping international student numbers and cutting Nom] could negatively impact our economy, compound our existing skills shortages and make it harder to invest in new projects and grow businesses,' CEO Bran Black said in a Wednesday statement.
He called for a migration strategy that 'underpinned by robust housing and infrastructure planning, that attracts highly skilled workers'.
'Australia's migration program should be geared towards helping address our growing skills shortages and backing in our international education sector as the country's fourth largest export.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Four-day work week? Six weeks of holidays? Australians have a choice about how to bank productivity gains
One of the ideas that has captured many peoples' attention amid the flurry of proposals ahead of the economic roundtable is the Australian Council of Trade Unions' vision of a four-day working week. The peak union body argued that working less could actually be productivity enhancing, although the studies behind those claims aren't too rigorous. While many Australians would certainly welcome a three-day weekend, Jim Chalmers has made it clear that working towards a national four-day working week is not on the government's agenda, while reaffirming Labor's commitment to flexible work. Employer groups have been scathing, and it's not likely to be a big discussion point on day two of the three-day roundtable. Clearly not on board with the treasurer's 'open hearts and open minds' approach to this week's talkfest, the Australian Industry Group's chief executive, Innes Willox, called the four-day working week idea 'another populist, anti-productivity thought bubble'. Willox calculated that at the current dismal rate of productivity growth it would take 26 years to get to the point where we could drop a day's work without going backwards economically. But as the ACTU secretary, Sally McManus, explained to the Conversation's Michelle Grattan: the labour movement doesn't expect a revolution in the working week to happen overnight. 'To be clear, we weren't asking for a change to the workplace laws for the government to do something,' McManus said. 'We were raising this in the context of a discussion both around productivity and around AI as an important part of the distribution of the benefits of productivity growth or, for that matter, productivity growth out of less jobs, out of AI.' The longer arc of Australian history has been towards shorter working weeks and longer holidays. But that progress stopped a few decades back, settling on the current set-up of a 38-hour full-time job, two-day weekend and four weeks' paid leave. But there has been progress in other ways (assuming 'progress' is working less – many believe hard work is an end in and of itself). For example, since the turn of the century, the share of full-time employed Australians who say they work longer than 50 hours weekly has gone from 25% to 15%. Meanwhile, part-time work has flourished, fed in particular by a surge in women entering the jobs market. (Which means households overall are probably working harder.) Since the turn of the century, the female employment to working-age population ratio has climbed from 50% to over 60%, according to data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. (The equivalent workforce participation rate for men is just under 68% and hasn't moved much over 25 years.) Of course, the working from home phenomenon that emerged with Covid has been a revolution for many, particularly working families. Thankfully, employers are on board and hybrid work looks set to stay. But to many Australians juggling work and other commitments, time still feels like the greatest luxury. In which case, why shouldn't the reward for lifting productivity growth be fewer working hours for the same pay? Some fascinating research earlier this year by Rusha Das, an economist at the Productivity Commission, showed we would have a three-day working week today if we had collectively decided in 1980 to spend all the productivity gains of the following decades on leisure time instead of higher incomes. Das calculated that Australians used only a quarter of the productivity 'dividend' from the past 40-plus years to work less, while we banked the remaining three-quarters as higher income. 'We have largely traded it for higher incomes, and more and better stuff,' she said. One of the great things about a more efficient and dynamic economy is that it can give us more choices about what we want to do – how much more we want to buy, how much more we want to work and how much more we want to devote to family, hobbies or helping others. This may be getting ahead of ourselves – we have to raise our economic speed limit before we decide how much faster we want to drive. But we'd be mad to limit our thinking to the notion higher productivity is all about generating more income. The ACTU's four-day work week proposal is a good reminder of that.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
More than two-thirds of NSW public land suitable for housing sold to private developers
The New South Wales government has sold more than two-thirds of publicly owned sites identified as surplus and suitable for housing to private developers as a result of its much-vaunted statewide property audit. Many sites are being sold without requirements for social or affordable housing. Despite a Labor policy directing that government land suitable for housing should be prioritised for public housing, Homes NSW has bought just three of the 55 sites that have been identified for sale. It is now in the planning stage to construct 208 homes. It has expressed interest in a further seven sites. 'Homes NSW and Landcom have a first right of refusal on all sites identified as part of the land audit. Approximately a third of all sites identified have been transferred to or are currently undergoing due diligence by Homes NSW or Landcom,' a spokesperson for the Department of Lands said in a statement. Another way of putting it: more than two-thirds of the land is going to private developers. 'It's increasingly clear that this land audit is actually a scam – and it's those struggling with the housing crisis who will suffer from this broken promise,' the NSW Greens MP Jenny Leong said. 'What was an election commitment to identity public land in order to deliver more social and affordable housing has been exposed for what it really is – a systematic way of selling off public land to the highest bidder with no requirement for any social or affordable housing,' she said. The sale of surplus land is part of the Minns Labor government's plan to deliver up to 30,000 homes through the $6.6bn Building Homes for NSW program announced in the 2024-25 budget. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The government promised to build 8,400 new public homes and a further 21,000 affordable and market-rate homes. But progress has been slow. Leong said not a single new home has been built two years into the program. Despite the acute shortage of public housing and long waiting lists, the government had disposed of livable homes to the private sector. For example, three terrace houses in Rozelle, which were acquired during by Roads and Maritime during the building of WestConnex, were sold off to the private market in April. They sold for between $1.6m and $2.33m. A review of government sales by the Guardian found that most of the vacant land being sold by the Minns government is going to private sector developers, with no firm requirements for social or affordable housing as part of the terms of sale. The sites included: The dive site for WestConnex at Camperdown will not have any social or affordable housing, although the project will earmark 230 units for essential worker homes out of a likely 600 units, because of its proximity to the Royal Prince Alfred hospital. A site at 164 Talavera Road, Marsfield, also owned by Roads and Maritime, was sold for $4.4m to a developer for high-density development. The agent on the sale, Ray White's Peter Vines, said there was no requirement for social or affordable housing. The buyer intends to build student accommodation, he said. A major site at 870 Windsor Road, Rouse Hill, not far from the new metro station, is at the tender stage. The CBRE agent Ben Wicks said there were no firm requirements from the government about levels of social and affordable housing. Bidders had been invited to put in multiple proposals that included social and affordable housing as well as build-to-rent projects, he said. A spokesperson for the minister for lands and property, Steve Kamper, said: 'The land audit has so far identified surplus government sites capable of delivering more than 9,000 homes. 'Any proceeds from surplus government sites developed into housing by the private sector will be directed back into the construction of new public housing.' But this is not as it seems. Leong insisted that she has been told that a Treasury policy requires land sale proceeds to be returned to the department that owned the land – often the roads, education or health departments. NSW Homes clarified that 'the sale of any private housing on these sites will be used to build public housing'. At this stage the amount of money it has received is 'nil'. At the 2022 NSW Labor policy conference, 800 delegates unanimously endorsed an ambitious public housing program. It committed the state Labor party to introducing laws banning 'the sale, leasing, or outsourcing of any public housing assets or services'. The resolution also required Labor to increase the number of public dwellings 'at a rate exceeding private developments'. In the lead-up to the March state election, Labor promised residents of Sydney's Redfern and Waterloo public housing estates that a Minns government would tear up the Coalition government's plans to redevelop these estates. After taking the reins, however, the premier, Chris Minns, sought to redefine his election commitments. As he explained, his promise to 'freeze the sale of all public and social housing' didn't mean freezing existing plans to demolish an entire estate at Waterloo and rebuild it with the private sector. Instead he would improve it by ensuring that 30% of units remained social housing. Announcing the policy of selling off surplus land for housing in May 2023, Minns said his objective was to ensure each new block would include 30% social, affordable or inclusive housing. 'It's not privatisation even by the loosest definition of it,' he said. 'We were very consistent and clear about our plans in relation to government land prior to the last election,' he said. Homes NSW has acquired some sites and there will be some new public housing built. The historic Clothing Store at Eveleigh, near Redfern, will be developed by Homes NSW into 500 units with 50% public housing. Two sites at Box Hill and Riverstone will be transferred to Homes NSW for potential development of almost 50 social and affordable homes and more than 35 market homes. The government said a further nine sites across Sydney and three sites in regional NSW have been identified for future housing development by either Landcom or in partnership with the private sector, to allow the estimated delivery of more than 1300 market and affordable homes. But Landcom developments do not necessarily deliver affordable housing options, with its brief being to act as a publicly owned commercial developer. 'If the NSW Labor government won't even build public housing on public land that they already own, where will they build it?' Leong said. 'Instead of identifying publicly owned land on which to deliver homes, NSW Labor has simply identified more things they want to flog off – this isn't an 'audit' so much as a stocktake sale.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Air Canada flight attendants reach ‘tentative' deal with airline to end strike
Air Canada flight attendants say they have reached a 'tentative' deal with the airline to end a strike over wages and ground work that has cancelled travel for half a million people worldwide. Roughly 10,000 flight attendants walked off the job after midnight Saturday, insisting Air Canada had failed to address their demands for higher pay and compensation for unpaid ground work, including during boarding. The attendants' union defied two orders from a regulatory tribunal to return to work, forcing Air Canada to roll back plans to partially restore service. But after resuming talks on Monday evening, the union said it had reached a potential deal with the airline that it would put to its members for consideration. 'The strike has ended. We have a tentative agreement we will bring forward to you,' the Canadian Union of Public Employees' (Cupe) Air Canada branch said in a statement. 'We are required to advise our membership that we must fully cooperate with resumption of operations,' the statement said. Air Canada said in a statement that it would 'gradually restart its operations' after reaching an agreement with Cupe through a mediator, William Kaplan. It said the first flights were scheduled for Tuesday evening but warned that full service may not return for seven to 10 days. 'Restarting a major carrier like Air Canada is a complex undertaking. Full restoration may require a week or more,' Air Canada president Michael Rousseau said. Neither the union nor the airline immediately provided details of the proposed agreement. But Cupe said the deal achieves 'transformational change for our industry after a historic fight'. 'Unpaid work is over,' it added, a reference to a key demand throughout the talks that flight attendants also be compensated for time not spent in the air. 'When our rights were taken away, we stood strong, we fought back – and we secured a tentative agreement that our members can vote on,' Cupe further said. Air Canada said it would not comment on the terms of the deal 'until the ratification process is complete'. It was not immediately clear when Cupe would schedule a vote. Air Canada – the national carrier which flies directly to 180 cities domestically and abroad – has said the strike forced cancellations impacting 500,000 people. Over the weekend, federal labor minister Patty Hajdu invoked a legal provision to halt the strike and force both sides into binding arbitration. Following that intervention, the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB), a regulatory tribunal, ordered the flight attendants back to work in two separate orders – on Sunday and Monday. But the union said it would not comply with the orders, forcing Air Canada to walk back service resumption plans. Air Canada told customers on Tuesday to expect continued disruption 'as aircraft and crew are out of position'. It urged passengers to only travel to the airport if their flight was shown as operating. 'The suspension of our service is extremely difficult for our customers. We deeply regret and apologize for the impact on them of this labour disruption,' Rousseau said. Prime minister Mark Carney told reporters Monday it was 'disappointing' that eight months of negotiations between the carrier and union had not produced an agreement. He said it was 'important' that flight attendants were 'compensated equitably', but voiced unease that hundreds of thousands of people were facing travel uncertainty.
